Inventus Expands Pardo With Strong Drill Results and Advances Multiple Gold Layers Toward a Maiden Resource
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Inventus Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- IVS
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-14 06:49:48 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Inventus Mining Corp. announced strong new assay results from its Phase 2 drill program at the Pardo 'River of Gold' Project in Ontario, expanding the near-surface gold mineralization footprint by 150%. The program has identified multiple stacked gold layers, including the Main, Upper, and Matinenda Conglomerates, which are being advanced towards a maiden resource estimate. Highlight intercepts include 23.45 g/t gold over 0.30 m and 18.81 g/t gold over 0.36 m, demonstrating high-grade potential within narrow intervals.
Reasoning: The company reports new, high-grade gold intercepts that significantly expand the known mineralization and confirm a multi-layer gold system, providing a clear path towards a maiden resource estimate. While grades are high, widths are narrow, and true width and cut-off grade are not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong drill intercepts with bonanza grades
- Expansion of mineralized footprint by 150%
- Identification and evaluation of multiple stacked gold layers
- Advancement towards a maiden resource estimate
- QA/QC protocols and accredited lab disclosed
- Qualified Person sign-off
Negative factors
- Intercepts are generally narrow, leading to lower grade-thickness products despite high grades
- True width not disclosed for intercepts
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Some historical results are being re-assayed, indicating reliance on older core for new information
Facts used in scoring: 71
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 71. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (71)
PD-25-159Pardo · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.18 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-159
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.18 m
- From
- 9 m
- To
- 11.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 14.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-159:9-11.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556248
- Northing
- 5183272
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 2.18
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-25-159Pardo · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.66 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-159
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.66 m
- From
- 10.52 m
- To
- 11.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 14.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-159:10.52-11.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556248
- Northing
- 5183272
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: 0.66
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-25-160Pardo · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-160
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.32 m
- From
- 11.08 m
- To
- 12.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-160:11.08-12.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556220
- Northing
- 5183314
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.23”
Context: 1.32
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-25-160Pardo · goldGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-160
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 11.4 m
- To
- 11.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.08 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-160:11.4-11.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556220
- Northing
- 5183314
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.22”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-25-161Pardo · goldGrade: 5.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-161
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.12 m
- From
- 12.78 m
- To
- 13.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.78 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-161:12.78-13.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556203
- Northing
- 5183294
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: 1.12
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“5.16”
Context: 1.12
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-25-161Pardo · goldGrade: 9.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-161
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 13.08 m
- To
- 13.58 m
- Hole Depth
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.78 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-161:13.08-13.58
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556203
- Northing
- 5183294
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“9.70”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“9.70”
Context: 0.50
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-25-163Pardo · goldGrade: 2.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.81 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-163
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.81 m
- From
- 9.85 m
- To
- 11.66 m
- Hole Depth
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-163:9.85-11.66
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556221
- Northing
- 5183270
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.37”
Context: 1.81
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-25-163Pardo · goldGrade: 6.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-25-163
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.43 m
- From
- 9.85 m
- To
- 10.28 m
- Hole Depth
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-25-163:9.85-10.28
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556221
- Northing
- 5183270
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“6.04”
Context: 0.43
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“6.04”
Context: 0.43
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-176Pardo · goldGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-176
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.38 m
- From
- 1.37 m
- To
- 3.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.37 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-176:1.37-3.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 555984
- Northing
- 5183885
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: 2.38
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-176Pardo · goldGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-176
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 2.35 m
- To
- 2.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.37 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-176:2.35-2.85
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 555984
- Northing
- 5183885
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.48”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-193Pardo · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-193
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.35 m
- From
- 23.83 m
- To
- 27.18 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.83 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-193:23.83-27.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 555824
- Northing
- 5183739
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 3.35
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-193Pardo · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.52 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-193
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.52 m
- From
- 26.14 m
- To
- 26.66 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.83 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-193:26.14-26.66
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 555824
- Northing
- 5183739
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.13”
Context: 0.52
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-194Pardo · goldGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.82 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-194
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.82 m
- From
- 16.85 m
- To
- 17.67 m
- Hole Depth
- 20.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-194:16.85-17.67
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 555825
- Northing
- 5183800
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.66”
Context: 0.82
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-194Pardo · goldGrade: 6.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-194
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.32 m
- From
- 16.85 m
- To
- 17.17 m
- Hole Depth
- 20.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-194:16.85-17.17
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 555825
- Northing
- 5183800
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“6.41”
Context: 0.32
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“6.41”
Context: 0.32
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-199Pardo · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.06 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-199
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.06 m
- From
- 34.24 m
- To
- 36.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 41.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-199:34.24-36.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556279
- Northing
- 5182981
