Gunpoint's Scout Program Drills 47 Meters of 1.1 g/t Oxide Gold in Newly Identified Ranch Trend
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.
- Ticker
- GUN
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Nevada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-18 02:55:00 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Gunpoint Exploration Ltd. announced initial drill results from its scout program on the newly identified Ranch Trend in Nevada, part of the Talapoosa Project. Highlights include 47 meters of 1.1 g/t oxide gold in hole RT-6, with other holes also returning significant gold mineralization. The company believes this new trend could expand the project's open-pit potential, though true widths are yet to be determined. The release also references a historical resource estimate for the Talapoosa Project.
Reasoning: The document reports positive initial drill results from a new gold trend, including high-grade intercepts, which could expand the existing resource. While the drilling is early-stage and true widths are not established, the discovery potential and disclosed QA/QC are positive. The mentioned resource estimate is historical.
Positive factors
- Discovery of a new mineralized trend (Ranch Trend) with significant gold intercepts.
- High-grade intercepts in RT-4 and RT-6, indicating potential for economic mineralization.
- Proximity to an existing mineral resource and potential for a larger open-pit mining plan.
- Robust QA/QC protocols disclosed, enhancing data reliability.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralized intervals not established, which may overstate apparent widths.
- Drilling is early-stage 'scout' program, requiring further definition.
- Resource estimate mentioned is historical, limiting its current relevance.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 29
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 29. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (25)
RT-1Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.115Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-1
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.115
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 94.5 m
- To
- 100.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-1:94.5-100.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON45
- Easting
- 304908
- Northing
- 4370214
- Elevation
- 1697 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.115”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-1Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-1
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 115.8 m
- To
- 120.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 201.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-1:115.8-120.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON45
- Easting
- 304908
- Northing
- 4370214
- Elevation
- 1697 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-2Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.162Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-2
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.162
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 80.8 m
- To
- 89.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 231.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 80.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-2:80.8-89.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON32
- Easting
- 305465
- Northing
- 4369662
- Elevation
- 1669 m
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.162”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-3Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.366Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-3
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.366
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 62.5 m
- To
- 67.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 243.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-3:62.5-67.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON32
- Easting
- 305489
- Northing
- 4369695
- Elevation
- 1668 m
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.366”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-3Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.792Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-3
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.792
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 64 m
- To
- 65.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 243.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-3:64-65.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON32
- Easting
- 305489
- Northing
- 4369695
- Elevation
- 1668 m
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade, narrow intercept within a broader zone, contributing to the understanding of the new trend's potential.
Positive factors
- Higher grade inclusion within a broader mineralized zone.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.792”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-3Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.152Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-3
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.152
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 106.7 m
- To
- 109.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 243.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 62.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-3:106.7-109.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON32
- Easting
- 305489
- Northing
- 4369695
- Elevation
- 1668 m
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.152”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-4Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.148Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-4
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.148
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 44.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-4:39.6-44.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON32
- Easting
- 305446
- Northing
- 4369577
- Elevation
- 1647 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.148”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-4Talapoosa · goldGrade: 1.237Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-4
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.237
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 137.2 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-4:137.2-146.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON32
- Easting
- 305446
- Northing
- 4369577
- Elevation
- 1647 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong grade over a good width, indicating significant gold mineralization in the new trend.
Positive factors
- Strong grade for an open-pit gold project.
- Good intercept length.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“1.237”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-4Talapoosa · goldGrade: 5.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-4
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 141.7 m
- To
- 143.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-4:141.7-143.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- CON32
- Easting
- 305446
- Northing
- 4369577
- Elevation
- 1647 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade gold intercept, suggesting bonanza-grade potential within the newly identified Ranch Trend, despite its narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade gold intercept, well above open-pit thresholds.
- Indicates potential for bonanza grades within the new trend.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“5.88”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptional high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm (5.88 g/t Au exceeds 5 g/t exceptional threshold for open pit gold).
