JUNE 2025 QUARTERLY REPORT

Original announcement by research on

Company
Unico Silver Limited
Ticker
USL
Exchange
ASX
Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Other, Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-11-05 10:39:03 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Unico Silver’s quarterly report highlights continued drilling success at Joaquin and Cerro Leon, including new discoveries, step-outs and infill results across multiple prospects in Santa Cruz, Argentina. The company also reiterated its resource-growth strategy and said revised Mineral Resource Estimates are on track for September 2025. The report includes a large number of drill intercepts, plus corporate and cash-flow updates.

Reasoning: The document is a quarterly company report with a broad operational update, not a single technical release, but it contains substantial new drill results and resource-growth context. The drilling is materially positive overall, though some results are historical or equivalent-grade based, which moderates confidence and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Multiple new drill discoveries and extensions across Joaquin and Cerro Leon
  • Strong silver-equivalent intercepts include 90m at 144gpt AgEq and 36m at 474gpt AgEq
  • Resource growth strategy is supported by infill, step-out and sulphide drilling
  • JORC Mineral Resource Estimates on track for September 2025

Negative factors

  • Many intercepts are reported as AgEq rather than individual metal grades
  • Some results are restatements or historical comparisons from prior releases
  • Assay results remained pending for 27 holes

Facts used in scoring: 340

Classification and evidence

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The Cerro Leon project is described as approximately 45 kilometers northwest of AngloGold Ashanti's Cerro Vanguardia mine.

Evidence · text

“approximately 45 kilometers northwest of AngloGold Ashanti's Cerro Vanguardia mine”

Step Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The release explicitly says step-out drilling defines wide zones of mineralisation and reports step-out holes at La Morocha SE and La Negra SE.

Evidence · text

“Step out drilling returns exceptional La Negra SE Extension”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The report states that infill drilling aimed at increasing confidence and converting the Foreign Estimate to a JORC MRE.

Evidence · text

“Infill drilling is designed on a 25m by 50m grid”

Stale Data Re Releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: Several drill intercepts are explicitly described as historical results or previously reported in earlier releases.

Evidence · text

“The information in this announcement that relates to the current Mineral Resources for Cerro Leon has been extracted from the ASX release”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: AgEq is reported and assumptions are stated, but many drill intercepts are presented only as equivalent grades rather than full individual metal grades in the narrative.

Evidence · text

“AgEq = Ag (g/t) + 79.18 x Au (g/t)”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Cerro Leon resource table is stated to conform to the JORC Code 2012 Edition.

Evidence · text

“The preceding statements of Mineral Resources conforms to the Australasian Code”

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Joaquin foreign estimate is said to be suitable for reporting purpose under NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“suitable for reporting purpose under the standards of NI 43-101”

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: The Joaquin estimate is explicitly described as a foreign estimate and not compliant with JORC.

Evidence · text

“The estimates of mineralisation in respect of the Joaquin Project included in this announcement are foreign estimates”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 340. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (320)

JDD017-25JoaquinIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD017-25
Project
Joaquin
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Intercept
6 m
From
28 m
To
34 m
Intercept Depth
28 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD017-25:10-100
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
La Negra SE
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
559
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-05T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong high-grade sub-interval, but it is a restated historical intercept rather than a new assay in this report.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver-equivalent sub-interval
  • Part of the La Negra extension zone

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Equivalent-grade reporting only

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re Releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

JRC011-25JoaquinIntercept: 23 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JRC011-25
Project
Joaquin
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Intercept
23 m
From
4 m
To
27 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JRC011-25:4-27
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Brunilda
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
88
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: A new discovery intercept with moderate grade over a useful width.

Positive factors

  • Near-surface discovery result
  • Supports a new Brunilda discovery on a parallel structure

Negative factors

  • Equivalent grade only

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

JDD005-25JoaquinIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
JDD005-25
Project
Joaquin
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Intercept
7 m
From
39.7 m
To
46.7 m
Intercept Depth
39.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
JDD005-25:33-61
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
La Negra
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A bonanza-style sub-interval, but only as historical context in this quarterly report.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional-grade sub-interval
  • Adds weight to the high-grade core at La Negra

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Equivalent-grade only

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re Releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

PR015-25Cerro Leon · silverGrade: 903Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
903
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Karina
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
gpt AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval within the Karina infill hole, but restated from prior release.

Positive factors

  • Very high-grade sub-interval

Negative factors

  • Historical result
  • Equivalent-grade only

Evidence · table

“PR015-25 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re Releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

P062-25Cerro LeonIntercept: 15.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P062-25
Project
Cerro Leon
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Intercept
15.1 m
From
149.5 m
To
164.6 m
Intercept Depth
149.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P062-25:134.4-149.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Ivonne Extension
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
175
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Ag-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Meaningful step-out style intercept extending the Ivonne mineralized shoot.

Positive factors

  • Confirms continuity beyond current resource boundary
  • Good grade over useful width

