Great Bear Reports 95.2% to 99.2% Gold Recoveries in Preliminary LP Fault Metallurgical Tests - Gold is Free Milling and Readily Soluble at All Grades

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Great Bear Resources Ltd.
Ticker
GBR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Ontario, Canada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-09-12 07:51:43 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Great Bear Resources reported excellent preliminary metallurgical test results for its LP Fault zone at the Dixie Project in Ontario, Canada, with gold recoveries ranging from 95.2% to 99.2%. The tests confirmed that gold is free-milling and readily soluble across all grades and ore types, requiring no complex processing like autoclaving. These positive results, achieved through standard cyanidation bottle roll tests, significantly de-risk the project's future development and align with high operational recoveries seen in the Red Lake district.

Reasoning: The preliminary metallurgical test results for the LP Fault zone show consistently high gold recoveries (95.2% to 99.2%) across various grades and ore types, indicating free-milling and readily soluble gold, which significantly de-risks the project's processing pathway and aligns with regional operational benchmarks.

Positive factors

  • High gold recoveries (95.2% to 99.2%) across all tested grades and ore types.
  • Gold is free-milling and readily soluble, indicating simple processing.
  • Low cyanide consumption rates (0.12 to 0.27 kg/t) for the LP Fault samples.
  • No autoclave processing (POX/BIOX) required, reducing CAPEX and OPEX.
  • Results are in line with high operational gold recoveries at mines in the Red Lake district.
  • Potential for significant gravity circuit gold recoveries.

Negative factors

  • Tests are preliminary and conducted at bench-scale (bottle roll), not pilot scale.
  • LP Fault tests are focused on a single domain, limiting variability understanding across the entire deposit.

Facts used in scoring: 22

Classification and evidence

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The document reports gold recoveries ranging from 95.2% to 99.2%, which are at or above the exceptional band for the mill_cil processing route.

Evidence · text

“95.2% to 99.2% Gold Recoveries”

Free Millingpositive

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'Gold is Free Milling and Readily Soluble at All Grades' and 'LP Fault gold mineralization is not refractory. All samples, regardless of grade, were described as "free-milling"'.

Evidence · text

“Gold is Free Milling and Readily Soluble at All Grades”

Bench Scale Onlynegative

Only preliminary bench tests completed — no locked-cycle or pilot work.

Why it applies: The metallurgical tests were conducted using a 'standard 48 hour bottle roll procedure', which is a bench-scale test.

Evidence · text

“standard 48 hour bottle roll procedure”

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: The LP Fault tests are described as representing 'the most mineralogically complex intervals drilled to date at the LP Fault', indicating a focus within a single deposit domain rather than comprehensive variability across multiple distinct domains.

Evidence · text

“The samples reported here represent the most mineralogically complex intervals drilled to date at the LP Fault”

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: The historical tests in Table 3 include samples from 'Hinge Zone Comp', 'DL Argillite Comp', and 'DL High Sulphide Comp', indicating testing across multiple distinct ore domains.

Evidence · table

“Hinge Zone Comp”

Context: CN-1

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The results for the metallurgical test program were provided and approved by Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd., a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Results for the metallurgical test program were provided and approved by Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd., a Qualified Person for the purpose of National Instrument 43-101.”

Refractory Orenegative

Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'LP Fault gold mineralization is not refractory' and 'Autoclave processing will not be required'.

Evidence · text

“LP Fault gold mineralization is not refractory. All samples, regardless of grade, were described as "free-milling"”

Gravity Routeneutral

Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.

Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (22)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 98 %Head Grade: 9.24Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-13 Baseline (9.2 g/t Au)
Grind P80
77 µm

Recovery

Recovery
98 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
9.24
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.18
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.19 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows excellent gold recovery for a high-grade sample from the LP Fault, with low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery (98.0%) for a high-grade sample.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.19 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“98.0”

Context: CN-13

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 98% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97.7 %Head Grade: 9.23Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-14 Lead Nitrate (9.2 g/t Au)
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.7 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
9.23
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.21
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.22 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows excellent gold recovery for a high-grade sample from the LP Fault, with low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics, even with lead nitrate addition.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery (97.7%) for a high-grade sample.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.22 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“97.7”

