# Kootenay Resources Reports Continued Review of Two Times Fred Drill Results Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-resources-reports-continued-review-of-two-times-fred-drill-results--4e728a3f-0b0c-427f-bd5a-3f695615e2b8 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/KTRI/news/6340295002041915/kootenay-resources-reports-continued-review-of-two-times-fred-drill-results Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2025-04-14T11:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Kootenay Resources Inc. - Ticker: KTRI - Exchange: TSX - Region: British Columbia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver, Copper - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-18 07:08:07 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Kootenay Resources is reviewing $4.0 million worth of historical exploration data at the Two Times Fred epithermal vein system in British Columbia. The review identifies several key vein trends \(Gold Hill, Shinju, Borrow Pit, Saki, and Hidden\) with significant strike potential indicated by magnetics and outcrop. Reasoning: The release is a data compilation and review of historical work rather than a report of new drill assays. While it outlines the structural potential of the Two Times Fred system, the lack of new numeric intercepts limits immediate materiality. - Positive factor: systematic review of historical data - Positive factor: identification of multiple vein trends - Positive factor: epithermal vein system potential - Negative factor: no new assay values reported in this release - Negative factor: wide drill spacing - Negative factor: lightly drilled status Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The release discusses the Two Times Fred system within the context of the company's Nechako Plateau properties. Evidence · text > Two Times Fred, Nechako Plateau Region, British Columbia **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: The document describes a review of existing work to understand the system, which is characteristic of resource/infill-style review rather than new discovery. Evidence · text > continues the compilation and review of $4.0 million dollars of work conducted on Two Times Fred ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (2) ### 2XF-21-0036 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-resources-reports-continued-review-of-two-times-fred-drill-results--4e728a3f-0b0c-427f-bd5a-3f695615e2b8#fact-drill-facts-0) Two Times Fred · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 2XF-21-0036 - Project: Two Times Fred - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: KTRI #### Geometry - From: 300 m - Intercept Depth: 300 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: underground #### Location - Location: Gold Hill Vein - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-04-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This is a single historical hole mentioned to provide depth context for the Gold Hill vein. Evidence · text > One lone hole 2XF-21-0036 intercepted Vein at 300m vertical depth from surface. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### 2XF21-0031 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/kootenay-resources-reports-continued-review-of-two-times-fred-drill-results--4e728a3f-0b0c-427f-bd5a-3f695615e2b8#fact-drill-facts-1) Two Times Fred · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: 2XF21-0031 - Project: Two Times Fred - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: KTRI #### Geometry - From: 265 m - Intercept Depth: 265 m #### Classification - Deposit Type: epithermal - Program: exploration - Sample Type: drill - Mining Method: underground #### Location - Location: Shinju Vein - Loc. Confidence: medium - Loc. Source: document #### QA/QC - QP Signed: Yes - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2025-04-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: This hole is cited as the deepest intersection to date for the Shinju vein. Evidence · text > Deepest intersection to date is 265m from surface \(2XF21-0031\) #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.