Lion Copper and Gold Corp. Announces Further Expansion of Bear Mineralization

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Lion Copper and Gold Corp.
Ticker
LEO
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-18 07:14:34 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Lion Copper and Gold Corp. announced positive drill results from its 2023 exploration program in Nevada, primarily at the Bear deposit. New diamond core holes B-053A and B-054 intersected thick intervals of copper mineralization, expanding the deposit's footprint by 1,850 feet. Additional drilling at other targets also returned copper intercepts. The company highlights the potential of the large, underexplored porphyry system, despite some new grades being lower than historical highs.

Reasoning: The document reports new drill results that expand the known copper mineralization at the Bear deposit, a large porphyry system, and identify new exploration targets. While some new grades are lower than historical highs, the overall expansion and geological context are positive, supported by disclosed QA/QC and QP sign-off.

Positive factors

  • Thick intervals of copper mineralization encountered in new drilling
  • Expansion of the Bear deposit footprint by 1,850 feet in the northwesterly direction
  • Identification of additional untested targets for future exploration
  • High sulphide percentages in new holes may indicate proximity to higher-grade zones
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified reference materials, blanks, and chain of custody
  • Technical information reviewed and approved by a Qualified Person (QP)

Negative factors

  • Grades in new holes (B-053A and B-054) are less than some legacy holes
  • Historical resource estimate is explicitly stated as non-compliant NI 43-101 and not treated as current
  • No true width reported for any intercept, only downhole length

Facts used in scoring: 47

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: New drilling expanded the Bear deposit 1,850 ft in the northwesterly direction.

Evidence · text

“The intercepts in B-053A and B-054 have expanded the Bear deposit 1,850 ft in the northwesterly direction”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions the insertion of certified reference materials and blanks, and a chain of custody program.

Evidence · text

“Commercially-prepared certified reference materials and blanks were inserted by the Company at 50-ft intervals to ensure precision of results as a quality control measure. The Company also applied a chain of custody program to confirm sample security during all stages of sample collection, shipment, and storage.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The technical information has been reviewed and approved by C. Travis Naugle, QP MMSA, a qualified person as defined in NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by C. Travis Naugle, QP MMSA, CEO of Lion Copper and Gold Corp. and a qualified person as defined in NI 43-101.”

Porphyry Depositneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The Bear deposit is described as a large zone of porphyry copper mineralization.

Evidence · text

“Bear deposit, a large and partially-defined zone of porphyry copper mineralization”

Historical Estimate Onlynegative

Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling.

Why it applies: Anaconda's 1980 resource estimate is explicitly stated as non-compliant NI 43-101 and not treated as a current mineral resource.

Evidence · text

“In 1980, Anaconda developed a non-compliant NI 43-101 resource estimate* of 735 Mt of 0.44% TCu... The Company is not treating the historical estimates as current mineral resources.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: All reported intervals are given as downhole widths with no true width or drill orientation information to estimate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“926 ft of 0.31% TCu”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 47. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (46)

B-053ABear deposit · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 282.2448 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-053A
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
282.2448 m
From
674.2176 m
To
956.4024 m
Intercept Depth
674.2176 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-053A:674.2176-956.4024
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is a thick zone of copper mineralization that contributes to the expansion of the Bear deposit, with disclosed QA/QC and QP sign-off.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization
  • Contributes to expansion of the Bear deposit footprint
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 926

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

B-053ABear deposit · copperGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 71.0184 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-053A
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
71.0184 m
From
782.4816 m
To
853.44 m
Intercept Depth
782.4816 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-053A:782.4816-853.44
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval shows a higher copper grade within the broader mineralized zone, supporting the expansion of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade included interval within a thick mineralized zone
  • Contributes to expansion of the Bear deposit footprint
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 233

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

B-053ABear deposit · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 41.148 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-053A
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
41.148 m
From
899.4168 m
To
940.6728 m
Intercept Depth
899.4168 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-053A:899.4168-940.6728
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Another included interval with good copper grade, further supporting the mineralization continuity.