Context: CN-14

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.7% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 99.2 %Head Grade: 22.98Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-15 Baseline (> 20.0 g/t Au)
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
99.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
22.98
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.19
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.23 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test demonstrates exceptional gold recovery for a very high-grade sample from the LP Fault, with low cyanide consumption, highlighting highly favorable processing characteristics.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold recovery (99.2%) for a very high-grade sample.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.23 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“99.2”

Context: CN-15

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 99.2% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 98.7 %Head Grade: 26.58Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-16 Lead Nitrate (> 20.0 g/t Au)
Grind P80
74 µm

Recovery

Recovery
98.7 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
26.58
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.34
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.27 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows excellent gold recovery for a very high-grade sample from the LP Fault, with low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics, even with lead nitrate addition.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery (98.7%) for a very high-grade sample.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.27 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“98.7”

Context: CN-16

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 98.7% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97.5 %Head Grade: 4.19Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-17 Baseline (4.1 – 4.2 g/t Au)
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
4.19
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.11
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.18 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows excellent gold recovery for a mid-grade sample from the LP Fault, with very low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery (97.5%) for a mid-grade sample.
  • Very low cyanide consumption (0.18 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“97.5”

Context: CN-17

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97.3 %Head Grade: 4.08Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-18 Lead Nitrate (4.1 – 4.2 g/t Au)
Grind P80
74 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
4.08
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.11
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.12 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows excellent gold recovery for a mid-grade sample from the LP Fault, with very low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics, even with lead nitrate addition.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery (97.3%) for a mid-grade sample.
  • Very low cyanide consumption (0.12 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“97.3”

Context: CN-18

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.3% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 96.3 %Head Grade: 1.59Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-19 Baseline (1.3 – 1.6 g/t Au)
Grind P80
75 µm

Recovery

Recovery
96.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.59
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.06
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.12 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows high gold recovery for a low-grade sample from the LP Fault, with very low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (96.3%) for a low-grade sample.
  • Very low cyanide consumption (0.12 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“96.3”

Context: CN-19

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 96.3% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 96.4 %Head Grade: 1.36Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-20 Lead Nitrate (1.3 – 1.6 g/t Au)
Grind P80
74 µm

Recovery

Recovery
96.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1.36
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.05
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.19 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows high gold recovery for a low-grade sample from the LP Fault, with low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics, even with lead nitrate addition.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (96.4%) for a low-grade sample.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.19 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“96.4”

Context: CN-20

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 96.4% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 95.2 %Head Grade: 0.75Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-21 Baseline (0.50 – 1.0 g/t Au)
Grind P80
77 µm

Recovery

Recovery
95.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.75
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.04
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.23 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows high gold recovery for a very low-grade sample from the LP Fault, with low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (95.2%) for a very low-grade sample.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.23 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“95.2”

Context: CN-21

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 95.2% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 95.9 %Head Grade: 0.97Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-22 Lead Nitrate (0.50 – 1.0 g/t Au)
Grind P80
74 µm

Recovery

Recovery
95.9 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
0.97
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.04
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.12 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This test shows high gold recovery for a very low-grade sample from the LP Fault, with very low cyanide consumption, indicating favorable processing characteristics, even with lead nitrate addition.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (95.9%) for a very low-grade sample.
  • Very low cyanide consumption (0.12 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).

Evidence · table

“95.9”

Context: CN-22

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 95.9% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 95.4 %Head Grade: 13.96Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-1 Hinge Zone Comp Effect of Primary Grind
Grind P80
112 µm

Recovery

Recovery
95.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
13.96
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.64
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.37 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Hinge Zone composite, indicating favorable processing characteristics, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (95.4%) for Hinge Zone composite.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.37 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“95.4”

Context: CN-1

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 95.4% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97.2 %Head Grade: 13.94Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-2 Hinge Zone Comp Effect of Primary Grind
Grind P80
74 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.2 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
13.94
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.39
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
0.43 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows excellent gold recovery for a Hinge Zone composite, indicating favorable processing characteristics, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Very high gold recovery (97.2%) for Hinge Zone composite.
  • Low cyanide consumption (0.43 kg/t).

