LithiumBank Files NI 43-101 Resource Estimate Technical Report for the Boardwalk Lithium Brine Project, West-Central Alberta

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
LithiumBank Resources Corp.
Ticker
LBNK
Exchange
TSX
Region
West-Central Alberta
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-18 07:16:15 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

LithiumBank Resources Corp. has filed a NI 43-101 technical report for its Boardwalk lithium brine project in Alberta, revealing a significant resource expansion. The updated estimate shows a 30% increase in total lithium resources and an 18% increase in grade, resulting in 5.195 Mt of M&I LCE at 81.6 mg/L lithium.

Reasoning: The announcement reports a significant expansion in both lithium grade and total resource tonnage at the Boardwalk project, supported by a formal NI 43-101 technical report and robust QA/QC disclosures.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage increase of over 30%
  • Substantial grade improvement of ~18%
  • High-grade M&I resource for the region
  • NI 43-101 compliant technical report filed
  • QA/QC protocols and certified lab (AGAT) disclosed

Facts used in scoring: 5

Classification and evidence

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The company filed a NI 43-101 Resource Estimate Technical Report.

Evidence · text

“LithiumBank Files NI 43-101 Resource Estimate Technical Report”

Tonnage Growthpositive

Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Overall lithium resources increased by approximately 30% compared to the previous estimate.

Evidence · text

“increase in overall lithium resources by approximately 30%”

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: Lithium grade increased by approximately 18% from the previous estimate.

Evidence · text

“increase in lithium grade of approximately 18%”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Alex Haluszka, P. Geo. is named as the Qualified Person who reviewed and approved the technical report.

Evidence · text

“reviewed and validated by Alex Haluszka of Montrose Environmental Solutions Canada Inc.; a Qualified Person”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource estimation was completed using a cut-off of 50 mg/L Li.

Evidence · text

“completed and reported using a cut-off of 50 mg/L Li”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The source explicitly discloses a revised resource estimate

Evidence · text

“updated mineral resource estimate”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (5)

measuredBoardwalk · lithiumTonnes: 91000Grade: 71.8Grade Unit: mg/L lithiumContained Metal: 91000Contained Unit: tonnes lceView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Boardwalk
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_ab
Reported Region
West-Central Alberta
Ticker
LBNK

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alex Haluszka
Resource group id
resource:3f4ca5b4d012c4490224
Deposit or zone
Leduc (oil saturated zone)
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
91000
Grade
71.8
Grade Unit
mg/L lithium
Contained Metal
91000
Contained Unit
tonnes lce
Cutoff Grade
50
Cutoff Unit
mg/L Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-20

Lab

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured component of the Leduc reservoir.

Evidence · table

“71.8”

Context: 91,000

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

measuredBoardwalk · lithiumTonnes: 1580000Grade: 81.8Grade Unit: mg/L lithiumContained Metal: 1580000Contained Unit: tonnes lceView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Boardwalk
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_ab
Reported Region
West-Central Alberta
Ticker
LBNK

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alex Haluszka
Resource group id
resource:b1f28e3c1a08306bba9a
Deposit or zone
Leduc (water saturated zone)
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
1580000
Grade
81.8
Grade Unit
mg/L lithium
Contained Metal
1580000
Contained Unit
tonnes lce
Cutoff Grade
50
Cutoff Unit
mg/L Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-20

Lab

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Measured component of the Leduc reservoir.

Evidence · table

“81.8”

Context: 1,580,000

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

indicatedBoardwalk · lithiumTonnes: 3524000Grade: 81.8Grade Unit: mg/L lithiumContained Metal: 3524000Contained Unit: tonnes lceView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Boardwalk
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_ab
Reported Region
West-Central Alberta
Ticker
LBNK

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alex Haluszka
Resource group id
resource:71342e79462ac4085199
Deposit or zone
Leduc (water saturated zone)
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3524000
Grade
81.8
Grade Unit
mg/L lithium
Contained Metal
3524000
Contained Unit
tonnes lce
Cutoff Grade
50
Cutoff Unit
mg/L Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-20

Lab

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated component of the Leduc reservoir.

Evidence · table

“81.8”

Context: 3,524,000

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredBoardwalk · lithiumTonnes: 1128000Grade: 81.8Grade Unit: mg/L lithiumContained Metal: 1128000Contained Unit: tonnes lceView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Boardwalk
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_ab
Reported Region
West-Central Alberta
Ticker
LBNK

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alex Haluszka
Resource group id
resource:8d157032a9f2d56cae01
Deposit or zone
Leduc (water saturated zone)
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1128000
Grade
81.8
Grade Unit
mg/L lithium
Contained Metal
1128000
Contained Unit
tonnes lce
Cutoff Grade
50
Cutoff Unit
mg/L Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-20

Lab

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred component of the Leduc reservoir.

Evidence · table

“81.8”

Context: 1,128,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

inferredBoardwalk · lithiumTonnes: 1649000Grade: 78.1Grade Unit: mg/L lithiumContained Metal: 1649000Contained Unit: tonnes lceView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Boardwalk
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_ab
Reported Region
West-Central Alberta
Ticker
LBNK

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-02-20T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alex Haluszka
Resource group id
resource:c44c28288ea7b1fe357a
Deposit or zone
Beaverhill Lake/Swan Hills
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1649000
Grade
78.1
Grade Unit
mg/L lithium
Contained Metal
1649000
Contained Unit
tonnes lce
Cutoff Grade
50
Cutoff Unit
mg/L Li

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-02-20

Lab

Laboratory
AGAT Laboratories

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-04-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred component in the Beaverhill Lake/Swan Hills aquifer.

Evidence · table

“78.1”

Context: 1,649,000

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.