Lupaka Samples 9.22 g/t Au-Eq. Over A Strike Length of 130 m from the Newly Developed 3430 Sublevel at Invicta
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Lupaka Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- LPK
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Peru
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Metallurgy, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-12 11:53:50 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Lupaka Gold Corp. announced encouraging sampling results from the newly developed 3430 sublevel at its Invicta Gold Development Project in Peru. The program returned an average of 9.22 g/t Au-Eq. over a 130-meter strike length with an average width of 4.2 meters, exceeding the estimated grade in the block model. The results demonstrate continuity of mineralization and suggest potential for more efficient mining, although the production decision is not yet based on a feasibility study.
Reasoning: The sampling program on the newly developed 3430 sublevel returned strong average gold equivalent grades, exceeding prior estimates and confirming continuity of the Atenea vein. Several individual samples show bonanza grades, and the geological observations suggest improved mining efficiency. QA/QC procedures are well-documented, supporting the reliability of the results.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold equivalent results from new sublevel
- Average grades exceed block model estimates
- Demonstrated continuity of mineralization along strike and up-dip
- Potential for more efficient mining and lower dilution due to merging veins
- Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure and accredited laboratory use
Negative factors
- PEA is preliminary and includes Inferred Mineral Resources
- Production decision not based on a feasibility study
- Intervals are apparent width only from channel sampling
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 39
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The analyses for this sampling campaign were carried out by ALS, an accredited laboratory, in Lima, Peru, exercising a thorough Quality Assurance and Control program (QA/QC). As part of QA/QC protocol, duplicates, standards and blanks were inserted into the sample processing stream.
Evidence · text
“The analyses for this sampling campaign were carried out by ALS, an accredited laboratory, in Lima, Peru, exercising a thorough Quality Assurance and Control program (QA/QC). As part of QA/QC protocol, duplicates, standards and blanks were inserted into the sample processing stream.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The reported 'Width metres' for channel samples are apparent widths, and no true width is stated for individual samples.
Evidence · text
“Individual sample channels vary between 0.2 to 2.5 metres wide.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The sampling program was conducted on a newly developed sublevel in preparation for the first block of mining production and to compare grades with the current Mineral Resource block model, indicating a resource definition purpose.
Evidence · text
“Development on the newly constructed 3430 sublevel was initiated in preparation for the first block of mining production (located between the 3400 Level and the 3430 sublevel)”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The results demonstrate continuity of the Atenea mineralization both up-dip from the 3400 Level and along strike, extending the known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“demonstrates the continuity of the Atenea mineralization both up-dip from the 3400 Level and along strike.”
Multi-Domain Testedpositive
Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.
Why it applies: 2 distinct composites were tested
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 39. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Metallurgical Results (39)
Fact 1Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Average sampling results from 3430 Sublevel Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The average gold equivalent grade of 9.22 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“4.31”
Context: 4.2
Fact 2Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 2.64 g/t is considered weak for an underground mining scenario (rubric: weak >=2.5 g/t).
Negative factors
- Weak gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 1.70
Fact 3Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 39.19 g/t is considered exceptional for an underground mining scenario (rubric: exceptional >=15 g/t).
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“34.79”
Context: 2.50
Fact 4Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 3.09 g/t is considered weak for an underground mining scenario (rubric: weak >=2.5 g/t).
Positive factors
- Weak gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“1.11”
Context: 2.40
Fact 5Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 2.19 g/t is considered below the weak threshold for an underground mining scenario (rubric: weak >=2.5 g/t).
Negative factors
- Below weak gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: 3.35
Fact 6Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 3.54 g/t is considered weak for an underground mining scenario (rubric: weak >=2.5 g/t).
Positive factors
- Weak gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“2.02”
Context: 3.45
Fact 7Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 4.34 g/t is considered moderate for an underground mining scenario (rubric: moderate >=4 g/t).
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“2.57”
Context: 3.30
Fact 8Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 5.65 g/t is considered moderate for an underground mining scenario (rubric: moderate >=4 g/t).
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“1.46”
Context: 3.40
Fact 9Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 3.09 g/t is considered weak for an underground mining scenario (rubric: weak >=2.5 g/t).
Positive factors
- Weak gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“1.36”
Context: 3.30
Fact 10Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 6.01 g/t is considered moderate for an underground mining scenario (rubric: moderate >=4 g/t).
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“2.57”
Context: 5.90
Fact 11Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 5.89 g/t is considered moderate for an underground mining scenario (rubric: moderate >=4 g/t).
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“2.96”
Context: 5.12
Fact 12Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 4.12 g/t is considered moderate for an underground mining scenario (rubric: moderate >=4 g/t).
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: 4.40
Fact 13Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 7.56 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 4.00
Fact 14Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 8.33 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 3.90
Fact 15Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 7.06 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“2.87”
Context: 4.00
Fact 16Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 9.80 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“6.46”
Context: 3.50
Fact 17Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 9.86 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“4.62”
Context: 10.50
Fact 18Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 3.90 g/t is considered weak for an underground mining scenario (rubric: weak >=2.5 g/t).
Positive factors
- Weak gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“1.52”
Context: 3.30
Fact 19Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 7.13 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“1.16”
Context: 3.50
Fact 20Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 9.47 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“1.64”
Context: 3.20
Fact 21Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 11.68 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“3.78”
Context: 5.75
Fact 22Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 9.12 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“2.15”
Context: 3.50
Fact 23Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 9.16 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“4.24”
Context: 7.30
Fact 24Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 10.21 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“4.89”
Context: 3.42
Fact 25Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 9.39 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“5.21”
Context: 4.40
Fact 26Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 8.76 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“3.81”
Context: 3.40
Fact 27Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 9.82 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“4.15”
Context: 3.46
Fact 28Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 8.21 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“5.06”
Context: 3.50
Fact 29Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 10.85 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“5.45”
Context: 9.30
Fact 30Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 18.86 g/t is considered exceptional for an underground mining scenario (rubric: exceptional >=15 g/t).
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“10.40”
Context: 3.30
Fact 31Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 10.66 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“3.85”
Context: 9.40
Fact 32Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 7.59 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“3.45”
Context: 4.10
Fact 33Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 16.51 g/t is considered exceptional for an underground mining scenario (rubric: exceptional >=15 g/t).
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“7.99”
Context: 3.80
Fact 34Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 7.07 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“3.25”
Context: 3.80
Fact 35Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 10.72 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“5.17”
Context: 3.35
Fact 36Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 11.35 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“3.34”
Context: 3.30
Fact 37Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 25.23 g/t is considered exceptional for an underground mining scenario (rubric: exceptional >=15 g/t).
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“19.81”
Context: 2.40
Fact 38Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 13.86 g/t is considered strong for an underground mining scenario (rubric: strong >=7 g/t).
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“7.93”
Context: 3.50
Fact 39Invicta Gold Development Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Invicta Gold Development Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- peru
- Reported Region
- Peru
- Ticker
- LPK
Test Work
- Sample
- Summary assay from 3430 Level Atenea Vein
Lab
- Laboratory
- ALS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2018-06-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold equivalent grade of 3.14 g/t is considered weak for an underground mining scenario (rubric: weak >=2.5 g/t).
Positive factors
- Weak gold equivalent grade for underground mining
Evidence · table
“1.06”
Context: 3.30
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.