Positive factors

  • Good grade included interval within a thick mineralized zone
  • Contributes to expansion of the Bear deposit footprint
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 135

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

B-054Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 319.4304 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-054
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
319.4304 m
From
704.3928 m
To
1023.8952 m
Intercept Depth
704.3928 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-054:704.3928-1023.8952
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
205 °
Dip
-70 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept is a very thick zone of copper mineralization, further expanding the Bear deposit footprint.

Positive factors

  • Very thick interval of copper mineralization
  • Contributes to expansion of the Bear deposit footprint
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 1,048

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

B-054Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 39.9288 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-054
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
39.9288 m
From
704.3928 m
To
744.3816 m
Intercept Depth
704.3928 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-054:704.3928-744.3816
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
205 °
Dip
-70 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This included interval shows a higher copper grade within the broader mineralized zone, supporting the expansion of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Higher grade included interval within a thick mineralized zone
  • Contributes to expansion of the Bear deposit footprint
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 131

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

B-054Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 84.4392 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-054
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
84.4392 m
From
751.9416 m
To
836.3872 m
Intercept Depth
751.9416 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-054:751.9416-836.3872
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
205 °
Dip
-70 °

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Another included interval with good copper grade, further supporting the mineralization continuity.

Positive factors

  • Good grade included interval within a thick mineralized zone
  • Contributes to expansion of the Bear deposit footprint
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 277

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-332MacArthur Wedge · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.524 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-332
Project
MacArthur Wedge
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.524 m
From
134.112 m
To
135.636 m
Intercept Depth
134.112 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-332:134.112-135.636
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur Wedge
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade, narrow copper intercept from the MacArthur Wedge target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Narrow interval
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-332MacArthur Wedge · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.048 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-332
Project
MacArthur Wedge
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.048 m
From
163.068 m
To
166.116 m
Intercept Depth
163.068 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-332:163.068-166.116
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur Wedge
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade, narrow copper intercept from the MacArthur Wedge target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Narrow interval
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-332MacArthur Wedge · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.524 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-332
Project
MacArthur Wedge
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.524 m
From
195.072 m
To
196.596 m
Intercept Depth
195.072 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-332:195.072-196.596
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur Wedge
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow copper intercept from the MacArthur Wedge target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Narrow interval
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-333MacArthur East · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.572 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-333
Project
MacArthur East
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.572 m
From
77.724 m
To
82.296 m
Intercept Depth
77.724 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-333:77.724-82.296
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur East
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a copper intercept from the MacArthur East target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-333MacArthur East · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.572 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-333
Project
MacArthur East
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.572 m
From
86.868 m
To
91.44 m
Intercept Depth
86.868 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-333:86.868-91.44
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur East
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade copper intercept from the MacArthur East target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-333MacArthur East · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.096 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-333
Project
MacArthur East
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.096 m
From
96.012 m
To
102.108 m
Intercept Depth
96.012 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-333:96.012-102.108
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur East
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade copper intercept from the MacArthur East target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-333MacArthur East · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.048 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-333
Project
MacArthur East
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.048 m
From
114.3 m
To
117.348 m
Intercept Depth
114.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-333:114.3-117.348
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur East
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a narrow copper intercept from the MacArthur East target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Narrow interval
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-334MacArthur East · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.572 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-334
Project
MacArthur East
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.572 m
From
106.68 m
To
111.252 m
Intercept Depth
106.68 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-334:106.68-111.252
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur East
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade copper intercept from the MacArthur East target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 15

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QM-334MacArthur East · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.096 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
QM-334
Project
MacArthur East
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.096 m
From
204.216 m
To
210.312 m
Intercept Depth
204.216 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
QM-334:204.216-210.312
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
MacArthur East
Azimuth
180 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a low-grade copper intercept from the MacArthur East target, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MP-001Mason Pass Prospect · copperGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.048 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MP-001
Project
Mason Pass Prospect
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.048 m
From
70.104 m
To
73.152 m
Intercept Depth
70.104 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MP-001:70.104-73.152
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Mason Pass Prospect
Azimuth
295 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a copper intercept from the Mason Pass Prospect, part of the 2023 exploration program.

