Green Bridge Metals Intersects 195.0 Metres Grading 0.25% Cu and 10.18% TiO2 at Titac South, Minnesota; Step-Out Hole Confirms Mineralization at Previously Untested Geophysical Target

Original announcement by accesswire on

Company
Green Bridge Metals Corporation
Ticker
GRBM
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Minnesota
Primary commodity
Titanium
Secondary commodities
Copper, Vanadium
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-12 00:30:11 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Green Bridge Metals has reported final assay results from its Phase 1 drill program at the Titac Project in Minnesota. A key highlight is the step-out hole TS26-007, which intersected copper and titanium mineralization at a previously untested geophysical target, validating the company's 3D VTEM inversion modelling.

Reasoning: The step-out hole TS26-007 successfully intersected mineralization at a new target, validating the company's geophysical targeting model and providing significant exploration upside.

Positive factors

  • Step-out hole confirmed mineralization at a previously untested geophysical target
  • Validation of 3D VTEM inversion modelling as an effective targeting tool
  • Consistent occurrence of copper alongside titanium
  • Acceleration of Phase 2 drilling program

Negative factors

  • True widths cannot currently be determined due to irregular geometry

Facts used in scoring: 7

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (7)

TS26-004aTitac South · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 195 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TS26-004a
Project
Titac South
Commodity
copper
Region
minnesota
Reported Region
minnesota
Ticker
GRBM

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
195 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TS26-004a:0-195
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Titac South
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Standard intercept confirming existing mineralization.

Evidence · text

“drill hole TS26-004a intersected 195.0m grading 0.25% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TS26-004aTitac South · titaniumGrade: 10.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 195 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TS26-004a
Project
Titac South
Commodity
titanium
Region
minnesota
Reported Region
minnesota
Ticker
GRBM

Geometry

Grade
10.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
195 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TS26-004a:0-195
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Titac South
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Standard intercept confirming existing mineralization.

Evidence · text

“195.0m grading 0.25% Cu and 10.18% TiO2”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TS26-004aTitac South · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TS26-004a
Project
Titac South
Commodity
copper
Region
minnesota
Reported Region
minnesota
Ticker
GRBM

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TS26-004a:0-195
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Titac South
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval within the main intercept.

Evidence · text

“including 62.0m grading 0.29% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TS26-004aTitac South · titaniumGrade: 10.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TS26-004a
Project
Titac South
Commodity
titanium
Region
minnesota
Reported Region
minnesota
Ticker
GRBM

Geometry

Grade
10.54
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
62 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TS26-004a:0-195
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Titac South
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval within the main intercept.

Evidence · text

“including 62.0m grading 0.29% Cu and 10.54% TiO2”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TS26-007Titac South · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TS26-007
Project
Titac South
Commodity
copper
Region
minnesota
Reported Region
minnesota
Ticker
GRBM

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TS26-007:0-12
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Titac South
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Critical step-out success confirming the predictive power of the geophysical model.

Positive factors

  • Successfully intersected mineralization at a previously untested geophysical target
  • Validates 3D VTEM inversion modelling

Evidence · text

“Exploratory step-out hole TS26-007... returned 12.0 m @ 0.20% Cu, 8.33% TiO2, 0.15% V2O5”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TS26-007Titac South · titaniumGrade: 8.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TS26-007
Project
Titac South
Commodity
titanium
Region
minnesota
Reported Region
minnesota
Ticker
GRBM

Geometry

Grade
8.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TS26-007:0-12
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Titac South
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Critical step-out success confirming the predictive power of the geophysical model.

Positive factors

  • Successfully intersected mineralization at a previously untested geophysical target
  • Validates 3D VTEM inversion modelling

Evidence · text

“Exploratory step-out hole TS26-007... returned 12.0 m @ 0.20% Cu, 8.33% TiO2, 0.15% V2O5”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TS26-007Titac South · vanadiumGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TS26-007
Project
Titac South
Commodity
vanadium
Region
minnesota
Reported Region
minnesota
Ticker
GRBM

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TS26-007:0-12
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Titac South
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Critical step-out success confirming the predictive power of the geophysical model.

Positive factors

  • Successfully intersected mineralization at a previously untested geophysical target
  • Validates 3D VTEM inversion modelling

Evidence · text

“Exploratory step-out hole TS26-007... returned 12.0 m @ 0.20% Cu, 8.33% TiO2, 0.15% V2O5”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.