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“97.2”

Context: CN-2

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.2% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 92.9 %Head Grade: 10.07Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-3 DL Argillite Comp Effect of Primary Grind
Grind P80
138 µm

Recovery

Recovery
92.9 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
10.07
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.72
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.1 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb Argillite composite, but with moderate cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (92.9%) for Dixie Limb Argillite composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.1 kg/t) is moderate.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“92.9”

Context: CN-3

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 88.3 %Head Grade: 10.89Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-4 DL Argillite Comp Effect of Primary Grind
Grind P80
77 µm

Recovery

Recovery
88.3 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
10.89
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
1.27
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
4.47 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows a lower gold recovery and very high cyanide consumption for a Dixie Limb Argillite composite, indicating potential processing challenges for this material.

Negative factors

  • Recovery (88.3%) is below the strong band for mill_cil.
  • Very high cyanide consumption (4.47 kg/t).
  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“88.3”

Context: CN-4

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 93.1 %Head Grade: 8.99Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-5 DL High Sulphide Comp Effect of Primary Grind
Grind P80
121 µm

Recovery

Recovery
93.1 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
8.99
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.62
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.11 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite, but with moderate cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (93.1%) for Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.11 kg/t) is moderate.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“93.1”

Context: CN-5

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 96.1 %Head Grade: 8.92Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-6 DL High Sulphide Comp Effect of Primary Grind
Grind P80
74 µm

Recovery

Recovery
96.1 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
8.92
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.35
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.91 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite, but with high cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (96.1%) for Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.91 kg/t) is high.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“96.1”

Context: CN-6

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 96.1% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97 %Head Grade: 10.37Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-7 DL Argillite Comp Effect of Lead Nitrate
Grind P80
78 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
10.37
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.31
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.66 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb Argillite composite, but with high cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (97.0%) for Dixie Limb Argillite composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.66 kg/t) is high.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“97.0”

Context: CN-7

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97.4 %Head Grade: 11.06Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-8 DL Argillite Comp Effect of Lead Nitrate
Grind P80
76 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.4 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
11.06
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.29
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.43 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb Argillite composite, but with moderate to high cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (97.4%) for Dixie Limb Argillite composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.43 kg/t) is moderate to high.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“97.4”

Context: CN-8

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.4% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97.5 %Head Grade: 11.49Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-9 DL Argillite Comp Effect of Cyanide Concentration
Grind P80
74 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.5 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
11.49
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.29
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
3.3 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb Argillite composite, but with very high cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (97.5%) for Dixie Limb Argillite composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Very high cyanide consumption (3.3 kg/t).
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“97.5”

Context: CN-9

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.5% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 97.1 %Head Grade: 10.06Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-10 DL Argillite Comp Effect of Lead Nitrate / Pre- treatment
Grind P80
79 µm

Recovery

Recovery
97.1 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
10.06
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.29
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.56 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate / Pre-treatment

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb Argillite composite, but with high cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (97.1%) for Dixie Limb Argillite composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.56 kg/t) is high.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“97.1”

Context: CN-10

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 97.1% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 96.9 %Head Grade: 9.35Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-11 DL High Sulphide Comp Effect of Lead Nitrate
Grind P80
76 µm

Recovery

Recovery
96.9 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
9.35
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.29
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.55 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite, but with high cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (96.9%) for Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.55 kg/t) is high.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“96.9”

Context: CN-11

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 96.9% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

bottle rollDixie Project · goldRecovery: 96.7 %Head Grade: 8.8Head Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Dixie Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario, Canada
Ticker
GBR

Test Work

Program Status
optimization
Test Type
bottle roll
Processing Route
mill_cil
Sample
CN-12 DL High Sulphide Comp Effect of Lead Nitrate / Pre- treatment
Grind P80
77 µm

Recovery

Recovery
96.7 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
8.8
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Tailings Grade
0.29
Tailings Grade Unit
g/t

Reagents

Cyanide
1.35 kg/t
Reagent Notes
Lead Nitrate / Pre-treatment

Lab

Laboratory
Blue Coast Research Ltd.
Consultant
Andrew Kelly, P.Eng., of Blue Coast Research Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2020-11-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2021-10-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical test shows high gold recovery for a Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite, but with moderate to high cyanide consumption, and is not new information.

Positive factors

  • High gold recovery (96.7%) for Dixie Limb High Sulphide composite.

Negative factors

  • Test is bench-scale (bottle roll).
  • Cyanide consumption (1.35 kg/t) is moderate to high.
  • Historical data, not new results.

Evidence · table

“96.7”

Context: CN-12

Tags used in scoring

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 96.7% is at or above the exceptional band (95%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.