# Koryx Copper Files Technical Report with Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Haib Copper Project, Southern Namibia

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/koryx-copper-files-technical-report-with-updated-mineral-resource-estimate-for-t--1ee3c8e4-c6ac-4794-9c00-45b20be8d8c1

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/KRY/news/8930320996425380/koryx-copper-files-technical-report-with-updated-mineral-resource-estimate-for-t

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-05-08T20:26:17.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Koryx Copper S.A.

- Ticker: KRY

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Namibia

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: Molybdenum, Gold

- Document categories: Resource update, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-18 06:45:02 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Koryx Copper has filed a new NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Haib Copper Project in Namibia, featuring an updated Mineral Resource Estimate effective March 16, 2026. The company plans to publish a new PEA in late Q2 2026 and a PFS in Q4 2026, supported by an upcoming 50,000m drilling program.

Reasoning: The company has filed a new technical report containing an updated MRE, replacing an outdated PEA. While the departure of the COO is a corporate change, the technical roadmap \(drilling, PEA, and PFS\) provides clear project progression signals.

- Positive factor: Updated Mineral Resource Estimate \(MRE\) filed

- Positive factor: Clear roadmap for PEA and PFS

- Positive factor: Planned 50,000m infill and growth drilling program

- Positive factor: Porphyry deposit type with multiple metal potential

- Negative factor: Departure of COO

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The announcement is centered on the filing of a new technical report containing an updated mineral resource estimate.

Evidence · text

> announces that it has publicly filed on SEDAR+ its new technical report with the updated mineral resource estimate \(“ MRE ”\)

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The technical report is explicitly titled as an NI 43-101 Technical Report.

Evidence · text

> ‘NI 43-101 Technical Report – March 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate Haib Copper Project, Namibia’

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mr. J.C. Witley is named as the Qualified Person who reviewed and approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

> Mr. Witley has reviewed and approved the technical and scientific information within this news release.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (1)

### Haib

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/koryx-copper-files-technical-report-with-updated-mineral-resource-estimate-for-t--1ee3c8e4-c6ac-4794-9c00-45b20be8d8c1#fact-resource-facts-0)

Haib Copper Project · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Haib Copper Project
- Commodity: copper
- Region: namibia
- Reported Region: Namibia
- Ticker: KRY

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Jeremy C. Witley, Valentine E. Coetzee
- Resource group id: resource:37a7878599663274c802
- Deposit or zone: Haib
- Mining method: open\_pit
- Material type: sulphide
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-03-16

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-05-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The filing of a new technical report with an updated MRE is a key de-risking and progression milestone.

- Positive factor: Updated MRE filed

Evidence · text

> new technical report with the updated mineral resource estimate \(“ MRE ”\) titled ‘NI 43-101 Technical Report – March 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate Haib Copper Project, Namibia’

#### Tags used in scoring

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
