Greenheart Gold Provides an Update on Its Majorodam Project in Suriname, Including Results from Hole D-014 Which Intersected 15.3 m @ 3.72 g/t Au and a Planned 10,000 m Drill Program to Expand Mineralized Footprint

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Greenheart Gold Inc.
Ticker
GHRT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Suriname
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-14 02:57:31 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Greenheart Gold announced new drill results from its Majorodam Project in Suriname, highlighted by hole MAJD25-014 intersecting 15.3 m at 3.72 g/t gold, including a high-grade section of 8.0 m at 6.57 g/t gold. The company also identified a new target, Gowtu, defined by an 800 m x 1,500 m gold-in-soil anomaly. To follow up on these positive results and expand the mineralized footprint, Greenheart Gold plans to initiate a 10,000 m RC drill program across the Heuvel West, Heuvel East, and Gowtu targets.

Reasoning: Greenheart Gold reported strong gold drill results, including a high-grade intercept of 8.0 m @ 6.57 g/t Au within a broader 15.3 m @ 3.72 g/t Au interval, from its Majorodam Project. The company also announced a new target, Gowtu, and a significant 10,000 m drill program to expand and infill existing targets and test the new zone, indicating strong exploration progress and future potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept in MAJD25-014 (8.0 m @ 6.57 g/t Au) is exceptional for orogenic gold deposits.
  • Significant intercept length in MAJD25-014 (15.3 m @ 3.72 g/t Au) indicates good continuity.
  • Discovery of a new target, Gowtu, with a significant gold-in-soil anomaly expands exploration potential.
  • Planned 10,000 m drill program demonstrates commitment to further exploration and expansion.
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and QP sign-off enhance confidence in results.

Negative factors

  • True width of mineralization is unknown, which may overstate actual thickness.
  • Some intercepts are low grade, near the cutoff, indicating variability.

Facts used in scoring: 13

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: The intercept of 8.0 m @ 6.57 g/t Au in MAJD25-014 is well above the exceptional threshold for orogenic gold deposits (5 g/t Au).

Evidence · table

“6.57”

Context: 8.0

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'All significant intervals are reported as downhole lengths, and the true thickness of mineralization is unknown.'

Evidence · text

“All significant intervals are reported as downhole lengths, and the true thickness of mineralization is unknown.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details the use of certified laboratories (Actlabs, Filab), insertion of blanks, standards (certified reference materials), and duplicates, and QP sign-off.

Evidence · text

“Samples are submitted to either Actlabs or Filab laboratories, both located in Paramaribo, Suriname, while respecting best-practice chain of custody procedures. ... Certified reference materials and blanks are inserted at a rate of 5% of samples shipped to the laboratories. RC field duplicates and pulp duplicates are also generated at a rate of 5% of samples.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document clearly states the cut-off grades and maximum internal waste for both significant and included intervals.

Evidence · text

“In this press release significant intervals have been calculated using a grade cut-off of 0.3 g/t Au, a minimum length of 5 m, and a maximum length of 5 m of consecutive internal waste. Included significant intervals have been calculated using a grade cut-off of 1.0 g/t Au, a minimum length of 3 m, and a maximum length of 2 m of consecutive internal waste.”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The planned 10,000 m RC drill program aims to 'expand on the recent significant intercepts at the Heuvel West and East Targets' and 'step out to the north and south at Heuvel East'.

Evidence · text

“The RC drill program will aim at both expanding and infilling the Heuvel West Target and expanding the Heuvel East Target. Drilling will target areas between existing drill intercepts at Heuvel West and will step out to the north and south at Heuvel East”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The planned 10,000 m RC drill program aims to 'infilling the Heuvel West Target' and 'target areas between existing drill intercepts at Heuvel West'.

Evidence · text

“The RC drill program will aim at both expanding and infilling the Heuvel West Target and expanding the Heuvel East Target. Drilling will target areas between existing drill intercepts at Heuvel West”

New Zone Discoverypositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: A new target called Gowtu has been defined at Majorodam by a significant 800 m x 1,500 m gold in soil anomaly and is planned for scout drilling.