Negative factors

  • Equivalent-grade only

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P008-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.15 m
From
47.05 m
To
72.2 m
Intercept Depth
47.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P008-25:47.05-72.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P008-25 47.05 72.2 25.15 0.08 26 0.7 1.9 125 3148”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P008-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
25.15 m
From
47.05 m
To
72.2 m
Intercept Depth
47.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P008-25:47.05-72.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 653.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P008-25 47.05 72.2 25.15 0.08 26 0.7 1.9 125 3148”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P008-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.15 m
From
47.05 m
To
72.2 m
Intercept Depth
47.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P008-25:47.05-72.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 17.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P008-25 47.05 72.2 25.15 0.08 26 0.7 1.9 125 3148”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P008-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
25.15 m
From
47.05 m
To
72.2 m
Intercept Depth
47.05 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P008-25:47.05-72.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 47.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P008-25 47.05 72.2 25.15 0.08 26 0.7 1.9 125 3148”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 11.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
11.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
-11.55 m
To
5.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-11.55-5.45
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11.55 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 196.4 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 11.55 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P009-25 5.45 17 11.55 0.49 123 0.1 0.2 173 1994”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
-11.55 m
To
5.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-11.55-5.45
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.49 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P009-25 5.45 17 11.55 0.49 123 0.1 0.2 173 1994”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 123Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
123
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
-11.55 m
To
5.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-11.55-5.45
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 123 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2091.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 123 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P009-25 5.45 17 11.55 0.49 123 0.1 0.2 173 1994”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
-11.55 m
To
5.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-11.55-5.45
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P009-25 5.45 17 11.55 0.49 123 0.1 0.2 173 1994”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.1 m
From
48 m
To
65.1 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:48-65.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
100
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 48 65.1 17.1 0.21 66 0.2 0.3 100 1705”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.1 m
From
48 m
To
65.1 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:48-65.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
100
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 66 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1128.6 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 48 65.1 17.1 0.21 66 0.2 0.3 100 1705”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17.1 m
From
48 m
To
65.1 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:48-65.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
100
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 48 65.1 17.1 0.21 66 0.2 0.3 100 1705”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17.1 m
From
48 m
To
65.1 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:48-65.1
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
100
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 48 65.1 17.1 0.21 66 0.2 0.3 100 1705”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
116 m
To
129 m
Intercept Depth
116 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:116-129
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
150
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.16 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 116 129 13 0.16 25 0.7 2.4 150 1954”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
116 m
To
129 m
Intercept Depth
116 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:116-129
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
150
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 325.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 116 129 13 0.16 25 0.7 2.4 150 1954”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
116 m
To
129 m
Intercept Depth
116 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:116-129
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
150
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 116 129 13 0.16 25 0.7 2.4 150 1954”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
116 m
To
129 m
Intercept Depth
116 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:116-129
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
150
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 31.2 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 116 129 13 0.16 25 0.7 2.4 150 1954”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
-13 m
To
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-13-2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 195.0 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 13 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P010-25 2 15 13 0.1 42 0.7 0.1 72 934”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15 m
From
-13 m
To
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-13-2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P010-25 2 15 13 0.1 42 0.7 0.1 72 934”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
-13 m
To
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-13-2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 630.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 42 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P010-25 2 15 13 0.1 42 0.7 0.1 72 934”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
-13 m
To
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-13-2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 10.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.7 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P010-25 2 15 13 0.1 42 0.7 0.1 72 934”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49 m
From
40 m
To
89 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:40-89
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 40 89 49 0.03 12 0.5 0.9 63 3070”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49 m
From
40 m
To
89 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:40-89
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 588.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 40 89 49 0.03 12 0.5 0.9 63 3070”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
49 m
From
40 m
To
89 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:40-89
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 24.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 40 89 49 0.03 12 0.5 0.9 63 3070”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 49 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
49 m
From
40 m
To
89 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:40-89
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
63
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 44.1 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 40 89 49 0.03 12 0.5 0.9 63 3070”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
128 m
To
135.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:128-135.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 128 135.5 7.5 0.05 14 0.8 2.3 129 968”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
128 m
To
135.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:128-135.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 105.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 128 135.5 7.5 0.05 14 0.8 2.3 129 968”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.5 m
From
128 m
To
135.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:128-135.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.8 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 128 135.5 7.5 0.05 14 0.8 2.3 129 968”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.5 m
From
128 m
To
135.5 m
Intercept Depth
128 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:128-135.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
129
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 17.3 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 128 135.5 7.5 0.05 14 0.8 2.3 129 968”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
172.1 m
To
174.6 m
Intercept Depth
172.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:172.1-174.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
240
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 172.1 174.6 2.5 0.5 16 0.4 4.4 240 599”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.5 m
From
172.1 m
To
174.6 m
Intercept Depth
172.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:172.1-174.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
240
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 40.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 16 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 172.1 174.6 2.5 0.5 16 0.4 4.4 240 599”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
172.1 m
To
174.6 m
Intercept Depth
172.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:172.1-174.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
240
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 172.1 174.6 2.5 0.5 16 0.4 4.4 240 599”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
172.1 m
To
174.6 m
Intercept Depth
172.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:172.1-174.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
240
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.4 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 11.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 172.1 174.6 2.5 0.5 16 0.4 4.4 240 599”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.5 m
From
-7 m
To
79.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-7-79.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 605.5 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P011-25 79.5 86.5 7 0.02 50 1.2 1.7 149 1045”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 86.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
86.5 m
From
-7 m
To
79.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-7-79.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P011-25 79.5 86.5 7 0.02 50 1.2 1.7 149 1045”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 50Grade Unit: %Intercept: 86.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
50
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
86.5 m
From
-7 m
To
79.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-7-79.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4325.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 50 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P011-25 79.5 86.5 7 0.02 50 1.2 1.7 149 1045”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 86.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
86.5 m
From
-7 m
To
79.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-7-79.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 103.8 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.2 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P011-25 79.5 86.5 7 0.02 50 1.2 1.7 149 1045”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 10.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 130.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
10.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
130.7 m
From
-10.9 m
To
119.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-10.9-119.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1424.6 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 10.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P014-25 119.8 130.7 10.9 0.22 34 0.3 1.3 111 1204”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 130.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
130.7 m
From
-10.9 m
To
119.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-10.9-119.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.22 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P014-25 119.8 130.7 10.9 0.22 34 0.3 1.3 111 1204”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 130.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
130.7 m
From
-10.9 m
To
119.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-10.9-119.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 34 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4443.8 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 34 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P014-25 119.8 130.7 10.9 0.22 34 0.3 1.3 111 1204”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 130.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
130.7 m
From
-10.9 m
To
119.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-10.9-119.8
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 39.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P014-25 119.8 130.7 10.9 0.22 34 0.3 1.3 111 1204”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P019-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P019-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.4 m
From
71.67 m
To
78.07 m
Intercept Depth
71.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P019-25:71.67-78.07
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.37 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P019-25 71.67 78.07 6.4 0.37 21 0.6 3 184 1179”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P019-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P019-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P019-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.4 m
From
71.67 m
To
78.07 m
Intercept Depth
71.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P019-25:71.67-78.07
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 134.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P019-25 71.67 78.07 6.4 0.37 21 0.6 3 184 1179”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P019-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P019-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P019-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.4 m
From
71.67 m
To
78.07 m
Intercept Depth
71.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P019-25:71.67-78.07
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P019-25 71.67 78.07 6.4 0.37 21 0.6 3 184 1179”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P019-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P019-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P019-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.4 m
From
71.67 m
To
78.07 m
Intercept Depth
71.67 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P019-25:71.67-78.07
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
184
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.2 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P019-25 71.67 78.07 6.4 0.37 21 0.6 3 184 1179”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P019-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · goldGrade: 13.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 118.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
13.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
118.35 m
From
-13.35 m
To
105 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-13.35-105
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.35 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1580.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.35 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P028-25 105 118.35 13.35 0.44 24 0.5 1 111 1487”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 118.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
118.35 m
From
-13.35 m
To
105 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-13.35-105
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.44 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P028-25 105 118.35 13.35 0.44 24 0.5 1 111 1487”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · leadGrade: 24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 118.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
118.35 m
From
-13.35 m
To
105 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-13.35-105
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 24 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2840.4 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 24 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P028-25 105 118.35 13.35 0.44 24 0.5 1 111 1487”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 118.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
118.35 m
From
-13.35 m
To
105 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-13.35-105
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 59.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P028-25 105 118.35 13.35 0.44 24 0.5 1 111 1487”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P029-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.9 m
From
104.6 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P029-25:104.6-112.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
201
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.95 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P029-25 104.6 112.5 7.9 0.95 36 0.4 2 201 1588”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P029-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.9 m
From
104.6 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P029-25:104.6-112.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
201
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 284.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P029-25 104.6 112.5 7.9 0.95 36 0.4 2 201 1588”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P029-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.9 m
From
104.6 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P029-25:104.6-112.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
201
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P029-25 104.6 112.5 7.9 0.95 36 0.4 2 201 1588”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P029-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.9 m
From
104.6 m
To
112.5 m
Intercept Depth
104.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P029-25:104.6-112.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
201
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 15.8 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P029-25 104.6 112.5 7.9 0.95 36 0.4 2 201 1588”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
92.6 m
To
108.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:92.6-108.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
293
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.96 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 15.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P030-25 92.6 108.6 16 0.96 49 1.6 3.2 293 4685”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
92.6 m
To
108.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:92.6-108.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
293
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 49 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 784.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P030-25 92.6 108.6 16 0.96 49 1.6 3.2 293 4685”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m
From
92.6 m
To
108.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:92.6-108.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
293
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 25.6 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P030-25 92.6 108.6 16 0.96 49 1.6 3.2 293 4685”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m
From
92.6 m
To
108.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:92.6-108.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
293
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 51.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P030-25 92.6 108.6 16 0.96 49 1.6 3.2 293 4685”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
97.6 m
To
106.6 m
Intercept Depth
97.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:97.6-106.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
472
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 97.6 106.6 9 1.63 78 2.6 5 472 4247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
97.6 m
To
106.6 m
Intercept Depth
97.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:97.6-106.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
472
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 78 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 702.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 97.6 106.6 9 1.63 78 2.6 5 472 4247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
97.6 m
To
106.6 m
Intercept Depth
97.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:97.6-106.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
472
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.6 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 23.4 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 97.6 106.6 9 1.63 78 2.6 5 472 4247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P030-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
97.6 m
To
106.6 m
Intercept Depth
97.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P030-25:97.6-106.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
472
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 45.0 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 97.6 106.6 9 1.63 78 2.6 5 472 4247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
13.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
132.25 m
From
-13.6 m
To
118.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-13.6-118.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1798.6 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 13.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P035-25 118.65 132.25 13.6 0.02 10 0.7 1.5 89 1205”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 132.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
132.25 m
From
-13.6 m
To
118.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-13.6-118.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P035-25 118.65 132.25 13.6 0.02 10 0.7 1.5 89 1205”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 10Grade Unit: %Intercept: 132.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
132.25 m
From
-13.6 m
To
118.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-13.6-118.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1322.5 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 10 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P035-25 118.65 132.25 13.6 0.02 10 0.7 1.5 89 1205”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 132.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
132.25 m
From
-13.6 m
To
118.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-13.6-118.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.7 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 92.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P035-25 118.65 132.25 13.6 0.02 10 0.7 1.5 89 1205”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P036-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P036-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.05 m
From
129.7 m
To
145.75 m
Intercept Depth
129.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P036-25:129.7-145.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P036-25 129.7 145.75 16.05 0.03 11 0.2 2.7 125 2005”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P036-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P036-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P036-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.05 m
From
129.7 m
To
145.75 m
Intercept Depth
129.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P036-25:129.7-145.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 176.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P036-25 129.7 145.75 16.05 0.03 11 0.2 2.7 125 2005”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P036-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P036-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P036-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.05 m
From
129.7 m
To
145.75 m
Intercept Depth
129.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P036-25:129.7-145.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P036-25 129.7 145.75 16.05 0.03 11 0.2 2.7 125 2005”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P036-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P036-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.05 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P036-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.05 m
From
129.7 m
To
145.75 m
Intercept Depth
129.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P036-25:129.7-145.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
125
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.7 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 43.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P036-25 129.7 145.75 16.05 0.03 11 0.2 2.7 125 2005”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P036-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · goldGrade: 16.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 94.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
16.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
94.3 m
From
-16.15 m
To
78.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-16.15-78.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1522.9 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 16.15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P039-25 78.15 94.3 16.15 0.51 42 1.2 0.4 129 2087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 94.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
94.3 m
From
-16.15 m
To
78.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-16.15-78.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 48.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P039-25 78.15 94.3 16.15 0.51 42 1.2 0.4 129 2087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · leadGrade: 42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 94.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
94.3 m
From
-16.15 m
To
78.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-16.15-78.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 42 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3960.6 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 42 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P039-25 78.15 94.3 16.15 0.51 42 1.2 0.4 129 2087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · zincGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 94.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
94.3 m
From
-16.15 m
To
78.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-16.15-78.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 113.2 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.2 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P039-25 78.15 94.3 16.15 0.51 42 1.2 0.4 129 2087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P042-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P042-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
11.4 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
11.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P042-25:11.4-19
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
980
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.9 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P042-25 11.4 19 7.6 0.9 876 1.1 0.1 980 7448”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P042-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P042-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 876Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P042-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
876
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
11.4 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
11.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P042-25:11.4-19
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
980
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 876 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6657.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 876 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P042-25 11.4 19 7.6 0.9 876 1.1 0.1 980 7448”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P042-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P042-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P042-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
