# Hannan Expands Mineralized Breccia Footprint at Previsto to 305 metres

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/hannan-expands-mineralized-breccia-footprint-at-previsto-to-305-metres--8e69412b-b184-48f6-b0bb-58bd992341f1

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/HAN/news/7453061481342661/hannan-expands-mineralized-breccia-footprint-at-previsto-to-305-metres

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-07-22T10:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Hannan Metals Limited

- Ticker: HAN

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Peru

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Silver, Copper

- Document categories: Permitting, Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 02:34:35 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Hannan Metals has expanded the known width of the mineralized breccia at the Previsto prospect in Peru from 185m to 305m using channel sampling. The campaign maintained a 100% hit rate for gold or silver mineralization across 323 total samples and defined a high-grade silver footprint. The company has also submitted its environmental impact statement \(DIA\) to advance toward its first drilling program.

Reasoning: The announcement reports a significant expansion of the mineralized footprint at Previsto through channel sampling, maintaining a 100% hit rate and defining a high-grade silver zone, while also noting progress in environmental permitting.

- Positive factor: Significant expansion of mineralized breccia width from 185m to 305m

- Positive factor: 100% hit rate sustained across 323 channel samples

- Positive factor: High-grade silver footprint defined \(450m x 120m &gt; 5 g/t Ag\)

- Positive factor: Advancing permitting \(DIA submission\) for first drilling

- Negative factor: True widths not yet known \(surface sampling only\)

- Negative factor: Sampling limited to outcrops in jungle

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Mineralization footprint expanded from 185m to 305m in width.

Evidence · text

> This campaign increased the known width of the mineralized breccia unit from 185 m to 305 m

**Apparent Width Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Results are from channel sampling of outcrops; true widths are explicitly stated as unknown.

Evidence · text

> At this stage, true widths of mineralization are not known.

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: Release details QA/QC protocols including CRM, field duplicates, and check samples.

Evidence · text

> Soil samples were analyzed by a portable XRF \(VANTA-VMR\) using an in-house protocol which includes routine use of CRM and field duplicates as well as 10% check samples

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The project is described as part of an emerging alkalic porphyry-epithermal district.

Evidence · text

> The geological parallels to Cripple Creek in Colorado... are direct and compelling.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 0. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

No stored fact records are available for this extraction.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