Evidence · text

“A new target called Gowtu has been defined at Majorodam by a significant 800 m x 1,500 m gold in soil anomaly”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 13. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (13)

MAJD25-012Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-012
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
52 m
To
62 m
Hole Depth
100.9 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-012:52-62
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
679727
Northing
533276
Elevation
84 m
Azimuth
209 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization at Heuvel West.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJD25-012Majorodam · goldGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-012
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
58 m
To
62 m
Hole Depth
100.9 m
Intercept Depth
52 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-012:58-62
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
679727
Northing
533276
Elevation
84 m
Azimuth
209 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval shows a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, which is a positive indicator for the deposit's potential.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Indicates higher-grade core within broader mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“2.97”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJD25-013-W1Majorodam · goldGrade: 3.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-013-W1
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
3.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
110 m
To
116 m
Hole Depth
141 m
Intercept Depth
110 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-013-W1:110-116
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
679714
Northing
533065
Elevation
107 m
Azimuth
354 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from a wedge hole shows strong gold grades over a good width, indicating continuity of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“3.04”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJD25-013-W1Majorodam · goldGrade: 3.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-013-W1
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
3.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
111 m
To
116 m
Hole Depth
141 m
Intercept Depth
110 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-013-W1:111-116
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
679714
Northing
533065
Elevation
107 m
Azimuth
354 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval shows a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, further enhancing the prospectivity of the area.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Indicates higher-grade core within broader mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“3.46”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJD25-014Majorodam · goldGrade: 3.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-014
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
3.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
60.7 m
To
76 m
Hole Depth
102 m
Intercept Depth
60.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-014:60.7-76
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
679713
Northing
533065
Elevation
107 m
Azimuth
311 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a highly material intercept with strong gold grades over a significant width, indicating robust mineralization and high novelty as a new result.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Significant intercept length, indicating good continuity.
  • High GT product (56.9 g/t*m) is strong for orogenic gold.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“3.72”

Context: 15.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJD25-014Majorodam · goldGrade: 6.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-014
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
6.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
64 m
To
72 m
Hole Depth
102 m
Intercept Depth
60.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-014:64-72
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
679713
Northing
533065
Elevation
107 m
Azimuth
311 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval represents a bonanza-grade zone, significantly enhancing the overall prospectivity and economic potential of the intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • High GT product (52.56 g/t*m) is strong for orogenic gold.
  • Indicates a bonanza-grade core within the broader mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“6.57”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJD25-016Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-016
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
83 m
To
90.5 m
Hole Depth
114 m
Intercept Depth
83 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-016:83-90.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
679576
Northing
532745
Elevation
138 m
Azimuth
322 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 7.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJD25-019Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJD25-019
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.8 m
From
124.1 m
To
131.9 m
Hole Depth
161.5 m
Intercept Depth
124.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJD25-019:124.1-131.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
680547
Northing
532941
Elevation
144 m
Azimuth
315 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept from Heuvel East shows moderate gold grades over a good width, confirming mineralization in this area.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 7.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJR25-014Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJR25-014
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
16 m
To
21 m
Hole Depth
117 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJR25-014:16-21
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
680593
Northing
532991
Elevation
154 m
Azimuth
269 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization, confirming the presence of gold but not indicating high economic potential on its own.

Positive factors

  • Confirms presence of gold mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low grade, near cutoff.
  • True width unknown.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJT25-037Majorodam · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJT25-037
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
7 m
To
12 m
Intercept Depth
7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJT25-037:7-12
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold grades over a narrow width, but the lack of collar data reduces confidence in its precise location.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade for orogenic gold deposit.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.
  • Collar coordinates not found for this hole.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 5.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MAJT25-039Majorodam · goldGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAJT25-039
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
2.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
98 m
To
104 m
Intercept Depth
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MAJT25-039:98-104
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
2 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows strong gold grades over a good width, but the lack of collar data reduces confidence in its precise location.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • Good intercept length.

Negative factors

  • True width unknown.
  • Collar coordinates not found for this hole.

Evidence · table

“2.47”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

MJNT25-002Majorodam · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MJNT25-002
Project
Majorodam
Commodity
gold
Region
suriname
Reported Region
suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22 m
From
168 m
To
190 m
Intercept Depth
168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MJNT25-002:168-190
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, low-grade gold mineralization, which could be material if part of a bulk-tonnage target, but the lack of collar data reduces confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for orogenic gold deposit.
  • True width unknown.
  • Collar coordinates not found for this hole.

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 22.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Fact 13Majorodam ProjectNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Majorodam Project
Region
suriname
Reported Region
Suriname
Ticker
GHRT

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
Actlabs and Filab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
5 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The planned 10,000 m RC drill program is a highly positive and material development, indicating aggressive exploration to expand known mineralization and test new high-priority targets, which could significantly increase the project's value.

Positive factors

  • Large planned drill program (10,000 m) indicates significant exploration commitment.
  • Program aims to expand and infill existing targets, and test a new target (Gowtu), suggesting high potential for resource growth.
  • RC drilling is cost-effective for initial target testing and expansion.

Evidence · text

“Greenheart Gold plans to initiate an RC drill program of approximate 10,000 m to expand on the recent significant intercepts at the Heuvel West and East Targets.”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.