11.4 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
11.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P042-25:11.4-19
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
980
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P042-25 11.4 19 7.6 0.9 876 1.1 0.1 980 7448”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P042-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P042-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P042-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
11.4 m
To
19 m
Intercept Depth
11.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P042-25:11.4-19
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
980
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P042-25 11.4 19 7.6 0.9 876 1.1 0.1 980 7448”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P042-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.35 m
From
26.15 m
To
32.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:26.15-32.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
311
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.76 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.76 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P043-25 26.15 32.5 6.35 0.76 227 0.9 0 311 1974”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 227Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
227
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.35 m
From
26.15 m
To
32.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:26.15-32.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
311
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 227 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1441.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 227 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P043-25 26.15 32.5 6.35 0.76 227 0.9 0 311 1974”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.35 m
From
26.15 m
To
32.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:26.15-32.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
311
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.9 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P043-25 26.15 32.5 6.35 0.76 227 0.9 0 311 1974”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.35 m
From
26.15 m
To
32.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.15 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:26.15-32.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
311
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P043-25 26.15 32.5 6.35 0.76 227 0.9 0 311 1974”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
42 m
To
47 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:42-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
248
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.49 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 47 5 2.49 46 0.1 0 248 1239”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
42 m
To
47 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:42-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
248
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 46 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 230.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 47 5 2.49 46 0.1 0 248 1239”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
42 m
To
47 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:42-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
248
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 47 5 2.49 46 0.1 0 248 1239”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P043-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P043-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
42 m
To
47 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P043-25:42-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
248
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 47 5 2.49 46 0.1 0 248 1239”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P043-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARY/KARINAJoaquin · goldGrade: 38.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY/KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
38.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.5 m
From
-38.65 m
To
20.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY/KARINA:-38.65-20.85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38.65 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2299.7 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 38.65 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY/KARINA P046-25 20.85 59.5 38.65 0.57 114 0.5 0.1 176 6815”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY/KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARY/KARINAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY/KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.5 m
From
-38.65 m
To
20.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY/KARINA:-38.65-20.85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 33.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY/KARINA P046-25 20.85 59.5 38.65 0.57 114 0.5 0.1 176 6815”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY/KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARY/KARINAJoaquin · leadGrade: 114Grade Unit: %Intercept: 59.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY/KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
114
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
59.5 m
From
-38.65 m
To
20.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY/KARINA:-38.65-20.85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 114 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6783.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 114 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY/KARINA P046-25 20.85 59.5 38.65 0.57 114 0.5 0.1 176 6815”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY/KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARY/KARINAJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 59.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY/KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
59.5 m
From
-38.65 m
To
20.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY/KARINA:-38.65-20.85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 29.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY/KARINA P046-25 20.85 59.5 38.65 0.57 114 0.5 0.1 176 6815”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY/KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.2 m
From
21.8 m
To
35 m
Intercept Depth
21.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:21.8-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
128
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.46 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P049-25 21.8 35 13.2 0.46 54 1.3 0.1 128 1689”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.2 m
From
21.8 m
To
35 m
Intercept Depth
21.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:21.8-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
128
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 54 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 712.8 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P049-25 21.8 35 13.2 0.46 54 1.3 0.1 128 1689”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.2 m
From
21.8 m
To
35 m
Intercept Depth
21.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:21.8-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
128
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 17.2 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P049-25 21.8 35 13.2 0.46 54 1.3 0.1 128 1689”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.2 m
From
21.8 m
To
35 m
Intercept Depth
21.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:21.8-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
128
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P049-25 21.8 35 13.2 0.46 54 1.3 0.1 128 1689”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
42 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:42-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
772
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.52 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.52 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 55 13 0.52 707 0.3 0.4 772 10,036”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 707Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
707
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
42 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:42-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
772
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 707 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9191.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 707 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 55 13 0.52 707 0.3 0.4 772 10,036”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
42 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:42-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
772
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 55 13 0.52 707 0.3 0.4 772 10,036”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P049-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P049-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
42 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P049-25:42-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
772
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“and 42 55 13 0.52 707 0.3 0.4 772 10,036”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P049-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · goldGrade: 16.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 221.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
16.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
221.5 m
From
-16.75 m
To
204.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-16.75-204.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.75 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3710.1 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 16.75 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P050-25 204.75 221.5 16.75 0.07 12 0.4 1.6 91 1522”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 221.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
221.5 m
From
-16.75 m
To
204.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-16.75-204.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P050-25 204.75 221.5 16.75 0.07 12 0.4 1.6 91 1522”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · leadGrade: 12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 221.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
221.5 m
From
-16.75 m
To
204.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-16.75-204.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2658.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 12 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P050-25 204.75 221.5 16.75 0.07 12 0.4 1.6 91 1522”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 221.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
221.5 m
From
-16.75 m
To
204.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-16.75-204.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 88.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P050-25 204.75 221.5 16.75 0.07 12 0.4 1.6 91 1522”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 39.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
39.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
100 m
From
-39.35 m
To
60.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-39.35-60.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39.35 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3935.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 39.35 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P054-25 60.65 100 39.35 0.09 12 0.5 3 150 5911”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 100 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
100 m
From
-39.35 m
To
60.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-39.35-60.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 9.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P054-25 60.65 100 39.35 0.09 12 0.5 3 150 5911”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 100 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
100 m
From
-39.35 m
To
60.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-39.35-60.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1200.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 12 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P054-25 60.65 100 39.35 0.09 12 0.5 3 150 5911”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 100 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
100 m
From
-39.35 m
To
60.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-39.35-60.65
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 50.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P054-25 60.65 100 39.35 0.09 12 0.5 3 150 5911”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
84.9 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
84.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:84.9-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
545
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.44 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 84.9 88 3.1 0.44 38 1.5 11 545 1690”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.1 m
From
84.9 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
84.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:84.9-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
545
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 38 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 117.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 84.9 88 3.1 0.44 38 1.5 11 545 1690”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
84.9 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
84.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:84.9-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
545
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.7 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 84.9 88 3.1 0.44 38 1.5 11 545 1690”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
84.9 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
84.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:84.9-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
545
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 34.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 84.9 88 3.1 0.44 38 1.5 11 545 1690”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · goldGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 136.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
136.2 m
From
-12 m
To
124.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-12-124.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1634.4 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P055-25 124.2 136.2 12 0.01 5 0.1 2.2 95 1141”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 136.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
136.2 m
From
-12 m
To
124.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-12-124.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P055-25 124.2 136.2 12 0.01 5 0.1 2.2 95 1141”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · leadGrade: 5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 136.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
136.2 m
From
-12 m
To
124.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-12-124.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 681.0 %·m is exceptional (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P055-25 124.2 136.2 12 0.01 5 0.1 2.2 95 1141”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA SURJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 136.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA SUR
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
136.2 m
From
-12 m
To
124.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA SUR:-12-124.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA SUR P055-25 124.2 136.2 12 0.01 5 0.1 2.2 95 1141”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA SUR · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 7.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 142 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
7.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
142 m
From
-7.65 m
To
134.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-7.65-134.35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.65 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1086.3 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.65 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P057-25 134.35 142 7.65 0.17 76 1.3 1.4 178 1362”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 142 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
142 m
From
-7.65 m
To
134.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-7.65-134.35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.17 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P057-25 134.35 142 7.65 0.17 76 1.3 1.4 178 1362”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 142 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
142 m
From
-7.65 m
To
134.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-7.65-134.35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 76 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 10792.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 76 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P057-25 134.35 142 7.65 0.17 76 1.3 1.4 178 1362”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 142 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
142 m
From
-7.65 m
To
134.35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-7.65-134.35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 184.6 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.3 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P057-25 134.35 142 7.65 0.17 76 1.3 1.4 178 1362”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 12.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 153 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
12.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
153 m
From
-12.8 m
To
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-12.8-140.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1958.4 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P061-25 140.2 153 12.8 0.3 35 1 1.9 160 2041”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 153 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
153 m
From
-12.8 m
To
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-12.8-140.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 45.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P061-25 140.2 153 12.8 0.3 35 1 1.9 160 2041”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 153 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
35
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
153 m
From
-12.8 m
To
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-12.8-140.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5355.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 35 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P061-25 140.2 153 12.8 0.3 35 1 1.9 160 2041”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SILVIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 153 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SILVIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
153 m
From
-12.8 m
To
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SILVIA:-12.8-140.2
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.9
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 153.0 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SILVIA P061-25 140.2 153 12.8 0.3 35 1 1.9 160 2041”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SILVIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IVONNEJoaquin · goldGrade: 15.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 149.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IVONNE
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
15.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
149.5 m
From
-15.1 m
To
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IVONNE:-15.1-134.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15.1 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2257.4 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 15.1 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“IVONNE P062-25 134.4 149.5 15.1 1.44 29 0.1 0.8 178 2692”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · IVONNE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IVONNEJoaquin · silverGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 149.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IVONNE
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
149.5 m
From
-15.1 m
To
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IVONNE:-15.1-134.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 215.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“IVONNE P062-25 134.4 149.5 15.1 1.44 29 0.1 0.8 178 2692”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · IVONNE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IVONNEJoaquin · leadGrade: 29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 149.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IVONNE
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
149.5 m
From
-15.1 m
To
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IVONNE:-15.1-134.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4335.5 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 29 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“IVONNE P062-25 134.4 149.5 15.1 1.44 29 0.1 0.8 178 2692”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · IVONNE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IVONNEJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 149.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IVONNE
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
149.5 m
From
-15.1 m
To
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IVONNE:-15.1-134.4
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 15.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“IVONNE P062-25 134.4 149.5 15.1 1.44 29 0.1 0.8 178 2692”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · IVONNE · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · goldGrade: 3.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
3.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
134.4 m
To
139 m
Intercept Depth
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:134.4-139
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
419
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.79 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“inc. 134.4 139 4.6 3.79 74 0.1 1 419 1928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · silverGrade: 74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
134.4 m
To
139 m
Intercept Depth
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:134.4-139
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
419
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 74 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 340.4 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“inc. 134.4 139 4.6 3.79 74 0.1 1 419 1928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
134.4 m
To
139 m
Intercept Depth
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:134.4-139
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
419
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“inc. 134.4 139 4.6 3.79 74 0.1 1 419 1928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · zincGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
134.4 m
To
139 m
Intercept Depth
134.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:134.4-139
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
419
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“inc. 134.4 139 4.6 3.79 74 0.1 1 419 1928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · goldGrade: 28.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
28.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69.6 m
From
-28.6 m
To
41 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:-28.6-41
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1990.6 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 28.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P069-25 41 69.6 28.6 0.04 36 0.9 1.8 133 3808”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · silverGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69.6 m
From
-28.6 m
To
41 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:-28.6-41
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.04 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.04 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P069-25 41 69.6 28.6 0.04 36 0.9 1.8 133 3808”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · leadGrade: 36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.6 m
From
-28.6 m
To
41 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:-28.6-41
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2505.6 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 36 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P069-25 41 69.6 28.6 0.04 36 0.9 1.8 133 3808”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69.6 m
From
-28.6 m
To
41 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:-28.6-41
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 62.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MS LINK P069-25 41 69.6 28.6 0.04 36 0.9 1.8 133 3808”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.1 m
From
57.5 m
To
64.6 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:57.5-64.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
368
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 57.5 64.6 7.1 0.09 112 2.5 4.7 368 2615”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · silverGrade: 112Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
112
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.1 m
From
57.5 m
To
64.6 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:57.5-64.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
368
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 112 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 795.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 57.5 64.6 7.1 0.09 112 2.5 4.7 368 2615”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · leadGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.1 m
From
57.5 m
To
64.6 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:57.5-64.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
368
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 17.8 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 57.5 64.6 7.1 0.09 112 2.5 4.7 368 2615”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inc.Joaquin · zincGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
inc.
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
4.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.1 m
From
57.5 m
To
64.6 m
Intercept Depth
57.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
inc.:57.5-64.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
368
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.7 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 33.4 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“including 57.5 64.6 7.1 0.09 112 2.5 4.7 368 2615”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · inc. · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ARCHENJoaquin · goldGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 184.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ARCHEN
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
184.5 m
From
-8 m
To
176.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ARCHEN:-8-176.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1038
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1476.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“ARCHEN P071-25 176.5 184.5 8 1.3 21 129 1038”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · ARCHEN · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ARCHENJoaquin · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 184.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ARCHEN
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
184.5 m
From
-8 m
To
176.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ARCHEN:-8-176.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1038
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 239.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“ARCHEN P071-25 176.5 184.5 8 1.3 21 129 1038”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · ARCHEN · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ARCHENJoaquin · leadGrade: 21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 184.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ARCHEN
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
184.5 m
From
-8 m
To
176.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ARCHEN:-8-176.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1038
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3874.5 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 21 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“ARCHEN P071-25 176.5 184.5 8 1.3 21 129 1038”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · ARCHEN · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

