lAMGOLD Reports Mineral Resources and Reserves for the Year Ended 2025

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
IAMGOLD Corporation
Ticker
IMG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-12 07:12:11 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

IAMGOLD reported its year-end 2025 Mineral Resources and Reserves, showing a 16% increase in Measured and Indicated (M&I) gold resources to 31.0 million ounces, driven by resource conversion at Côté Gold and Nelligan, and new acquisitions. However, Proven and Probable (P&P) gold reserves decreased by 7% to 9.9 million ounces, primarily due to depletion and grade adjustments at Côté Gold and Essakane, partially offset by increases at Westwood. The update highlights both growth in resource base and challenges in reserve replacement, with some grade dilution noted across key assets.

Reasoning: IAMGOLD reported its annual Mineral Resources and Reserves update, showing a significant increase in Measured and Indicated resources due to resource conversion and acquisitions, but a decrease in Proven and Probable reserves. Several deposits experienced grade declines, some offset by lower cut-off grades, indicating a mixed outcome for the year.

Positive factors

  • Category Upgrade
  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth
  • QP/CP Signed
  • NI 43-101 Compliant

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Cut-off Lowered
  • Dilutive Growth

Facts used in scoring: 31

Classification and evidence

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources increased 16% to 31.0 million ounces of gold in 1.0 Bt at 0.94 g/t Au.

Evidence · text

“Measured and Indicated ("M&I") Mineral Resources (100% basis) increased 16% to 31.0 million ounces of gold in 1.0 Bt at 0.94 g/t Au”

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources increased 16% to 31.0 million ounces of gold.

Evidence · text

“Measured and Indicated ("M&I") Mineral Resources (100% basis) increased 16% to 31.0 million ounces of gold”

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The increase in M&I resources was primarily associated with the conversion of Inferred Mineral Resources in the Gosselin deposit at Côté Gold and Nelligan deposit.

Evidence · text

“The increase was primarily associated with the conversion of Inferred Mineral Resources in the Gosselin deposit at Côté Gold and Nelligan deposit”

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves decreased 7%, or 796,000 ounces, from the year prior, primarily due to depletion at Côté Gold and Essakane.

Evidence · text

“P&P Mineral Reserves decreased 7%, or 796,000 ounces, from the year prior, primarily due to depletion at Côté Gold and Essakane”

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves decreased 7%, or 796,000 ounces, from the year prior.

Evidence · text

“P&P Mineral Reserves decreased 7%, or 796,000 ounces, from the year prior”

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: Essakane M&I Mineral Resources saw a 26% decrease in grades (to 0.91 g/t Au, including stockpiles).

Evidence · text

“a 26% decrease in grades (to 0.91 g/t Au, including stockpiles)”

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade reduced beyond the suspicious bound vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: Westwood (underground) Mineral Reserves cut-off grade was reduced to 6.40 g/t Au (down from 6.82 g/t Au previously).

Evidence · text

“reduction in the underground cut-off grade to 6.40 g/t Au (down from 6.82 g/t Au previously)”

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: Essakane M&I Mineral Resources increased 50% in tonnes but saw a 26% decrease in grades, indicating a dilutive expansion.

Evidence · text

“a 50% increase in tonnes (to 150 Mt) offsetting a 26% decrease in grades (to 0.91 g/t Au, including stockpiles)”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves statement was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

“prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101")”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., and Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng., are the 'qualified persons' responsible for the estimates.

Evidence · text

“Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Senior Director, Mining Geology, IAMGOLD Corporation is the "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101 ("QP") with respect to the mineralization being reported on and is responsible for the review and approval of all Mineral Resources estimates for IAMGOLD. Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng., Senior Director, Mining & Integrated Planning, IAMGOLD Corporation is the QP for the purposes of NI 43-101 with respect to the mineralization being reported on and is responsible for the review and approval of all Mineral Reserves estimates for IAMGOLD.”

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The Chevrier Mineral Resources were estimated as of September 23, 2022, and Philibert Mineral Resources as of September 22, 2023, making them over two years old relative to the December 31, 2025 effective date.

