# Mako Mining Files Technical Report for Moss Mine Mineral Resource Estimate

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mako-mining-files-technical-report-for-moss-mine-mineral-resource-estimate--23a81d17-7de1-4de8-8db0-a012d95b3c46

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/MKO/news/8287868194504027/mako-mining-files-technical-report-for-moss-mine-mineral-resource-estimate

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-03-10T20:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Mako Mining Corp.

- Ticker: MKO

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Arizona, USA

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-16 10:51:59 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.00 · Neutral

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Mako Mining Corp. has filed an NI 43-101 Technical Report for the 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate of the Moss Mine Project in Arizona. The report supports the mineral resource estimate previously announced on January 26, 2026.

Reasoning: The document is a corporate announcement regarding the filing of a technical report; it does not contain new mineral resource numbers, but rather references a previously announced estimate.

- Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliant technical report filed

- Negative factor: No new resource figures disclosed in this release

- Negative factor: Resource estimate is a restatement of previously announced data

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The announcement concerns the filing of a technical report for a mineral resource estimate.

Evidence · text

> Technical Report for the 2025 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Moss Mine Project

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Story-specific tag

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The release refers to a previously announced resource estimate without providing new numeric values.

Evidence · text

> supports the previously announce mineral resource estimate at the Moss Mine

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (1)

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mako-mining-files-technical-report-for-moss-mine-mineral-resource-estimate--23a81d17-7de1-4de8-8db0-a012d95b3c46#fact-resource-facts-0)

Moss Mine · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Moss Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_az
- Reported Region: Arizona, USA
- Ticker: MKO

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Resource group id: resource:a438d7d98279b21a1117

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-18

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-01-26T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of the resource estimate previously announced in the January 26, 2026 release.

- Negative factor: No new assay or tonnage data provided in this release

Evidence · text

> supports the previously announce mineral resource estimate at the Moss Mine, having an effective date of December 18, 2025 \( see new release dated January 26, 2026 \)

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**No QP/CP Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.

Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.