ARCHENJoaquin · zincGrade: 129Grade Unit: %Intercept: 184.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ARCHEN
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
129
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
184.5 m
From
-8 m
To
176.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
ARCHEN:-8-176.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1038
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 129 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 23800.5 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 129 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“ARCHEN P071-25 176.5 184.5 8 1.3 21 129 1038”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · ARCHEN · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P072-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P072-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
163.5 m
To
167.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P072-25:163.5-167.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P072-25 163.5 167.3 3.8 2.3 149 328 1247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P072-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P072-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 149Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P072-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
149
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
163.5 m
To
167.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P072-25:163.5-167.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 149 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 566.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P072-25 163.5 167.3 3.8 2.3 149 328 1247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P072-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P072-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 328Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P072-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
328
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.8 m
From
163.5 m
To
167.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P072-25:163.5-167.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 328 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1246.4 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 328 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P072-25 163.5 167.3 3.8 2.3 149 328 1247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P072-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P072-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1247Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P072-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1247
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.8 m
From
163.5 m
To
167.3 m
Intercept Depth
163.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P072-25:163.5-167.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1247 % zinc is exceptional against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4738.6 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 1247 % zinc is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P072-25 163.5 167.3 3.8 2.3 149 328 1247”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P072-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · goldGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 122.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
7.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
122.5 m
From
-7.5 m
To
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-7.5-115
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.5 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 918.8 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.5 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P073-25 115 122.5 7.5 0.29 30 1.1 2.4 176 1319”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 122.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
122.5 m
From
-7.5 m
To
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-7.5-115
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 35.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.29 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P073-25 115 122.5 7.5 0.29 30 1.1 2.4 176 1319”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · leadGrade: 30Grade Unit: %Intercept: 122.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
30
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
122.5 m
From
-7.5 m
To
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-7.5-115
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 30 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3675.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 30 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P073-25 115 122.5 7.5 0.29 30 1.1 2.4 176 1319”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 122.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
122.5 m
From
-7.5 m
To
115 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-7.5-115
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 134.8 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.1 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY P073-25 115 122.5 7.5 0.29 30 1.1 2.4 176 1319”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 97.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 5.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
5.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.95 m
From
104.75 m
To
111.7 m
Intercept Depth
104.75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:104.75-111.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
263
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.8 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 40.3 %·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 104.75 111.7 6.95 0.13 14 0.4 5.8 263 1829”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 11.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 50Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
50
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 50 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 610.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.3 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P074-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P074-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
157.5 m
To
169.7 m
Intercept Depth
157.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P074-25:157.5-169.7
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
308
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.6 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 43.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P074-25 157.5 169.7 12.2 0.97 50 1.5 3.6 308 3755”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P074-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 101.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
101.9 m
From
-3.9 m
To
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-3.9-98
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 397.4 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 101.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
101.9 m
From
-3.9 m
To
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-3.9-98
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 75.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.74 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 260Grade Unit: %Intercept: 101.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
260
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
101.9 m
From
-3.9 m
To
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-3.9-98
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 260 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 26494.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 260 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 101.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
101.9 m
From
-3.9 m
To
98 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-3.9-98
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 61.1 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS P076-25 98 101.9 3.9 0.74 260 0.6 1.5 394 1535”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 40Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
40
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 388.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 2.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.7 m
From
26.8 m
To
36.5 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:26.8-36.5
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
112
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 26.8 36.5 9.7 0.11 40 0.3 1.4 112 1083”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.39 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.39 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 51 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 387.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.6 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P077-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P077-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m
From
48 m
To
55.6 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P077-25:48-55.6
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
168
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 13.7 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.8 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P077-25 48 55.6 7.6 0.39 51 0.6 1.8 168 1280”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P077-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 20.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 116.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
20.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
116.5 m
From
-20.55 m
To
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-20.55-95.95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20.55 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2394.1 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 20.55 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P079-25 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 116.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
116.5 m
From
-20.55 m
To
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-20.55-95.95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 10.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P079-25 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 116.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
116.5 m
From
-20.55 m
To
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-20.55-95.95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 932.0 %·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P079-25 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 116.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
116.5 m
From
-20.55 m
To
95.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-20.55-95.95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 46.6 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P079-25 95.95 116.5 20.55 0.09 8 0.4 3.7 171 3519”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · goldGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 101 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
101 m
From
-6 m
To
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-6-95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 606.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P080-25 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 101 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
101 m
From
-6 m
To
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-6-95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 56.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.56 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P080-25 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · leadGrade: 44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 101 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
101 m
From
-6 m
To
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-6-95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 44 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4444.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 44 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P080-25 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · zincGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 101 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
101 m
From
-6 m
To
95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-6-95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % zinc is strong against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 131.3 %·m is strong (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.3 % zinc is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA P080-25 95 101 6 0.56 44 1.3 4 280 1678”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.19 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.19 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P080-25 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P080-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 205.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P080-25 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P080-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P080-25 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P080-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P080-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P080-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.8 m
From
140.5 m
To
151.3 m
Intercept Depth
140.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P080-25:140.5-151.3
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 17.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P080-25 140.5 151.3 10.8 0.19 19 0.5 1.6 110 1188”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P080-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.84 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.84 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 87 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 435.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5 m
From
17 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
17 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:17-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
203
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 17 22 5 0.84 87 1.9 0 203 1014”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.55 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 417Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
417
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 417 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1668.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 417 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P081-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P081-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
102 m
To
106 m
Intercept Depth
102 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P081-25:102-106
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
461
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P081-25 102 106 4 0.55 417 0 0 461 1844”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P081-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.21 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P082-25 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P082-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 25 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 213.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P082-25 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P082-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.8 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P082-25 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P082-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