Evidence · table
“5.88”
Context: 1.5
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-5Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-5
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 4.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 91.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-5:3-4.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306146
- Northing
- 4369800
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-5Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.189Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-5
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.189
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.5 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 45.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 91.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-5:15.2-45.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306146
- Northing
- 4369800
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the understanding of the new trend's extent.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.189”
Context: 30.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-5Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.519Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-5
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.519
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 91.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-5:22.9-24.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306146
- Northing
- 4369800
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a moderate-grade, narrow intercept within a broader zone, contributing to the understanding of the new trend's potential.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade inclusion within a broader mineralized zone.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.519”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-5Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.233Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-5
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.233
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 68.6 m
- To
- 86.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 91.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-5:68.6-86.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306146
- Northing
- 4369800
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -45 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows broad, low-grade gold mineralization, contributing to the understanding of the new trend's extent.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length, indicating broad mineralization.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.233”
Context: 18.3
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-6Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.154Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-6
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.154
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 22.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-6:13.7-22.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306144
- Northing
- 4369798
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.154”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-6Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.139Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-6
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.139
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 30.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-6:27.4-30.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306144
- Northing
- 4369798
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.139”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-6Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.142Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-6
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.142
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-6:36.6-47.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306144
- Northing
- 4369798
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.142”
Context: 10.7
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-6Talapoosa · goldGrade: 1.101Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-6
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.101
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 47.2 m
- From
- 50.3 m
- To
- 96 m
- Hole Depth
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-6:50.3-96
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306144
- Northing
- 4369798
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a highly material intercept with strong grade and significant width, representing a key discovery in the new Ranch Trend and supporting the project's open-pit potential.
Positive factors
- Strong grade over a significant intercept length, indicating a substantial mineralized zone.
- Described as a 'discovery hole' for the new Ranch Trend.
- Supports potential for a larger open-pit mining plan.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“1.101”
Context: 47.2
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit into the newly identified Ranch Trend.
Evidence · text
“The Ranch Trend is an exciting new, large, mineralized structural trend verified by a first pass scouting drill program.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-6Talapoosa · goldGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-6
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 67.1 m
- To
- 76.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-6:67.1-76.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306144
- Northing
- 4369798
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is an exceptionally high-grade gold intercept, suggesting bonanza-grade potential within the newly identified Ranch Trend, despite its narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional high-grade gold intercept, well above open-pit thresholds.
- Indicates potential for bonanza grades within the new trend.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“3.45”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptional high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm (3.45 g/t Au exceeds 2 g/t strong threshold for open pit gold).
Evidence · table
“3.45”
Context: 9.1
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-7Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.229Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-7
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.229
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 10.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-7:6.1-10.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306143
- Northing
- 4369797
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.229”
Context: 4.6
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-7Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.134Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-7
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.134
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 22.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-7:15.2-22.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306143
- Northing
- 4369797
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.134”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-7Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.179Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-7
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.179
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 42.7 m
- To
- 50.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-7:42.7-50.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306143
- Northing
- 4369797
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.179”
Context: 7.6
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-7Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.432Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-7
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.432
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 74.7 m
- To
- 89.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-7:74.7-89.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306143
- Northing
- 4369797
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate-grade gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to the understanding of the new trend's potential.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade over a good intercept length.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.432”
Context: 15.2
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-7Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.161Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-7
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.161
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 93 m
- To
- 99.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-7:93-99.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306143
- Northing
- 4369797
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows low-grade gold mineralization as part of an early-stage exploration program, contributing to the overall understanding of the new trend but not a highlight.
Positive factors
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
- Widespread mineralization.
Negative factors
- Low grade for gold.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.161”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-7Talapoosa · goldGrade: 0.466Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-7
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.466
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 114.3 m
- To
- 134.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-7:114.3-134.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306143
- Northing
- 4369797
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate-grade gold mineralization over a good width, contributing to the understanding of the new trend's potential.
Positive factors
- Moderate grade over a good intercept length.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“0.466”
Context: 19.8
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
RT-7Talapoosa · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RT-7
- Project
- Talapoosa
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- GUN
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 123.4 m
- To
- 126.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 182.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RT-7:123.4-126.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- RANCH VEIN
- Easting
- 306143
- Northing
- 4369797
- Elevation
- 1556 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- American Assay Laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong-grade, narrow intercept within a broader zone, contributing to the understanding of the new trend's potential.
Positive factors
- Strong grade inclusion within a broader mineralized zone.
- Part of a new exploration program on a newly identified trend.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- Apparent width only, true width not established.