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade, but the narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is moderate for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 2.06
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-199Pardo · goldGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-199
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 34.5 m
- To
- 35 m
- Hole Depth
- 41.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-199:34.5-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556279
- Northing
- 5182981
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.10”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-201Pardo · goldGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-201
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 29.92 m
- To
- 31.42 m
- Hole Depth
- 37.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29.92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-201:29.92-31.42
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556247
- Northing
- 5182919
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.53”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-201Pardo · goldGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-201
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 30.92 m
- To
- 31.42 m
- Hole Depth
- 37.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29.92 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-201:30.92-31.42
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556247
- Northing
- 5182919
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.14”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-202Pardo · goldGrade: 2.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.12 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-202
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.12 m
- From
- 34.2 m
- To
- 36.32 m
- Hole Depth
- 41.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-202:34.2-36.32
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556247
- Northing
- 5182982
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.28”
Context: 2.12
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-202Pardo · goldGrade: 3.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-202
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 34.75 m
- To
- 35.85 m
- Hole Depth
- 41.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-202:34.75-35.85
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556247
- Northing
- 5182982
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“3.04”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“3.04”
Context: 1.10
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-203Pardo · goldGrade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-203
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.75 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 34.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 38.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-203:32.5-34.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556248
- Northing
- 5182951
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is moderate for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.35”
Context: 1.75
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-203Pardo · goldGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-203
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 38.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-203:32.5-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556248
- Northing
- 5182951
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: 0.50
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-208Pardo · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-208
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 33.2 m
- To
- 36 m
- Hole Depth
- 41.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-208:33.2-36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556313
- Northing
- 5183044
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 2.80
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-208Pardo · goldGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-208
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 34 m
- To
- 35 m
- Hole Depth
- 41.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-208:34-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556313
- Northing
- 5183044
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-209Pardo · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-209
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.35 m
- From
- 29.15 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 38.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-209:29.15-33.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556327
- Northing
- 5183082
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 4.35
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-209Pardo · goldGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-209
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 33 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 38.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29.15 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-209:33-33.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556327
- Northing
- 5183082
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.25”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-211Pardo · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-211
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.8 m
- From
- 27.2 m
- To
- 31 m
- Hole Depth
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-211:27.2-31
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556345
- Northing
- 5183043
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.65”
Context: 3.80
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-211Pardo · goldGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-211
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.25
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 28.5 m
- To
- 29 m
- Hole Depth
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-211:28.5-29
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556345
- Northing
- 5183043
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.25”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-213Pardo · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-213
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 8.5 m
- To
- 9.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-213:8.5-9.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556216
- Northing
- 5183131
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-215Pardo · goldGrade: 2.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-215
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.95
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.63 m
- From
- 26.79 m
- To
- 28.42 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-215:26.79-28.42
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556257
- Northing
- 5183165
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.95”
Context: 1.63
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-215Pardo · goldGrade: 7.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-215
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 27.1 m
- To
- 27.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26.79 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-215:27.1-27.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556257
- Northing
- 5183165
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“7.53”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“7.53”
Context: 0.50
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-216Pardo · goldGrade: 3.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-216
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.33 m
- From
- 29.9 m
- To
- 32.23 m
- Hole Depth
- 35.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-216:29.9-32.23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556259
- Northing
- 5183114
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“3.44”
Context: 2.33
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“3.44”
Context: 2.33
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-216Pardo · goldGrade: 23.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-216
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 30.4 m
- To
- 30.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 35.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 29.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-216:30.4-30.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556259
- Northing
- 5183114
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“23.45”
Context: 0.30
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“23.45”
Context: 0.30
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-217Pardo · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-217
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 28.8 m
- To
- 30.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 32.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 28.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-217:28.8-30.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556302
- Northing
- 5183150
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 2.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-217Pardo · goldGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-217
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 30.3 m
- To
