Inomin Acquires La Gitana and Pena Blanca Gold-Silver Projects
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Inomin Mines Inc.
- Ticker
- MINE
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction, Capital raise
- Extracted
- 2026-09-18 03:36:26 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Inomin Mines Inc. has acquired the La Gitana and Pena Blanca gold-silver projects in Mexico, which host significant historical drill and surface sample results. The La Gitana project includes historical drill intercepts of up to 6.00 g/t gold and 281.6 g/t silver over 7.5 metres, while Pena Blanca shows broad gold anomalies and high-grade surface samples. To fund the acquisition and initial exploration, Inomin has announced a non-brokered private placement aiming to raise up to $400,000.
Reasoning: Inomin Mines Inc. has acquired two gold-silver projects, La Gitana and Pena Blanca, in Mexico, which come with significant historical exploration data including high-grade gold and silver intercepts. The company has also announced a private placement to fund the acquisition and future exploration, indicating a clear path forward for these projects. While the results are historical, their magnitude and the QP review provide a strong positive signal for the company's new assets.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of two prospective gold-silver projects
- Significant historical drill intercepts at La Gitana, including exceptional grades
- Broad gold anomalies and high-grade surface samples at Pena Blanca
- Capital raise to fund acquisition and exploration
- Technical information reviewed by a Qualified Person
Negative factors
- All reported drill and sample results are historical and require confirmation
- No true width reported for drill intercepts
- Cut-off grades for historical intercepts are undisclosed
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 39
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 38. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (38)
DH-01La Gitana · goldGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 133.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-01
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 133.5 m
- From
- 21 m
- To
- 154.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-01:21-154.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong gold grade over a substantial width, indicating significant mineralization. However, its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.78”
Context: DH-01
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-01La Gitana · silverGrade: 100.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 133.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-01
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 100.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 133.5 m
- From
- 21 m
- To
- 154.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-01:21-154.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a strong silver grade over a substantial width, indicating significant mineralization. However, its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“100.7”
Context: DH-01
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-03La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-03
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-03:39-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: DH-03
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-03La Gitana · silverGrade: 39.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-03
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 39 m
- To
- 72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 39 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-03:39-72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“39.2”
Context: DH-03
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-04La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-04
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-04:0-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: DH-04
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-04La Gitana · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-04
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-04:0-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a reasonable width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“1.6”
Context: DH-04
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-06La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 124.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-06
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 124.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 124.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-06:0-124.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: DH-06
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-06La Gitana · silverGrade: 24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 124.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-06
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 124.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 124.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-06:0-124.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“24.0”
Context: DH-06
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-07La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 64.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-07
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 64.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 64.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-07:0-64.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: DH-07
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-07La Gitana · silverGrade: 22.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 64.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-07
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 64.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 64.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-07:0-64.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a reasonable width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“22.2”
Context: DH-07
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-08La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 145.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-08
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 145.5 m
- From
- 67.5 m
- To
- 213 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-08:67.5-213
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: DH-08
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-08La Gitana · silverGrade: 32.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 145.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-08
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 32.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 145.5 m
- From
- 67.5 m
- To
- 213 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-08:67.5-213
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“32.8”
Context: DH-08
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-09La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-09
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 93 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-09:12-105
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.99”
Context: DH-09
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-09La Gitana · silverGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-09
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 93 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 105 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-09:12-105
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“19.4”
Context: DH-09
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-10La Gitana · goldGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-10
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 63 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 64.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-10:1.5-64.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: DH-10
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-10La Gitana · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 63 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-10
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 63 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 64.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-10:1.5-64.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“70.0”
Context: DH-10
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-11La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-11
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 90 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-11:0-90
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: DH-11
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-11La Gitana · silverGrade: 15.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 90 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-11
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 90 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 90 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-11:0-90
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“15.7”
Context: DH-11
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-12La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-12
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 93 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-12:1.5-94.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: DH-12
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-12La Gitana · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 93 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-12
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 20
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 93 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 94.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-12:1.5-94.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“20.0”