Positive factors

  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Narrow interval
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

RP-004Reno Prospect · copperGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.524 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RP-004
Project
Reno Prospect
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.524 m
From
230.124 m
To
231.648 m
Intercept Depth
230.124 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RP-004:230.124-231.648
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Reno Prospect
Azimuth
215 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry and Paragon Geochemical
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a high-grade copper intercept, though very narrow, from the Reno Prospect, indicating potential for further exploration.

Positive factors

  • High-grade copper intercept
  • QA/QC disclosed and QP signed

Negative factors

  • Very narrow interval
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Bear 1Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 378.8664 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 1
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
378.8664 m
From
273.1008 m
To
651.9672 m
Intercept Depth
273.1008 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 1:273.1008-651.9672
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1961-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, included for context but not representing new findings.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 1,243

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 10Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 504.7488 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 10
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
504.7488 m
From
529.7448 m
To
1034.4992 m
Intercept Depth
529.7448 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 10:529.7448-1034.4992
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1963-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing context for the current exploration.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 1,656

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 13Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 459.3936 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 13
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
459.3936 m
From
587.9072 m
To
1047.3408 m
Intercept Depth
587.9072 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 13:587.9072-1047.3408
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1963-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick and good-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing important historical context.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of good grade copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 1,507

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 14Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 614.172 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 14
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
614.172 m
From
413.004 m
To
1027.176 m
Intercept Depth
413.004 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 14:413.004-1027.176
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1964-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, very thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the understanding of the deposit's scale.

Positive factors

  • Very thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 2,015

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 17Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 726.6432 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 17
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
726.6432 m
From
402.0312 m
To
1128.7464 m
Intercept Depth
402.0312 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 17:402.0312-1128.7464
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1964-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, very thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, indicating significant historical mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 2,384

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 19Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 249.6312 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 19
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
249.6312 m
From
764.496 m
To
1014.6792 m
Intercept Depth
764.496 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 19:764.496-1014.6792
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1965-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 819

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 2Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 396.5448 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 2
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
396.5448 m
From
368.5032 m
To
764.496 m
Intercept Depth
368.5032 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 2:368.5032-764.496
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1962-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing context for the current exploration.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 1,301

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 20Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 252.0744 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 20
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
252.0744 m
From
435.5672 m
To
687.6928 m
Intercept Depth
435.5672 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 20:435.5672-687.6928
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1965-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 827

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 21Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 866.5584 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 21
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
866.5584 m
From
345.3464 m
To
1211.9808 m
Intercept Depth
345.3464 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 21:345.3464-1211.9808
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1966-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, very thick but low-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, indicating broad mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 2,843

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 22Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 725.4864 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 22
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
725.4864 m
From
497.4936 m
To
1222.2456 m
Intercept Depth
497.4936 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 22:497.4936-1222.2456
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1966-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, very thick and good-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, highlighting significant historical mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very thick interval of good grade copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 2,380

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 23BBear deposit · copperGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 320.0376 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 23B
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
320.0376 m
From
486.7656 m
To
807.4992 m
Intercept Depth
486.7656 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 23B:486.7656-807.4992
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1966-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick and high-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, indicating strong historical mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of high-grade copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 1,052

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 24Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 435.864 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 24
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
435.864 m
From
847.6568 m
To
1283.5968 m
Intercept Depth
847.6568 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 24:847.6568-1283.5968
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1967-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 1,430

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 25Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 459.6984 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 25
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
459.6984 m
From
553.212 m
To
1012.8448 m
Intercept Depth
553.212 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 25:553.212-1012.8448
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1967-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 1,508

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 31Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 149.352 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 31
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.55
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
149.352 m
From
754.0752 m
To
903.4872 m
Intercept Depth
754.0752 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 31:754.0752-903.4872
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1967-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick and high-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, indicating strong historical mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of high-grade copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.55”

Context: 490

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 32Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 376.1232 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 32
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
376.1232 m
From
356.3112 m
To
732.4824 m
Intercept Depth
356.3112 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 32:356.3112-732.4824
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1967-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 1,234

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 6ABear deposit · copperGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 517.5504 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 6A
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
517.5504 m
From
484.632 m
To
1002.1824 m
Intercept Depth
484.632 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 6A:484.632-1002.1824
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1963-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing context for the current exploration.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 1,698

