# Green Battery Minerals Defines Zone-3 targets at its Flagship Berkwood Graphite Project in Quebec Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/green-battery-minerals-defines-zone-3-targets-at-its-flagship-berkwood-graphite--1e8dd37c-6e6c-4b4e-86e1-0c37e6f1e3b6 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/GEM/news/6372938651000079/green-battery-minerals-defines-zone-3-targets-at-its-flagship-berkwood-graphite- Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2023-11-23T13:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Green Battery Minerals Inc. - Ticker: GEM - Exchange: TSX - Region: Quebec - Primary commodity: Graphite - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Drill results, Resource update, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-12 07:41:07 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Green Battery Minerals has defined new exploration targets at Zone 3 of its Berkwood Graphite Project in Quebec, following prospecting and ground MAG/EM surveys. The work confirmed a 1.4 km EM anomaly and highlighted historical drill intercepts including 22.0 m at 20.91% graphitic carbon and individual assays up to 27.8% Cgr. The company plans further work, including stripping, channel sampling, and drilling, to expand its resource base, and also restated its existing 2019 resource estimate for the Lac Gueret South Project. Reasoning: Green Battery Minerals has defined new exploration targets at Zone 3 based on ground geophysics and compelling historical high-grade drill intercepts, indicating strong potential for resource expansion, though new assays are pending and historical data needs verification. - Positive factor: Definition of new compelling exploration targets at Zone 3 - Positive factor: Confirmation of high-grade historical graphite intercepts \(up to 27.8% Cgr\) - Positive factor: Large EM conductivity anomaly \(1.4 km strike length with potential for 1.6 km extension\) - Positive factor: Proximity to the Lac Guéret property JV - Positive factor: Plans for future drilling and resource expansion - Negative factor: Drill results are historical and explicitly stated as not verified by the author of the release - Negative factor: Laboratory results for new rock chip samples are pending - Negative factor: The resource estimate is a restatement from 2019, not a new update Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 5 ## Classification and evidence No classification tags are available. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (3) ### LG-13-04N [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/green-battery-minerals-defines-zone-3-targets-at-its-flagship-berkwood-graphite--1e8dd37c-6e6c-4b4e-86e1-0c37e6f1e3b6#fact-drill-facts-0) Berkwood · graphite Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: LG-13-04N - Project: Berkwood - Commodity: graphite - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: canada\_qc - Ticker: GEM #### Geometry - Grade: 20.9 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 22 m - From: 4.4 m - To: 26.4 m - Intercept Depth: 4.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: LG-13-04N:4.4-26.4 #### Location - Easting: 489939 - Northing: 5666044 - Elevation: 589 m - Azimuth: 300 ° - Dip: -45 ° - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: No - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2023-11-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade historical intercept at shallow depth, but data is old and unverified with no QA/QC disclosure. - Positive factor: High-grade graphite intercept - Positive factor: Near-surface mineralization - Negative factor: Historical data, not verified - Negative factor: Apparent width only - Negative factor: No QA/QC disclosure Evidence · table > 20.9 Context: 22 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated #### Rejected tags **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: Historical drill results from 2013 are re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation. Evidence · text > Historical drilling of coarse flake graphite at LG-13-04N included 22.0 m @ 20.91% CG **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation. Evidence · text > 22.0 m @ 20.91% CG **No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Reason: The release states that historical data has not been verified by the author. Evidence · text > the results have not been verified by the author ### LG-13-04N [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/green-battery-minerals-defines-zone-3-targets-at-its-flagship-berkwood-graphite--1e8dd37c-6e6c-4b4e-86e1-0c37e6f1e3b6#fact-drill-facts-1) Berkwood · graphite Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: LG-13-04N - Project: Berkwood - Commodity: graphite - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: canada\_qc - Ticker: GEM #### Geometry - Grade: 7.78 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 4.5 m - From: 74.25 m - To: 78.75 m - Intercept Depth: 74.25 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: LG-13-04N:74.25-78.75 #### Location - Easting: 489939 - Northing: 5666044 - Elevation: 589 m - Azimuth: 300 ° - Dip: -45 ° - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: No - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2023-11-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate-grade historical intercept, but data is old and unverified with no QA/QC disclosure. - Positive factor: Moderate-grade graphite intercept - Negative factor: Historical data, not verified - Negative factor: Apparent width only - Negative factor: No QA/QC disclosure