GT Resources Intersects 2.0% Nickel over 33.5 meters at the Canalask Nickel-Copper Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
GT Resources Inc.
Ticker
GT
Exchange
TSX
Region
Yukon, Canada
Primary commodity
Nickel
Secondary commodities
Copper, Cobalt, Palladium, Platinum, Gold
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-18 03:23:53 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

GT Resources announced new drill assay results from its 2024 exploration campaign at the Canalask Nickel-Copper Project in Yukon, Canada. Hole CSK24-05 intersected 1.95% nickel over 33.5 meters, including higher-grade sub-intervals, along with copper, cobalt, gold, and palladium. The program, which included previously released results from CSK24-02, focused on footwall-style mineralization and identified new precious metal occurrences, suggesting a larger nickel sulphide accumulation. QA/QC procedures were disclosed, and a Qualified Person reviewed the technical information.

Reasoning: The document reports new high-grade nickel and precious metal intercepts over significant widths from the 2024 exploration drilling campaign at the Canalask project, with transparent QA/QC, indicating strong potential for the project's Footwall Zone. However, the lack of true width reporting and some uncompleted holes introduce minor uncertainties.

Positive factors

  • High-grade nickel intercepts over significant widths
  • Identification of previously unrecognized precious metals (palladium and gold)
  • Transparent QA/QC procedures and QP sign-off
  • Exploration success suggesting potential for larger accumulation of nickel sulphide

Negative factors

  • True width not reported for intercepts
  • Some holes stopped short of target due to challenging ground conditions

Facts used in scoring: 61

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 61. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (61)

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
2.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.9 m
From
17.6 m
To
37.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:17.6-37.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong nickel grade over a good width, contributing positively to the project's overall potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Strong nickel grade (2.12%) over a good width (19.9m)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“2.12”

Context: 19.9

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.9 m
From
17.6 m
To
37.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:17.6-37.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 19.9

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.9 m
From
17.6 m
To
37.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:17.6-37.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low cobalt grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 19.9

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.9 m
From
17.6 m
To
37.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:17.6-37.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept includes a moderate palladium grade over a good width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Palladium presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 19.9

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.9 m
From
17.6 m
To
37.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:17.6-37.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 19.9

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.9 m
From
17.6 m
To
37.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:17.6-37.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept includes a low gold grade over a good width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 19.9

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 3.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
3.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.4 m
From
19.4 m
To
26.7 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:19.4-26.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional nickel grade over a good width, significantly contributing to the project's potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional nickel grade (3.42%) over a good width (7.4m)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“3.42”

Context: 7.4

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Nickel grade of 3.42% is exceptional (>=3%) for underground mining.

Evidence · table

“3.42”

Context: 7.4

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.4 m
From
19.4 m
To
26.7 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:19.4-26.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 7.4

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.4 m
From
19.4 m
To
26.7 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:19.4-26.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low cobalt grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 7.4

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.4 m
From
19.4 m
To
26.7 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:19.4-26.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good palladium grade over a good width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Good palladium grade
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 7.4

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.4 m
From
19.4 m
To
26.7 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:19.4-26.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 7.4

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.4 m
From
19.4 m
To
26.7 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:19.4-26.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept includes a low gold grade over a good width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 7.4

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 4.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
4.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
24.5 m
To
25.8 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:24.5-25.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional nickel grade, which is highly material, but over a narrow width. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional nickel grade (4.45%)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width (1.3m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“4.45”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Nickel grade of 4.45% is exceptional (>=3%) for underground mining.

Evidence · table

“4.45”

Context: 1.3

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
24.5 m
To
25.8 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:24.5-25.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.3 m
From
24.5 m
To
25.8 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:24.5-25.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low cobalt grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
24.5 m
To
25.8 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:24.5-25.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong palladium grade, adding significant value to the polymetallic potential, but over a narrow width. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Strong palladium grade
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width (1.3m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
24.5 m
To
25.8 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:24.5-25.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
24.5 m
To
25.8 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:24.5-25.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.82
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept includes a low gold grade over a narrow width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 1.3

