# Great Pacific Gold Announces Results of Annual General Meeting

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/great-pacific-gold-announces-results-of-annual-general-meeting--90abfdfb-7fe5-4870-8328-3ab769c2dfac

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/GPAC/news/8879583955965066/great-pacific-gold-announces-results-of-annual-general-meeting

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-06-17T22:51:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Great Pacific Gold Corp.

- Ticker: GPAC

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Unavailable

- Primary commodity: Unavailable

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-16 02:38:13 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.00 · Neutral

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Great Pacific Gold Corp. announced the successful conclusion of its Annual General Meeting held on June 17, 2026. Shareholders approved all motions, including director re-elections and the appointment of BDO Canada LLP as auditors.

Reasoning: Routine administrative announcement regarding Annual General Meeting results; no new geological or financial data provided.

- Positive factor: shareholder approval of all motions

- Positive factor: re-election of directors

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Story-specific tag

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The high-grade intercept for WDG-08 is mentioned as a historical result in the project description rather than new assay results.

Evidence · text

> Drilling of the epithermal structure on the Sinivit target has yielded high-grade results, including WDG-08

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (1)

### WDG-08

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/great-pacific-gold-announces-results-of-annual-general-meeting--90abfdfb-7fe5-4870-8328-3ab769c2dfac#fact-drill-facts-0)

Wild Dog · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: WDG-08
- Project: Wild Dog
- Commodity: gold
- Region: png
- Reported Region: png
- Ticker: GPAC

#### Geometry

- Grade: 50
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 8.4 m
- From: 154 m
- To: 162.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 154 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: WDG-08:154-162.4

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-06-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade epithermal intercept mentioned as part of project background/historical context.

- Positive factor: high-grade intercept

Evidence · text

> WDG-08 which intercepted 8.4 metres at 50 g/t AuEq from 154 metres

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Kesar Project: located in the Eastern Highlands Province of PNG and contiguous with the mine tenements of K92 Mining Inc"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.