# Lion Copper Corp. Announces Filing of NI 43-101 Technical Report for Bear Deposit Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/lion-copper-corp-announces-filing-of-ni-43-101-technical-report-for-bear-deposit--a7b2d286-d579-4409-ac54-aa1103b7565e Original source: https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/314120/Lion-Copper-Corp.-Announces-Filing-of-NI-43101-Technical-Report-for-Bear-Deposit Publisher: newsfile Original announcement: 2026-09-14T19:40:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Lion Copper Corp. - Ticker: LCU - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: Nevada - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Resource update - Extracted: 2026-09-14 19:52:24 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Lion Copper Corp. has filed an NI 43-101 technical report for the Bear Deposit in Nevada. The report supports the maiden Mineral Resource Estimate previously announced in August 2026, which includes 1,064 Mt at 0.29% Cu \(Indicated\) and 1,770 Mt at 0.22% Cu \(Inferred\). Reasoning: The document announces the filing of a technical report supporting a maiden MRE that was already announced on August 4, 2026, meaning the core data is not new. - Positive factor: Maiden MRE technical report filed - Positive factor: Large scale copper resource - Negative factor: Stale data re-release \(supports previously announced MRE\) - Negative factor: High proportion of Inferred resource Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **Maiden Resource** Polarity: neutral Definition: First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component. No prior estimate exists, so every change band is not applicable. Why it applies: The technical report supports the maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for the Bear Deposit. Evidence · text > supporting the maiden Mineral Resource Estimate \("MRE"\) **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The report was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards. Evidence · text > prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: The MRE was previously announced on August 4, 2026. Evidence · text > previously announced by the Company on August 4, 2026 **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: Qualified Persons Tim Maunula and Michael McGlynn are named as responsible for the report. Evidence · table > Mr. Tim Maunula Context: Mr. Michael McGlynn ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (2) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/lion-copper-corp-announces-filing-of-ni-43-101-technical-report-for-bear-deposit--a7b2d286-d579-4409-ac54-aa1103b7565e#fact-resource-facts-0) Bear Deposit · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Bear Deposit - Commodity: copper - Region: usa\_nv - Reported Region: Nevada - Ticker: LCU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tim Maunula, Michael McGlynn, John Banning - Resource group id: resource:3a5731609b61d0230170 - Deposit or zone: Bear Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 1064000000 - Grade: 0.29 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 6710000 - Contained Unit: 000 cu lbs - Cutoff Grade: 0.1 - Cutoff Unit: Cu% #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-07-21 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Indicated resource at 0.29% Cu for a large tonnage deposit. - Positive factor: Indicated category provides geological confidence - Negative factor: Previously announced Evidence · table > 0.29 Context: 1,064 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/lion-copper-corp-announces-filing-of-ni-43-101-technical-report-for-bear-deposit--a7b2d286-d579-4409-ac54-aa1103b7565e#fact-resource-facts-1) Bear Deposit · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Bear Deposit - Commodity: copper - Region: usa\_nv - Reported Region: Nevada - Ticker: LCU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Tim Maunula, Michael McGlynn, John Banning - Resource group id: resource:9eace91f660dd56dd801 - Deposit or zone: Bear Deposit #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 1770000000 - Grade: 0.22 - Grade Unit: % - Contained Metal: 8770000 - Contained Unit: 000 cu lbs - Cutoff Grade: 0.1 - Cutoff Unit: Cu% #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2026-07-21 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Large inferred resource component. - Positive factor: Significant tonnage - Negative factor: Inferred category is speculative Evidence · table > 0.22 Context: 1,770 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.