P082-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
P082-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.55 m
From
124.45 m
To
133 m
Intercept Depth
124.45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
P082-25:124.45-133
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 12.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“P082-25 124.45 133 8.55 0.21 25 0.8 1.4 117 1004”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · P082-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 58.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 105.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
58.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
105.55 m
From
-58.55 m
To
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-58.55-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 58.55 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6180.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 58.55 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P083-25 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 105.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
105.55 m
From
-58.55 m
To
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-58.55-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.06 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.06 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P083-25 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 105.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
105.55 m
From
-58.55 m
To
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-58.55-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 844.4 %·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P083-25 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 105.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
105.55 m
From
-58.55 m
To
47 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-58.55-47
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 42.2 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA P083-25 47 105.55 58.55 0.06 8 0.4 1.2 70 4117”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TRANQUILOJoaquin · goldGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TRANQUILO
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
67 m
From
-12 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TRANQUILO:-12-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 804.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“TRANQUILO PR001-25 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · TRANQUILO · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TRANQUILOJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TRANQUILO
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
67 m
From
-12 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TRANQUILO:-12-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.37 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.37 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“TRANQUILO PR001-25 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · TRANQUILO · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TRANQUILOJoaquin · leadGrade: 364Grade Unit: %Intercept: 67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TRANQUILO
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
364
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
67 m
From
-12 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TRANQUILO:-12-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 364 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 24388.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 364 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“TRANQUILO PR001-25 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · TRANQUILO · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TRANQUILOJoaquin · zincGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TRANQUILO
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
67 m
From
-12 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TRANQUILO:-12-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 73.7 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“TRANQUILO PR001-25 55 67 12 0.37 364 1.1 0.7 449 5392”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · TRANQUILO · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.17 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.17 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR002-25 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR002-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 167Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
167
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 167 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1002.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR002-25 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR002-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR002-25 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR002-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR002-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR002-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
60 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR002-25:60-66
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
205
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR002-25 60 66 6 0.17 167 0.2 0.5 205 1233”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR002-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · goldGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
20
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
-20 m
To
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-20-9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 580.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 20 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR003-25 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
-20 m
To
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-20-9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR003-25 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · leadGrade: 59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29 m
From
-20 m
To
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-20-9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 59 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1711.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 59 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR003-25 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · zincGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29 m
From
-20 m
To
9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-20-9
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 34.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR003-25 9 29 20 0.57 59 1.2 0.1 139 2784”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Joaquin · goldGrade: 2.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.35 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR003-26 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR003-26 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Joaquin · silverGrade: 26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 182.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR003-26 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR003-26 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR003-26 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR003-26 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR003-26Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR003-26
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
57 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
57 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR003-26:57-64
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
237
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR003-26 57 64 7 2.35 26 0.6 0.2 237 1661”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR003-26 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 40Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
40
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 40 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 280.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 10.5 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
49 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
49 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:49-56
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
154
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.3 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 49 56 7 0.3 40 1.5 1.3 154 1075”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 255Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
255
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 255 g/t silver is strong against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6630.0 g/t·m is strong.

