Magnum Goldcorp Intersects Multiple High Grade Gold Intervals, Including 3.47 m of 13.90 g/t and 9.30 m of 4.51 g/t
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Magnum Goldcorp Inc.
- Ticker
- MGI
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 11:13:16 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Magnum Goldcorp announced encouraging drill results from its LH Property in British Columbia, intersecting multiple high-grade gold intervals, including 3.47 m of 13.90 g/t gold and 9.30 m of 4.51 g/t gold. The program successfully extended mineralization to depth and along strike, with the company aiming to define an initial NI 43-101 compliant resource. QA/QC procedures were detailed, but true widths remain unknown.
Reasoning: The drill program successfully intersected multiple high-grade gold intervals, extending known mineralization and demonstrating strong potential for a maiden resource. The bonanza grades and well-documented QA/QC are significant positives, though the lack of true width information and selective sampling introduce some uncertainty.
Positive factors
- Multiple high-grade gold intercepts, including bonanza grades, confirm significant mineralization.
- Drilling extends mineralization to depth and along strike, indicating potential for resource growth.
- QA/QC procedures are well-documented, including certified lab and QP sign-off, enhancing data credibility.
- The program aims to define an initial NI 43-101 compliant resource, signaling advancement towards development.
Negative factors
- True width of intercepts is not yet known, which may overstate actual thickness.
- Sampling was limited to visually identified sulphide-rich intervals, potentially missing broader mineralization.
- Some historical results are re-stated without new assays, reducing novelty for those specific facts.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 45
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 15.92 g/t Au over 1.57 m in LH22-55 and 19.31 g/t Au over 1.60 m in LH22-56 are exceptionally high-grade for an orogenic gold deposit.
Evidence · table
“15.92”
Context: 1.57
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 13.90 g/t Au over 3.47 m in LH22-56 is exceptionally high-grade for an orogenic gold deposit.
Evidence · table
“13.90”
Context: 3.47
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 32.00 g/t Au over 1.14 m in LH22-56 is exceptionally high-grade for an orogenic gold deposit.
Evidence · table
“32.00”
Context: 1.14
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the laboratory (ALS Chemex), sample preparation, and assay methods (ICP-MS, ICP-AES, Fire Assay with AA/Gravimetric finish), and mentions review by a P. Geo.
Evidence · text
“Drill core was split at approximately 1 metre intervals, with one half sent to the ALS Chemex lab in Kamloops, BC for initial preparation. The remaining core was returned to the core box and stored, together with core from previous programs, in Crescent Valley, BC. Samples were crushed to 70% passing 2 mm and a 250 gram sub-sample then pulverized to 85% passing 75 microns. Samples were initially analyzed using the ME-MS61 package (four acid digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis). Arsenic over-limits were analyzed using the ME-OG62 package (four acid digestion followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES)). Gold was analyzed using the AuAA23 package (Fire Assay on a 30 g separate and analyzed using Atomic Absorption). Gold over-limits were analyzed using the Au-GRA21 package (Fire Assay on a 30 g separate with a Gravimetric finish).”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Rick Walker, P. Geo., is named as the Qualified Person who reviewed and approved the news release in accordance with NI 43-101.
Evidence · text
“This news release has been reviewed and approved by Rick Walker, P. Geo., who is acting as the Company's Qualified Person for the LH Property project, in accordance with regulations under NI 43-101.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that the true thickness of the mineralized intercepts is unknown at this time.
Evidence · text
“The true thickness of the mineralized intercepts documented in the 2022 program is unknown at this time.”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document mentions historical drill hole LH86-06 and its results, which were drilled previously by Noranda Exploration Ltd in 1986.
Evidence · text
“In addition, drill hole LH86-06 (drilled previously by Noranda Exploration Ltd, internal report dated 1986) documents two mineralized intervals, the first grading 1.46 g/t over 10.65 m and the second grading 1.46 g/t over 13.20 m”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 45. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (45)
LH-22-53LH · goldGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.83 m
- From
- 34.57 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:34.57-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate gold mineralization, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit, but is not a highlight result.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a reasonable width.
Negative factors
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.60”
Context: 6.83
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH-22-53LH · silverGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.83 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.83 m
- From
- 34.57 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:34.57-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.43”
Context: 6.83
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH-22-53LH · goldGrade: 5.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:40.5-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, but its narrow width limits overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“5.35”
Context: 0.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH-22-53LH · silverGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH-22-53
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.57 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH-22-53:40.5-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 330 °
- Dip
- -55 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: 0.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · goldGrade: 15.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.92
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.57 m
- From
- 12.59 m
- To
- 14.16 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:12.59-14.16
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade, indicating a very high-grade zone, which is highly positive despite the narrow width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“15.92”
Context: 1.57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · silverGrade: 1.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.57 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.57 m
- From
- 12.59 m
- To
- 14.16 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:12.59-14.16
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1.93”
Context: 1.57
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · goldGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.04 m
- From
- 26.84 m
- To
- 27.88 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:26.84-27.88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.38”
Context: 1.04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · silverGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.04 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.04 m
- From
- 26.84 m
- To
- 27.88 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:26.84-27.88
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 1.04
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · goldGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.67
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.79 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 244.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-244.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, suggesting broader but lower-grade mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length.
