# Limestone Quarry and Lime Production Plant, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/limestone-quarry-and-lime-production-plant-akmola-region-kazakhstan--4e3d0ce6-4d5c-4542-ad4f-e83bd319f760

Original source: https://minemarket.ai/listing/ec6cd4d1-8e75-423b-8400-a44200b311ce

Publisher: minemarket

Original announcement: 2026-09-22T00:28:38.979Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: AL Production Company LLP

- Ticker: Unavailable

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Akmola Region, Kazakhstan

- Primary commodity: Limestone

- Secondary commodities: Lime

- Document categories: Resource update, Agreement transaction, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-22 00:32:48 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.10 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

AL Production Company LLP is seeking a USD 20 million joint venture investment to develop a greenfield lime production project in the Akmola Region, Kazakhstan. The project targets the Maylysorskoye limestone deposit, which has historical reserves from 1985 and a preliminary expansion potential of 40 million tonnes.

Reasoning: The document describes a greenfield investment opportunity for a lime project. While it cites significant historical reserves and potential, the lack of modern compliant resource reporting and the current third-party ownership of the quarry license represent significant development risks.

- Positive factor: Significant potential resource expansion \(40Mt\)

- Positive factor: Existing mining licence for quarry

- Positive factor: Confirmed calcite composition via lab testing

- Negative factor: Historical reserves \(1985\) lack modern compliance \(JORC/NI 43-101\)

- Negative factor: Quarry ownership is currently held by a third party \(Tazagul Construction LLP\)

- Negative factor: Project is greenfield with no formal resource assessment for the 40Mt estimate

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 3

## Classification and evidence

**Historical Estimate Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: Reserves were approved in 1985 by a local commission and do not comply with modern JORC/NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

> Reserves at the Maylysorskoye deposit were approved in 1985 by the Territorial Reserves Commission

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The project relies on proximity to major industrial consumers in Kazakhstan.

Evidence · text

> major industrial consumers close to the deposit

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/limestone-quarry-and-lime-production-plant-akmola-region-kazakhstan--4e3d0ce6-4d5c-4542-ad4f-e83bd319f760#fact-resource-facts-0)

Maylysorskoye · limestone

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Maylysorskoye
- Commodity: limestone
- Region: kazakhstan
- Reported Region: Akmola Region, Kazakhstan

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:74765ae91160f611d8f6
- Deposit or zone: Maylysorskoye

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 391000

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1985-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical reserve figure provided without modern reporting standard.

- Negative factor: Historical data \(1985\)

Evidence · text

> 391 thousand tonnes in category B

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 41.7 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/limestone-quarry-and-lime-production-plant-akmola-region-kazakhstan--4e3d0ce6-4d5c-4542-ad4f-e83bd319f760#fact-resource-facts-1)

Maylysorskoye · limestone

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Maylysorskoye
- Commodity: limestone
- Region: kazakhstan
- Reported Region: Akmola Region, Kazakhstan

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:97b5203cecf1d3d19e8b
- Deposit or zone: Maylysorskoye

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 1569000

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1985-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical reserve figure provided without modern reporting standard.

- Negative factor: Historical data \(1985\)

Evidence · text

> 1,569 thousand tonnes in category C1

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 41.7 years before this release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
