Greenheart Gold Announces Results from the Maiden Drill Program at Igab, Including Hole D-007 Intersecting 7.0 m @ 5.82 g/t Au, and Results at Majorodam

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Greenheart Gold Inc.
Ticker
GHRT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Suriname
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-14 02:32:30 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Greenheart Gold Inc. announced initial diamond drill results from its maiden program at the Igab project in Suriname, highlighted by 7.0 meters at 5.82 g/t gold in hole IGBD26-007. The company also reported additional high-grade trenching results from Igab and an update on the Majorodam project, where a shallow RC drilling program is underway to expand mineralization and identify new zones. While the results are promising, approximately 35% of the Majorodam assays are still pending due to laboratory delays, and true widths of mineralization remain unknown for all reported intercepts.

Reasoning: The maiden drill program at Igab delivered strong high-grade gold intercepts, indicating significant discovery potential. New trenching results at both Igab and Majorodam also show promising gold mineralization, although the lack of true width information and pending assay results for Majorodam introduce some uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Maiden drill program at Igab returned high-grade gold intercepts, including 7.0 m @ 5.82 g/t Au in IGBD26-007 and 3.0 m @ 11.59 g/t Au in trench IGBT26-113.
  • New trenching results at Igab's Cannibal Creek include 22.0 m @ 2.13 g/t Au, including 15.0 m @ 3.01 g/t Au.
  • Drill program at Majorodam is expanding the mineralized envelope and stepping out to identify additional zones.
  • Comprehensive QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off.

Negative factors

  • True widths of mineralization are unknown for all reported intercepts.
  • Approximately 35% of Majorodam RC drill program assay results are pending due to laboratory delays.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 44

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole IGBD26-007 intersected 7.0 m @ 5.82 g/t Au, which is above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au.

Evidence · table

“5.82”

Context: 7.0

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Trench IGBT26-113 intersected 3.0 m @ 11.59 g/t Au, which is significantly above the exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au.

Evidence · table

“11.59”

Context: 3.0

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes detailed QA/QC disclosure, mentioning certified labs, blanks, standards, duplicates, and QP sign-off.

Evidence · text

“Sample Collection, Assaying and Data Management Significant intervals are reported as sampling interval lengths, and the true width of mineralization is unknown. Significant intervals have been calculated using a grade cut-off of 0.30 g/t Au, a minimum length of 5.0 m and a maximum length of 5.0 m of consecutive internal waste. Included intervals have been calculated using a grade cut-off of 1.00 g/t Au, a minimum length of 3.0 m and a maximum length of 2.0 m of consecutive internal waste. Gold grades are uncapped. Trench samples are collected continuously in 1 m or 2 m length intervals along the base of the excavated exposure and are designed to represent a similar volume to half-HQ core. Diamond drill core samples consist of half of either HQ or NQ core taken continuously at regular intervals averaging 1.35 m, bagged and labelled at the on-site core shed. Samples are submitted to either Actlabs or ALS Chemex laboratories, both located in Paramaribo, Suriname, while respecting best-practice chain of custody procedures. Samples are dried, crushed to 80% passing 2 mm, riffle split (to either 250 g or 500 g), and pulverized to 95% passing 105 μm. Coarse blanks are inserted by the Company, and are used between and following suspected high-grade intervals. Barren sand flushes are inserted by the analytical laboratory after each sample is pulverized to clean the bowl. Actlabs' pulverized samples are transported by Actlabs to their laboratory in Georgetown, Guyana (an ISO 9001 certified laboratory), whilst ALS Chemex pulverized samples are sent to ALS facilities in Peru or Columbia. In both cases, gold assay is carried out using a 30 g or 50 g fire assay with an atomic absorption finish. Assays with overlimit results are re-assayed with a gravimetric finish. Certified reference materials and blanks are inserted at a rate of 5% of samples shipped to the laboratories. RC field duplicates and pulp duplicates are also generated at a rate of 5% of samples. All assay data is subject to QA/QC prior to acceptance into the Company database managed by an independent consultant. Qualified Person All scientific and technical information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Justin van der Toorn, CGeol FGS, EurGeol, President and CEO of Greenheart Gold, and a Qualified Person under Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects .”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The cut-off grades and internal dilution rules for reported intervals are clearly stated in the document.

