Mammoth Identifies Draw Point Locations for Future Small-Scale Gold-Silver Mineral Extraction and Pilot Leach Testing at its Tenoriba Gold-Silver Property, Mexico
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Mammoth Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- MTH
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-18 11:06:26 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Mammoth Resources has identified six potential draw point locations at its Tenoriba Gold-Silver Property in Mexico for future small-scale mineral extraction and pilot leach testing. These locations were selected based on a re-evaluation of thousands of historical surface and drill-hole assay results, revealing average gold equivalent grades up to 3.86 g/t from surface samples and drill intercepts up to 1.21 g/t over 25.0 metres. The company plans further field checks and metallurgical testing to define the surface footprint and tonnage potential of these areas.
Reasoning: Mammoth Resources has identified several high-grade gold-silver areas at its Tenoriba project for future small-scale mineral extraction and pilot leach testing, based on a re-evaluation of existing surface and drill data. This is a positive step in advancing the project, although it is still at an early stage.
Positive factors
- Identification of high-grade areas for future development
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade for intervals
Negative factors
- Early stage of project development (small-scale, pilot testing)
- Drill intercepts reported as apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 25
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 25. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (25)
Fact 1Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- A
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Surface sample average grade of 0.97 g/t AuEq is a good result for identifying a potential small-scale extraction point, based on reinterpretation of historical data.
Positive factors
- High gold equivalent grade for a surface sample
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
Negative factors
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: A
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN17-06Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 126.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN17-06
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 126.8 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- A
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 126.8m intercept at 0.52 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, but its length contributes to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length (126.8m)
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“126.8 @ 0.52”
Context: TEN17-06
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN17-06Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 58.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN17-06
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 58.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- A
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.8
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 58.2m sub-interval at 0.80 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length (58.2m) at a moderate gold equivalent grade
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“58.2 @ 0.80”
Context: including 58.2 @ 0.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN17-06Tenoriba · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN17-06
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- A
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.21
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 25.0m sub-interval at 1.21 g/t AuEq is a good result, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (1.21 g/t AuEq) over a good width (25.0m)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“25.0 @ 1.21”
Context: including 25.0 @ 1.21
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 5Tenoriba · goldGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- B
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Surface sample average grade of 1.48 g/t AuEq is a good result for identifying a potential small-scale extraction point, based on reinterpretation of historical data.
Positive factors
- High gold equivalent grade for a surface sample
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
Negative factors
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“1.48”
Context: B
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-12Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 46.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-12
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 46.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- B
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.52
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 46.5m intercept at 0.52 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length (46.5m)
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“46.5 @ 0.52”
Context: TEN21-12
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 7Tenoriba · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Surface sample average grade of 2.26 g/t AuEq is a strong result, indicating a high-grade area for potential small-scale extraction, based on reinterpretation of historical data.
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for a surface sample
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
Negative factors
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“2.26”
Context: C
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-03Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 43.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-03
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 43.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.59
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 43.5m intercept at 0.59 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length (43.5m)
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“43.5 @ 0.59”
Context: TEN21-03
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-03Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-03
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 6.0m sub-interval at 0.73 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (0.73 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (6.0m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“6.0 @ 0.73”
Context: including 6.0 @ 0.73
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-03Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-03
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.73
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 4.5m sub-interval at 0.73 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (0.73 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (4.5m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“4.5 @ 0.73”
Context: including 4.5 @ 0.73
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-16Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-16
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.61
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 12.0m intercept at 0.61 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length (12.0m)
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“12.0 @ 0.61”
Context: TEN21-16
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-16Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 85.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-16
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 85.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.47
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 85.7m sub-interval at 0.47 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length (85.7m)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“85.7 @ 0.47”
Context: including 85.7 @ 0.47
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-16Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-16
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 6.0m sub-interval at 0.97 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (0.97 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (6.0m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“6.0 @ 0.97”
Context: including 6.0 @ 0.97
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-18Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 81 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-18
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 81 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 81.0m intercept at 0.48 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length (81.0m)
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“81.0 @ 0.48”
Context: TEN21-18
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-18Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-18
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 3.0m sub-interval at 0.82 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (0.82 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (3.0m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“3.0 @ 0.82”
Context: including 3.0 @ 0.82
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-18Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-18
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.76
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 7.5m sub-interval at 0.76 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (0.76 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Moderate intercept length (7.5m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“7.5 @ 0.76”
Context: including 7.5 @ 0.76
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-18Tenoriba · goldGrade: 1.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-18
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- C
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.07
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 12.0m sub-interval at 1.07 g/t AuEq is a good result, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (1.07 g/t AuEq) over a moderate width (12.0m)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“12.0 @ 1.07”
Context: including 12.0 @ 1.07
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 18Tenoriba · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- D
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Surface sample average grade of 1.63 g/t AuEq is a good result for identifying a potential small-scale extraction point, based on reinterpretation of historical data.
Positive factors
- High gold equivalent grade for a surface sample
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
Negative factors
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“1.63”
Context: D
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-04Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-04
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- D
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 19.5m intercept at 0.63 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate intercept length (19.5m)
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“19.5 @ 0.63”
Context: TEN21-04
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-04Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-04
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- D
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 10.5m sub-interval at 0.97 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (0.97 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Moderate intercept length (10.5m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“10.5 @ 0.97”
Context: including 10.5 @ 0.97
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 21Tenoriba · goldGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- E
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.48
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Surface sample average grade of 1.48 g/t AuEq is a good result for identifying a potential small-scale extraction point, based on reinterpretation of historical data.
Positive factors
- High gold equivalent grade for a surface sample
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
Negative factors
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“1.48”
Context: E
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-15Tenoriba · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-15
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- E
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.63
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 30.0m intercept at 0.63 g/t AuEq is a moderate result, contributing to the potential of this draw point. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length (30.0m)
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for gold equivalent
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“30.0 @ 0.63”
Context: TEN21-15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-15Tenoriba · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-15
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- E
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.21
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 3.0m sub-interval at 1.21 g/t AuEq is a good result, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (1.21 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (3.0m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“3.0 @ 1.21”
Context: including 3.0 @ 1.21
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TEN21-15Tenoriba · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TEN21-15
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- E
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.18
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t AuEq
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A 6.0m sub-interval at 1.02 g/t AuEq is a good result, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept. It is based on reinterpretation of historical data with no true width stated.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold equivalent grade (1.02 g/t AuEq)
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
- Disclosed cut-off grade
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (6.0m)
- Apparent width only, no true width stated
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
Evidence · table
“6.0 @1.02”
Context: including 6.0 @1.02
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 25Tenoriba · goldGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Tenoriba
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- mexico
- Reported Region
- mexico
- Ticker
- MTH
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- F
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS laboratories
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.86
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Surface sample average grade of 3.86 g/t AuEq is a strong result, indicating a high-grade area for potential small-scale extraction, based on reinterpretation of historical data, though no drilling has been conducted here.
Positive factors
- Strong gold equivalent grade for a surface sample
- Identified as a potential draw point for future extraction
- Disclosed QA/QC procedures
- Disclosed metal equivalent assumptions
Negative factors
- Results are based on reinterpretation of historical data, not new assays
- Early stage, 'small-scale' focus
- No drilling reported for this target
Evidence · table
“3.86”
Context: F
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.