# Jantar to Acquire 100% of Zigzag Lake Lithium-Tantalum Project Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project--2bb8f8f9-138a-4f8d-8b01-663b1f2d6282 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/ULT/news/24740054/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2009-09-02T14:17:26.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Jantar Resources Ltd. - Ticker: JR - Exchange: TSX - Region: Ontario - Primary commodity: Lithium - Secondary commodities: Tantalum, Beryllium, Gallium - Document categories: Drill results, Agreement transaction - Extracted: 2026-09-19 05:13:22 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Jantar Resources Ltd. has signed a letter of intent to acquire a 100% interest in the Zigzag Lake Lithium-Tantalum Project in Ontario. The project features historical high-grade lithium and tantalum intercepts but relies on legacy data from the 1950s through the early 2000s. Reasoning: The company has signed an LOI to acquire a lithium-tantalum project with significant historical high-grade intercepts, though the data is aged and requires new drilling to confirm continuity and scale. - Positive factor: Acquisition of 100% interest via LOI - Positive factor: Encouraging historical high-grade lithium and tantalum results - Positive factor: Contiguous to a known lithium project \(Seymour Lake\) - Negative factor: Historical data is from 1956, 1957, 1975, 1982, 2002, and 2003, requiring modern verification Facts used in scoring: 7 ## Classification and evidence **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Story-specific tag Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The project is contiguous to Linear Metals' Seymour Lake Lithium project. Evidence · text > Jantar's property is contiguous to Linear Metals' \(TSX-V: LRM\) Seymour Lake Lithium project. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (6) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project--2bb8f8f9-138a-4f8d-8b01-663b1f2d6282#fact-drill-facts-1) lithium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Commodity: lithium - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: JR #### Geometry - Grade: 1.28 - Grade Unit: % Li2O - Intercept: 9.8 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 1957-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical channel sample from Lens \#2. - Positive factor: High grade lithium intercept - Negative factor: Historical data Evidence · text > Lens \#2 assayed 1.28% Li2O over 9.8 m. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project--2bb8f8f9-138a-4f8d-8b01-663b1f2d6282#fact-drill-facts-2) lithium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Commodity: lithium - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: JR #### Geometry - Grade: 1.53 - Grade Unit: % Li2O - Intercept: 7.3 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 1957-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical channel sample from Lens 4. - Positive factor: High grade lithium intercept - Negative factor: Historical data Evidence · text > Lens 4 assayed 1.53% Li2O over 7.3 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project--2bb8f8f9-138a-4f8d-8b01-663b1f2d6282#fact-drill-facts-3) lithium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Commodity: lithium - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: JR #### Geometry - Grade: 1.64 - Grade Unit: % Li2O - Intercept: 6.3 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 1957-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical channel sample from Lens 4. - Positive factor: High grade lithium intercept - Negative factor: Historical data Evidence · text > 1.64% Li2O over 6.3 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project--2bb8f8f9-138a-4f8d-8b01-663b1f2d6282#fact-drill-facts-4) lithium Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Commodity: lithium - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: JR #### Geometry - Grade: 1.68 - Grade Unit: % Li2O - Intercept: 7.9 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 1957-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical channel sample from Lens 4. - Positive factor: High grade lithium intercept - Negative factor: Historical data Evidence · text > 1.68% Li2O over 7.9 m. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project--2bb8f8f9-138a-4f8d-8b01-663b1f2d6282#fact-drill-facts-5) tantalum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Commodity: tantalum - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: JR #### Geometry - Grade: 0.168 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 2.54 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2002-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical tantalum channel sample from Lens \#1. - Negative factor: Historical data Evidence · text > Lens \#1 assayed 0.168% Ta over 2.54 meters #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/jantar-to-acquire-100-of-zigzag-lake-lithium-tantalum-project--2bb8f8f9-138a-4f8d-8b01-663b1f2d6282#fact-drill-facts-6) tantalum Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Commodity: tantalum - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: JR #### Geometry - Grade: 0.3 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 0.92 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2002-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2009-09-02T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical tantalum channel sample from Lens \#4. - Negative factor: Historical data Evidence · text > Lens \#4 assayed 0.300% Ta over 0.92 meters. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.