Evidence · text

“Significant intervals have been calculated using a grade cut-off of 0.30 g/t Au, a minimum length of 5.0 m and a maximum length of 5.0 m of consecutive internal waste. Included intervals have been calculated using a grade cut-off of 1.00 g/t Au, a minimum length of 3.0 m and a maximum length of 2.0 m of consecutive internal waste.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: All intervals are reported as downhole lengths, and the document explicitly states that true widths of mineralization are unknown.

Evidence · text

“Intervals are reported as sampling interval lengths and true widths of mineralization are unknown.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The Majorodam program is aimed at 'expanding the mineralized envelope around previously intersected gold mineralization', indicating infill drilling.

Evidence · text

“Greenheart Gold completed a shallow reverse circulation (" RC ") drilling program at Majorodam comprising 160 holes for a total of 11,748 m, aimed at both expanding the mineralized envelope around previously intersected gold mineralization”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The Majorodam program is aimed at 'stepping out to the north to identify additional mineralized zones', indicating step-out drilling.

Evidence · text

“and stepping out to the north to identify additional mineralized zones.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: At Igab, follow-up drilling is planned to 'test extensions to the northwest and southeast' of hole IGBD26-007.

Evidence · text

“At Koela West, follow-up drilling is expected to test extensions to the northwest and southeast of hole IGBD26-007”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: At Igab, the next phase of drilling will focus on 'testing the strike continuity' and 'testing the intervening areas between the known intercepts where drilling remains sparse', indicating infill drilling.

Evidence · text

“At Koela East, the next phase of drilling will focus on testing the strike continuity of the mineralized trend around holes IGBD26-003, which intersected 8.0 m @ 2.16 g/t Au and IGBD26-011, which intersected 4.0 m @ 4.68 g/t Au (see Figure 1 and Table 1). Drilling at Koela East will also include testing the intervening areas between the known intercepts where drilling remains sparse.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 44. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (44)

IGBD26-003Igab · goldGrade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-003
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
135 m
To
143 m
Hole Depth
203 m
Intercept Depth
135 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-003:135-143
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Easting
776518
Northing
532327
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
162 m
Azimuth
57 °
Dip
-48 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade in the maiden drill program, indicating promising mineralization, though the true width is not yet determined.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.16 g/t Au) for an exploration program.
  • Part of a maiden drill program at Igab.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“2.16”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-005Igab · goldGrade: 6.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-005
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
6.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
68.6 m
To
71 m
Hole Depth
137.8 m
Intercept Depth
68.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-005:68.6-71
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Easting
776409
Northing
532343
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
193 m
Azimuth
63 °
Dip
-52 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, which is highly positive for a maiden drill program, though the narrow width and unknown true width temper the materiality.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (6.42 g/t Au) in a maiden drill program.

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (2.4 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“6.42”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-006Igab · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-006
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
110 m
To
116 m
Hole Depth
201.9 m
Intercept Depth
110 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-006:110-116
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Easting
776311
Northing
532318
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
211 m
Azimuth
65 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept represents a weak gold grade, but it indicates the presence of mineralization in a new zone that could host higher-grade shoots.

Positive factors

  • Identifies a mineralized zone that warrants additional along-strike testing.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.31 g/t Au) at the lower end of the reporting cut-off.
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-007Igab · goldGrade: 5.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-007
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
5.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
5.3 m
To
12.3 m
Hole Depth
160.9 m
Intercept Depth
5.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-007:5.3-12.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Easting
776236
Northing
532285
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
246 m
Azimuth
65 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept represents a bonanza-grade gold discovery over a good width in the maiden drill program, making it a highly material and novel result.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (5.82 g/t Au) over a significant width (7.0 m).
  • High GT product (40.74 g/t·m) for an exploration program.
  • Key highlight from the maiden drill program at Igab.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“5.82”

