Ivanhoe Electric's Preliminary Feasibility Study for the Santa Cruz Copper Project in Arizona Defines a High-Quality Underground Mining Operation with Strong Economics

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Ivanhoe Electric Inc.
Ticker
IE
Exchange
TSX
Region
Arizona
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy, Permitting
Extracted
2026-09-12 07:27:13 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Ivanhoe Electric announced the positive results of a Preliminary Feasibility Study for its Santa Cruz Copper Project in Arizona, defining a high-quality underground mining operation with strong economics. The study outlines Probable Mineral Reserves of 136 million tonnes at 1.08% copper, supporting a 23-year mine life with a 92.2% copper recovery via heap leaching. The project boasts an after-tax NPV8% of $1.9 billion and an IRR of 24.0% at current COMEX copper prices, with low initial capital of $1.24 billion and first quartile C1 cash costs of $1.32 per pound of copper.

Reasoning: The Preliminary Feasibility Study confirms strong economics for a high-grade underground copper project with low capital and operating costs, supported by high recoveries and significant reserves, de-risking the project for financing and development. The project's location on private land and the comprehensive permitting plan further enhance its development prospects.

Positive factors

  • The Preliminary Feasibility Study defines a high-quality underground mining operation with strong economics, including a high after-tax NPV8% of $1.9 billion and IRR of 24.0% at current copper prices.
  • The project boasts low initial capital of $1.24 billion and first quartile C1 cash costs of $1.32 per pound of copper over the life of mine.
  • High copper recoveries of 92.2% are projected using a conventional heap leach process, which is well-suited for the high-grade oxide and chalcocite mineralization.
  • The project has significant Probable Mineral Reserves of 136 million tonnes at 1.08% copper, supporting a 23-year mine life.
  • Additional Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources, exclusive of reserves, provide substantial potential for future expansion.
  • The project is located on 100%-owned private land, which is expected to streamline the permitting process.
  • The study is compliant with S-K 1300 and signed off by multiple Qualified Persons, indicating a high level of technical rigor.

Facts used in scoring: 26

Classification and evidence

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: The study includes an initial Mineral Reserve Estimate for the Santa Cruz Copper Project, including Probable Reserves for the Santa Cruz and East Ridge Deposits.

Evidence · text

“Probable Mineral Reserves of 136 million tonnes at a grade of 1.08% copper totaling 1.5 million tonnes of contained copper supports a 23-year mine life”

S-K 1300 Compliantpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The mineral reserves in this estimate are reported in accordance with the definitions for mineral reserves in S-K 1300.

Evidence · text

“They are reported in accordance with the definitions for mineral reserves in S-K 1300.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons are listed as responsible for preparing and approving the scientific and technical information in the news release and study.

Evidence · text

“Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, and David Willock (BBA), Ulises Arvayo (Burns & McDonnell), Subhamoy Dasgupta and Ivan Sanchez (Fluor), Kirk Craig (Geosyntec), Rick Frechette (Haley & Aldrich), Annelia Tinklenberg (INTERA), Jim Casey (KCB), Tom Meuzelaar (Life Cycle Geo), James Moore (Met), Casey Schmitt (Paterson & Cooke), Kim Trapani (Stantec), and Daryl Longwell (Tetra Tech). Each Qualified Person has reviewed and approved the information in this news release relevant to the portion of the scientific and technical information for which they are responsible. Other disclosures of a scientific or technical nature included in this news release regarding the Santa Cruz Copper Project, have been reviewed, verified, and approved by Glen Kuntz, P.Geo., who is a Qualified Person as defined by Regulation S-K, Subpart 1300 promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and by Canadian National Instrument 43-101.”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document announces the completion of a Preliminary Feasibility Study which includes updated reserves and resources.

Evidence · text

“Updated Reserves and Mine Plan Support 100% Heap Leach Process Producing 1.4 Million Tonnes of Copper Cathode Over 23 Year Mine Life”

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Additional Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources, exclusive of reserves, provide substantial potential for future expansion.