Negative factors
- Weak gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“0.67”
Context: 13.79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.79 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.79 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 244.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-244.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 13.79
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · goldGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-231.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: 1.09
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · silverGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:230.31-231.4
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: 1.09
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:234.95-236
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: 1.05
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-55LH · silverGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-55
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
- Hole Depth
- 250 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12.59 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-55:234.95-236
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 338 °
- Dip
- -48 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 1.05
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 13.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.47 m
- From
- 11.28 m
- To
- 14.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.28-14.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept features an exceptional gold grade over a strong width, representing a highly significant result for the project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Strong intercept length.
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“13.90”
Context: 3.47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.47 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.53
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.47 m
- From
- 11.28 m
- To
- 14.75 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.28-14.75
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1.53”
Context: 3.47
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 19.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval contains an exceptional gold grade, highlighting a very high-grade core within the broader intercept.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“19.31”
Context: 1.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: 1.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 2.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.43 m
- From
- 20.4 m
- To
- 21.83 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.4-21.83
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.81”
Context: 1.43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.43 m
- From
- 20.4 m
- To
- 21.83 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.4-21.83
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 1.43
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows an exceptional gold grade, indicating a very high-grade zone, but its extremely narrow width limits overall materiality.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“10.60”
Context: 0.31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“3.57”
Context: 0.31
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 3.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.67 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.67 m
- From
- 27.28 m
- To
- 28.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:27.28-28.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a narrow width, indicating localized high-grade mineralization.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“3.01”
Context: 1.67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.67 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.67 m
- From
- 27.28 m
- To
- 28.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:27.28-28.95
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 1.67
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 4.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.3 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 224.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.5-224.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade over a moderate width, representing a significant result for the project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Moderate intercept length.
Negative factors
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“4.51”
Context: 9.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.3 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 224.8 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.5-224.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 9.30
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.5-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization picture.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: 0.63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:215.5-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: 0.63
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · goldGrade: 32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval contains an exceptional gold grade, representing a bonanza intercept within the broader mineralization.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length.
- True width is unknown.
Evidence · table
“32.00”
Context: 1.14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH22-56LH · silverGrade: 3.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH22-56
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
- Hole Depth
- 230.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.28 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LH22-56:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -45 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver grade is very low and likely not economically significant on its own, but contributes to polymetallic understanding.
Negative factors
- Low silver grade.
Evidence · table
“3.54”
Context: 1.14
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
LH86-06LH · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LH86-06
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.46
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1986-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a historical intercept with moderate gold grade over a strong width, but its age and lack of modern QA/QC reduce its novelty and confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade over a strong width.
Negative factors
- Historical data, not new results.
- True width is unknown.
- No QA/QC disclosure.
Evidence · text
“1.46 g/t over 13.20 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
includesLH · goldGrade: 5.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 40.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:40.5-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.35 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.35”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · silverGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.9 m
- From
- 40.5 m
- To
- 41.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 40.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:40.5-41.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.19 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.19 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.19”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · goldGrade: 3.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:230.31-231.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.23 g/t gold is weak against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.23”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · silverGrade: 0.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.62
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.09 m
- From
- 230.31 m
- To
- 231.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 230.31 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:230.31-231.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.62 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.62”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · goldGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:234.95-236
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.05 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · silverGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.95 m
- To
- 236 m
- Intercept Depth
- 234.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:234.95-236
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · goldGrade: 19.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 19.31 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 30.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 19.31 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“19.31”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · silverGrade: 2.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 11.66 m
- To
- 13.26 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.66 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:11.66-13.26
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.27 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 3.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 2.27 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.27”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · goldGrade: 10.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20.76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 10.6 g/t gold is strong against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 3.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 10.6 g/t gold is strong on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“10.60”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · silverGrade: 3.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.31 m
- From
- 20.76 m
- To
- 21.07 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20.76 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:20.76-21.07
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.57 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.57 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.57”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:215.5-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.87 g/t gold is below against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.87 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (2.5 g/t) on the underground mining band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · silverGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.63 m
- From
- 215.5 m
- To
- 216.13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 215.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:215.5-216.13
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.18 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.18 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.18”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · goldGrade: 32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 222.22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 32 g/t gold is exceptional against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 36.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 32 g/t gold is exceptional on the underground mining band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“32.00”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
includesLH · silverGrade: 3.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- LH
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- MGI
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.14 m
- From
- 222.22 m
- To
- 223.36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 222.22 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:222.22-223.36
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Chemex
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates, check_assays
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-08-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.54 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 4.0 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.54 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.54”
Context: includes
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.