Evidence · text

“Chevrier Mineral Resources (including underground Inferred Resources) have been estimated as of September 23, 2022... Philibert Mineral Resources have been estimated as of September 22, 2023”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 31. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (31)

provenCôté GoldTonnes: 116055000Grade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3902Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté Gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:198f82e8103c42d4ecbf
Deposit or zone
Côté
Ownership percent
70 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
116055000
Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3902
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.46
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
127747000
Prior Grade
1.07
Prior Contained Metal
4376
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Proven reserves at Côté Gold decreased in tonnage, grade, and contained metal, indicating depletion and a slight grade dilution, despite a higher cut-off grade.

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 116,055

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 116055000 against 127747000 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 3902 against 4376 previously

probableCôté GoldTonnes: 101112000Grade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3139Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté Gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:048b7fb02312abe6781d
Deposit or zone
Côté
Ownership percent
70 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
101112000
Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3139
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.46
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
101427000
Prior Grade
0.91
Prior Contained Metal
2965
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.35

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable reserves at Côté Gold show a slight increase in grade and contained metal, despite stable tonnage, indicating an improvement in the quality of the probable reserve base.

Positive factors

  • Grade Improvement
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 101,112

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 101112000 against 101427000 previously

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 0.97 against 0.91 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 3139 against 2965 previously

provenWestwoodTonnes: 897000Grade: 10.89Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 314Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Westwood
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:0e3510276bd04a13cb37
Deposit or zone
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
897000
Grade
10.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
314
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
6.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
717000
Prior Grade
12.61
Prior Contained Metal
291
Prior Cutoff Grade
6.82

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Proven underground reserves at Westwood increased in tonnage and contained metal, but with a notable decrease in grade, partially influenced by a lower cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline
  • Cut-off Lowered

Evidence · table

“10.89”

Context: 897

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 897000 against 717000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 10.89 against 12.61 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 314 against 291 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade reduced beyond the suspicious bound vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 6.4 against 6.82 previously

probableWestwoodTonnes: 2565000Grade: 9.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 767Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Westwood
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:f169e8bf23e76b876d19
Deposit or zone
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
2565000
Grade
9.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
767
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
6.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
1886000
Prior Grade
10.98
Prior Contained Metal
666
Prior Cutoff Grade
6.82

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable underground reserves at Westwood increased significantly in tonnage and contained metal, but with a decrease in grade, influenced by a lower cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline
  • Cut-off Lowered

Evidence · table

“9.30”

Context: 2,565

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 2565000 against 1886000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 9.3 against 10.98 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 767 against 666 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade reduced beyond the suspicious bound vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 6.4 against 6.82 previously

provenWestwoodTonnes: 658000Grade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 17Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Westwood
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:5b51aa46c57051837471
Deposit or zone
Grand Duc
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
658000
Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
17
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.59
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
363000
Prior Grade
0.8
Prior Contained Metal
9
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.54

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Proven reserves at Grand Duc show strong growth in tonnage and contained metal, with a slight grade improvement, despite a higher cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Grade Improvement
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 658

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 658000 against 363000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 17 against 9 previously

probableWestwoodTonnes: 1238000Grade: 1.25Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 50Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Westwood
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:d404c7ec5714eca65a68
Deposit or zone
Grand Duc
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
1238000
Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
50
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.59
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
1090000
Prior Grade
1.08
Prior Contained Metal
38
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.54

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable reserves at Grand Duc show strong growth in tonnage, grade, and contained metal, indicating a positive update for this zone.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Grade Improvement
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 1,238

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 1.25 against 1.08 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 50 against 38 previously

provenEssakaneTonnes: 22178000Grade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 457Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Essakane
Region
burkina_faso
Reported Region
Burkina Faso
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:3b863521548ccaf72ea9
Material type
stockpile
Ownership percent
85 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
22178000
Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
457
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.31
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
18876000
Prior Grade
0.65
Prior Contained Metal
396
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.39

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Proven stockpile reserves at Essakane increased in tonnage and contained metal, but with a slight grade decrease, likely influenced by a lower cut-off grade.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline
  • Cut-off Lowered

Evidence · table

“0.64”

Context: 22,178

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 22178000 against 18876000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 457 against 396 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade reduced beyond the suspicious bound vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.31 against 0.39 previously

probableEssakaneTonnes: 34903000Grade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1219Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Essakane
Region
burkina_faso
Reported Region
Burkina Faso
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:c37147f1049c9f9c234a
Ownership percent
85 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
34903000
Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1219
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
0.31
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
44017000
Prior Grade
1.36
Prior Contained Metal
1920
Prior Cutoff Grade
0.39

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable open pit reserves at Essakane saw significant decreases in tonnage, grade, and contained metal, despite a lower cut-off grade, indicating a substantial reduction in this reserve category.

