Legacy Gold Extends Main Zone Width to 1,020ft (310m), Intersecting 0.67 g/t Gold over 50ft (15.2m) and 0.39 g/t over 200ft (61.0m) at Baner, Idaho

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Legacy Gold Mines Ltd.
Ticker
LEGY
Exchange
TSX
Region
Idaho
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-18 06:25:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Legacy Gold Mines Ltd. announced assay results from RC drill holes LG26-021 and LG26-022 at its Baner Gold Mine Property in Idaho. Hole LG26-021 extended the Main Zone mineralization to the west and uphill, increasing its width to approximately 310 metres, with intercepts including 0.67 g/t gold over 15.2 metres and 0.39 g/t gold over 61.0 metres. The company noted that mineralization remains open in all directions, supporting their interpretation of broad, continuous mineralization.

Reasoning: Legacy Gold reported new drill results from its Baner Gold Mine Property, with holes LG26-021 and LG26-022 intersecting significant gold mineralization. LG26-021 notably extended the Main Zone width and mineralization to the west and uphill. While the results are positive for extending the known mineralization, the lack of true width information and the deviation of one hole introduce some uncertainty.

Positive factors

  • Significant gold intercepts reported, including high-grade zones.
  • Drilling successfully extended the Main Zone mineralization to the west and uphill, increasing its demonstrated width.
  • Broad intersections of mineralization were encountered at or near surface.
  • QA/QC procedures and lab accreditation are disclosed.
  • Compositing parameters (cutoff and internal dilution) are transparently stated.

Negative factors

  • True widths are currently unknown, which may overstate apparent widths.
  • One hole (LG26-022) deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing its effectiveness.

Facts used in scoring: 23

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 23. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (23)

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
19.8 m
To
21.3 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
19.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:19.8-21.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is narrow and has a low gold grade, making it less material on its own, but it contributes to the overall mineralization picture.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.
  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 61 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
61 m
From
24.4 m
To
85.3 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
15 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:24.4-85.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This broad, near-surface intercept is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and contributing to the expanded Main Zone width. The grade is moderate but the width is substantial.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length, indicating significant mineralization.
  • Intercept starts near surface, favorable for potential open-pit mining.
  • Contributes to extending the Main Zone width.

Negative factors

  • Grade is moderate for gold.

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 61.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
2.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
27.4 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
15 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:27.4-29
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-grade intercept, but its narrow width limits its overall materiality, though it indicates the presence of higher-grade zones within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.41”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
64 m
To
65.5 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
15 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:64-65.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a moderate grade but is very narrow, limiting its individual significance, though it contributes to the overall picture of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.86”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
76.2 m
To
77.7 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
15 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:76.2-77.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good gold grade but is narrow, contributing to the overall mineralization but not being a standalone significant result.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
80.8 m
To
82.3 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
15 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:80.8-82.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good gold grade but is narrow, contributing to the overall mineralization but not being a standalone significant result.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
93 m
To
94.5 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
93 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:93-94.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is narrow and has a low gold grade, making it less material on its own, but it contributes to the overall mineralization picture.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.
  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
120.4 m
To
135.6 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:120.4-135.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is a strong positive, combining a good gold grade with a moderate width, and is significant for extending the known mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good grade over a moderate intercept length.
  • Contributes to extending the Main Zone mineralization.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 15.2

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
121.9 m
To
123.4 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:121.9-123.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-grade intercept, but its narrow width limits its overall materiality, though it indicates the presence of higher-grade zones within the broader mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-021Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-021
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
153.9 m
To
155.4 m
Hole Depth
158.5 m
Intercept Depth
153.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-021:153.9-155.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
233 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is narrow and at the cutoff grade, making it less material on its own, but it confirms the presence of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.
  • Narrow intercept length.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
18.3 m
To
25.9 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
12.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:18.3-25.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is near surface and of moderate width, but the grade is low and the hole's deviation reduces confidence in its representativeness of true width.

Positive factors

  • Intercept starts near surface.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
39.6 m
To
42.7 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
27.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:39.6-42.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a good grade but is narrow, and the hole's deviation reduces confidence in its representativeness of true width.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
79.2 m
To
80.8 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
79.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:79.2-80.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the stated cutoff grade and very narrow, making it a weak result, further impacted by the hole's deviation.

