# Mako Mining Reports Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 598 Koz Au and 6.30 Moz Ag Grading 0.327 g/t Au and 3.45 g/t Ag in 56.8 M Tonnes at the Moss Mine in Arizona, Supporting a Post-Tax NPV 5% of US$254 Million and a 15-Year Mine Life at US$3,500/oz Au and US$50/oz Ag

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mako-mining-reports-proven-and-probable-mineral-reserves-of-598-koz-au-and-6-30--1125a1bd-1aa3-4509-b10f-bec4b0a61be2

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/MKO/news/8968429745999328/mako-mining-reports-proven-and-probable-mineral-reserves-of-598-koz-au-and-6-30-

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-07-07T12:45:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Mako Mining Corp.

- Ticker: MKO

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Arizona

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Silver

- Document categories: Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-09-16 10:32:58 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Mako Mining has declared its first mineral reserves at the Moss Mine in Arizona, totaling 56.8 Mt at 0.327 g/t Au and 3.45 g/t Ag. The reserves support a 15-year mine life with a post-tax NPV of US$254 million at a 5% discount rate.

Reasoning: The announcement of the company's first mineral reserves at Moss Mine is a major de-risking milestone with strong economic indicators.

- Positive factor: First mineral reserve declaration for the company

- Positive factor: Strong project economics with US$254M NPV

- Positive factor: High return on invested capital acquisition

- Positive factor: No initial capital required

- Positive factor: Significant exploration upside mentioned

- Negative factor: Low grade \(0.327 g/t Au\)

- Negative factor: Ongoing royalty litigation with Royal Gold Inc.

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The reserve estimate was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

> prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mohsin Hashmi, P.Eng. is named as the Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

> prepared by Mohsin Hashmi, P.Eng., a Qualified Person

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.14 g/t Au is explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

> Mineral Reserves are reported using a cut-off grade of 0.14 g/t Au

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### probable

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mako-mining-reports-proven-and-probable-mineral-reserves-of-598-koz-au-and-6-30--1125a1bd-1aa3-4509-b10f-bec4b0a61be2#fact-resource-facts-0)

Moss Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Moss Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_az
- Reported Region: Arizona
- Ticker: MKO

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: reserve
- Effective date: 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mohsin Hashmi, Richard Gowans, Christopher Keech, Garth Luikko, William Lewis
- Resource group id: resource:c0c82c1bc4e9dac708bb
- Deposit or zone: Moss Mine
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: probable
- Tonnes: 56800000
- Grade: 0.327
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 597744
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.14
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-06-30

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant reserve declaration for a previously resource-only asset.

- Positive factor: First reserve declaration

- Negative factor: Low grade

Evidence · table

> 0.327

Context: 56.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**Probable Reserve**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### probable

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mako-mining-reports-proven-and-probable-mineral-reserves-of-598-koz-au-and-6-30--1125a1bd-1aa3-4509-b10f-bec4b0a61be2#fact-resource-facts-1)

Moss Mine · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Moss Mine
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_az
- Reported Region: Arizona
- Ticker: MKO

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: reserve
- Effective date: 2025-12-18T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Mohsin Hashmi, Richard Gowans, Christopher Keech, Garth Luikko, William Lewis
- Resource group id: resource:c0c82c1bc4e9dac708bb
- Deposit or zone: Moss Mine
- Mining method: open\_pit

#### Resource Data

- Category: probable
- Tonnes: 56800000
- Grade: 6.3
- Grade Unit: moz
- Contained Metal: 6.3
- Contained Unit: moz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.14
- Cutoff Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-06-30

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant silver byproduct in the reserve estimate.

- Positive factor: Significant silver content

Evidence · table

> 6.30

Context: 56.8

#### Tags used in scoring

**Probable Reserve**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
