# Granada Gold Mine Advances On-Site Processing Authorization for Gravity Concentration at Granada Gold Project Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/granada-gold-mine-advances-on-site-processing-authorization-for-gravity-concentr--8186d028-41e5-4259-83fa-b8bbeb758914 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/GGM/news/7316763797799186/granada-gold-mine-advances-on-site-processing-authorization-for-gravity-concentr Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-05-26T13:01:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Granada Gold Mine Inc. - Ticker: GGM - Exchange: TSX - Region: Quebec - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Resource update, Permitting - Extracted: 2026-09-14 02:38:21 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Granada Gold Mine has engaged an environmental engineering company to prepare an authorization modification for on-site gravity concentration at the Granada Gold Project in Quebec. This permitting step is part of the company's 'Rolling Start' development pathway and complements ongoing mineral resource estimate updates and ore sorting work. Reasoning: The company is advancing a key permitting step for on-site gravity concentration, which provides a strategic processing pathway alongside toll milling, while also updating its mineral resource. - Positive factor: Permitting milestone for on-site processing - Positive factor: Low-capital-intensity gravity technology - Positive factor: Non-deleterious residue with resale potential - Positive factor: Synergy with existing ore sorting results - Negative factor: Regulatory approval is subject to timelines and engineering design packages Facts used in scoring: 4 ## Classification and evidence **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: The document mentions an ongoing mineral resource estimate update with GoldMinds Geoservices Inc. Evidence · text > advancing a mineral resource estimate update with GoldMinds Geoservices Inc. **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The technical information was reviewed and approved by a Qualified Person in accordance with NI 43-101. Evidence · text > Qualified Person in accordance with NI 43-101 ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (4) ### measured [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/granada-gold-mine-advances-on-site-processing-authorization-for-gravity-concentr--8186d028-41e5-4259-83fa-b8bbeb758914#fact-resource-facts-0) Granada Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Granada Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: GGM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Matthew Halliday - Resource group id: resource:497fc7585cdd2b90b4d4 - Deposit or zone: Granada Gold Project - Mining method: combined - Material type: InPit+UG - Ownership percent: 100 % - Resource basis: gross #### Resource Data - Category: measured - Tonnes: 4900000 - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 269000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 0.55 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2022-06-23 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical resource component being restated for context. Evidence · table > 1.70 Context: 4,900,000 #### Tags used in scoring **Measured Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves. Why it applies: category is "measured" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/granada-gold-mine-advances-on-site-processing-authorization-for-gravity-concentr--8186d028-41e5-4259-83fa-b8bbeb758914#fact-resource-facts-1) Granada Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Granada Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: GGM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Matthew Halliday - Resource group id: resource:6a5cd729959151a225cd - Deposit or zone: Granada Gold Project - Mining method: combined - Material type: InPit+UG - Ownership percent: 100 % - Resource basis: gross #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 3320000 - Grade: 2.57 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 274000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 0.55 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2022-06-23 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical resource component being restated for context. Evidence · table > 2.57 Context: 3,320,000 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/granada-gold-mine-advances-on-site-processing-authorization-for-gravity-concentr--8186d028-41e5-4259-83fa-b8bbeb758914#fact-resource-facts-2) Granada Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Granada Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: GGM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Matthew Halliday - Resource group id: resource:f4a925a3e001610caba0 - Deposit or zone: Granada Gold Project - Mining method: combined - Material type: InPit+UG - Ownership percent: 100 % - Resource basis: gross #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 8220000 - Grade: 2.05 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 543000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 0.55 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2022-06-23 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical M&I resource component being restated for context. Evidence · table > 2.05 Context: 8,220,000 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/granada-gold-mine-advances-on-site-processing-authorization-for-gravity-concentr--8186d028-41e5-4259-83fa-b8bbeb758914#fact-resource-facts-3) Granada Gold Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Granada Gold Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: GGM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Effective date: 2022-06-23T00:00:00.000Z - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Matthew Halliday - Resource group id: resource:b4ad69bae32b6dfc74e8 - Deposit or zone: Granada Gold Project - Mining method: combined - Material type: InPit+UG - Ownership percent: 100 % - Resource basis: gross #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3010000 - Grade: 4.71 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 456000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2022-06-23 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2022-08-22T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Inferred resource component being restated for context. Evidence · table > 4.71 Context: 3,010,000 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate **PEA-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.