Granada Gold Mine Advances On-Site Processing Authorization for Gravity Concentration at Granada Gold Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Granada Gold Mine Inc.
Ticker
GGM
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update, Permitting
Extracted
2026-09-14 02:38:21 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Granada Gold Mine has engaged an environmental engineering company to prepare an authorization modification for on-site gravity concentration at the Granada Gold Project in Quebec. This permitting step is part of the company's 'Rolling Start' development pathway and complements ongoing mineral resource estimate updates and ore sorting work.

Reasoning: The company is advancing a key permitting step for on-site gravity concentration, which provides a strategic processing pathway alongside toll milling, while also updating its mineral resource.

Positive factors

  • Permitting milestone for on-site processing
  • Low-capital-intensity gravity technology
  • Non-deleterious residue with resale potential
  • Synergy with existing ore sorting results

Negative factors

  • Regulatory approval is subject to timelines and engineering design packages

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document mentions an ongoing mineral resource estimate update with GoldMinds Geoservices Inc.

Evidence · text

“advancing a mineral resource estimate update with GoldMinds Geoservices Inc.”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The technical information was reviewed and approved by a Qualified Person in accordance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“Qualified Person in accordance with NI 43-101”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (4)

measuredGranada Gold Project · goldTonnes: 4900000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 269000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Granada Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec
Ticker
GGM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Matthew Halliday
Resource group id
resource:497fc7585cdd2b90b4d4
Deposit or zone
Granada Gold Project
Mining method
combined
Material type
InPit+UG
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
4900000
Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
269000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.55
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-06-23

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical resource component being restated for context.

Evidence · table

“1.70”

Context: 4,900,000

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

indicatedGranada Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3320000Grade: 2.57Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 274000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Granada Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec
Ticker
GGM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Matthew Halliday
Resource group id
resource:6a5cd729959151a225cd
Deposit or zone
Granada Gold Project
Mining method
combined
Material type
InPit+UG
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3320000
Grade
2.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
274000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.55
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-06-23

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical resource component being restated for context.

Evidence · table

“2.57”

Context: 3,320,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

indicatedGranada Gold Project · goldTonnes: 8220000Grade: 2.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 543000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Granada Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec
Ticker
GGM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Matthew Halliday
Resource group id
resource:f4a925a3e001610caba0
Deposit or zone
Granada Gold Project
Mining method
combined
Material type
InPit+UG
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
8220000
Grade
2.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
543000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.55
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-06-23

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical M&I resource component being restated for context.

Evidence · table

“2.05”

Context: 8,220,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

inferredGranada Gold Project · goldTonnes: 3010000Grade: 4.71Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 456000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Granada Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
Quebec
Ticker
GGM

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Matthew Halliday
Resource group id
resource:b4ad69bae32b6dfc74e8
Deposit or zone
Granada Gold Project
Mining method
combined
Material type
InPit+UG
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3010000
Grade
4.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
456000
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
2.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2022-06-23

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical Inferred resource component being restated for context.

Evidence · table

“4.71”

Context: 3,010,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.