Goliath Successfully Completes 48,443 Meters Of Drilling in 97 Drill Holes in 94 Days, With A 100% Hit Rate And Expands Footprint Of High-Grade Surebet Gold Discovery To 2.01 Km2 That Remains Open, Golddigger Property, Golden Triangle, B.C.

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Goliath Resources Limited
Ticker
GOT
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Drill results, Metallurgy, Other
Extracted
2026-09-22 10:18:30 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Goliath Resources has completed a 48,443-meter drill program across 97 holes at its Surebet Gold Discovery in British Columbia, achieving a 100% hit rate and expanding the discovery footprint to 2.01 km². While assays for 83 holes are pending, the company highlights strong continuity with visible gold occurrences and reports historical high-grade intercepts and positive metallurgical test results, including 92.2% gold recovery. The program also identified a new mineralized area, the Big Bulk Zone, and expanded the Bonanza and Golden Gate zones.

Reasoning: Goliath Resources successfully completed a large drill program, significantly expanding the footprint of its high-grade Surebet gold discovery and identifying a new zone. While no new assay results are reported, the document highlights strong geological continuity and high historical metallurgical recoveries, suggesting significant potential. The lack of new assays for the current program is a drawback, but the overall progress and scale increase are positive.

Positive factors

  • Successful completion of a large drill program with 100% hit rate
  • Significant expansion of the Surebet gold discovery footprint and key zones
  • Identification of a new mineralized zone (Big Bulk Zone)
  • High historical metallurgical recoveries for gold and other metals
  • Strong geological continuity indicated by visible gold occurrences and close drill spacing
  • QP sign-off and detailed QA/QC protocol disclosed

Negative factors

  • No new assay results reported for the recently completed drill program
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully representative of all mineralization styles or zones
  • Historical nature of the reported key intercepts and metallurgical results

Facts used in scoring: 39

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed 'Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Protocol' section covering core and surface samples handling, sampling, and analysis procedures.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Protocol”

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states that true width is estimated to be 80-90% of the reported drill lengths.

Evidence · text

“Drill core intervals are reported as drill lengths, where the true width is estimated to be 80-90% of the length.”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent values are provided for comparative purposes only and do not include metal recovery factors, as known metallurgical recoveries are based on preliminary test work and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Gold Equivalent (AuEq) values are provided for comparative purposes only and do not include metal recovery factors given that known metallurgical recoveries are only based on preliminary test work and may not be representative of all mineralization styles or zones.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mr. Rein Turna P. Geo is named as the qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, and has reviewed and approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Rein Turna P. Geo is the qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, for Goliath Resources Limited projects, and supervised the preparation of, and has reviewed and approved, the technical information in this release.”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Metallurgical testing achieved 92.2% Au recovery, which is above the exceptional band for gold mill route.

Evidence · text

“metal recoveries of 92.2% for Au”

Free Millingpositive

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: Metallurgical testing showed a benign rock composition without deleterious elements and 48.8% free gold recovery from gravity alone, requiring no cyanide leaching for gold and silver.

Evidence · text

“The metallurgical testing completed to date shows a benign rock composition without deleterious elements (see news release March 1, 2023).”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 32. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (28)

Fact 1Bonanza · goldGrade: 8.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Bonanza
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
8.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.35
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold equivalent grade over a significant width, indicating high-grade mineralization in the Bonanza zone, which remains open.

Positive factors

  • High gold equivalent grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Zone remains open for expansion

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · table

“8.35 g/t AuEq over 23 m”

Context: Bonanza

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 2Surebet · goldGrade: 21.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Surebet
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
21.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.08
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept demonstrates an exceptional gold equivalent grade over a significant width, highlighting the high-grade nature of the Surebet zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold equivalent grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Zone remains open for expansion

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · table

“21.08 g/t AuEq over 23 m”

Context: Surebet

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 3Golden Gate · goldGrade: 34.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golden Gate
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
34.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
34.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold equivalent grade over a very significant width, indicating high-grade and broad mineralization in the Golden Gate zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold equivalent grade
  • Very significant intercept length
  • Zone remains open for expansion

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · table

“34.52 g/t AuEq over 39 m”