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline
  • Cut-off Lowered

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 34,903

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 34903000 against 44017000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.09 against 1.36 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 1219 against 1920 previously

Cut-off Lowerednegative

Cut-off grade reduced beyond the suspicious bound vs prior estimate — tonnage growth may be artificial inflation.

Why it applies: 0.31 against 0.39 previously

measuredCôté GoldTonnes: 153873000Grade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4598Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté Gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:0b5dbf49191e33f8005b
Deposit or zone
Côté
Ownership percent
70 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
153873000
Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4598
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
162140000
Prior Grade
0.94
Prior Contained Metal
4907

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resources at Côté decreased in tonnage, grade, and contained metal, indicating a reduction in the highest confidence resource category.

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 153,873

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 153873000 against 162140000 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 4598 against 4907 previously

indicatedCôté GoldTonnes: 268833000Grade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6697Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté Gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:85bb14bc32523eda0013
Deposit or zone
Côté
Ownership percent
70 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
268833000
Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
6697
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
276404000
Prior Grade
0.77
Prior Contained Metal
6878

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Côté saw a slight decrease in tonnage and contained metal, while grade remained stable.

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 268,833

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 268833000 against 276404000 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 6697 against 6878 previously

inferredCôté GoldTonnes: 62760000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1206Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté Gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:4b5db6f13545e1d7db4f
Deposit or zone
Côté
Ownership percent
70 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
62760000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1206
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
60362000
Prior Grade
0.61
Prior Contained Metal
1177

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Côté increased in tonnage and contained metal, despite a slight grade decrease, indicating some expansion of the speculative resource base.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 62,760

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 1206 from 1177

indicatedCôté GoldTonnes: 266741000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6861Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté Gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:4a29e634fe8387098130
Deposit or zone
Gosselin
Ownership percent
70 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
266741000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
6861
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
161300000
Prior Grade
0.85
Prior Contained Metal
4420

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Gosselin saw a substantial increase in tonnage and contained metal, primarily due to conversion from Inferred resources, despite a grade decrease.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth
  • Category Upgrade

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.80”

Context: 266,741

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 266741000 against 161300000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.8 against 0.85 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 6861 against 4420 previously

inferredCôté GoldTonnes: 37840000Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 959Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté Gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:d2058dc7b8e51827ed44
Deposit or zone
Gosselin
Ownership percent
70 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
37840000
Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
959
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
123900000
Prior Grade
0.75
Prior Contained Metal
2980

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Gosselin significantly decreased in tonnage and contained metal, largely due to conversion to Indicated category, despite a slight grade increase.

Positive factors

  • Grade Improvement

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 37,840

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 37840000 against 123900000 previously

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 0.79 against 0.75 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 959 against 2980 previously

measuredWestwoodTonnes: 1619000Grade: 7.21Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 375Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Westwood
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:87c1c4eb2b2af6b2b48a
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
1619000
Grade
7.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
375
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
1062000
Prior Grade
9.15
Prior Contained Metal
312

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resources at Westwood increased in tonnage and contained metal, but with a significant decrease in grade.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“7.21”

Context: 1,619

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 1619000 against 1062000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 7.21 against 9.15 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 375 against 312 previously

indicatedWestwoodTonnes: 10324000Grade: 6.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2022Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Westwood
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:f24f2bf3f5e69d99acd2
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
10324000
Grade
6.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2022
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
5627000
Prior Grade
7.75
Prior Contained Metal
1402

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Westwood significantly increased in tonnage and contained metal, but with a notable decrease in grade.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“6.09”

Context: 10,324

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 10324000 against 5627000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 6.09 against 7.75 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 2022 against 1402 previously

inferredWestwoodTonnes: 4507000Grade: 10.46Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1515Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Westwood
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:668a9c9f0d61a637701f
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4507000
Grade
10.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1515
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
4369000
Prior Grade
12.82
Prior Contained Metal
1801

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Westwood show a slight increase in tonnage but a significant decrease in grade and contained metal, indicating a dilution of the inferred resource base.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“10.46”

Context: 4,507

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 10.46 against 12.82 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 1515 against 1801 previously

Dilutive Growthnegative

Tonnage increased but contained metal flat or down — likely from lower cut-off grade, not geological expansion.

