Kingfisher Confirms Blind Copper-Gold Porphyry Discovery at Hank, HWY 37 Project, Golden Triangle, British Columbia

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Kingfisher Metals Corp.
Ticker
KFR
Exchange
TSX
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-16 07:10:26 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Kingfisher Metals Corp. has announced the discovery of a new blind copper-gold porphyry system at its HWY 37 Project in British Columbia. Drillhole HW-25-011 intersected 425.0 meters grading 0.40% CuEq, including a high-grade gold interval of 1.6 meters at 6.95 g/t Au. The company plans aggressive follow-up drilling in 2026 to test the large-scale potential of this new discovery, which remains open in all directions.

Reasoning: Kingfisher Metals has announced a significant blind copper-gold porphyry discovery at its HWY 37 Project, highlighted by a 425.0m intercept grading 0.40% CuEq, including a bonanza-grade gold interval. This represents a major new target with strong exploration potential, supported by geophysical anomalies and robust QA/QC. However, the lack of true width determination and reliance on assumed metallurgical recoveries for metal equivalents introduce some uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Discovery of a new blind copper-gold porphyry system, indicating significant exploration potential.
  • Long intercept of 425.0 meters at 0.40% CuEq, which is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • High-grade gold sub-intercept of 1.6 meters at 6.95 g/t Au, suggesting bonanza-grade zones.
  • Mineralization remains open in all directions, with the hole terminating in increasing copper grades.
  • Strong geophysical anomalies (IP surveys) indicate a potentially larger sulfide system.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, and the Qualified Person has approved the technical aspects.

Negative factors

  • True widths of the reported mineralized intervals have not been determined, which may overstate apparent thickness.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries (80% for all metals) as no testwork has been completed, introducing uncertainty.

Facts used in scoring: 91

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'True widths of the reported mineralized interval have not been determined.'

Evidence · text

“True widths of the reported mineralized interval have not been determined.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details a full QAQC program including blanks, standards, duplicates, and mentions the use of a certified laboratory (Bureau Veritas) and QP sign-off.

Evidence · text

“Drilling on site at the HWY 37 Project was supervised by on-site Kingfisher personnel who implemented a full QAQC program using coarse blanks, pulp blanks, standards, and duplicates inserted into the sample stream to monitor analytical accuracy and precision. The samples were sealed on site using tamper proof seals with unique identifiers. The samples were sent to the Bureau Veritas (BV) lab in Vancouver, British Columbia. BV's quality control system complies with global certifications for Quality ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories .”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent calculations are based on assumed metallurgical recoveries (80% for all metals) as no actual metallurgical testwork has been completed.

Evidence · text

“No current or historical metallurgical work has been completed therefore recoveries are assumed to be 80% for copper, 80% for gold and 80% for silver.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 91. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (91)