Context: Golden Gate

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 4Whopper · goldGrade: 32.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Whopper
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
32.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
32.67
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional gold equivalent grade, though over a narrower width, indicating high-grade mineralization in the Whopper zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold equivalent grade
  • Zone remains open for expansion

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Relatively narrow intercept length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · table

“32.67 g/t AuEq over 4 m”

Context: Whopper

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 5Eldorado · goldGrade: 13.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Eldorado
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
13.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
13.93
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold equivalent grade over a moderate width, indicating high-grade mineralization in the Eldorado zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Zone remains open for expansion

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Relatively narrow intercept length
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · table

“13.93 g/t AuEq over 5.75 m”

Context: Eldorado

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 6Gold-rich dykes · goldGrade: 12.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gold-rich dykes
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
12.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong gold equivalent grade over a significant width within the gold-rich dykes, indicating a promising target.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold equivalent grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Zone remains open for expansion

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · table

“12.03 g/t AuEq over 10 m”

Context: Gold-rich dykes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-23-157Surebet Discovery · goldGrade: 18.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-23-157
Project
Surebet Discovery
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
18.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.08
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-08-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-23-157 shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant length, indicating very high-grade mineralization in the quartz-sulphide breccias and stockwork veins.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-23-157 that assayed 21.08 g/t AuEq (18.95 g/t Au and 95.31 g/t Ag) over 23.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-23-157Surebet Discovery · silverGrade: 95.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 23 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-23-157
Project
Surebet Discovery
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
95.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
23 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
21.08
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-08-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-23-157 shows a strong silver grade over a significant length, contributing to the overall high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-23-157 that assayed 21.08 g/t AuEq (18.95 g/t Au and 95.31 g/t Ag) over 23.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-23-157Surebet Discovery · goldGrade: 30.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-23-157
Project
Surebet Discovery
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
30.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.75
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-08-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-23-157 shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant length, indicating a very high-grade core within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Very high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 33.75 g/t AuEq (30.39 g/t Au and 150.42 g/t Ag) over 14.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-23-157Surebet Discovery · silverGrade: 150.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-23-157
Project
Surebet Discovery
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
150.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
33.75
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-08-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-23-157 shows an exceptional silver grade over a significant length, contributing to the very high-grade core.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Very high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 33.75 g/t AuEq (30.39 g/t Au and 150.42 g/t Ag) over 14.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-23-157Surebet Discovery · goldGrade: 45.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-23-157
Project
Surebet Discovery
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
45.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.27
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-08-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-23-157 shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant length, representing a bonanza-grade core within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Extremely high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 50.27 g/t AuEq (45.27 g/t Au and 225.42 g/t Ag) over 9.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-23-157Surebet Discovery · silverGrade: 225.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-23-157
Project
Surebet Discovery
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
225.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
50.27
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-08-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-23-157 shows an exceptional silver grade over a significant length, contributing to the bonanza-grade core.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Extremely high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 50.27 g/t AuEq (45.27 g/t Au and 225.42 g/t Ag) over 9.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-260Golden Gate Zone · goldGrade: 34.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-260
Project
Golden Gate Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
34.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
34.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-24-260 in the Golden Gate Zone shows an exceptional gold grade over a very significant length, indicating broad and high-grade mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Very significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-24-260 from the Golden Gate Zone that assayed 34.52 g/t AuEq (34.47 Au and 3.96 Ag) over 39.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-260Golden Gate Zone · silverGrade: 3.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-260
Project
Golden Gate Zone
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
3.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
34.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-24-260 shows a moderate silver grade over a very significant length, contributing to the overall high gold equivalent value.