- 30.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 32.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 28.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-217:30.3-30.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556302
- Northing
- 5183150
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.71”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-218Pardo · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-218
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 34 m
- Hole Depth
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-218:32.5-34
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556294
- Northing
- 5183117
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 1.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-218Pardo · goldGrade: 2.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-218
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 32.5 m
- To
- 33 m
- Hole Depth
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-218:32.5-33
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556294
- Northing
- 5183117
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.75”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-219Pardo · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-219
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 30 m
- To
- 35 m
- Hole Depth
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-219:30-35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556328
- Northing
- 5183113
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 5.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-219Pardo · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-219
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 32 m
- Hole Depth
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-219:31-32
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556328
- Northing
- 5183113
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-220Pardo · goldGrade: 0.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-220
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.68
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 25.5 m
- To
- 30 m
- Hole Depth
- 34 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-220:25.5-30
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556364
- Northing
- 5183112
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.68”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-220Pardo · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-220
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25.5 m
- To
- 26 m
- Hole Depth
- 34 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-220:25.5-26
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556364
- Northing
- 5183112
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.40”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-221Pardo · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-221
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 25.5 m
- To
- 31.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 35.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-221:25.5-31.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556360
- Northing
- 5183163
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade, but the narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is moderate for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-221Pardo · goldGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-221
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 29 m
- Hole Depth
- 35.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-221:26-29
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556360
- Northing
- 5183163
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a moderate gold grade, but the narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is moderate for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-221Pardo · goldGrade: 2.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-221
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 26 m
- To
- 26.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 35.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-221:26-26.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556360
- Northing
- 5183163
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.29”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-222Pardo · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-222
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.04 m
- From
- 19.46 m
- To
- 21.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-222:19.46-21.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556356
- Northing
- 5183209
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 2.04
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-222Pardo · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-222
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 21 m
- To
- 21.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-222:21-21.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556356
- Northing
- 5183209
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-222Pardo · goldGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-222
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 26.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-222:24-26.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556356
- Northing
- 5183209
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: 2.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-222Pardo · goldGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-222
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 25.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.46 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-222:25-25.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556356
- Northing
- 5183209
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“2.66”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-223Pardo · goldGrade: 5.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.22 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-223
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.22 m
- From
- 19.03 m
- To
- 20.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 23.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.03 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-223:19.03-20.25
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556333
- Northing
- 5183235
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“5.87”
Context: 1.22
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“5.87”
Context: 1.22
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-223Pardo · goldGrade: 18.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-223
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.36 m
- From
- 19.53 m
- To
- 19.89 m
- Hole Depth
- 23.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.03 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-223:19.53-19.89
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556333
- Northing
- 5183235
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is exceptional for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“18.81”
Context: 0.36
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Evidence · table
“18.81”
Context: 0.36
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-225Pardo · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-225
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.37 m
- From
- 18.04 m
- To
- 20.41 m
- Hole Depth
- 22 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.04 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-225:18.04-20.41
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556283
- Northing
- 5183216
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 2.37
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-225Pardo · goldGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-225
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 19.5 m
- To
- 20 m
- Hole Depth
- 22 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.04 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-225:19.5-20
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556283
- Northing
- 5183216
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.36”
Context: 0.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-232Pardo · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-232
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.5 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 36 m
- Hole Depth
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-232:33.5-36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556311
- Northing
- 5182862
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: 2.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-232Pardo · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-232
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 34.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 33.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-232:33.5-34.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556311
- Northing
- 5182862
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.12”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-233Pardo · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-233
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 34.5 m
- To
- 40.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 45.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-233:34.5-40.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556310
- Northing
- 5182893