Positive factors

  • 255 g/t silver is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m
From
81 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
81 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:81-107
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
321
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 20.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 81 107 26 0.27 255 0.5 0.8 321 8344”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.03 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.03 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 1839Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1839
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1839 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5517.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1839 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR004-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR004-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
91 m
To
94 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR004-25:91-94
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2002
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 4.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR004-25 91 94 3 1.03 1839 1 1.4 2002 6006”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR004-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NJoaquin · goldGrade: 15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA N
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50 m
From
-15 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA N:-15-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 750.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 15 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA N PR006-25 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA N · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 50 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA N
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
50 m
From
-15 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA N:-15-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA N PR006-25 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA N · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NJoaquin · leadGrade: 65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA N
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
65
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
50 m
From
-15 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA N:-15-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 65 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3250.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 65 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA N PR006-25 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA N · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NJoaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 50 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA N
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
50 m
From
-15 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA N:-15-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA N PR006-25 35 50 15 0.1 65 0 0 73 1095”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA N · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR007-25 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR007-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
121
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 121 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1573.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR007-25 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR007-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR007-25 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR007-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR007-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR007-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
39 m
To
52 m
Intercept Depth
39 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR007-25:39-52
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
140
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR007-25 39 52 13 0.14 121 0.3 0 140 1818”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR007-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.41 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 436Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
436
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 436 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15696.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 436 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
36 m
From
1 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:1-37
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
474
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 1 37 36 0.41 436 0.2 0 474 17061”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 1024Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1024
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1024 g/t silver is exceptional against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13312.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 1024 g/t silver is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.9 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.3 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR008-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR008-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
16 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR008-25:16-29
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1096
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR008-25 16 29 13 0.8 1024 0.3 0 1096 14244”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR008-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · goldGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
95 m
From
-8 m
To
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-8-87
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 760.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 8 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR011-25 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
95 m
From
-8 m
To
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-8-87
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR011-25 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · leadGrade: 138Grade Unit: %Intercept: 95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
138
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
95 m
From
-8 m
To
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-8-87
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 138 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13110.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 138 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR011-25 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
95 m
From
-8 m
To
87 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-8-87
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 9.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR011-25 87 95 8 0.25 138 0.1 0 161 1284”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · goldGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
55 m
From
-39 m
To
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-39-16
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2145.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 39 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR015-25 16 55 39 0.55 208 0.1 0 255 9928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
55 m
From
-39 m
To
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-39-16
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR015-25 16 55 39 0.55 208 0.1 0 255 9928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · leadGrade: 208Grade Unit: %Intercept: 55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
208
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
55 m
From
-39 m
To
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-39-16
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 208 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 11440.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 208 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR015-25 16 55 39 0.55 208 0.1 0 255 9928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KARINAJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KARINA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
55 m
From
-39 m
To
16 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KARINA:-39-16
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 5.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KARINA PR015-25 16 55 39 0.55 208 0.1 0 255 9928”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KARINA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.93 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.93 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR015-25 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 9.1 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR015-25 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR015-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR015-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
38 m
To
45 m
Intercept Depth
38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR015-25:38-45
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1011
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR015-25 38 45 7 0.93 903 1.3 0 1011 7074”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR015-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 17.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR016-25 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR016-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
78
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 78 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2964.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR016-25 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR016-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR016-25 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR016-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR016-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR016-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
38 m
From
12 m
To
50 m
Intercept Depth
12 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR016-25:12-50
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
117
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR016-25 12 50 38 0.45 78 0.1 0 117 4429”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR016-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR017-25 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR017-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 864.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR017-25 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR017-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 14.4 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR017-25 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR017-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR017-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR017-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24 m
From
0 m
To
24 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR017-25:0-24
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
74
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR017-25 0 24 24 0.24 36 0.6 0.1 74 1787”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR017-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.57 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.57 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR018-25 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR018-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 121Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
121
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 121 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1694.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR018-25 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR018-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 8.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR018-25 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR018-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR018-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR018-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
22 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR018-25:22-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
182
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR018-25 22 36 14 0.57 121 0.6 0 182 2547”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR018-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · goldGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26 m
From
-4 m
To
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-4-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 104.0 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR023-25 22 26 4 0.41 205 2.7 0.3 319 1275”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26 m
From
-4 m
To
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-4-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.59 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.59 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR021-25 22 26 4 0.59 285 2.4 0.2 401 1606”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · leadGrade: 285Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
285
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m
From
-4 m
To
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-4-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 285 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7410.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 285 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR021-25 22 26 4 0.59 285 2.4 0.2 401 1606”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CSSJoaquin · zincGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CSS
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m
From
-4 m
To
22 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CSS:-4-22
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 62.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“CSS PR021-25 22 26 4 0.59 285 2.4 0.2 401 1606”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · CSS · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.64 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.64 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR022-25 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 193Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
193
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 193 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1158.0 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR022-25 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 5.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.9 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR022-25 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR022-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR022-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
30 m
To
36 m
Intercept Depth
30 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR022-25:30-36
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
275
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % zinc is below against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 1.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % zinc is below the weak threshold (2 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR022-25 30 36 6 0.64 193 0.9 0.2 275 1651”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR022-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · goldGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69 m
From
-14 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-14-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 14 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 966.0 g/t·m is exceptional (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 14 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY PR025-25 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
69 m
From
-14 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-14-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 29.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY PR025-25 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · leadGrade: 22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69 m
From
-14 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-14-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1518.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 22 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY PR025-25 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

SAVARYJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 69 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
SAVARY
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
69 m
From
-14 m
To
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
SAVARY:-14-55
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.8
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % zinc is moderate against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 41.4 %·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“SAVARY PR025-25 55 69 14 0.43 22 0.6 1.8 143 1997”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · SAVARY · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.42 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR026-25 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR026-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 21 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 147.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 21 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR026-25 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR026-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.5 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR026-25 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR026-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR026-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR026-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
78 m
To
85 m
Intercept Depth
78 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR026-25:78-85
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 16.8 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR026-25 78 85 7 0.42 21 0.5 2.4 162 1134”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR026-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.33 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR027-25 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR027-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 20Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
20
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 20 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 280.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR027-25 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR027-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.5 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR027-25 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR027-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR027-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR027-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
72 m
To
86 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR027-25:72-86
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
126
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 23.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR027-25 72 86 14 0.33 20 0.5 1.7 126 1766”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR027-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 2.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.45 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.45 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 98Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
98
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 98 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 294.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 6.0 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
79 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
79 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:79-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
432
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 6.6 %·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 79 82 3 2.45 98 2 2.2 432 1295”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.38 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 153.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 3.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR028-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR028-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
92 m
To
109 m
Intercept Depth
92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR028-25:92-109
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
104
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 25.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR028-25 92 109 17 0.38 9 0.2 1.5 104 1762”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR028-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.88 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 20.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR029-25 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 91 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1001.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR029-25 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.7 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 18.7 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR029-25 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR029-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR029-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
77 m
To
88 m
Intercept Depth
77 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR029-25:77-88
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
372
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 24.2 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR029-25 77 88 11 1.88 91 1.7 2.2 372 4087”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR029-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.95 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 12.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR030-25 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 35 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 455.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR030-25 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 7.8 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR030-25 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR030-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR030-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
69 m
To
82 m
Intercept Depth
69 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR030-25:69-82
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
185
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR030-25 69 82 13 0.95 35 0.6 1.5 185 2411”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR030-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · goldGrade: 17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51 m
From
-17 m
To
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-17-34
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 17 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 867.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 17 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA PR031-25 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51 m
From
-17 m
To
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-17-34
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 21.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.43 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA PR031-25 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · leadGrade: 28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51 m
From
-17 m
To
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-17-34
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 28 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 1428.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 28 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA PR031-25 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KASIAJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KASIA
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51 m
From
-17 m
To
34 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KASIA:-17-34
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.7
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 25.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“KASIA PR031-25 34 51 17 0.43 28 0.5 1.7 142 2417”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · KASIA · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 14.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR032-25 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR032-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 629.0 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR032-25 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR032-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.8 % lead is weak against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 13.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR032-25 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR032-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR032-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR032-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17 m
From
45 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
45 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR032-25:45-62
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
162
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 15.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR032-25 45 62 17 0.86 37 0.8 0.9 162 2749”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR032-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Joaquin · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 0.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.09 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR035-25 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR035-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Joaquin · silverGrade: 22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 220.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR035-25 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR035-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Joaquin · leadGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % lead is below against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 4.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 % lead is below the weak threshold (1 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR035-25 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR035-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

PR035-25Joaquin · zincGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PR035-25
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
80 m
To
90 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PR035-25:80-90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
114
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 19.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“PR035-25 80 90 10 0.09 22 0.4 1.9 114 1143”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · PR035-25 · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · goldGrade: 16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51 m
From
-16 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-16-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 816.0 g/t·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 16 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR036-25 35 51 16 0.05 15 0.6 1 74 1180”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · silverGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51 m
From
-16 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-16-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR036-25 35 51 16 0.05 15 0.6 1 74 1180”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · leadGrade: 15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51 m
From
-16 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-16-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 15 % lead is exceptional against the default band [10, 6, 3, 1] %. Grade×width 765.0 %·m is exceptional.

Positive factors

  • 15 % lead is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR036-25 35 51 16 0.05 15 0.6 1 74 1180”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MARTA NWJoaquin · zincGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MARTA NW
Project
Joaquin
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
argentina
Ticker
AGD

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51 m
From
-16 m
To
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MARTA NW:-16-35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
Coeur Mining
QP Signed
No

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 % zinc is weak against the default band [18, 10, 5, 2] %. Grade×width 30.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“MARTA NW PR036-25 35 51 16 0.05 15 0.6 1 74 1180”

Context: Table 4: Cerro Leon project, significant drill hole assay results reported during the June 2025 quarter. · MARTA NW · Columns: Hole ID | From | To | Interval | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) | AgEq | AgEq GT

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (20)

indicatedCerro Leon · silverTonnes: 6820000Contained Metal: 37.8Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:4339bf4f9ddaf0a3210d
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6820000
Contained Metal
37.8
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A substantial indicated resource row from the existing Cerro Leon MRE, reproduced here as background rather than a new estimate.