Why it applies: tonnage rose while contained metal went 1515 from 1801

measuredEssakaneTonnes: 38312000Grade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 640Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Essakane
Region
burkina_faso
Reported Region
Burkina Faso
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:7eaa03ca36f59a7a8273
Ownership percent
85 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
38312000
Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
640
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
21157000
Prior Grade
0.64
Prior Contained Metal
433

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured resources at Essakane increased significantly in tonnage and contained metal, but with a notable decrease in grade.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 38,312

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 38312000 against 21157000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.52 against 0.64 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 640 against 433 previously

indicatedEssakaneTonnes: 111683000Grade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3772Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Essakane
Region
burkina_faso
Reported Region
Burkina Faso
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:b4da0c7c13a8c36c2418
Ownership percent
85 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
111683000
Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3772
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
78722000
Prior Grade
1.4
Prior Contained Metal
3534

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Essakane show significant tonnage and contained metal growth, but with a substantial decrease in grade, suggesting a dilutive expansion.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 111,683

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 111683000 against 78722000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.05 against 1.4 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 3772 against 3534 previously

inferredEssakaneTonnes: 24195000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 853Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Essakane
Region
burkina_faso
Reported Region
Burkina Faso
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:dcae0d1b17b1b001bb86
Ownership percent
85 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
24195000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
853
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
12623000
Prior Grade
1.76
Prior Contained Metal
713

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Essakane show strong growth in tonnage and contained metal, but with a significant decrease in grade, indicating a dilutive expansion of the inferred base.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 24,195

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 24195000 against 12623000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 1.1 against 1.76 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 853 against 713 previously

indicatedGosseyTonnes: 14795000Grade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 355Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gossey
Region
burkina_faso
Reported Region
Burkina Faso
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:4692481d90dabe6d6553
Ownership percent
85 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
14795000
Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
355
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
8383000
Prior Grade
0.87
Prior Contained Metal
235

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Gossey show strong growth in tonnage and contained metal, despite a decrease in grade, indicating a positive expansion of the resource.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 14,795

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 14795000 against 8383000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.75 against 0.87 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 355 against 235 previously

inferredGosseyTonnes: 2688000Grade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 74Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gossey
Region
burkina_faso
Reported Region
Burkina Faso
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:bf03ac498d98baa804fd
Ownership percent
85 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2688000
Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
74
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
1611000
Prior Grade
1
Prior Contained Metal
52

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Gossey show growth in tonnage and contained metal, despite a decrease in grade, indicating an expansion of the speculative resource.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Grade Decline

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: 2,688

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 2688000 against 1611000 previously

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 0.85 against 1 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 74 against 52 previously

indicatedNelligan Mining ComplexTonnes: 122000000Grade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3700Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Nelligan Mining Complex
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:38fc0419f98f291d4fdf
Deposit or zone
Nelligan
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
122000000
Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3700
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
102845000
Prior Grade
0.95
Prior Contained Metal
3125

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Nelligan show strong growth in tonnage and contained metal, with stable grade, indicating a successful infill program to increase confidence.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 122,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: 122000000 against 102845000 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 3700 against 3125 previously

inferredNelligan Mining ComplexTonnes: 151000000Grade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4647Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Nelligan Mining Complex
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:880e2bb282516452a170
Deposit or zone
Nelligan
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
151000000
Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4647
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
166395000
Prior Grade
0.96
Prior Contained Metal
5161

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Nelligan decreased in tonnage and contained metal, likely due to conversion to higher confidence categories.

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline
  • Contained Metal Decline

Evidence · table

“0.96”

Context: 151,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 151000000 against 166395000 previously

Contained Metal Declinenegative

Contained metal decreased vs prior despite tonnage growth — grade dilution exceeds volume gain.