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Bear 8Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 387.9984 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Bear 8
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
387.9984 m
From
419.7096 m
To
807.72 m
Intercept Depth
419.7096 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Bear 8:419.7096-807.72
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1963-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.29”

Context: 1,273

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

MH 2Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 174.3456 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MH 2
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
174.3456 m
From
549.2576 m
To
723.5952 m
Intercept Depth
549.2576 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MH 2:549.2576-723.5952
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1961-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, included for context but not representing new findings.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 572

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

L-1Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 204.216 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
L-1
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
204.216 m
From
853.44 m
To
1057.656 m
Intercept Depth
853.44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
L-1:853.44-1057.656
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing context for the current exploration.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 670

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

L-2Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 164.592 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
L-2
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
164.592 m
From
414.528 m
To
579.12 m
Intercept Depth
414.528 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
L-2:414.528-579.12
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1969-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick and good-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing important historical context.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of good grade copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 540

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

L-3Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 187.7568 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
L-3
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
187.7568 m
From
389.2896 m
To
576.9264 m
Intercept Depth
389.2896 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
L-3:389.2896-576.9264
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1970-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, low-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, included for context but not representing new findings.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 616

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

L-5Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 304.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
L-5
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
304.8 m
From
883.92 m
To
1188.72 m
Intercept Depth
883.92 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
L-5:883.92-1188.72
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1970-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing context for the current exploration.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 1,000

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

L-8Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 192.024 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
L-8
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
192.024 m
From
505.968 m
To
697.992 m
Intercept Depth
505.968 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
L-8:505.968-697.992
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1970-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, providing context for the current exploration.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 630

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

L-12Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 152.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
L-12
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
152.4 m
From
249.936 m
To
402.336 m
Intercept Depth
249.936 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
L-12:249.936-402.336
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1973-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 500

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

B-048Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 353.0864 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-048
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
353.0864 m
From
479.4504 m
To
832.4088 m
Intercept Depth
479.4504 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-048:479.4504-832.4088
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick and good-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, indicating strong historical mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of good grade copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 1,158

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

B-049Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 407.2128 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-049
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
407.2128 m
From
484.0824 m
To
891.8448 m
Intercept Depth
484.0824 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-049:484.0824-891.8448
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, very thick but low-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, indicating broad mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 1,338

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

B-050Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 159.0456 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-050
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
159.0456 m
From
740.3088 m
To
899.4168 m
Intercept Depth
740.3088 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-050:740.3088-899.4168
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, thick copper intercept from the Bear deposit, contributing to the overall historical data set.

Positive factors

  • Thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 522

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

B-051Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 452.3832 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-051
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
452.3832 m
From
667.2048 m
To
1120.194 m
Intercept Depth
667.2048 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-051:667.2048-1120.194
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, very thick but low-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, indicating broad mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Very thick interval of copper mineralization

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 1,484

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

B-052Bear deposit · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 203.3016 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
B-052
Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
203.3016 m
From
634.2288 m
To
837.6592 m
Intercept Depth
634.2288 m

Classification

Deposit Type
porphyry
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
B-052:634.2288-837.6592
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, very low-grade copper intercept from the Bear deposit, included for context but not representing new findings.

Negative factors

  • Historical data, not new information
  • Very low grade copper intercept
  • Apparent width only, no true width disclosed

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 667

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Resource Estimates (1)

BearBear deposit · copperTonnes: 735000000Grade: 0.44Grade Unit: % TCuHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Bear deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
LEO

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
other
QP Signed
No
Resource group id
resource:985392b2d6b30dd11845
Deposit or zone
Bear

Resource Data

Tonnes
735000000
Grade
0.44
Grade Unit
% TCu

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1980-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-10-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a historical, non-compliant resource estimate from 1980, indicating significant copper tonnage and grade but not meeting current reporting standards or being treated as a current resource.

Positive factors

  • Indicates significant historical copper potential

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate only, not compliant with current standards
  • Not treated as a current mineral resource by the company
  • No QP sign-off for current compliance

Evidence · text

“In 1980, Anaconda developed a non-compliant NI 43-101 resource estimate* of 735 Mt of 0.44% TCu”

Tags used in scoring

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 43.8 years before this release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.