HW-25-001HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 548.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-001
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
548.1 m
From
249 m
To
797.1 m
Hole Depth
803 m
Intercept Depth
249 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-001:249-797.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409395
Northing
6344077
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
119 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept of 548.1m at 0.34% CuEq is a good result for a porphyry system, indicating significant mineralization. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept of 548.1m at 0.34% CuEq, which is a moderate to strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-001HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 124.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-001
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
124.2 m
From
426.55 m
To
550.75 m
Hole Depth
803 m
Intercept Depth
249 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-001:426.55-550.75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409395
Northing
6344077
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
119 °
Dip
-80 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong intercept of 124.2m at 0.47% CuEq within a broader mineralized zone is a positive result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept of 124.2m at 0.47% CuEq, which is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-002HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-002
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
118 m
To
124 m
Hole Depth
550 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-002:118-124
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409769
Northing
6343628
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
292 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 6.0m at 0.50 g/t AuEq is a moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade of 0.50 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 6.0m.
  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-002HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-002
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
201 m
To
217 m
Hole Depth
550 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-002:201-217
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409769
Northing
6343628
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
292 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A 16.0m intercept at 0.29 g/t AuEq is a weak to moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Weak to moderate grade of 0.29 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-002HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-002
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
233 m
To
247 m
Hole Depth
550 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-002:233-247
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409769
Northing
6343628
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
292 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A 14.0m intercept at 0.32 g/t AuEq is a weak to moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Weak to moderate grade of 0.32 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-002HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-002
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
405 m
To
415 m
Hole Depth
550 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-002:405-415
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409769
Northing
6343628
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
292 °
Dip
-85 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A 10.0m intercept at 0.47 g/t AuEq is a moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade of 0.47 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-003HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-003
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.3 m
From
101.7 m
To
108 m
Hole Depth
668 m
Intercept Depth
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-003:101.7-108
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
410086
Northing
6343432
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
286 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 6.3m at 0.56 g/t AuEq is a strong result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade of 0.56 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 6.3m.
  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-003HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-003
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
160 m
To
164 m
Hole Depth
668 m
Intercept Depth
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-003:160-164
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
410086
Northing
6343432
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
286 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.87
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 4.0m at 0.87 g/t AuEq is a strong result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade of 0.87 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 4.0m.
  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-003HWY 37 · goldGrade: 2.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-003
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
2.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
487.5 m
To
488.4 m
Hole Depth
668 m
Intercept Depth
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-003:487.5-488.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
410086
Northing
6343432
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
286 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very narrow intercept of 0.9m at 2.02 g/t AuEq is an exceptional grade for a porphyry system, but its limited width reduces overall materiality. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade of 2.02 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 0.9m.
  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-003HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-003
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
504 m
To
510 m
Hole Depth
668 m
Intercept Depth
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-003:504-510
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
410086
Northing
6343432
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
286 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 6.0m at 0.41 g/t AuEq is a moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade of 0.41 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 6.0m.
  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-004HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 557.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-004
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
557.8 m
From
328.1 m
To
885.9 m
Hole Depth
886 m
Intercept Depth
328.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-004:328.1-885.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409510
Northing
6344131
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
169 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very long intercept of 557.8m at 0.64% CuEq is a strong result for a porphyry system, indicating significant mineralization. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Very long intercept of 557.8m at 0.64% CuEq, which is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-004HWY 37 · copperGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 234.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-004
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
234.35 m
From
328.1 m
To
562.45 m
Hole Depth
886 m
Intercept Depth
328.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-004:328.1-562.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409510
Northing
6344131
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
169 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 234.35m at 1.00% CuEq within a broader mineralized zone is a very strong result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept of 234.35m at 1.00% CuEq, which is an exceptional grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-006HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 241 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-006
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
241 m
From
192 m
To
433 m
Hole Depth
839 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-006:192-433
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
410475
Northing
6341586
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
295 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept of 241.0m at 0.29 g/t AuEq is a weak to moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept of 241.0m at 0.29 g/t AuEq, which is a weak to moderate grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-006HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 110 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-006
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
110 m
From
197 m
To
307 m
Hole Depth
839 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-006:197-307
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
410475
Northing
6341586
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
295 °
Dip
-77 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.49
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A significant intercept of 110.0m at 0.49 g/t AuEq within a broader mineralized zone is a moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept of 110.0m at 0.49 g/t AuEq, which is a moderate grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-008HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 889.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-008
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
889.35 m
From
3.65 m
To
893 m
Hole Depth
893 m
Intercept Depth
3.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-008:3.65-893
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409415
Northing
6343882
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
27 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very long intercept of 889.35m at 0.47% CuEq is a strong result for a porphyry system, indicating significant mineralization. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Very long intercept of 889.35m at 0.47% CuEq, which is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-008HWY 37 · copperGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-008
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.15 m
From
287.95 m
To
328.1 m
Hole Depth
893 m
Intercept Depth
3.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-008:287.95-328.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409415
Northing
6343882
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
27 °
Dip
-73 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 40.15m at 1.16% CuEq within a broader mineralized zone is a very strong result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept of 40.15m at 1.16% CuEq, which is an exceptional grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-009HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 272.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-009
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
272.7 m
From
49.3 m
To
322 m
Hole Depth
761 m
Intercept Depth
49.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-009:49.3-322
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409586
Northing
6343818
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-82 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept of 272.7m at 0.31% CuEq is a moderate result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept of 272.7m at 0.31% CuEq, which is a moderate grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-010HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 721.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-010
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
721.7 m
From
4.3 m
To
726 m
Hole Depth
797 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-010:4.3-726
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409419
Northing
6343879
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-84 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very long intercept of 721.7m at 0.46% CuEq is a strong result for a porphyry system, indicating significant mineralization. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Very long intercept of 721.7m at 0.46% CuEq, which is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-010HWY 37 · copperGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 78.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-010
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
78.7 m
From
4.3 m
To
83 m
Hole Depth
797 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-010:4.3-83
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409419
Northing
6343879
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-84 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 78.7m at 1.01% CuEq within a broader mineralized zone is a very strong result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept of 78.7m at 1.01% CuEq, which is an exceptional grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-010HWY 37 · copperGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 47.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-010
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
47.55 m
From
273 m
To
320.55 m
Hole Depth
797 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-010:273-320.55
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
409419
Northing
6343879
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
75 °
Dip
-84 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional intercept of 47.55m at 1.12% CuEq within a broader mineralized zone is a very strong result for a porphyry system. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional intercept of 47.55m at 1.12% CuEq, which is an exceptional grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-011Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
281 m
To
293 m
Hole Depth
959 m
Intercept Depth
281 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-011:281-293
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
408790
Northing
6342028
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
111 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A 12.0m intercept at 1.22 g/t AuEq is an exceptional grade for a porphyry system and contributes to the significance of the new blind discovery. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade of 1.22 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.
  • Part of a new blind porphyry discovery.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-011Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 6.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
6.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
284.85 m
To
286.45 m
Hole Depth
959 m
Intercept Depth
281 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-011:284.85-286.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
408790
Northing
6342028
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
111 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A bonanza-grade intercept of 1.6m at 6.99 g/t AuEq is an exceptional result, contributing significantly to the new blind porphyry discovery. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza grade of 6.99 g/t AuEq over 1.6m, which is an exceptional grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.
  • Part of a new blind porphyry discovery.