Context: 7.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-011Igab · goldGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-011
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
4.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
12 m
To
16 m
Hole Depth
135 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-011:12-16
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Easting
776494
Northing
532623
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
155 m
Azimuth
66 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade in the maiden drill program, indicating promising mineralization, though the true width is not yet determined.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (4.68 g/t Au) in a maiden drill program.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“4.68”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-012Igab · goldGrade: 2.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-012
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
34 m
To
36 m
Hole Depth
86 m
Intercept Depth
34 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-012:34-36
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Easting
776416
Northing
532590
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
179 m
Azimuth
68 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade, which is positive for a maiden drill program, though the narrow width and unknown true width temper the materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.58 g/t Au) in a maiden drill program.

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (2.0 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“2.58”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-016Igab · goldGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-016
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.3 m
From
26.7 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
153.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-016:26.7-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Desiberg
Easting
771475
Northing
526589
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
117 m
Azimuth
86 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade, which is positive for a maiden drill program, though the narrow width and unknown true width temper the materiality.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.49 g/t Au) in a maiden drill program.

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (2.3 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“2.49”

Context: 2.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-016Igab · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-016
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.9 m
From
94.9 m
To
101.8 m
Hole Depth
153.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-016:94.9-101.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Desiberg
Easting
771475
Northing
526589
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
117 m
Azimuth
86 °
Dip
-58 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization, but contributes to understanding the geological context of the Desiberg target in the maiden drill program.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization at the Desiberg target.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.37 g/t Au) at the lower end of the reporting cut-off.
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 6.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBD26-017Igab · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBD26-017
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.6 m
From
7.5 m
To
16.1 m
Hole Depth
150.1 m
Intercept Depth
7.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IGBD26-017:7.5-16.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Desiberg
Easting
771475
Northing
526589
CRS
WGS 84, UTM Zone 21N
EPSG
32621
Elevation
102 m
Azimuth
136 °
Dip
-49 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to understanding the Desiberg target in the maiden drill program.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a good width (8.6 m) at the Desiberg target.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.52 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 8.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

IGBT25-058Igab · goldGrade: 6.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT25-058
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
6.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
201 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows an exceptional gold grade, which is highly positive for exploration, though the narrow width and unknown true width temper the materiality.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (6.23 g/t Au) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (3.0 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“6.23”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-110Igab · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-110
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
26 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to understanding the Koela target.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a good width (7.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.70 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 7.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-113Igab · goldGrade: 11.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-113
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
11.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
5 m
Intercept Depth
5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Koela
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows a bonanza-grade gold intercept, which is highly material and novel for exploration, though the narrow width and unknown true width temper the overall impact.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (11.59 g/t Au) from trenching.
  • High GT product (34.77 g/t·m) for an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (3.0 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“11.59”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-087Igab · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-087
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
2 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows moderate gold mineralization over a good width, indicating potential at the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.33 g/t Au) over a good width (9.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-087Igab · goldGrade: 2.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-087
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
8 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.96 g/t Au) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (3.0 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“2.96”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-092Igab · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-092
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
92 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows moderate gold mineralization over a good width, indicating potential at the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.10 g/t Au) over a good width (6.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-092Igab · goldGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-092
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
94 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.56 g/t Au) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (3.0 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-093Igab · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-093
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
59 m
Intercept Depth
59 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows moderate gold mineralization over a good width, indicating potential at the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.37 g/t Au) over a good width (9.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-093Igab · goldGrade: 2.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-093
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
59 m
Intercept Depth
59 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a good width, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.16 g/t Au) over a good width (5.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“2.16”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-093Igab · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-093
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
169 m
Intercept Depth
59 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization, but contributes to understanding the geological context of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a good width (6.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.44 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-094Igab · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-094
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
30 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization over a significant width, indicating potential at the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a significant width (16.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.72 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 16.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-094Igab · goldGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-094
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.47 g/t Au) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.47”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-094Igab · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-094
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
52 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization, but contributes to understanding the geological context of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a good width (8.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.32 g/t Au) at the lower end of the reporting cut-off.
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-094Igab · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-094
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
131 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization over a significant width, contributing to understanding the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a significant width (10.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.48 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-094Igab · goldGrade: 2.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-094
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
147 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows strong gold mineralization over an exceptional width, making it a highly material and novel result for the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.13 g/t Au) over an exceptional width (22.0 m) from trenching.
  • High GT product (46.86 g/t·m) for an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“2.13”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-094Igab · goldGrade: 3.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-094
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
3.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
147 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional gold mineralization over a strong width, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (3.01 g/t Au) over a strong width (15.0 m) from trenching.
  • High GT product (45.15 g/t·m) for an exploration program.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“3.01”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-095Igab · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-095
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows moderate gold mineralization over a significant width, indicating potential at the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.63 g/t Au) over a significant width (10.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.63”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-095Igab · goldGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-095
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
80 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.90 g/t Au) over a good width (8.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.90”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-099Igab · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-099
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
2 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows moderate gold mineralization over a good width, indicating potential at the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.53 g/t Au) over a good width (6.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-099Igab · goldGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-099
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
2 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, enhancing the overall prospectivity of the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.72 g/t Au) over a good width (5.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-101Igab · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-101
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
1 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to understanding the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a good width (7.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.86 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 7.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

