Mako Mining Files Technical Report for Moss Mine Mineral Resource Estimate
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Mako Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- MKO
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Arizona, USA
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Resource update, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 10:51:59 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Mako Mining Corp. has filed an NI 43-101 Technical Report for the 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate of the Moss Mine Project in Arizona. The report supports the mineral resource estimate previously announced on January 26, 2026.
Reasoning: The document is a corporate announcement regarding the filing of a technical report; it does not contain new mineral resource numbers, but rather references a previously announced estimate.
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant technical report filed
Negative factors
- No new resource figures disclosed in this release
- Resource estimate is a restatement of previously announced data
Facts used in scoring: 1
Classification and evidence
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The announcement concerns the filing of a technical report for a mineral resource estimate.
Evidence · text
“Technical Report for the 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Moss Mine Project”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The release refers to a previously announced resource estimate without providing new numeric values.
Evidence · text
“supports the previously announce mineral resource estimate at the Moss Mine”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (1)
inferredMoss Mine · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Moss Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_az
- Reported Region
- Arizona, USA
- Ticker
- MKO
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Resource group id
- resource:a438d7d98279b21a1117
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-18
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-01-26T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of the resource estimate previously announced in the January 26, 2026 release.
Negative factors
- No new assay or tonnage data provided in this release
Evidence · text
“supports the previously announce mineral resource estimate at the Moss Mine, having an effective date of December 18, 2025 ( see new release dated January 26, 2026 )”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.