# Kermode Reports 2023 Review and 2024 Plans for Monashee Mountains Projects Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/KLM/news/8696352514768734/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2024-02-06T19:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Kermode Resources Ltd. - Ticker: KLM - Exchange: TSX - Region: British Columbia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver, Graphitic carbon, Sulfur, Iron ore - Document categories: Drill results, Metallurgy - Extracted: 2026-09-16 07:27:26 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Kermode Resources Ltd. has released a review of its 2023 exploration results and plans for 2024 across four projects in the Monashee Mountains, British Columbia. The review highlights previously reported high-grade gold and silver assays from grab and channel samples at Silver Bell, Khrysos, and Eastgate BC, including concentrate grades up to 379.0 ppm gold and 5140 ppm silver. Additionally, the Vigh Graphite project shows high graphitic carbon grades up to 21.3%. Reasoning: The document reviews previously reported exploration results from multiple projects, highlighting high-grade gold, silver, and graphitic carbon from surface samples and concentrate tests. However, the data lacks novelty, and the QA/QC procedures are noted as preliminary. - Positive factor: High-grade gold and silver results from grab samples and concentrate tests - Positive factor: High graphitic carbon grades reported - Positive factor: Review covers multiple projects with exploration potential - Negative factor: All reported assay results are re-releases of previously disclosed data, limiting novelty - Negative factor: Samples are primarily surface grab and channel samples, which have lower representativeness than drill intercepts - Negative factor: QA/QC statement indicates no blind blanks or standards were utilized by the company, relying solely on commercial lab internal procedures - Negative factor: Preliminary nature of field geochemistry programs Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 74 ## Classification and evidence **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: All assay results presented in the document are explicitly stated as 'previously reported by Kermode on...' with specific dates, indicating no new data is being released. Evidence · text > The following assays were previously reported by Kermode on November 28, 2023. **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: The QA/QC Statement explicitly notes that 'no blind analytical blanks and standards were utilized by the Company', indicating a lack of independent QA/QC measures by the company itself. Evidence · text > Due to the preliminary nature of the field geochemistry programs, no blind analytical blanks and standards were utilized by the Company **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: The 'Qualified Person' section states that Mr. Robert Carrington, Professional Geologist, a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical information. Evidence · text > The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Robert Carrington, Professional Geologist and Professional Engineering Geologist, a Qualified Person as defined in Canadian NI 43-101 **Mill Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\). Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route \("concentrate"\) **Gravity Route** Polarity: neutral Definition: Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet. Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route \("gravity"\) **Multi-Domain Tested** Polarity: positive Definition: Variability across ore domains \(oxide, transition, fresh\) has been addressed. Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 74. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (64) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-0) Silver Bell · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.9 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399177 - Northing: 5562273 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3.9 Context: 996412 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-1) Silver Bell · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1100 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399177 - Northing: 5562273 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade silver from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1,100 Context: 996412 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-2) Silver Bell · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 4.9 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399162 - Northing: 5562271 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 4.9 Context: 996413 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-3) Silver Bell · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 612 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399162 - Northing: 5562271 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade silver from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 612 Context: 996413 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-4) Silver Bell · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 16.4 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399177 - Northing: 5562273 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade gold from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade gold from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 16.4 Context: 996420 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 6 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-5) Silver Bell · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 65 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399177 - Northing: 5562273 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate silver grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 65 Context: 996420 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 7 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-6) Silver Bell · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.2 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399177 - Northing: 5562273 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3.2 Context: 996421 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 8 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-7) Silver Bell · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 433 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 399177 - Northing: 5562273 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade silver from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 433 Context: 996421 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 9 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-12) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.1 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade over 1.1m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 4.0 Context: 996414 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 10 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-13) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 168 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.1 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade silver over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade silver over 1.1m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 168 Context: 996414 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 11 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-14) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.7 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate gold grade over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade over 0.7m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 996415 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 12 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-15) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 260 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.7 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade silver over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade silver over 0.7m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 260 Context: 996415 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 13 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-16) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low gold grade over a channel sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low gold grade over 0.4m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: 996416 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 14 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-17) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 34 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a channel sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate silver grade over 0.4m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 34 Context: 996416 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 15 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-18) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.8 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low gold grade over a channel sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low gold grade over 0.8m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.2 Context: 996417 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 16 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-19) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 21 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.8 m #### Classification - Sample Type: channel #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low silver grade over a channel sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low silver grade over 0.8m channel sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a channel sample, not a drill intercept - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 21 Context: 996417 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 17 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-20) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.3 