Evidence · table > 7.78 Context: 4.5 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated #### Rejected tags **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: Historical drill results from 2013 are re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation. Evidence · text > Historical drilling of coarse flake graphite at LG-13-04N included ... a secondary zone of 4.50 m @ 7.78% CG **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation. Evidence · text > 4.50 m @ 7.78% CG **No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Reason: The release states that historical data has not been verified by the author. Evidence · text > the results have not been verified by the author ### LG-13-04N [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/green-battery-minerals-defines-zone-3-targets-at-its-flagship-berkwood-graphite--1e8dd37c-6e6c-4b4e-86e1-0c37e6f1e3b6#fact-drill-facts-2) Berkwood · graphite Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: LG-13-04N - Project: Berkwood - Commodity: graphite - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: canada\_qc - Ticker: GEM #### Geometry - Grade: 27.8 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 2 m - From: 10.4 m - To: 12.4 m - Intercept Depth: 10.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: LG-13-04N:10.4-12.4 #### Location - Easting: 489939 - Northing: 5666044 - Elevation: 589 m - Azimuth: 300 ° - Dip: -45 ° - Loc. Confidence: high - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: No - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2023-11-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Very high-grade historical intercept over a narrow width, but data is old and unverified with no QA/QC disclosure. - Positive factor: Very high-grade graphite intercept - Negative factor: Historical data, not verified - Negative factor: Narrow interval - Negative factor: Apparent width only - Negative factor: No QA/QC disclosure Evidence · table > 27.8 Context: 2 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated #### Rejected tags **Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Reason: Historical drill results from 2013 are re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation. Evidence · text > historical assays up to 27.8% Cgr at shallow depths **Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation. Evidence · table > 2 Context: 10.4 **No QA/QC Disclosure** — Rejected; excluded from scoring Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Reason: The release states that historical data has not been verified by the author. Evidence · text > the results have not been verified by the author ## Resource Estimates (2) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/green-battery-minerals-defines-zone-3-targets-at-its-flagship-berkwood-graphite--1e8dd37c-6e6c-4b4e-86e1-0c37e6f1e3b6#fact-resource-facts-3) Lac Gueret South Project · graphite Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Lac Gueret South Project - Commodity: graphite - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: GEM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Edward Lyons, Florent Baril, Claude Duplessis - Resource group id: resource:cdfa327a967d6825221f #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 1760000 - Grade: 17 - Grade Unit: % Cgr - Contained Metal: 299200 - Contained Unit: t - Cutoff Grade: 6.81 - Cutoff Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-06-30 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-06-30T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-11-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade indicated resource, but it is a restatement of a 2019 estimate, offering no new information and is considered stale. - Positive factor: High-grade indicated resource - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant - Positive factor: QP/CP signed - Negative factor: Stale estimate \(2019\) - Negative factor: Restatement, no new information Evidence · table > 1.76 Context: Indicated #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/green-battery-minerals-defines-zone-3-targets-at-its-flagship-berkwood-graphite--1e8dd37c-6e6c-4b4e-86e1-0c37e6f1e3b6#fact-resource-facts-4) Lac Gueret South Project · graphite Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Lac Gueret South Project - Commodity: graphite - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: Quebec - Ticker: GEM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Edward Lyons, Florent Baril, Claude Duplessis - Resource group id: resource:ccd65d7aeee0fbd68ac0 #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1530000 - Grade: 16.4 - Grade Unit: % Cgr - Contained Metal: 250200 - Contained Unit: t - Cutoff Grade: 6.81 - Cutoff Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-06-30 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-06-30T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-11-23T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade inferred resource, but it is a restatement of a 2019 estimate, offering no new information and is considered stale. - Positive factor: High-grade inferred resource - Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant - Positive factor: QP/CP signed - Negative factor: Stale estimate \(2019\) - Negative factor: Restatement, no new information - Negative factor: Inferred category Evidence · table > 1.53 Context: Inferred #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: The resource is in the speculative Inferred category. Evidence · table > Inferred Context: Inferred **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.