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length of 1.6m.
  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The intercept of 1.6m at 6.95 g/t Au (6.99 g/t AuEq) is well above the exceptional threshold for gold in a porphyry deposit.

Evidence · table

“6.95”

Context: 1.6

HW-25-011Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
From
357 m
To
362.4 m
Hole Depth
959 m
Intercept Depth
281 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-011:357-362.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
408790
Northing
6342028
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
111 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A narrow intercept of 5.4m at 0.97 g/t AuEq is a strong result for a porphyry system and contributes to the significance of the new blind discovery. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade of 0.97 g/t AuEq for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.
  • Part of a new blind porphyry discovery.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length of 5.4m.
  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-011Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
468 m
To
497 m
Hole Depth
959 m
Intercept Depth
281 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-011:468-497
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
408790
Northing
6342028
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
111 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A 29.0m intercept at 0.30 g/t AuEq is a moderate result for a porphyry system and contributes to the significance of the new blind discovery. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade of 0.30 g/t AuEq over 29.0m for a porphyry deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.
  • Part of a new blind porphyry discovery.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-011Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 425 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
425 m
From
534 m
To
959 m
Hole Depth
959 m
Intercept Depth
281 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-011:534-959
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
408790
Northing
6342028
CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09
Azimuth
111 °
Dip
-65 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% CuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The discovery of a new blind porphyry system with a very long intercept of 425.0m at 0.40% CuEq is a highly significant result, indicating substantial exploration potential. The QA/QC is disclosed, but true width is not stated and metal equivalent assumptions are based on assumed recoveries.

Positive factors

  • Discovery of a new blind copper-gold porphyry system.
  • Very long intercept of 425.0m at 0.40% CuEq, which is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit.
  • Mineralization remains open in all directions, with the hole terminating in increasing copper grades.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and QP signed off.

Negative factors

  • True widths not determined.
  • Metal equivalent calculations rely on assumed metallurgical recoveries.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Reason: The document explicitly states the discovery of a 'new copper-gold porphyry system below the Hank epithermal gold-silver mineralized system' and a 'blind discovery'.