Positive factors

  • Silver presence contributes to overall value
  • Very significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Silver grade is relatively low compared to gold
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-24-260 from the Golden Gate Zone that assayed 34.52 g/t AuEq (34.47 Au and 3.96 Ag) over 39.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-260Golden Gate Zone · goldGrade: 132.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-260
Project
Golden Gate Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
132.78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
132.93
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-24-260 shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant length, indicating a bonanza-grade core within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Extremely high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 132.93 g/t AuEq (132.78 Au and 12.98 Ag) over 10.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-260Golden Gate Zone · silverGrade: 12.98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-260
Project
Golden Gate Zone
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
12.98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
132.93
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-24-260 shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, contributing to the very high gold equivalent value.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Extremely high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 132.93 g/t AuEq (132.78 Au and 12.98 Ag) over 10.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-260Golden Gate Zone · goldGrade: 165.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-260
Project
Golden Gate Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
165.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
166.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-24-260 shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant length, representing a bonanza-grade core within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Extremely high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“and 166.04 g/t AuEq (165.84 Au and 16.07 Ag) over 8.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-260Golden Gate Zone · silverGrade: 16.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-260
Project
Golden Gate Zone
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
16.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
166.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-01-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-24-260 shows a strong silver grade over a significant length, contributing to the very high gold equivalent value.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Extremely high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“and 166.04 g/t AuEq (165.84 Au and 16.07 Ag) over 8.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-291Big Bulk Zone · goldGrade: 1.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-291
Project
Big Bulk Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
1.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-24-291 in the Big Bulk Zone shows a strong gold grade over a very significant length, supporting the potential for bulk mining methods.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade for a bulk mining target
  • Very significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-24-291 that assayed 1.97 g/t AuEq (1.92 Au and 1.85 Ag) over 33 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-24-291Big Bulk Zone · silverGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-24-291
Project
Big Bulk Zone
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-24-291 shows a moderate silver grade over a very significant length, contributing to the overall gold equivalent value for the Big Bulk Zone.

Positive factors

  • Silver presence contributes to overall value
  • Very significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Silver grade is relatively low compared to gold
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-24-291 that assayed 1.97 g/t AuEq (1.92 Au and 1.85 Ag) over 33 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · goldGrade: 11.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
11.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-22-58 shows a strong gold grade over a significant length within the Eocene-aged dykes, indicating a promising target.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-22-58 that assayed 12.03 g/t AuEq (11.84 g/t Au and 15.61 g/t Ag) over 10.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · silverGrade: 15.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
15.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
12.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept from GD-22-58 shows a strong silver grade over a significant length within the Eocene-aged dykes, contributing to the overall high gold equivalent value.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“GD-22-58 that assayed 12.03 g/t AuEq (11.84 g/t Au and 15.61 g/t Ag) over 10.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · goldGrade: 19.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
19.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.91
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-22-58 shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant length, indicating a high-grade core within the dykes.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Very high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 19.91 g/t AuEq (19.62 g/t Au and 25.61 g/t Ag) over 6.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · silverGrade: 25.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
25.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
19.91
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-22-58 shows a strong silver grade over a significant length, contributing to the high gold equivalent value within the dykes.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Very high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 19.91 g/t AuEq (19.62 g/t Au and 25.61 g/t Ag) over 6.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · goldGrade: 23.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
23.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-22-58 shows an exceptional gold grade over a significant length, indicating a very high-grade core within the dykes.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Very high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 23.82 g/t AuEq (23.47 g/t Au and 30.54 g/t Ag) over 5.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · silverGrade: 30.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
30.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval from GD-22-58 shows a strong silver grade over a significant length, contributing to the very high gold equivalent value within the dykes.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • Very high gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“including 23.82 g/t AuEq (23.47 g/t Au and 30.54 g/t Ag) over 5.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · goldGrade: 8.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
8.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.59
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical separate interval from GD-22-58 shows a strong gold grade over a significant length within the Eocene-aged dykes, indicating consistent mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“a second separate interval down hole of 8.59 g/t AuEq (8.35 g/t Au and 20.74 g/t Ag) over 5.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GD-22-58Eocene-aged dykes · silverGrade: 20.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GD-22-58
Project
Eocene-aged dykes
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOT

Geometry

Grade
20.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Central Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
8.59
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical separate interval from GD-22-58 shows a strong silver grade over a significant length within the Eocene-aged dykes, contributing to the overall high gold equivalent value.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade
  • Significant intercept length
  • High gold equivalent grade

Negative factors

  • Result is historical, not new
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are not fully disclosed

Evidence · text

“a second separate interval down hole of 8.59 g/t AuEq (8.35 g/t Au and 20.74 g/t Ag) over 5.00 meters”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Metallurgical Results (4)

