# Kootenay Commissions a Preliminary Economic Assessment on La Cigarra Silver Deposit and Continues to Aggressively Drill Columba

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-commissions-a-preliminary-economic-assessment-on-la-cigarra-silver-depo--1c6a1a84-5864-443d-bb2f-0bdacd152ded

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/KTN/news/7092235204366622/kootenay-commissions-a-preliminary-economic-assessment-on-la-cigarra-silver-depo

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-01-20T12:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Kootenay Silver Inc.

- Ticker: KTN

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Chihuahua, Mexico

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Lead, Zinc

- Document categories: Resource update, Economic study

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 06:58:53 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Kootenay Silver Inc. has commissioned a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for its La Cigarra silver deposit in Chihuahua, Mexico. The company is also conducting an aggressive 50,000-meter drilling program at the Columba deposit to expand its silver resource.

Reasoning: The company is advancing its La Cigarra project by commissioning a PEA, supported by a substantial silver-equivalent resource, while simultaneously drilling to expand the Columba deposit.

- Positive factor: Commissioning of PEA for La Cigarra

- Positive factor: High-grade silver resource \(102 g/t\)

- Positive factor: Significant silver-equivalent scale \(60.56 Moz M+I\)

- Positive factor: Aggressive drilling program at Columba

- Negative factor: Resource is a restatement of 2024 data \(historical context\)

Facts used in scoring: 5

## Classification and evidence

**PEA Only**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Only Class 4 / Initial Assessment economics available. Not bankable.

Why it applies: The company has commissioned a Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for the La Cigarra deposit.

Evidence · text

> engaged engineering firms Sacré-Davey Engineering Inc. \("Sacré-Davey"\) and Canenco Consulting Corp. \("Canenco"\) to conduct a Preliminary Economic Assessment \("PEA"\) on its La Cigarra Silver deposit

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

> The Mineral Resource Estimate was estimated by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P. Geo. of SGS Geological Services and is an independent Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Allan Armitage, PhD, P.Geo is named as the independent Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

> The Mineral Resource Estimate was estimated by Allan Armitage , PhD., P.Geo. of SGS Geological Services, and is an independent Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource is reported at a base case cut-off grade of 50 g/t AgEq.

Evidence · text

> Mineral resources are reported at a base case cut-off grade of 50 g/t AgEq.

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The resource estimate effective date is November 29, 2023, which is over two years prior to the publication date.

Evidence · text

> The effective date for the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate is November 29, 2023.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (4)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-commissions-a-preliminary-economic-assessment-on-la-cigarra-silver-depo--1c6a1a84-5864-443d-bb2f-0bdacd152ded#fact-resource-facts-1)

La Cigarra · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2023-11-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:22a6aa8a8c3931ec8ac0
- Deposit or zone: La Cigarra
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Material type: undisclosed

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 13650000
- Grade: 102
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 44.66
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 50
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2023-11-29

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 120
- Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant silver-equivalent resource reported, but it is a restatement of a 2024 estimate.

- Positive factor: Large silver resource

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · table

> 102

Context: 13.65

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.1 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-commissions-a-preliminary-economic-assessment-on-la-cigarra-silver-depo--1c6a1a84-5864-443d-bb2f-0bdacd152ded#fact-resource-facts-2)

La Cigarra · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra
- Commodity: gold
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2023-11-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:22a6aa8a8c3931ec8ac0
- Deposit or zone: La Cigarra
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Material type: undisclosed

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 13650000
- Grade: 0.07
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 29.6
- Contained Unit: koz
- Cutoff Grade: 50
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2023-11-29

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant silver-equivalent resource reported, but it is a restatement of a 2024 estimate.

- Positive factor: Large silver resource

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · table

> 0.07

Context: 13.65

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.1 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-commissions-a-preliminary-economic-assessment-on-la-cigarra-silver-depo--1c6a1a84-5864-443d-bb2f-0bdacd152ded#fact-resource-facts-3)

La Cigarra · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra
- Commodity: lead
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2023-11-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:22a6aa8a8c3931ec8ac0
- Deposit or zone: La Cigarra
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Material type: undisclosed

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 13650000
- Grade: 0.16
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 47.3
- Contained Unit: mlbs
- Cutoff Grade: 50
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2023-11-29

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant silver-equivalent resource reported, but it is a restatement of a 2024 estimate.

- Positive factor: Large silver resource

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · table

> 0.16

Context: 13.65

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.1 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-commissions-a-preliminary-economic-assessment-on-la-cigarra-silver-depo--1c6a1a84-5864-443d-bb2f-0bdacd152ded#fact-resource-facts-4)

La Cigarra · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: La Cigarra
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ticker: KTN

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2023-11-29T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Allan Armitage
- Resource group id: resource:22a6aa8a8c3931ec8ac0
- Deposit or zone: La Cigarra
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Material type: undisclosed

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 13650000
- Grade: 0.21
- Grade Unit: %
- Contained Metal: 63.6
- Contained Unit: mlbs
- Cutoff Grade: 50
- Cutoff Unit: g/t AgEq

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2023-11-29

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-01-25T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant silver-equivalent resource reported, but it is a restatement of a 2024 estimate.

- Positive factor: Large silver resource

- Negative factor: Historical data

Evidence · table

> 0.21

Context: 13.65

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.1 years before this release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