Evidence · text

“Additional Indicated Mineral Resources, Exclusive of Mineral Reserves, Provide Potential Opportunities for Future Expansion”

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: Additional Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources, exclusive of reserves, provide substantial potential for future expansion.

Evidence · text

“Additional Indicated Mineral Resources, Exclusive of Mineral Reserves, Provide Potential Opportunities for Future Expansion”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The project includes significant Inferred Resources which are not included in the current mine plan.

Evidence · text

“Additionally, the Santa Cruz Copper Project includes Inferred Resources, which are not included in the Study or the associated mine plan, which comprise a further 3.3 million tonnes of contained copper across the Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco Deposits.”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The study projects high copper recoveries averaging 92.2% over the life of mine.

Evidence · text

“high copper recoveries averaging 92.2% over the life of mine”

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: The project utilizes a conventional chloride-assisted on/off heap leaching flowsheet.

Evidence · text

“conventional chloride-assisted on/off heap leaching flowsheet to produce copper cathode”

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: The study incorporates extensive drilling and associated metallurgical, hydrogeological, and geotechnical studies, implying variability across ore domains was considered for the heap leaching flowsheet.

Evidence · text

“Data analysis and trade-off studies related to the extensive drilling and associated metallurgical, hydrogeological, and geotechnical studies identified the material benefits of using a conventional chloride-assisted on/off heap leaching flowsheet”

Permitting in Progressneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Table 4 details the current permitting status, showing several permits are in progress or submitted.

Evidence · table

“In progress”

Context: City of Casa Grande Major Site Plan and Development permit

Streamlined Permittingpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The project's location on 100%-owned private land is highlighted as enabling a streamlined permitting process.

Evidence · text

“Private Land Enables Streamlined Permitting Process”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a mill_cil route ("concentrator")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 26. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (25)

probableSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 132061000Grade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1430Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:0b613394484f4f30d949
Deposit or zone
Santa Cruz
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
132061000
Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1430
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
43.95
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Probable Mineral Reserve for Santa Cruz represents a substantial, high-grade copper deposit, forming the economic backbone of the project.

Positive factors

  • High tonnage and grade for a Probable Reserve.
  • Supports a significant portion of the project's mine life.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“132,061”

Context: Santa Cruz

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 4112000Grade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 42Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:b7536a3697d1f54e4392
Deposit or zone
East Ridge
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
4112000
Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
42
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
43.95
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The East Ridge Probable Reserve contributes to the project's overall economic viability, albeit with a smaller tonnage than Santa Cruz.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall Probable Reserve base with a good copper grade.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“4,112”

Context: East Ridge

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

probableSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 136173000Grade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1472Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:59fea4d104536dea0bf1
Deposit or zone
Total
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
136173000
Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1472
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
43.95
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The total Probable Mineral Reserves demonstrate the project's robust economic foundation and potential for long-term production.

Positive factors

  • Significant total Probable Reserves supporting a long mine life.
  • High overall copper grade for the reserve.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“136,173”

Context: Total

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 178451000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1435Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:56db0ee1da3a4c62cfae
Deposit or zone
Santa Cruz
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
178451000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1435
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource at Santa Cruz, separate from reserves, offers significant potential for extending the mine life or expanding operations.

Positive factors

  • Large Indicated Resource tonnage with good copper grade, exclusive of reserves.
  • Provides potential for future expansion.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“178,451”

Context: Santa Cruz

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · goldTonnes: 178451000Grade: 0.024Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 139Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:56db0ee1da3a4c62cfae
Deposit or zone
Santa Cruz
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
178451000
Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
139
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold content in the Indicated Resource provides additional economic upside, even at low grades, as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: 178,451

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · silverTonnes: 178451000Grade: 1.43Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 8211Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:56db0ee1da3a4c62cfae
Deposit or zone
Santa Cruz
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
178451000
Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
8211
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver content in the Indicated Resource provides additional economic upside, even at low grades, as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 178,451

