Kermode Reports 2023 Review and 2024 Plans for Monashee Mountains Projects
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Kermode Resources Ltd.
- Ticker
- KLM
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Graphitic carbon, Sulfur, Iron ore
- Document categories
- Drill results, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 07:27:26 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Kermode Resources Ltd. has released a review of its 2023 exploration results and plans for 2024 across four projects in the Monashee Mountains, British Columbia. The review highlights previously reported high-grade gold and silver assays from grab and channel samples at Silver Bell, Khrysos, and Eastgate BC, including concentrate grades up to 379.0 ppm gold and 5140 ppm silver. Additionally, the Vigh Graphite project shows high graphitic carbon grades up to 21.3%.
Reasoning: The document reviews previously reported exploration results from multiple projects, highlighting high-grade gold, silver, and graphitic carbon from surface samples and concentrate tests. However, the data lacks novelty, and the QA/QC procedures are noted as preliminary.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold and silver results from grab samples and concentrate tests
- High graphitic carbon grades reported
- Review covers multiple projects with exploration potential
Negative factors
- All reported assay results are re-releases of previously disclosed data, limiting novelty
- Samples are primarily surface grab and channel samples, which have lower representativeness than drill intercepts
- QA/QC statement indicates no blind blanks or standards were utilized by the company, relying solely on commercial lab internal procedures
- Preliminary nature of field geochemistry programs
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 74
Classification and evidence
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: All assay results presented in the document are explicitly stated as 'previously reported by Kermode on...' with specific dates, indicating no new data is being released.
Evidence · text
“The following assays were previously reported by Kermode on November 28, 2023.”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: The QA/QC Statement explicitly notes that 'no blind analytical blanks and standards were utilized by the Company', indicating a lack of independent QA/QC measures by the company itself.
Evidence · text
“Due to the preliminary nature of the field geochemistry programs, no blind analytical blanks and standards were utilized by the Company”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The 'Qualified Person' section states that Mr. Robert Carrington, Professional Geologist, a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Robert Carrington, Professional Geologist and Professional Engineering Geologist, a Qualified Person as defined in Canadian NI 43-101”
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("concentrate")
Gravity Routeneutral
Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.
Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")
Multi-Domain Testedpositive
Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.
Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 74. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (64)
Fact 1Silver Bell · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399177
- Northing
- 5562273
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: 996412
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 2Silver Bell · silverGrade: 1100Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1100
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399177
- Northing
- 5562273
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1,100”
Context: 996412
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 3Silver Bell · goldGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399162
- Northing
- 5562271
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“4.9”
Context: 996413
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 4Silver Bell · silverGrade: 612Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 612
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399162
- Northing
- 5562271
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“612”
Context: 996413
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 5Silver Bell · goldGrade: 16.4Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399177
- Northing
- 5562273
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade gold from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“16.4”
Context: 996420
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 6Silver Bell · silverGrade: 65Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399177
- Northing
- 5562273
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“65”
Context: 996420
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 7Silver Bell · goldGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399177
- Northing
- 5562273
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 996421
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 8Silver Bell · silverGrade: 433Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 433
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 399177
- Northing
- 5562273
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“433”
Context: 996421
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 9Khrysos · goldGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over 1.1m channel sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 996414
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 10Khrysos · silverGrade: 168Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 168
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver over 1.1m channel sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“168”
Context: 996414
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 11Khrysos · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over 0.7m channel sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 996415
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 12Khrysos · silverGrade: 260Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 260
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver over 0.7m channel sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“260”
Context: 996415
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 13Khrysos · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a channel sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade over 0.4m channel sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 996416
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 14Khrysos · silverGrade: 34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over 0.4m channel sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“34”
Context: 996416
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 15Khrysos · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade over a channel sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade over 0.8m channel sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.2”
Context: 996417
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 16Khrysos · silverGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- channel
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade over a channel sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade over 0.8m channel sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“21”
Context: 996417
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 17Khrysos · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 996426
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 18Khrysos · silverGrade: 15Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low silver grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“15”
Context: 996426
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 19Khrysos · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 996427
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 20Khrysos · silverGrade: 387Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 387
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“387”
Context: 996427
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 21Khrysos · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.6”
Context: 996428
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 22Khrysos · silverGrade: 108Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 108
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“108”
Context: 996428
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 23Khrysos · goldGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 996429
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 24Khrysos · silverGrade: 172Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 172
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“172”
Context: 996429
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 25Eastgate BC · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eastgate BC
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 675775
- Northing
- 5447431
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 996422
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 26Eastgate BC · goldGrade: 0Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eastgate BC
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 674783
- Northing
- 5447535
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Barren gold grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0”
Context: 996423
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 27Eastgate BC · goldGrade: 43.7Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eastgate BC
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 43.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 675783
- Northing
- 5447499
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“43.7”
Context: 996424
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 28Eastgate BC · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Eastgate BC
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Easting
- 675710
- Northing
- 5447477
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 996425
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 29Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 23-20-01
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 30Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 6.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate iron grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“6.3”
Context: 23-20-01
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 31Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3.6”
Context: 23-20-01
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 32Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low sulphur content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: 23-20-02