Negative factors

  • Below cutoff grade.
  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
106.7 m
To
108.2 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
106.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:106.7-108.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is at the cutoff grade and very narrow, making it a weak result, further impacted by the hole's deviation.

Negative factors

  • At cutoff grade.
  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
120.4 m
To
123.4 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
80 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:120.4-123.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a moderate grade but is narrow, and the hole's deviation reduces confidence in its representativeness of true width.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
172.2 m
To
182.9 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
110 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:172.2-182.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a moderate grade over a moderate width, but the hole's deviation reduces confidence in its representativeness of true width.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Moderate grade for gold.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
199.6 m
To
207.3 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
120 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:199.6-207.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept has a low grade over a moderate width, and the hole's deviation reduces confidence in its representativeness of true width.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG26-022Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG26-022
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
237.7 m
To
240.8 m
Hole Depth
244 m
Intercept Depth
237.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LG26-022:237.7-240.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
615174
Northing
5069538
Azimuth
56 °
Dip
-45 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is below the stated cutoff grade and very narrow, making it a weak result, further impacted by the hole's deviation.

Negative factors

  • Below cutoff grade.
  • Narrow intercept length.
  • Hole deviated and became parallel to mineralization, reducing effectiveness.

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 3.0

Tags used in scoring

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

ICG2018-11Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ICG2018-11
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good grade and moderate width, but its age and lack of detailed context limit its current materiality and novelty.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information.
  • Limited context provided (no depths, collar info).

Evidence · text

“historic intersection of 0.93 g/t Au over 9.3m (30.5ft) in ICG2018-11”

Tags used in scoring

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: This is a historic intersection from 2018, re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“historic intersection of 0.93 g/t Au over 9.3m (30.5ft) in ICG2018-11”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”
ICG2018-17Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
ICG2018-17
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Main Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with a good grade and moderate width, but its age and lack of detailed context limit its current materiality and novelty.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information.
  • Limited context provided (no depths, collar info).

Evidence · text

“easternmost interpreted intersection of 1.1 g/t Au over 6.0m in ICG2018-17”

Tags used in scoring

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: This is a historic intersection from 2018, re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“easternmost interpreted intersection of 1.1 g/t Au over 6.0m in ICG2018-17”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”
LG25-004Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 187.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG25-004
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
187.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept is very broad with a moderate gold grade, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature reduces its novelty.

Positive factors

  • Very broad intercept length.
  • Moderate gold grade.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information.
  • Limited context provided (no depths, collar info).

Evidence · text

“LG25-004 intersected 0.55 g/t Au over 187.5m (615ft)”

Tags used in scoring

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: This is a historical intercept from 2025, re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“LG25-004 intersected 0.55 g/t Au over 187.5m (615ft)”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG25-005Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 88.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG25-005
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
88.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept is broad but has a low gold grade, indicating mineralization but with limited individual significance due to its age and grade.

Positive factors

  • Broad intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information.
  • Low grade for gold.
  • Limited context provided (no depths, collar info).

Evidence · text

“LG25-005 intersected 0.32 g/t Au over 88.4m (290ft)”

Tags used in scoring

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: This is a historical intercept from 2025, re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“LG25-005 intersected 0.32 g/t Au over 88.4m (290ft)”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

LG25-005Baner Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LG25-005
Project
Baner Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
LEGY

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Main Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
Skyline Assayers & Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
10 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-26T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept is of moderate width but has a low gold grade, indicating mineralization but with limited individual significance due to its age and grade.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information.
  • Low grade for gold.
  • Limited context provided (no depths, collar info).

Evidence · text

“plus 0.47 g/t Au over 29.0m (95ft)”

Tags used in scoring

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: This is a historical intercept from 2025, re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

“LG25-005 intersected 0.32 g/t Au over 88.4m (290ft), plus 0.47 g/t Au over 29.0m (95ft) farther down the hill (see the Company's March 17, 2026 press release).”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.

Evidence · text

“True widths are unknown until zone dips are proven.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person, accredited lab, and describes RC drilling methods.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Mike Sutton, P.Geo., Director and VP of Exploration of the Company, is the Qualified Person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects , who reviewed and approved scientific and technical disclosure in this press release.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Composite intersections are calculated using a 0.2 g/t cutoff for gold with 10m internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.