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 31998000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 232Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:a9e68ffd2ca0f2b631c7
Deposit or zone
Santa Cruz
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
31998000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
232
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Mineral Resource at Santa Cruz provides additional exploration upside, though with lower confidence than Indicated resources.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“31,998”

Context: Santa Cruz

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · goldTonnes: 31998000Grade: 0.021Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 21Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:a9e68ffd2ca0f2b631c7
Deposit or zone
Santa Cruz
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
31998000
Grade
0.021
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
21
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold content in the Inferred Resource provides additional economic upside, though with lower confidence and as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“0.021”

Context: 31,998

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · silverTonnes: 31998000Grade: 1.78Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 1832Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:a9e68ffd2ca0f2b631c7
Deposit or zone
Santa Cruz
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
31998000
Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
1832
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver content in the Inferred Resource provides additional economic upside, though with lower confidence and as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“1.78”

Context: 31,998

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 4407000Grade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 41Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:219a76983452cefa65a7
Deposit or zone
East Ridge
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4407000
Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
41
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated Mineral Resource at East Ridge contributes to the project's overall resource base, offering further potential.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the Indicated Resource base with a good copper grade.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“4,407”

Context: East Ridge

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · goldTonnes: 4407000Grade: 0.015Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 2Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:219a76983452cefa65a7
Deposit or zone
East Ridge
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4407000
Grade
0.015
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
2
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold content in the Indicated Resource at East Ridge provides minor additional economic upside as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.015”

Context: 4,407

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · silverTonnes: 4407000Grade: 0.71Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 101Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:219a76983452cefa65a7
Deposit or zone
East Ridge
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
4407000
Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
101
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver content in the Indicated Resource at East Ridge provides minor additional economic upside as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: 4,407

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 48676000Grade: 0.89Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 436Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:0d25f5a0377a2bb25f40
Deposit or zone
East Ridge
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
48676000
Grade
0.89
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
436
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred Mineral Resource at East Ridge provides additional exploration upside, though with lower confidence than Indicated resources.

Positive factors

  • Adds to the overall resource base, indicating future potential.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“48,676”

Context: East Ridge

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · goldTonnes: 48676000Grade: 0.006Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 9Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:0d25f5a0377a2bb25f40
Deposit or zone
East Ridge
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
48676000
Grade
0.006
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
9
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold content in the Inferred Resource at East Ridge provides minor additional economic upside as a byproduct, though with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“0.006”

Context: 48,676

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · silverTonnes: 48676000Grade: 0.4Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 623Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:0d25f5a0377a2bb25f40
Deposit or zone
East Ridge
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
48676000
Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
623
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
40
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver content in the Inferred Resource at East Ridge provides minor additional economic upside as a byproduct, though with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 48,676

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 341345000Grade: 0.78Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 2664Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:ef31a49420d3ec4abdd1
Deposit or zone
Texaco
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
341345000
Grade
0.78
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
2664
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Texaco Inferred Mineral Resource represents a substantial future growth opportunity for the project, though it requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Very large Inferred Resource tonnage, indicating significant long-term potential.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“341,345”

Context: Texaco

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · goldTonnes: 341345000Grade: 0.028Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 302Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:ef31a49420d3ec4abdd1
Deposit or zone
Texaco
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
341345000
Grade
0.028
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
302
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold content in the Texaco Inferred Resource provides additional economic upside, though with lower confidence and as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“0.028”

Context: 341,345

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · silverTonnes: 341345000Grade: 0.81Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 8850Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:ef31a49420d3ec4abdd1
Deposit or zone
Texaco
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
341345000
Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
8850
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
32
Cutoff Unit
$/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver content in the Texaco Inferred Resource provides additional economic upside, though with lower confidence and as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the copper resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 341,345

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 182859000Grade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1476Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:99e3cb3668b1def5311a
Deposit or zone
All Deposits
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
182859000
Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
1476
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The aggregate Indicated Mineral Resources across all deposits represent a substantial and high-confidence base for future development.