Positive factors

  • JORC-compliant resource is explicitly stated
  • Large indicated resource base

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate restated in this report
  • Cut-off not disclosed in the table excerpt
  • No named competent person provided in the text provided

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

indicatedCerro Leon · goldTonnes: 6820000Grade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 107Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:4339bf4f9ddaf0a3210d
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6820000
Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
107
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade component of the historical Cerro Leon resource table.

Positive factors

  • Resource row provides gold component alongside AgEq

Negative factors

  • Historical resource context
  • Cut-off not disclosed in the excerpt

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

indicatedCerro Leon · leadTonnes: 6820000Grade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 41.9Contained Unit: mlbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:4339bf4f9ddaf0a3210d
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6820000
Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
41.9
Contained Unit
mlb

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lead resource grade from the historical Cerro Leon estimate.

Positive factors

  • Lead is explicitly reported as part of the resource table

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate
  • Economic value caveat applies to most prospects

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

indicatedCerro Leon · zincTonnes: 6820000Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 140Contained Unit: mlbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:4339bf4f9ddaf0a3210d
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6820000
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
140
Contained Unit
mlb

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Zinc resource grade from the historical Cerro Leon estimate.

Positive factors

  • Zinc explicitly reported in the resource table

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate
  • Economic value caveat applies to most prospects

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

indicatedJoaquin · silverTonnes: 15700000Grade: 128Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 65.2Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:f4eccd08d67532cfba4a
Deposit or zone
Joaquin

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
15700000
Grade
128
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
65.2
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2013-02-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
138
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical foreign estimate for Joaquin reproduced for comparison, not a new estimate.

Positive factors

  • Large historical foreign estimate
  • Supports broader Joaquin district context

Negative factors

  • Foreign estimate and not JORC-compliant
  • Historical estimate only
  • No QP/CP disclosure in the provided text

Evidence · table

“128”

Context: 15.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 13.8 years before this release

indicatedJoaquin · goldTonnes: 15700000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 61.1Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:f4eccd08d67532cfba4a
Deposit or zone
Joaquin

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
15700000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
61.1
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2013-02-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
138
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold component of the Joaquin foreign estimate table.

Positive factors

  • Gold component of the historical foreign estimate

Negative factors

  • Historical foreign estimate
  • Non-JORC estimate

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 15.7

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 13.8 years before this release

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 1000000Grade: 100Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.1Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:f3bebc45c43ac67d5b7a
Deposit or zone
Joaquin

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1000000
Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.1
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2013-02-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred silver resource from the Joaquin foreign estimate.

Positive factors

  • Historical inferred resource at Joaquin

Negative factors

  • Historical foreign estimate
  • Lower-confidence category

Evidence · table

“100”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 13.8 years before this release

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 1000000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.7Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:f3bebc45c43ac67d5b7a
Deposit or zone
Joaquin

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1000000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.7
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2013-02-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
110
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold component of the inferred foreign estimate row.

Positive factors

  • Gold component of the inferred Joaquin foreign estimate

Negative factors

  • Historical foreign estimate
  • Low-confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 1

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 13.8 years before this release

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 330000Grade: 410Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4.3Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:0fa01dc2192f975baa5b
Deposit or zone
Historical production 2019 to 2022

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
330000
Grade
410
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4.3
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2019-01-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
421
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2019-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical depletion/production table retained in the report.

Positive factors

  • Historical production figures disclosed

Negative factors

  • Not a resource estimate
  • Historical depletion figure

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.8 years before this release

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 330000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.5Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:0fa01dc2192f975baa5b
Deposit or zone
Historical production 2019 to 2022

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
330000
Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.5
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2019-01-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
421
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2019-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold component of the historical production/depletion row.

Positive factors

  • Gold component of the historical production table

Negative factors

  • Production/depletion context, not a resource estimate

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.8 years before this release

indicatedCerro Leon · silverGrade: 86Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 18.8Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:1619e82fffe504f98dd1
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
86
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
18.8
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A substantial indicated resource row from the existing Cerro Leon MRE, reproduced here as background rather than a new estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • JORC-compliant resource is explicitly stated
  • Large indicated resource base

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate restated in this report
  • Cut-off not disclosed in the table excerpt
  • No named competent person provided in the text provided

Evidence · table

“86”

Context: 6.82

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

indicatedCerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 107Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:1619e82fffe504f98dd1
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
107
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A substantial indicated resource row from the existing Cerro Leon MRE, reproduced here as background rather than a new estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • JORC-compliant resource is explicitly stated
  • Large indicated resource base

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate restated in this report
  • Cut-off not disclosed in the table excerpt
  • No named competent person provided in the text provided

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 6.82

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

indicatedCerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 41.9Contained Unit: mlbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:1619e82fffe504f98dd1
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
41.9
Contained Unit
mlb

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A substantial indicated resource row from the existing Cerro Leon MRE, reproduced here as background rather than a new estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • JORC-compliant resource is explicitly stated
  • Large indicated resource base

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate restated in this report
  • Cut-off not disclosed in the table excerpt
  • No named competent person provided in the text provided

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 6.82

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

indicatedCerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 140Contained Unit: mlbHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
not stated
Resource group id
resource:1619e82fffe504f98dd1
Deposit or zone
Cerro Leon

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
140
Contained Unit
mlb

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2023-05-18

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-05-18T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A substantial indicated resource row from the existing Cerro Leon MRE, reproduced here as background rather than a new estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • JORC-compliant resource is explicitly stated
  • Large indicated resource base

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate restated in this report
  • Cut-off not disclosed in the table excerpt
  • No named competent person provided in the text provided

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 6.82

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.5 years before this release

inferredCerro Leon · silverGrade: 77Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 40.9Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
silver
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:2e491781b8ae8fc080ed

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
77
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
40.9
Contained Unit
moz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“77”

Context: 16.47

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredCerro Leon · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 344Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
gold
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:2e491781b8ae8fc080ed

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
344
Contained Unit
koz

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 16.47

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredCerro Leon · leadGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 95.6Contained Unit: mlbView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
lead
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:2e491781b8ae8fc080ed

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
95.6
Contained Unit
mlb

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 16.47

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredCerro Leon · zincGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 304Contained Unit: mlbView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Cerro Leon
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:2e491781b8ae8fc080ed

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
304
Contained Unit
mlb

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
172
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 16.47

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 16700000Grade: 126Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 68.3Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:14921cddd094a161428f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16700000
Grade
126
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
68.3
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2013-02-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
136
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred silver resource from the Joaquin foreign estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Historical inferred resource at Joaquin

Negative factors

  • Historical foreign estimate
  • Lower-confidence category

Evidence · table

“126”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 13.8 years before this release

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 16700000Grade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 64.2Contained Unit: kozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Region
argentina
Reported Region
Santa Cruz, Argentina
Ticker
USL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:14921cddd094a161428f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
16700000
Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
64.2
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2013-02-01

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
136
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2013-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred silver resource from the Joaquin foreign estimate. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Historical inferred resource at Joaquin

Negative factors

  • Historical foreign estimate
  • Lower-confidence category

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 16.7

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 13.8 years before this release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.