# Jaguar Mining Provides Update on Geologic Interpretation at the Cham&\#xE9; Gold Exploration Target, Brazil Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jaguar-mining-provides-update-on-geologic-interpretation-at-the-cham-xe9-gold-ex--8213c42e-249b-45ba-928e-9265ca9fe78a Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/JAG/news/5436710225492762/jaguar-mining-provides-update-on-geologic-interpretation-at-the-cham-xe9-gold-ex Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-02-24T12:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Jaguar Mining Inc. - Ticker: JAG - Exchange: TSX - Region: Minas Gerais, Brazil - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-14 06:47:39 UTC Narrative sentiment: -0.20 · Bearish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Jaguar Mining has released initial assay results from its Chamé gold exploration target in Brazil. While drill holes FCM001 and FCM002 confirmed the presence of wide-spread gold mineralization, the grades were lower than previously observed surface trench values, suggesting the holes intersected marginal portions of the system. Reasoning: Initial drill results from FCM001 and FCM002 confirm mineralization but report low-grade intercepts \(0.44 and 0.33 g/t Au\) that failed to match historical high-grade surface expectations. - Positive factor: confirmed wide-spread gold mineralization - Positive factor: visible gold observed in core - Positive factor: QA/QC protocols disclosed - Negative factor: intercepts did not reproduce high-grade surface trench values - Negative factor: intercepts characterized as marginal portions of the system - Negative factor: unexpected structural ore control complexity Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: Release mentions use of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates at an accredited lab. Evidence · text > A comprehensive Quality Assurance/Quality Control \(QA/QC\) program involving the insertion of certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates was implemented **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The project is positioned 3km from the existing Santa Isabel Mine and CPA Complex. Evidence · text > located approximately 3km to the southeast of Jaguar's CPA Complex ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (2) ### FCM001 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jaguar-mining-provides-update-on-geologic-interpretation-at-the-cham-xe9-gold-ex--8213c42e-249b-45ba-928e-9265ca9fe78a#fact-drill-facts-0) Chamé · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: FCM001 - Project: Chamé - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: brazil - Ticker: JAG #### Geometry - Grade: 0.44 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 15.35 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: FCM001:0-15.35 - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS-Geosol Laboratories Ltd - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Intercept of 15.35m at 0.44 g/t Au confirms mineralization but is considered marginal. - Positive factor: confirmed wide-spread gold mineralization - Positive factor: visible gold observed in core - Negative factor: marginal portion of mineralized system Evidence · text > Drill hole FCM001 intersected 15.35 meters grading 0.44 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### FCM002 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jaguar-mining-provides-update-on-geologic-interpretation-at-the-cham-xe9-gold-ex--8213c42e-249b-45ba-928e-9265ca9fe78a#fact-drill-facts-1) Chamé · gold #### Identity - Hole ID: FCM002 - Project: Chamé - Commodity: gold - Region: brazil - Reported Region: brazil - Ticker: JAG #### Geometry - Grade: 0.33 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 4.09 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: FCM002:0-4.09 - Mining Method: unknown #### QA/QC - Laboratory: SGS-Geosol Laboratories Ltd - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - Lab Certified: Yes - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Intercept of 4.09m at 0.33 g/t Au is low grade and considered marginal. - Positive factor: confirmed wide-spread gold mineralization - Negative factor: marginal portion of mineralized system Evidence · text > drill hole FCM002 returned 4.09 meters grading 0.33 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.