Positive factors

  • Significant total Indicated Resource tonnage, exclusive of reserves.
  • Provides strong potential for future expansion.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“182,859”

Context: All Deposits

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · goldTonnes: 182859000Grade: 0.024Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 141Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:99e3cb3668b1def5311a
Deposit or zone
All Deposits
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
182859000
Grade
0.024
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
141
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Aggregate gold content in the Indicated Resources provides additional economic upside as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the overall Indicated Resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“0.024”

Context: 182,859

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Cruz Copper Project · silverTonnes: 182859000Grade: 1.41Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 8312Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:99e3cb3668b1def5311a
Deposit or zone
All Deposits
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
182859000
Grade
1.41
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
8312
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Aggregate silver content in the Indicated Resources provides additional economic upside as a byproduct.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the overall Indicated Resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Evidence · table

“1.41”

Context: 182,859

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperTonnes: 422020000Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 3332Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:61564cb5b54817b6510f
Deposit or zone
All Deposits
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
422020000
Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
3332
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The aggregate Inferred Mineral Resources across all deposits represent a substantial future growth opportunity, though requiring further work to upgrade confidence.

Positive factors

  • Very large total Inferred Resource tonnage, indicating significant long-term potential.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“422,020”

Context: All Deposits

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · goldTonnes: 422020000Grade: 0.025Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 333Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:61564cb5b54817b6510f
Deposit or zone
All Deposits
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
422020000
Grade
0.025
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
333
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Aggregate gold content in the Inferred Resources provides additional economic upside as a byproduct, though with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the overall Inferred Resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“0.025”

Context: 422,020

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Cruz Copper Project · silverTonnes: 422020000Grade: 0.83Grade Unit: grams per tonneContained Metal: 11304Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Todd McCracken, Shane Ghouralal, David Willock, Ulises Arvayo, Subhamoy Dasgupta, Ivan Sanchez, Kirk Craig, Rick Frechette, Annelia Tinklenberg, Jim Casey, Tom Meuzelaar, James Moore, Casey Schmitt, Kim Trapani, Daryl Longwell, Glen Kuntz
Resource group id
resource:61564cb5b54817b6510f
Deposit or zone
All Deposits
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
422020000
Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
grams per tonne
Contained Metal
11304
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-06-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Aggregate silver content in the Inferred Resources provides additional economic upside as a byproduct, though with lower confidence.

Positive factors

  • Adds byproduct value to the overall Inferred Resource.
  • Estimate is S-K 1300 compliant and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: 422,020

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Fact 25Santa Cruz Copper ProjectView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Resource scope

Reporting standards
ni_43_101, sec_sk1300
Resource group id
resource:3680068a40b854f77d9d
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The project's financial metrics at current COMEX copper prices are exceptionally strong, showcasing its robust profitability and attractiveness to investors.

Positive factors

  • Significantly higher NPV and IRR at current COMEX copper prices, indicating strong upside potential.
  • Demonstrates the project's resilience to market fluctuations and profitability at prevailing prices.

Evidence · table

“1.91”

Context: 4.83 (COMEX Spot*)

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

Metallurgical Results (1)

heap leachSanta Cruz Copper Project · copperRecovery: 92.4 %Head Grade: 1.1Head Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Cruz Copper Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_az
Reported Region
Arizona
Ticker
IE

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
heap leach
Processing Route
conventional chloride-assisted on/off heap leaching to produce copper cathode through solvent extraction and electrowinning
Sample
First 15 Years average

Recovery

Recovery
92.4 %
Recovery Basis
to_payable_metal
Head Grade
1.1
Head Grade Unit
%

Reagents

Acid
6 kg/t

Lab

Laboratory
Met Engineering, LLC
Consultant
Met Engineering, LLC

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The high copper recovery of 92.4% during the first 15 years of operation further reinforces the project's strong metallurgical performance and economic potential.

Positive factors

  • Very high copper recovery for a heap leach process, exceeding typical expectations.
  • Low sulfuric acid consumption indicates favorable ore characteristics.
  • Supports the economic viability of the project.

Evidence · table

“92.4”

Context: Recovery

Tags used in scoring

Heap Leach Routeneutral

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: processing_route matches the heap_leach signal

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: 92.4% is at or above the exceptional band (80%)

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.