Great Atlantic Resources Aggressively Expands its Tungsten, Tin, Indium Properties in Southwest New Brunswick
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- GREAT ATLANTIC RESOURCES CORP.
- Ticker
- GR
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- New Brunswick
- Primary commodity
- Tungsten
- Secondary commodities
- Tin, Indium, Molybdenum, Zinc, Copper, Lead, Silver, Bismuth
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 02:24:58 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Great Atlantic Resources has expanded its tungsten-tin land position in the Mount Pleasant area of New Brunswick by staking three new claims, increasing its total area by over 6,000 hectares. The expansion places the company's claims surrounding a former producing tungsten-molybdenum mine and near historical mineralized intercepts.
Reasoning: The company has significantly expanded its land position in a known tungsten district through new claim staking, though no new drilling results were reported.
Positive factors
- Expansion of land position by 6,000 hectares
- Strategic location surrounding a past producing mine
- Management team with direct district experience
- Proximity to known mineral occurrences
Negative factors
- Historical data requires verification
- No new assay results from the company's own drilling in this release
Facts used in scoring: 22
Classification and evidence
Nearology Playneutral · Story-specific tag
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The company is expanding its position surrounding the former Mount Pleasant Mine and near known mineral occurrences.
Evidence · text
“expanded its tungsten-tin land position in the Mount Pleasant area... partially surrounding the past producing Mount Pleasant tungsten - molybdenum mine”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The release primarily discusses historical drilling results from 2006-2008 to justify the new land position.
Evidence · text
“Tin, zinc, copper, lead, indium and silver mineralization were reportedly intersected during 2006-2008 diamond drilling”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (22)
WP-07-04Pughole · zincGrade: 9.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-04
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-04:0-5.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- High grade zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-04: 9.03% zinc and 225 ppm indium over 5.6 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-04Pughole · indiumGrade: 225Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-04
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- indium
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 225
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-04:0-5.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical indium intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Indium presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-04: 9.03% zinc and 225 ppm indium over 5.6 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-06Pughole · zincGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-06
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.05 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-06:0-11.05
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-06: 3.23% zinc, 1.01% lead and 119 ppm indium over 11.05 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-06Pughole · leadGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-06
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.05 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-06:0-11.05
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Lead presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-06: 3.23% zinc, 1.01% lead and 119 ppm indium over 11.05 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-06Pughole · indiumGrade: 119Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-06
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- indium
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 119
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11.05 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-06:0-11.05
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical indium intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Indium presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-06: 3.23% zinc, 1.01% lead and 119 ppm indium over 11.05 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-12Pughole · zincGrade: 14.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-12
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-12:0-0.51
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade zinc intercept but very narrow width reported from historical drilling.
Positive factors
- High grade zinc
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-12: 14.14% zinc and 121 ppm indium over 0.51 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-12Pughole · indiumGrade: 121Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-12
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- indium
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 121
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.51 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-12:0-0.51
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical indium intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Indium presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-12: 14.14% zinc and 121 ppm indium over 0.51 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-15Pughole · zincGrade: 6.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-15
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-15:0-0.61
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-15: 6.36% zinc, 1.1% lead, 1.06% copper and 196 ppm indium over 0.61 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-15Pughole · leadGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-15
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-15:0-0.61
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical lead intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Lead presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-15: 6.36% zinc, 1.1% lead, 1.06% copper and 196 ppm indium over 0.61 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-15Pughole · copperGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-15
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.06
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-15:0-0.61
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-15: 6.36% zinc, 1.1% lead, 1.06% copper and 196 ppm indium over 0.61 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-07-15Pughole · indiumGrade: 196Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.61 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-07-15
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- indium
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 196
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.61 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-07-15:0-0.61
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical indium intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Indium presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-07-15: 6.36% zinc, 1.1% lead, 1.06% copper and 196 ppm indium over 0.61 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-23Pughole · zincGrade: 18.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-23
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-23:0-1.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade zinc intercept reported from historical drilling.
Positive factors
- High grade zinc
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-23: 18.60% zinc and 0.51% copper, 0.32% tin and 785 ppm indium over 1.20 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-23Pughole · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-23
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-23:0-1.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical copper intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Copper presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-23: 18.60% zinc and 0.51% copper, 0.32% tin and 785 ppm indium over 1.20 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-23Pughole · tinGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-23
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-23:0-1.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical tin intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Tin presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-23: 18.60% zinc and 0.51% copper, 0.32% tin and 785 ppm indium over 1.20 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-23Pughole · indiumGrade: 785Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-23
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- indium
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 785
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-23:0-1.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade indium intercept reported from historical drilling.
Positive factors
- High grade indium
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-23: 18.60% zinc and 0.51% copper, 0.32% tin and 785 ppm indium over 1.20 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-24Pughole · zincGrade: 5.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.83 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-24
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.83 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-24:0-0.83
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-24: 5.64% zinc, 9.76% lead, 0.94% tin, 192 ppm indium and >100 ppm silver over 0.83 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-24Pughole · leadGrade: 9.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.83 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-24
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.83 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-24:0-0.83
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade lead intercept reported from historical drilling.
Positive factors
- High grade lead
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-24: 5.64% zinc, 9.76% lead, 0.94% tin, 192 ppm indium and >100 ppm silver over 0.83 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-24Pughole · tinGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.83 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-24
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.83 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-24:0-0.83
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical tin intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Tin presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-24: 5.64% zinc, 9.76% lead, 0.94% tin, 192 ppm indium and >100 ppm silver over 0.83 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-24Pughole · indiumGrade: 192Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.83 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-24
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- indium
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 192
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.83 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-24:0-0.83
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical indium intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Indium presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-24: 5.64% zinc, 9.76% lead, 0.94% tin, 192 ppm indium and >100 ppm silver over 0.83 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-24Pughole · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.83 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-24
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 100
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.83 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-24:0-0.83
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical silver presence reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Silver presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-24: 5.64% zinc, 9.76% lead, 0.94% tin, 192 ppm indium and >100 ppm silver over 0.83 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-26Pughole · zincGrade: 4.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.23 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-26
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.33
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-26:0-4.23
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical zinc intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-26: 4.33% zinc and 147 ppm indium over 4.23 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
WP-08-26Pughole · indiumGrade: 147Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.23 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WP-08-26
- Project
- Pughole
- Commodity
- indium
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- GR
Geometry
- Grade
- 147
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.23 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WP-08-26:0-4.23
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical indium intercept reported from 2006-2008 drilling.
Positive factors
- Indium presence
Negative factors
- Historical data from third-party
Evidence · text
“WP-08-26: 4.33% zinc and 147 ppm indium over 4.23 meters”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "4635) which is located immediately west of the past producing Mount Pleasant Mine."
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.