Lion Copper and Gold Corp. Announces Positive Mason Valley Exploration Results

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Lion Copper and Gold Corp.
Ticker
LEO
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-18 07:18:23 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Lion Copper and Gold Corp. has reported positive surface trenching results at the Mason Pass prospect in Nevada, encountering ore-grade copper oxide mineralization. The program identified several high-grade intercepts, including 20 ft at 0.70% TCu in Trench 1, with mineralization appearing to be open in multiple directions.

Reasoning: Positive surface trenching results at a new prospect (Mason Pass) showing ore-grade copper oxide mineralization, supported by robust QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • At-surface ore-grade copper oxide mineralization encountered
  • Mineralization remains open and untested in most directions
  • QA/QC protocols (standards, blanks, chain of custody) clearly disclosed
  • QP sign-off provided

Facts used in scoring: 8

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes details on standards, blanks, and chain of custody.

Evidence · text

“Commercially prepared standards and blanks were inserted by the Company at 50-ft intervals”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: New mineralization identified at Mason Pass prospect near existing MacArthur pit.

Evidence · text

“The Mason Pass prospect is an at-surface copper oxide target located approximately 1.5 miles south-southwest of the MacArthur pit”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 8. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (8)

Trench 4Mason Pass · copperGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60.96 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 4
Project
Mason Pass
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
60.96 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant width intercept of 200 ft at 0.28% TCu.

Evidence · text

“200 ft of 0.28% TCu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Trench 4Mason Pass · copperGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 4
Project
Mason Pass
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.14 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade narrow intercept within Trench 4.

Evidence · text

“30 ft of 0.22% TCu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Trench 4Mason Pass · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 173.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 4
Project
Mason Pass
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
173.15 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Average grade for the full length of Trench 4.

Evidence · text

“averages 0.14% TCu over the full length of the trench (568 ft)”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Trench 1Mason Pass · copperGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 1
Project
Mason Pass
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade intercept of 0.70% TCu.

Positive factors

  • High grade intercept

Evidence · text

“20 ft of 0.70% TCu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Trench 1Mason Pass · copperGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 1
Project
Mason Pass
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
27.43 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid grade intercept within Trench 1.

Evidence · text

“90 ft of 0.34% TCu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Trench 1Mason Pass · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 118.87 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 1
Project
Mason Pass
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
118.87 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Average grade for the full length of Trench 1.

Evidence · text

“averages 0.14% TCu over 390 ft”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Trench 2The Mason Pass prospect was first identified by Company geologists through geologic mapping of outcropping copper oxide mineralization occurring within the Singatse fault · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.24 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 2
Project
The Mason Pass prospect was first identified by Company geologists through geologic mapping of outcropping copper oxide mineralization occurring within the Singatse fault
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15.24 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Intercept of 0.20% TCu in Trench 2.

Evidence · text

“50 ft of 0.20% TCu”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Trench 2The Mason Pass prospect was first identified by Company geologists through geologic mapping of outcropping copper oxide mineralization occurring within the Singatse fault · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 109.12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Trench 2
Project
The Mason Pass prospect was first identified by Company geologists through geologic mapping of outcropping copper oxide mineralization occurring within the Singatse fault
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
LEO

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
109.12 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Lower average grade for Trench 2.

Evidence · text

“averages 0.08% TCu over 358 ft”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.