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 33Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low iron content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 23-20-02
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 34Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“9.6”
Context: 23-20-02
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 35Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low sulphur content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: 23-20-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 36Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 1.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low iron content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.7”
Context: 23-20-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 37Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 13.6Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Very high graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“13.6”
Context: 23-20-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 38Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 24-01
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 39Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate iron grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 24-01
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 40Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 24-01
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 41Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.1”
Context: 24-02
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 42Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate iron grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3.1”
Context: 24-02
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 43Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 24-02
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 44Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.3”
Context: 24-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 45Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate iron grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 24-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 46Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.5”
Context: 24-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 47Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low sulphur content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: 24-04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 48Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low iron content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.9”
Context: 24-04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 49Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Barren graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Barren graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: 24-04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 50Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High sulphur grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- High sulphur grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“7.0”
Context: 24-05
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 51Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 2.9Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate iron grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“2.9”
Context: 24-05
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 52Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 13.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Very high graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“13.1”
Context: 24-05
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 53Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low sulphur content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 24-06
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 54Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low iron content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.0”
Context: 24-06
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 55Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 24-06
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 56Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low sulphur content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.0”
Context: 24-07
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 57Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low iron content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 24-07
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 58Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.3”
Context: 24-07
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 59Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low sulphur content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.4”
Context: 24-08
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 60Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.2
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate iron grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“4.2”
Context: 24-08
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 61Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Moderate graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1.5”
Context: 24-08
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 62Vigh Graphite · sulfurGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- sulfur
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Low sulphur content
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 24-09
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 63Vigh Graphite · iron_oreGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- iron_ore
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.4
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- Moderate iron grade from grab sample
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3.4”
Context: 24-09
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 64Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbonGrade: 21.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Vigh Graphite
- Commodity
- graphitic carbon
- Ticker
- KLM
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.3
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- surface
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Exceptional graphitic carbon grade from grab sample
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“21.3”
Context: 24-09
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Metallurgical Results (10)
gold shaker tableSilver Bell · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- mine dump site material
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 66.4
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high gold grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Very high gold grade in concentrate from shaker table test
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“66.4”
Context: 996430
gold shaker tableSilver Bell · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- mine dump site material
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 2950
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade in concentrate from shaker table test
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“2,950”
Context: 996430
gold shaker tableSilver Bell · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- mine dump site material
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 9.9
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Good gold grade in middling product from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade in middling product
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“9.9”
Context: 996431
gold shaker tableSilver Bell · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Silver Bell
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- mine dump site material
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 1040
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high silver grade in middling product from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Very high silver grade in middling product
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“1,040”
Context: 996431
gold shaker tableKhrysos · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 379
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade in concentrate from shaker table test
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“379.0”
Context: 997709
gold shaker tableKhrysos · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 5140
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade in concentrate from shaker table test
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“5140”
Context: 997709
gold shaker tableKhrysos · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 74.5
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high gold grade in middling product from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Very high gold grade in middling product
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“74.5”
Context: 997710
gold shaker tableKhrysos · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 3750
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade in middling product from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade in middling product
Negative factors
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“3750”
Context: 997710
gold shaker tableKhrysos · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Tailings Grade
- 12.2
- Tailings Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High gold grade in tailings indicates poor recovery efficiency, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- High gold grade in tailings, indicating significant losses
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“12.2”
Context: 997711
gold shaker tableKhrysos · silverHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Khrysos
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- KLM
Test Work
- Program Status
- preliminary
- Test Type
- gold shaker table
- Processing Route
- crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table
- Sample
- 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing
Recovery
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Tailings Grade
- 91.6
- Tailings Grade Unit
- g/t
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High silver grade in tailings indicates poor recovery efficiency, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC.
Negative factors
- High silver grade in tailings, indicating significant losses
- Result is a re-release of historical data
- Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear
- No blind QA/QC samples used by company
Evidence · table
“91.6”
Context: 997711
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.