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.3 Context: 996426 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 18 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-21) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 15 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low silver grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low silver grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 15 Context: 996426 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 19 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-22) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.1 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.1 Context: 996427 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 20 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-23) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 387 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade silver from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 387 Context: 996427 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 21 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-24) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.6 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.6 Context: 996428 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 22 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-25) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 108 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate silver grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 108 Context: 996428 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 23 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-26) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 996429 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 24 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-27) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 172 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade silver from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High-grade silver from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 172 Context: 996429 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 25 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-34) Eastgate BC · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eastgate BC - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.1 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 675775 - Northing: 5447431 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.1 Context: 996422 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 26 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-35) Eastgate BC · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eastgate BC - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 674783 - Northing: 5447535 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Barren gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Barren gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0 Context: 996423 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 27 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-36) Eastgate BC · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eastgate BC - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 43.7 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 675783 - Northing: 5447499 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 43.7 Context: 996424 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 28 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-37) Eastgate BC · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eastgate BC - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.3 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### Location - Easting: 675710 - Northing: 5447477 - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low gold grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low gold grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.3 Context: 996425 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 29 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-38) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.1 Context: 23-20-01 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 30 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-39) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 6.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate iron grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 6.3 Context: 23-20-01 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 31 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-40) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.6 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3.6 Context: 23-20-01 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 32 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-41) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low sulphur content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.0 Context: 23-20-02 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 33 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-42) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low iron content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 23-20-02 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 34 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-43) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 9.6 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 9.6 Context: 23-20-02 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 35 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-44) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low sulphur content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.0 Context: 23-20-03 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 36 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-45) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low iron content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.7 Context: 23-20-03 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 37 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-46) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 13.6 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Very high graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Very high graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 13.6 Context: 23-20-03 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 38 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-47) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.9 Context: 24-01 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 39 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-48) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate iron grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3.2 Context: 24-01 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 40 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-49) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.5 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.5 Context: 24-01 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 41 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-50) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.1 Context: 24-02 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 42 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-51) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate iron grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3.1 Context: 24-02 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 43 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-52) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: 24-02 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 44 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-53) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate sulphur grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate sulphur grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.3 Context: 24-03 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 45 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-54) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate iron grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3.2 Context: 24-03 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 46 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-55) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.5 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.5 Context: 24-03 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 47 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-56) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low sulphur content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.0 Context: 24-04 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 48 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-57) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low iron content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.9 Context: 24-04 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 49 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-58) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Barren graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Barren graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.0 Context: 24-04 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 50 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-59) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 7 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High sulphur grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: High sulphur grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 7.0 Context: 24-05 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 51 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-60) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 2.9 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate iron grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 2.9 Context: 24-05 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 52 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-61) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 13.