Context: DH-12
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-13La Gitana · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-13
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 163.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-13:150-163.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: DH-13
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-13La Gitana · silverGrade: 60.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-13
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 60.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.5 m
- From
- 150 m
- To
- 163.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 150 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-13:150-163.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“60.2”
Context: DH-13
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-14La Gitana · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-14
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-14:3-63
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.20”
Context: DH-14
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-14La Gitana · silverGrade: 31.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 60 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-14
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 3 m
- To
- 63 m
- Intercept Depth
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-14:3-63
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“31.2”
Context: DH-14
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-15La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-15
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 10.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-15:0-10.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a narrow intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: DH-15
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-15La Gitana · silverGrade: 41.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-15
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 41.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 10.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-15:0-10.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a narrow width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a narrow intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“41.3”
Context: DH-15
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-18La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-18
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 102 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-18:30-102
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.75”
Context: DH-18
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-18La Gitana · silverGrade: 34.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-18
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 72 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 102 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-18:30-102
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“34.7”
Context: DH-18
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-20La Gitana · goldGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-20
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 43.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-20:36-43.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a reasonable width, indicating high-grade mineralization. However, its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“6.00”
Context: DH-20
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“6.00”
Context: DH-20
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-20La Gitana · silverGrade: 281.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-20
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 281.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 36 m
- To
- 43.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-20:36-43.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows an exceptional silver grade over a reasonable width, indicating high-grade mineralization. However, its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“281.6”
Context: DH-20
Tags used in scoring
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“281.6”
Context: DH-20
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-22La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 81 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-22
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 81 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-22:6-87
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: DH-22
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-22La Gitana · silverGrade: 19.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 81 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-22
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 81 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-22:6-87
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“19.8”
Context: DH-22
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-24La Gitana · goldGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-24
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.5 m
- From
- 103.5 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-24:103.5-132
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.55”
Context: DH-24
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-24La Gitana · silverGrade: 83.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 28.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-24
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 83.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 28.5 m
- From
- 103.5 m
- To
- 132 m
- Intercept Depth
- 103.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-24:103.5-132
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a reasonable width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a reasonable intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“83.8”
Context: DH-24
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-38La Gitana · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-38
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 177 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-38:126-177
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, but its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a significant intercept length
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: DH-38
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
DH-38La Gitana · silverGrade: 19.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DH-38
- Project
- La Gitana
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 126 m
- To
- 177 m
- Intercept Depth
- 126 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DH-38:126-177
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant width, and its historical nature, lack of true width, and undisclosed cut-off grade further reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Apparent width only, true width not stated
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“19.9”
Context: DH-38
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Note all grade intersections reported in above table are core interval lengths and not true thicknesses.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Notable Gold Mineralized Drillhole Intersections - Cerro Di Oro Zone”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 37Pena Blanca · goldGrade: 2.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pena Blanca
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width and ended in mineralization, suggesting potential continuity. However, its historical nature and the fact that it's a surface sample reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade from surface sampling over a narrow width
- Ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Surface samples are less definitive than drill results
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
Evidence · table
“2.15”
Context: Outcrop
Tags used in scoring
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“The trenching and outcrop channel sampling results reported by Chesapeake are as follows:”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Fact 38Pena Blanca · silverGrade: 6.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pena Blanca
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2020-08-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical surface sample shows a weak silver grade over a narrow width and ended in mineralization, suggesting potential continuity. However, its historical nature and the fact that it's a surface sample reduce confidence and novelty.
Positive factors
- Ended in mineralization, suggesting continuity
- QA/QC procedures and QP review disclosed
Negative factors
- Results are historical and require confirmation
- Surface samples are less definitive than drill results
- Cut-off grade for compositing is undisclosed
- Weak silver grade
Evidence · table
“6.5”
Context: Outcrop
Tags used in scoring
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“All technical results on the La Gitana and Pena Blanca properties reported herein is information completed and disclosed publically by Chesapeake Gold Corp. and/or Gunpoint Exploration Ltd.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“All drill core samples were sent for preparation to ALS Chemex laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico; prepared samples sent to ALS Chemex laboratory in Vancouver, Canada for analyses for gold by fire assay and for multi-element by 4-acid digestion ICP.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“The trenching and outcrop channel sampling results reported by Chesapeake are as follows:”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.