Leading Edge MAG SYSTEM, Maps Extensive Lithium Bearing Pegmatite Dyke Swarm, LNPG Project, NWT

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Lake Winn Resources Corp.
Ticker
LWR
Exchange
TSX
Region
Northwest Territories
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
Tantalum, Tin, Cesium
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-14 12:01:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Lake Winn Resources has completed a high-tech QMAGT magnetic survey that successfully mapped an extensive lithium-bearing pegmatite dyke swarm at the LNPG Project. The survey identified large anomalies, including the 'Alpha Prime' signature, and confirmed high-grade lithium intercepts through drilling and channel sampling.

Reasoning: The magnetic survey successfully mapped a large, continuous pegmatite system, providing high-confidence targets for the upcoming drill program.

Positive factors

  • Successful mapping of extensive pegmatite dyke swarm via QMAGT
  • High-grade lithium intercepts confirmed by drilling and channel sampling
  • Large magnetic anomaly (Alpha Prime) suggests significant scale
  • Upcoming 3,000m drill program already permitted

Negative factors

  • Survey sensitivity lost in deep cirque valleys due to topography

Facts used in scoring: 6

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions the technical information was approved by a Qualified Person (Heather Burrell, P.Geo).

Evidence · text

“approved by Heather Burrell, P.Geo., ... and a qualified person”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The company plans to expand on existing intercepts using 50m step-outs.

Evidence · text

“expand on the intercepts in these holes using 50 m step outs”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (6)

MAC06LNPG · lithiumGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.96 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAC06
Project
LNPG
Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
northwest territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17.96 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 17.96 m at 1.03% LiO2 is a solid intercept for a pegmatite system.

Positive factors

  • Significant width and grade

Evidence · text

“MAC06 encountered 17.96 m of LCT pegmatite grading 1.03% LiO 2”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MAC07LNPG · lithiumGrade: 1.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.94 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MAC07
Project
LNPG
Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
northwest territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10.94 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 10.94 m at 1.47% LiO2 is a high-grade intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for the system

Evidence · text

“MAC07 drilled ... encountered 10.94 m of LCT pegmatite grading 1.47% LiO 2”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Prison WallLNPG Project · lithiumGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Prison Wall
Project
LNPG Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
4.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Channel sample confirms lithium mineralization in outcrop.

Positive factors

  • Above 1% threshold

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Prison WallLNPG Project · tantalumGrade: 55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Prison Wall
Project
LNPG Project
Commodity
tantalum
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Elevated tantalum in channel sample.

Positive factors

  • Coincident tantalum

Evidence · table

“55.0”

Context: 4.40

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Berlin WallLNPG Project · lithiumGrade: 3.1Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Berlin Wall
Project
LNPG Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
0.95 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high grade lithium in a narrow channel sample.

Positive factors

  • High grade

Evidence · table

“3.10”

Context: 0.95

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Great Wall of ChinaLNPG Project · lithiumGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 16.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Great Wall of China
Project
LNPG Project
Commodity
lithium
Region
northwest territories
Reported Region
Northwest Territories
Ticker
LWR

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
% Li2O
Intercept
16.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-07-06T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wide intercept of 16.65m at 1.21% Li2O.

Positive factors

  • Significant width

Evidence · table

“1.21”

Context: 16.65

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.