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept grade is weak for an open pit gold deposit, and the width is narrow, with no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 6.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-26-233Pardo · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-26-233
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 34.5 m
- To
- 35.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 45.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-26-233:34.5-35.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Main Conglomerate Layer
- Easting
- 556310
- Northing
- 5182893
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The intercept shows a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 3. Recent Phase 2 Drilling Assay Highlights.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-15-01Pardo · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.08 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-15-01
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.08 m
- From
- 0.28 m
- To
- 11.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-15-01:0.28-11.36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Upper Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade, and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 11.08
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-15-01Pardo · goldGrade: 1.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-15-01
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 6.2 m
- To
- 7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-15-01:6.2-7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Upper Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.38”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-15-01Pardo · goldGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.66 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-15-01
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.66 m
- From
- 10.7 m
- To
- 11.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-15-01:10.7-11.36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Upper Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 0.66
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-12-10Pardo · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-12-10
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.5 m
- From
- 2.6 m
- To
- 12.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-12-10:2.6-12.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Upper Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade, and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 9.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-10-102Pardo · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.34 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-10-102
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.34 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 6.34 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-10-102:0-6.34
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Upper Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade, and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 6.34
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-08-29Pardo · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-08-29
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 9 m
- To
- 18 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-08-29:9-18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Upper Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade, and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 9.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 1. Previous drill result highlights of the Upper Conglomerate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-12-55Pardo · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.86 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-12-55
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.86 m
- From
- 14.32 m
- To
- 22.18 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-12-55:14.32-22.18
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“0.70”
Context: 7.86
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-12-55Pardo · goldGrade: 1.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.87 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-12-55
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.87 m
- From
- 19.84 m
- To
- 21.71 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14.32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-12-55:19.84-21.71
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“1.59”
Context: 1.87
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-12-63Pardo · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-12-63
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 8.72 m
- To
- 10.72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-12-63:8.72-10.72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a moderate gold grade, but the narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Positive factors
- Grade is moderate for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 2.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-12-63Pardo · goldGrade: 2.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.57 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-12-63
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.57 m
- From
- 9.67 m
- To
- 10.24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8.72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-12-63:9.67-10.24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade, but the very narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is very narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“2.11”
Context: 0.57
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-12-51Pardo · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-12-51
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 11.5 m
- From
- 25.5 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-12-51:25.5-37
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 11.50
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-12-50Pardo · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.75 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-12-50
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.75 m
- From
- 27 m
- To
- 36.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-12-50:27-36.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2012-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 9.75
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-09-05Pardo · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-09-05
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.13 m
- From
- 11 m
- To
- 18.13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-09-05:11-18.13
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2009-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a weak gold grade and no true width or cut-off grade disclosed, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for open pit gold
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 7.13
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-09-05Pardo · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-09-05
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.13 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 18.13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-09-05:16-18.13
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2009-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a strong gold grade, but the narrow width and lack of true width or cut-off grade disclosure limit its materiality, with potential deleterious elements due to its sulphide-rich nature.
Positive factors
- Grade is strong for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
- Cut-off grade for compositing is not stated
- Deleterious elements present due to sulphide-rich nature
Evidence · table
“1.22”
Context: 2.13
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Evidence · text
“Interval (Metres)”
Cut-off UndisclosedRejected · negative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Reason: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Evidence · text
“Table 2. Previous drill result highlights of the Matineda Conglomerate.”
Deleterious Elements PresentRejected · negative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Reason: Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Evidence · text
“Given its sulphide-rich nature, the Company is evaluating its metallurgy and ore sorting potential, with the objective of producing a higher-grade sulphide concentrate.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Evidence · text
“Drill core samples collected by Inventus and described in this news release were subject to robust QA/QC protocols.”
PD-10-37Pardo · goldGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PD-10-37
- Project
- Pardo
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- IVS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.26 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 2.26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- other
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PD-10-37:0-2.26
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Matinenda Conglomerate Layer
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- MSA Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
Positive factors
- Grade is moderate for open pit gold
Negative factors
- Intercept width is narrow
- Apparent width only, true width not disclosed
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: 2.26
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.