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Very high graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Very high graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 13.1 Context: 24-05 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 53 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-62) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low sulphur content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: 24-06 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 54 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-63) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low iron content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.0 Context: 24-06 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 55 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-64) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 2.0 Context: 24-06 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 56 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-65) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low sulphur content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.0 Context: 24-07 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 57 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-66) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.8 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low iron content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low iron content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.8 Context: 24-07 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 58 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-67) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Low graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.3 Context: 24-07 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 59 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-68) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low sulphur content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.4 Context: 24-08 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 60 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-69) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 4.2 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate iron grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 4.2 Context: 24-08 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 61 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-70) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Moderate graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1.5 Context: 24-08 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 62 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-71) Vigh Graphite · sulfur Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: sulfur - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 0.1 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Low sulphur content from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Low sulphur content - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 0.1 Context: 24-09 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 63 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-72) Vigh Graphite · iron\_ore Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: iron\_ore - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 3.4 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Moderate iron grade from a grab sample, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: Moderate iron grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3.4 Context: 24-09 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### Fact 64 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-drill-facts-73) Vigh Graphite · graphitic carbon Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Vigh Graphite - Commodity: graphitic carbon - Ticker: KLM #### Geometry - Grade: 21.3 - Grade Unit: % #### Classification - Sample Type: surface #### QA/QC - QA/QC Disclosed: Yes - QP Signed: Yes #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2024-01-15T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional graphitic carbon grade from a grab sample, but the data is historical and from a surface sample with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Exceptional graphitic carbon grade from grab sample - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample is a surface grab, limiting representativeness - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 21.3 Context: 24-09 #### Tags used in scoring **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## Metallurgical Results (10) ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-8) Silver Bell · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: mine dump site material #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 66.4 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Very high gold grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Very high gold grade in concentrate from shaker table test - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 66.4 Context: 996430 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-9) Silver Bell · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: mine dump site material #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 2950 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Exceptional silver grade in concentrate from shaker table test - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 2,950 Context: 996430 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-10) Silver Bell · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: mine dump site material #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 9.9 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Good gold grade in middling product from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Good gold grade in middling product - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 9.9 Context: 996431 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-11) Silver Bell · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Silver Bell - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: mine dump site material #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 1040 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Very high silver grade in middling product from a shaker table test on dump material, but the data is historical and from non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Very high silver grade in middling product - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from a mine dump, not representative of in-situ ore - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 1,040 Context: 996431 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-28) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 379 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional gold grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade in concentrate from shaker table test - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 379.0 Context: 997709 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-29) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 5140 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade achieved in concentrate from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Exceptional silver grade in concentrate from shaker table test - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 5140 Context: 997709 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-30) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 74.5 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Very high gold grade in middling product from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Very high gold grade in middling product - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 74.5 Context: 997710 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-31) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Conc. Grade: 3750 - Conc. Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Exceptional silver grade in middling product from a shaker table test on ore drum material, but the data is historical and from potentially non-representative material with preliminary QA/QC. - Positive factor: Exceptional silver grade in middling product - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 3750 Context: 997710 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-32) Khrysos · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: gold - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Tailings Grade: 12.2 - Tailings Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High gold grade in tailings indicates poor recovery efficiency, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: High gold grade in tailings, indicating significant losses - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 12.2 Context: 997711 ### gold shaker table [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kermode-reports-2023-review-and-2024-plans-for-monashee-mountains-projects--9c9c19e3-4dc0-43a5-93fe-da2a3a1c891b#fact-metallurgical-facts-33) Khrysos · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Khrysos - Commodity: silver - Ticker: KLM #### Test Work - Program Status: preliminary - Test Type: gold shaker table - Processing Route: crushed using a jaw crusher, pulverized by a small grinding mill, and concentrated using a gold shaker table - Sample: 5 kg taken from ore drums at the Kami Main Showing #### Recovery - Recovery Basis: actual\_test - Tailings Grade: 91.6 - Tailings Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2023-12-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2024-02-06T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High silver grade in tailings indicates poor recovery efficiency, with historical data and preliminary QA/QC. - Negative factor: High silver grade in tailings, indicating significant losses - Negative factor: Result is a re-release of historical data - Negative factor: Sample material is from ore drums, representativeness of in-situ ore is unclear - Negative factor: No blind QA/QC samples used by company Evidence · table > 91.6 Context: 997711 ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.