Evidence · text

“Drillhole HW-25-011 confirms discovery of a new copper - gold (Cu-Au) porphyry system below the Hank epithermal gold-silver (Au-Ag) mineralized system. This newly identified zone represents a blind discovery”
HW-25-011Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
281 m
To
293 m
Intercept Depth
281 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-011:281-293
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: HW-25-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-011Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-011
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
281 m
To
293 m
Intercept Depth
281 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-011:281-293
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 19.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: HW-25-011

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Incl.HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6 m
From
284.85 m
To
286.45 m
Intercept Depth
284.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Incl.:284.85-286.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: Incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Incl.HWY 37 · goldGrade: 6.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
6.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
284.85 m
To
286.45 m
Intercept Depth
284.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Incl.:284.85-286.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.95 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 11.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.95 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.95”

Context: Incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Incl.HWY 37 · silverGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
3.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
284.85 m
To
286.45 m
Intercept Depth
284.85 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Incl.:284.85-286.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.99
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.5”

Context: Incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.4 m
From
357 m
To
362.4 m
Intercept Depth
357 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:357-362.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
From
357 m
To
362.4 m
Intercept Depth
357 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:357-362.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.94 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 5.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.94 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.94”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
From
357 m
To
362.4 m
Intercept Depth
357 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:357-362.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29 m
From
468 m
To
497 m
Intercept Depth
468 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:468-497
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
468 m
To
497 m
Intercept Depth
468 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:468-497
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 2.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
2.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m
From
468 m
To
497 m
Intercept Depth
468 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:468-497
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 60.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.1”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 425 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
425 m
From
534 m
To
959 m
Intercept Depth
534 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:534-959
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 63.8 %·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 425 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
425 m
From
534 m
To
959 m
Intercept Depth
534 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:534-959
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 89.3 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 425 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
425 m
From
534 m
To
959 m
Intercept Depth
534 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:534-959
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.4
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.2 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 935.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.2”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-001HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 548.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-001
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
548.1 m
From
249 m
To
797.1 m
Intercept Depth
249 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-001:249-797.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 87.7 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: HW-25-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-001HWY 37 · silverGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 548.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-001
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
548.1 m
From
249 m
To
797.1 m
Intercept Depth
249 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-001:249-797.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.8 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 986.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.8”

Context: HW-25-001

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 124.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
124.2 m
From
426.55 m
To
550.75 m
Intercept Depth
426.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:426.55-550.75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 % copper is weak against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 22.4 %·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 124.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
124.2 m
From
426.55 m
To
550.75 m
Intercept Depth
426.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:426.55-550.75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 28.6 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 124.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
124.2 m
From
426.55 m
To
550.75 m
Intercept Depth
426.55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:426.55-550.75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 372.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.0”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-002HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-002
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
118 m
To
124 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-002:118-124
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: HW-25-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-002HWY 37 · silverGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-002
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
118 m
To
124 m
Intercept Depth
118 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-002:118-124
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 6.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.1”

Context: HW-25-002

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m
From
201 m
To
217 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:201-217
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
201 m
To
217 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:201-217
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16 m
From
201 m
To
217 m
Intercept Depth
201 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:201-217
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 36.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
233 m
To
247 m
Intercept Depth
233 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:233-247
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.02 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.3 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.02 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
233 m
To
247 m
Intercept Depth
233 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:233-247
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14 m
From
233 m
To
247 m
Intercept Depth
233 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:233-247
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.32
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.0”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
405 m
To
415 m
Intercept Depth
405 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:405-415
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
405 m
To
415 m
Intercept Depth
405 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:405-415
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 4.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
405 m
To
415 m
Intercept Depth
405 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:405-415
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 14.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.4”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-003HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-003
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.3 m
From
101.7 m
To
108 m
Intercept Depth
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-003:101.7-108
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: HW-25-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-003HWY 37 · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-003
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.3 m
From
101.7 m
To
108 m
Intercept Depth
101.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-003:101.7-108
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.56
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 31.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.0”

Context: HW-25-003

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
160 m
To
164 m
Intercept Depth
160 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:160-164
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.87
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
160 m
To
164 m
Intercept Depth
160 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:160-164
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.87
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.77 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 3.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.77 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 8.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
8.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
160 m
To
164 m
Intercept Depth
160 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:160-164
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.87
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 34.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 8.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“8.6”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m
From
487.5 m
To
488.4 m
Intercept Depth
487.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:487.5-488.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.0 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
487.5 m
To
488.4 m
Intercept Depth
487.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:487.5-488.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.68 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 1.68 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 33.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
33.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
487.5 m
To
488.4 m
Intercept Depth
487.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:487.5-488.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 33.9 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 30.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“33.9”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
504 m
To
510 m
Intercept Depth
504 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:504-510
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.03 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 0.2 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.03 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
504 m
To
510 m
Intercept Depth
504 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:504-510
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

andMary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Mary Cu-Au Deposits as well as the Hank Epithermal Au-Ag
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
504 m
To
510 m
Intercept Depth
504 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:504-510
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: and

