Lake Winn Announces Results from 2023 Field Program at Little Nahanni Pegmatite Property, Northwest Territories, Canada

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Lake Winn Resources Corp.
Ticker
LWR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Northwest Territories
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
Tantalum, Cesium, Tin
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-14 11:59:13 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Lake Winn Resources completed a multi-faceted 2023 exploration program at the Little Nahanni Pegmatite Project, featuring rock chip sampling, soil sampling, and geophysical surveys. Highlights include peak lithium values of 3.52% in rock samples and the identification of a new 7 km-long geophysical anomaly. The results support upcoming diamond drilling to test high-priority targets.

Reasoning: The 2023 field program successfully identified high-grade lithium-bearing pegmatite dykes and delineated extensions, providing strong targets for upcoming diamond drilling.

Positive factors

  • High-grade lithium intercepts in rock sampling
  • Exceptional lateral continuity of dykes
  • Successful delineation of extensions under cover via soil sampling
  • Identification of a new 7 km geophysical anomaly
  • QA/QC disclosed with certified lab and QP sign-off

Facts used in scoring: 7

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Analytical work was completed by ALS Canada Ltd. and technical information was approved by a Qualified Person (Kelson Willms, P.Geo).

Evidence · text

“Technical information in this news release has been approved by Kelson Willms, P.Geo... and a qualified person”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Soil sampling successfully delineated the extension of dyke swarms that extend under cover into previously unexplored areas.

Evidence · text

“Soil sampling successfully delineated the extension of dyke swarms that extend under cover into areas that have never been explored.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (7)

Fact 1lithiumGrade: 3.52Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
3.52
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
spodumene-bearing pegmatite dykes
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-11-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Peak value from spodumene-bearing pegmatite dykes.

Positive factors

  • High grade for lithium pegmatite

Evidence · text

“Peak value from spodumene-bearing pegmatite dykes was 3.52% Li”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 2lithiumGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
outcropping dyke
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-11-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 10 m composite sample across an outcropping dyke.

Positive factors

  • Strong intercept width and grade

Evidence · text

“A 10 m composite sample across an outcropping dyke returned 1.77% Li”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 3lithiumGrade: 2.11Grade Unit: % Li 2 OIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
2.11
Grade Unit
% Li 2 O
Intercept
1.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-11-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 2023 chip sampling highlight.

Positive factors

  • High grade lithium oxide

Evidence · text

“2.11% Li 2 O over 1.70 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 4lithiumGrade: 1.62Grade Unit: % Li 2 OIntercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.62
Grade Unit
% Li 2 O
Intercept
3.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-11-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 2023 chip sampling highlight.

Positive factors

  • Solid lithium oxide grade

Evidence · text

“1.62% Li 2 O over 3.10 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 5lithiumGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: % Li 2 OIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
% Li 2 O
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-11-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 2023 chip sampling highlight.

Positive factors

  • Solid lithium oxide grade

Evidence · text

“1.52% Li 2 O over 3.00 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 6lithiumGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: % Li 2 OIntercept: 1.62 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
% Li 2 O
Intercept
1.62 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-11-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 2023 chip sampling highlight.

Positive factors

  • High grade lithium oxide

Evidence · text

“1.90% Li 2 O over 1.62 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 7lithiumGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
3-10 m wide spodumene-bearing dyke
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-11-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Rock samples from a 3-10 m wide spodumene-bearing dyke traced over 800 m strike.

Positive factors

  • Consistent grade over significant strike length

Evidence · text

“Rock samples collected from a 3-10 m wide spodumene-bearing dyke that can be traced over an 800 m strike length returned an average grade of 1.52% Li”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.