Fact 1Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone · goldRecovery: 92.2 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
GOT

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Processing Route
gravity and flotation circuits
Grind P80
327 µm

Recovery

Recovery
92.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-03-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The historical metallurgical test results show very high gold recovery using a simple and benign processing route, which is a strong positive for the project's economic viability, despite being preliminary.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery achieved
  • Simple processing route (gravity and flotation)
  • Benign rock composition with no deleterious elements

Negative factors

  • Results are historical and preliminary
  • Recovery factors not included in AuEq calculations

Evidence · text

“metal recoveries of 92.2% for Au, 86.5% for Ag, 94.2% for Pb and 96.9% for Zn achieved through a combination of simple gravity and flotation circuits. The gravity-only recoveries amount to 48.8% Au and 10.3% Ag with a crush size of 327 micrometer(no cyanide leaching required to recover the gold and silver). The metallurgical testing completed to date shows a benign rock composition without deleterious elements (see news release March 1, 2023).”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

Fact 2Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone · silverRecovery: 86.5 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
GOT

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Processing Route
gravity and flotation circuits
Grind P80
327 µm

Recovery

Recovery
86.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-03-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The historical metallurgical test results show high silver recovery using a simple and benign processing route, which is a strong positive for the project's economic viability, despite being preliminary.

Positive factors

  • High silver recovery achieved
  • Simple processing route (gravity and flotation)
  • Benign rock composition with no deleterious elements

Negative factors

  • Results are historical and preliminary
  • Recovery factors not included in AuEq calculations

Evidence · text

“metal recoveries of 92.2% for Au, 86.5% for Ag, 94.2% for Pb and 96.9% for Zn achieved through a combination of simple gravity and flotation circuits. The gravity-only recoveries amount to 48.8% Au and 10.3% Ag with a crush size of 327 micrometer(no cyanide leaching required to recover the gold and silver). The metallurgical testing completed to date shows a benign rock composition without deleterious elements (see news release March 1, 2023).”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

Fact 3Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone · leadRecovery: 94.2 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
GOT

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Processing Route
gravity and flotation circuits
Grind P80
327 µm

Recovery

Recovery
94.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-03-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The historical metallurgical test results show very high lead recovery using a simple and benign processing route, which is a strong positive for the project's economic viability, despite being preliminary.

Positive factors

  • Very high lead recovery achieved
  • Simple processing route (gravity and flotation)
  • Benign rock composition with no deleterious elements

Negative factors

  • Results are historical and preliminary
  • Recovery factors not included in AuEq calculations

Evidence · text

“metal recoveries of 92.2% for Au, 86.5% for Ag, 94.2% for Pb and 96.9% for Zn achieved through a combination of simple gravity and flotation circuits. The gravity-only recoveries amount to 48.8% Au and 10.3% Ag with a crush size of 327 micrometer(no cyanide leaching required to recover the gold and silver). The metallurgical testing completed to date shows a benign rock composition without deleterious elements (see news release March 1, 2023).”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

Fact 4Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone · zincRecovery: 96.9 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Golddigger Project, Surebet Zone
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
British Columbia
Ticker
GOT

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Processing Route
gravity and flotation circuits
Grind P80
327 µm

Recovery

Recovery
96.9 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-03-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The historical metallurgical test results show very high zinc recovery using a simple and benign processing route, which is a strong positive for the project's economic viability, despite being preliminary.

Positive factors

  • Very high zinc recovery achieved
  • Simple processing route (gravity and flotation)
  • Benign rock composition with no deleterious elements

Negative factors

  • Results are historical and preliminary
  • Recovery factors not included in AuEq calculations

Evidence · text

“metal recoveries of 92.2% for Au, 86.5% for Ag, 94.2% for Pb and 96.9% for Zn achieved through a combination of simple gravity and flotation circuits. The gravity-only recoveries amount to 48.8% Au and 10.3% Ag with a crush size of 327 micrometer(no cyanide leaching required to recover the gold and silver). The metallurgical testing completed to date shows a benign rock composition without deleterious elements (see news release March 1, 2023).”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the gravity signal

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.