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-004HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 557.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-004
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
557.8 m
From
328.1 m
To
885.9 m
Intercept Depth
328.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-004:328.1-885.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 167.3 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.3 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: HW-25-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-004HWY 37 · silverGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 557.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-004
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
557.8 m
From
328.1 m
To
885.9 m
Intercept Depth
328.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-004:328.1-885.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.64
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 892.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.6”

Context: HW-25-004

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 234.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
234.35 m
From
328.1 m
To
562.45 m
Intercept Depth
328.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:328.1-562.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 103.1 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.44 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.44”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 234.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
234.35 m
From
328.1 m
To
562.45 m
Intercept Depth
328.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:328.1-562.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 114.8 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.49 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · silverGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 234.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
234.35 m
From
328.1 m
To
562.45 m
Intercept Depth
328.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:328.1-562.45
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 539.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.3”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-006HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 241 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-006
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
241 m
From
192 m
To
433 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-006:192-433
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: HW-25-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-006HWY 37 · silverGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 241 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-006
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
241 m
From
192 m
To
433 m
Intercept Depth
192 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-006:192-433
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 96.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.4”

Context: HW-25-006

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 110 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
110 m
From
197 m
To
307 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:197-307
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.49
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.01 % copper is below against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 1.1 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.01 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.15 %) on the porphyry deposit band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 110 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
110 m
From
197 m
To
307 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:197-307
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.49
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.47 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 51.7 g/t·m is moderate.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · silverGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 110 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
110 m
From
197 m
To
307 m
Intercept Depth
197 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:197-307
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.49
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-008HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 889.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-008
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
889.35 m
From
3.65 m
To
893 m
Intercept Depth
3.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-008:3.65-893
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 195.7 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.22 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: HW-25-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-008HWY 37 · silverGrade: 1.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 889.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-008
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
889.35 m
From
3.65 m
To
893 m
Intercept Depth
3.65 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-008:3.65-893
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.47
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.5 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1334.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.5”

Context: HW-25-008

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.15 m
From
287.95 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
287.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:287.95-328.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.46 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 18.5 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.46 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.15 m
From
287.95 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
287.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:287.95-328.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 24.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.62 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.62”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · silverGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 40.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
2.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
40.15 m
From
287.95 m
To
328.1 m
Intercept Depth
287.95 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:287.95-328.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.16
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 100.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.5”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-009HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 272.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-009
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
272.7 m
From
49.3 m
To
322 m
Intercept Depth
49.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-009:49.3-322
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 40.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: HW-25-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-009HWY 37 · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 272.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-009
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
272.7 m
From
49.3 m
To
322 m
Intercept Depth
49.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-009:49.3-322
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4 g/t silver is moderate against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1090.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.0”

Context: HW-25-009

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-010HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 721.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-010
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
721.7 m
From
4.3 m
To
726 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-010:4.3-726
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.21 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 151.6 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.21 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: HW-25-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

HW-25-010HWY 37 · silverGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 721.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
HW-25-010
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
721.7 m
From
4.3 m
To
726 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
HW-25-010:4.3-726
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 938.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.3”

Context: HW-25-010

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 78.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
78.7 m
From
4.3 m
To
83 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:4.3-83
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.43 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 33.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.43 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
78.7 m
From
4.3 m
To
83 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:4.3-83
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.5 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 39.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.5 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 78.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
78.7 m
From
4.3 m
To
83 m
Intercept Depth
4.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:4.3-83
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 236.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.0”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 47.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
47.55 m
From
273 m
To
320.55 m
Intercept Depth
273 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:273-320.55
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 23.3 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.49 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.55 m
From
273 m
To
320.55 m
Intercept Depth
273 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:273-320.55
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 26.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 0.56 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

incl.HWY 37 · silverGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 47.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
incl.
Project
HWY 37
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
KFR

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
47.55 m
From
273 m
To
320.55 m
Intercept Depth
273 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
incl.:273-320.55
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

CRS
UTM NAD83 Zone 09

QA/QC

Laboratory
Bureau Veritas (BV)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.12
Metal Eq. Unit
% Cu-Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 90.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.9”

Context: incl.

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.