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
56 m
To
71 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:56-71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak nickel grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Weak nickel grade (0.28%)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
56 m
To
71 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:56-71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
56 m
To
71 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:56-71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low cobalt grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
56 m
To
71 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:56-71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no palladium, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No palladium detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
56 m
To
71 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:56-71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
56 m
To
71 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:56-71
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low gold grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 15.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
61.5 m
To
69 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:61.5-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak nickel grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Weak nickel grade (0.41%)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
61.5 m
To
69 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:61.5-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
61.5 m
To
69 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:61.5-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low cobalt grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
61.5 m
To
69 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:61.5-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no palladium, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No palladium detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
61.5 m
To
69 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:61.5-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
61.5 m
To
69 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:61.5-69
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low gold grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
101 m
To
103.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:101-103.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak nickel grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Weak nickel grade (0.41%)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.41”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
101 m
To
103.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:101-103.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
101 m
To
103.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:101-103.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low cobalt grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
101 m
To
103.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:101-103.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no palladium, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No palladium detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
101 m
To
103.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:101-103.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
101 m
To
103.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:101-103.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low gold grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
102 m
To
102.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:102-102.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong nickel grade, but over a very narrow width. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Strong nickel grade (1.34%)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept width (0.5m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
102 m
To
102.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:102-102.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low copper grade over a very narrow width. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • Very narrow intercept width (0.5m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
102 m
To
102.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:102-102.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a low cobalt grade over a very narrow width. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low cobalt grade
  • Very narrow intercept width (0.5m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
102 m
To
102.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:102-102.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no palladium, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No palladium detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
102 m
To
102.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:102-102.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
102 m
To
102.5 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:102-102.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept includes a very low gold grade over a very narrow width. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade
  • Very narrow intercept width (0.5m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · nickelGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
137.5 m
To
138.6 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:137.5-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Gold-Copper
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low nickel grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low nickel grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · copperGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
137.5 m
To
138.6 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:137.5-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Gold-Copper
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong copper grade, which is material, but over a narrow width. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade (1.24%)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width (1.1m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m
From
137.5 m
To
138.6 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:137.5-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Gold-Copper
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Very low cobalt grade
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
137.5 m
To
138.6 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:137.5-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Gold-Copper
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no palladium, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No palladium detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
137.5 m
To
138.6 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:137.5-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Gold-Copper
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. Its novelty is low as it was previously released, and the lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Evidence · text

“Values from hole CSK24-02 are previously released, see news release September 24, 2024”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-02Canalask · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-02
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
137.5 m
To
138.6 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
17.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-02:137.5-138.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Gold-Copper
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
755 m
Azimuth
350 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept includes a low gold grade over a narrow width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential, but its novelty is low as it was previously released. The lack of true width information is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • Narrow intercept width (1.1m)
  • Results are historical, reducing novelty
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 1.1

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

CSK24-05Canalask · nickelGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
1.95
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
33.5 m
From
24.6 m
To
58.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:24.6-58.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows a strong nickel grade over a significant width, starting near surface, which is highly material and novel for the project. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Strong nickel grade (1.95%) over a significant width (33.5m)
  • Intercept starts near surface (24.6m)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“1.95”

Context: 33.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
33.5 m
From
24.6 m
To
58.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:24.6-58.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 33.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
33.5 m
From
24.6 m
To
58.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:24.6-58.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low cobalt grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 33.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.5 m
From
24.6 m
To
58.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:24.6-58.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept includes a low gold grade over a significant width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 33.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.5 m
From
24.6 m
To
58.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:24.6-58.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept includes a good palladium grade over a significant width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Good palladium grade over a significant width
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: 33.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.5 m
From
24.6 m
To
58.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:24.6-58.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 33.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · nickelGrade: 2.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
2.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
28.1 m
To
39.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:28.1-39.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows a strong nickel grade over a good width, which is highly material and novel for the project. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Strong nickel grade (2.67%) over a good width (11.0m)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“2.67”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
28.1 m
To
39.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:28.1-39.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low copper grade, which is not material on its own. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low copper grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · cobaltGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
cobalt
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
28.1 m
To
39.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:28.1-39.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows a very low cobalt grade, which is not material on its own. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low cobalt grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · palladiumGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
palladium
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
28.1 m
To
39.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:28.1-39.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept includes a good palladium grade over a good width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Good palladium grade over a good width
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · platinumGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
platinum
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
28.1 m
To
39.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:28.1-39.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows no platinum, which is a minor negative. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • No platinum detected
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
28.1 m
To
39.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:28.1-39.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.73
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept includes a low gold grade over a good width, adding to the project's polymetallic potential. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Gold presence adds value
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

CSK24-05Canalask · nickelGrade: 4.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSK24-05
Project
Canalask
Commodity
nickel
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
GT

Geometry

Grade
4.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.1 m
From
33 m
To
37.1 m
Hole Depth
170 m
Intercept Depth
24.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSK24-05:33-37.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Footwall
Easting
524332.6
Northing
6869344
CRS
NAD83 z7
Elevation
756 m
Azimuth
346 °
Dip
-69.6 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t (Pd+Pt+Au)
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2024-11-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This new intercept shows an exceptional nickel grade, which is highly material and novel for the project, though over a narrow width. The presence of QA/QC adds confidence, though the lack of true width is a minor negative.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional nickel grade (4.08%)
  • QA/QC procedures disclosed and QP signed off

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept width (4.1m)
  • True width not reported

Evidence · table

“4.08”

Context: 4.1

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Nickel grade of 4.08% is exceptional (>=3%) for underground mining.

Evidence · table

“4.08”

Context: 4.1

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“(1) Reported widths are "drilled widths" not true widths and may not be indicative of the true grade, width and style of mineralization on the property.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Evidence · text

“Certified standards, blanks and crushed duplicates are placed in the sample stream at a rate of one QA/QC sample per 10 core samples.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.