Evidence · table
“1.34”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“The true width of mineralized intervals have not been established.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“The Company implemented a rigorous QA/QC protocol consistent with NI 43-101 standards, including the insertion of about 14% blanks and certified reference materials into the sample submittal stream.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (4)
indicatedTalapoosa Project · goldContained Metal: 1Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Talapoosa Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada
- Ticker
- GUN
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Kanhai, Todd McCracken
- Resource group id
- resource:dc20179415f6c6bf894c
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 1
- Contained Unit
- moz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2013-04-12
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical resource estimate, providing context for the project but not new information. Its age reduces its current materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Provides a baseline for the project's potential.
- Reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical (2013), limiting its current relevance.
- No new information provided in this release.
Evidence · text
“1.0 million ounces of gold and 13.6 million ounces of silver (in the Measured and Indicated categories)”
Tags used in scoring
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Evidence · text
“effective date of April 12, 2013”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Evidence · text
“Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Talapoosa Project, Nevada”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Evidence · text
“Messrs. Todd Kanhai, M.A Sc P.Eng., and Todd McCracken, P. Geo., from Tetra Tech are the Qualified Persons for the Talapoosa Project Mineral Resource.”
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Evidence · text
“Measured and Indicated categories”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 12.9 years before this release
indicatedTalapoosa Project · silverContained Metal: 13.6Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Talapoosa Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada
- Ticker
- GUN
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Kanhai, Todd McCracken
- Resource group id
- resource:dc20179415f6c6bf894c
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Contained Metal
- 13.6
- Contained Unit
- moz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2013-04-12
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical resource estimate, providing context for the project but not new information. Its age reduces its current materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Provides a baseline for the project's potential.
- Reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical (2013), limiting its current relevance.
- No new information provided in this release.
Evidence · text
“13.6 million ounces of silver (in the Measured and Indicated categories)”
Tags used in scoring
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Evidence · text
“effective date of April 12, 2013”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Evidence · text
“Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Talapoosa Project, Nevada”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Evidence · text
“Messrs. Todd Kanhai, M.A Sc P.Eng., and Todd McCracken, P. Geo., from Tetra Tech are the Qualified Persons for the Talapoosa Project Mineral Resource.”
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Evidence · text
“Measured and Indicated categories”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 12.9 years before this release
inferredTalapoosa Project · goldContained Metal: 233532Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Talapoosa Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada
- Ticker
- GUN
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Kanhai, Todd McCracken
- Resource group id
- resource:0f4fe15359040b9a162b
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 233532
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2013-04-12
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical resource estimate in the inferred category, providing context but with lower confidence and limited current relevance due to its age and category.
Positive factors
- Provides a baseline for the project's potential.
- Reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical (2013), limiting its current relevance.
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
- No new information provided in this release.
Evidence · text
“233,532 ounces of gold and 2,172,766 ounces of silver in the Inferred category”
Tags used in scoring
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Evidence · text
“effective date of April 12, 2013”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Evidence · text
“Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Talapoosa Project, Nevada”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Evidence · text
“Messrs. Todd Kanhai, M.A Sc P.Eng., and Todd McCracken, P. Geo., from Tetra Tech are the Qualified Persons for the Talapoosa Project Mineral Resource.”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Evidence · text
“Inferred category”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 12.9 years before this release
inferredTalapoosa Project · silverContained Metal: 2172766Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Talapoosa Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- Nevada
- Ticker
- GUN
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Todd Kanhai, Todd McCracken
- Resource group id
- resource:0f4fe15359040b9a162b
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Contained Metal
- 2172766
- Contained Unit
- oz
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2013-04-12
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2013-04-12T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical resource estimate in the inferred category, providing context but with lower confidence and limited current relevance due to its age and category.
Positive factors
- Provides a baseline for the project's potential.
- Reported under NI 43-101 standards with QP sign-off.
Negative factors
- Estimate is historical (2013), limiting its current relevance.
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
- No new information provided in this release.
Evidence · text
“2,172,766 ounces of silver in the Inferred category”
Tags used in scoring
Historical Estimate Onlynegative
Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Why it applies: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.
Evidence · text
“effective date of April 12, 2013”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Evidence · text
“Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Talapoosa Project, Nevada”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Evidence · text
“Messrs. Todd Kanhai, M.A Sc P.Eng., and Todd McCracken, P. Geo., from Tetra Tech are the Qualified Persons for the Talapoosa Project Mineral Resource.”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Evidence · text
“Inferred category”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 12.9 years before this release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.