Kestrel Gold Reports 2025 Diamond Drill Results from its 100% owned QCM Gold Property, British Columbia (Pursuant to Option to earn in Agreement with Centerra Gold) with Grades reporting up to 72 metres of 0.60 g/t Gold on the Main Zone and 22.35 metres of 0.66 g/t Gold on the 14 Vein
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Kestrel Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- KGC
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 04:10:04 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Kestrel Gold has released 2025 diamond drill results from its QCM Gold Property in British Columbia. Notable intercepts include 72 metres of 0.60 g/t gold in the Main Zone and 22.35 metres of 0.66 g/t gold in the 14 Vein.
Reasoning: The announcement reports new diamond drill results from the 2025 program, showing continuity in the Main Zone and 14 Vein, though grades are moderate.
Positive factors
- Continuous mineralization reported over significant widths
Negative factors
- Grades are relatively low (sub-1.0 g/t Au)
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The release reports results from a 2025 drilling program at the QCM Gold Property.
Evidence · text
“results from the 2025 diamond drilling program completed on the "Main Zone" and "14 Vein" zones”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1QCM · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 72 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- QCM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- KGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 72 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Reported 72m intercept at 0.60 g/t gold in the Main Zone.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept width of 72m
Negative factors
- Low grade of 0.60 g/t
Evidence · text
“72 metres of 0.60 g/t Gold on the Main Zone”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2QCM · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.35 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- QCM
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- KGC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- 14 Vein
- Loc. Source
- document
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Reported 22.35m intercept at 0.66 g/t gold in the 14 Vein.
Positive factors
- Solid intercept width of 22.35m
Negative factors
- Low grade of 0.66 g/t
Evidence · text
“22.35 metres of 0.66 g/t Gold on the 14 Vein”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.