Why it applies: 4647 against 5161 previously

indicatedNelligan Mining ComplexTonnes: 243000Grade: 13.04Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 102Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Nelligan Mining Complex
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:ab2febfe10098d570781
Deposit or zone
Monster Lake
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
243000
Grade
13.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
102
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
239000
Prior Grade
10.93
Prior Contained Metal
84

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Monster Lake show growth in tonnage, grade, and contained metal, indicating a positive update for this high-grade deposit.

Positive factors

  • Tonnage Growth
  • Grade Improvement
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“13.04”

Context: 243

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 13.04 against 10.93 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 102 against 84 previously

inferredNelligan Mining ComplexTonnes: 1046000Grade: 14.83Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 499Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Nelligan Mining Complex
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:d8f0ff5743b0a94a4bb8
Deposit or zone
Monster Lake
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1046000
Grade
14.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
499
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
1053000
Prior Grade
14.44
Prior Contained Metal
489

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Monster Lake show a slight increase in grade and contained metal, despite a minor tonnage decrease, indicating an improvement in the quality of the inferred resource.

Positive factors

  • Grade Improvement
  • Contained Metal Growth

Negative factors

  • Tonnage Decline

Evidence · table

“14.83”

Context: 1,046

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Tonnage Declinenegative

Resource tonnage decreased vs prior estimate — pit optimization removed marginal material or geological model revised down.

Why it applies: 1046000 against 1053000 previously

indicatedPhilibertTonnes: 7884000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 279Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Philibert
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:13598c424119070675f4
Deposit or zone
Philibert
Ownership percent
75 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
7884000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
279
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
0
Prior Grade
0
Prior Contained Metal
0

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Philibert deposit is a new addition to the resource base, contributing significant indicated resources, representing a positive acquisition.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Resource
  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 7,884

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredPhilibertTonnes: 48465000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1709Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Philibert
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:d129c392641414a1241d
Deposit or zone
Philibert
Ownership percent
75 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
48465000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1709
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
0
Prior Grade
0
Prior Contained Metal
0

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Philibert deposit is a new addition to the resource base, contributing significant inferred resources, representing a positive acquisition.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Resource
  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 48,465

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedChevrierTonnes: 6400000Grade: 1.26Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 260Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chevrier
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:e5f6e39cbae24076bdd3
Deposit or zone
Chevrier
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
6400000
Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
260
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
0
Prior Grade
0
Prior Contained Metal
0

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Chevrier deposit is a new addition to the resource base, contributing significant indicated resources, representing a positive acquisition.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Resource
  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 6,400

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredChevrierTonnes: 15660000Grade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 652Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Chevrier
Region
canada
Reported Region
Canada
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:9f18c890fd4d8d3a0b48
Deposit or zone
Chevrier
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
15660000
Grade
1.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
652
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
0
Prior Grade
0
Prior Contained Metal
0

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Chevrier deposit is a new addition to the resource base, contributing significant inferred resources, representing a positive acquisition.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Resource
  • Tonnage Growth
  • Contained Metal Growth

Evidence · table

“1.30”

Context: 15,660

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

indicatedDiakha-SiribayaTonnes: 27937000Grade: 1.48Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1325Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Diakha-Siribaya
Region
mali
Reported Region
Mali
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:f8c23b865604d51659e5
Ownership percent
90 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
27937000
Grade
1.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1325
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
27937000
Prior Grade
1.48
Prior Contained Metal
1325

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resources at Diakha-Siribaya remained unchanged from the prior year, indicating no new exploration or re-estimation work.

Evidence · table

“1.48”

Context: 27,937

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredDiakha-SiribayaTonnes: 8468000Grade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 417Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Diakha-Siribaya
Region
mali
Reported Region
Mali
Ticker
IMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Adrienne Rispoli, P.Eng.
Resource group id
resource:195865202ece51cd1319
Ownership percent
90 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8468000
Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
417
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31
Prior Tonnes
8468000
Prior Grade
1.53
Prior Contained Metal
417

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resources at Diakha-Siribaya remained unchanged from the prior year, indicating no new exploration or re-estimation work.

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 8,468

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.