IGBT26-102Igab · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IGBT26-102
Project
Igab
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
32 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cannibal Creek
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to understanding the Cannibal Creek target.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a good width (6.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.62 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

MAJR26-025Majorodam · goldGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-025
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
40 m
To
48 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-025:40-48
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This drill intercept shows strong gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to expanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.47 g/t Au) over a good width (8.0 m).

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“2.47”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR26-025Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-025
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
75 m
To
80 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-025:75-80
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This drill intercept shows weak gold mineralization, contributing to understanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.33 g/t Au) at the lower end of the reporting cut-off.
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR26-029Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-029
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
69 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-029:69-85
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This drill intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a significant width, contributing to expanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a significant width (16.0 m).

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.63 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 16.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR26-041Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-041
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
45 m
To
53 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-041:45-53
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This drill intercept shows weak gold mineralization, contributing to understanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.38 g/t Au) at the lower end of the reporting cut-off.
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR26-051Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-051
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
35 m
To
46 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-051:35-46
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This drill intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a significant width, contributing to expanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a significant width (11.0 m).

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.55 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR26-053Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-053
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
25 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
25 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-053:25-37
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This drill intercept shows moderate gold mineralization over a significant width, contributing to expanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.57 g/t Au) over a significant width (12.0 m).

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“1.57”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR26-053Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-053
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
25 m
To
28 m
Intercept Depth
25 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-053:25-28
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade, enhancing the overall prospectivity, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.16 g/t Au).

Negative factors

  • Relatively narrow intercept length (3.0 m).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR26-061Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR26-061
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
47 m
To
53 m
Intercept Depth
47 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR26-061:47-53
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This drill intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to expanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a good width (6.0 m).

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.83 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJT25-037Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJT25-037
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
7 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows moderate gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to understanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.11 g/t Au) over a good width (5.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

MAJT25-039Majorodam · goldGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJT25-039
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
98 m
Intercept Depth
98 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows strong gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to understanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (2.47 g/t Au) over a good width (6.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“2.47”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

MJNT25-001Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MJNT25-001
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
164 m
Intercept Depth
164 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization over a significant width, contributing to understanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over a significant width (10.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.36 g/t Au) at the lower end of the reporting cut-off.
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

MJNT25-001Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MJNT25-001
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
262 m
Intercept Depth
164 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows moderate gold mineralization over a significant width, contributing to understanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (1.04 g/t Au) over a significant width (12.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

MJNT25-002Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MJNT25-002
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
166 m
Intercept Depth
166 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs or ALS Chemex
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This trench result shows weak gold mineralization over an exceptional width, contributing to understanding the mineralized envelope, though pending assays and unknown true width add uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Indicates gold mineralization over an exceptional width (22.0 m) from trenching.

Negative factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.69 g/t Au).
  • True width of mineralization is unknown.
  • 35% of assay results for the program are pending.

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.