# Manganese X Energy Announces Eric Sprott's Commitment to Fund Pre-Feasibility Study of Electric Royalties' Flagship Manganese Royalty Asset in New Brunswick

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/manganese-x-energy-announces-eric-sprott-s-commitment-to-fund-pre-feasibility-st--c9225670-c0b5-4197-839e-852c95eaf2b5

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/ELEC/news/6880403019585886/manganese-x-energy-announces-eric-sprott-s-commitment-to-fund-pre-feasibility-st

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-01-03T17:55:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Electric Royalties Ltd.

- Ticker: ELEC

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: New Brunswick

- Primary commodity: Manganese

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Agreement transaction, Economic study

- Extracted: 2026-09-19 21:15:20 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Electric Royalties announced that Manganese X Energy has secured a C$2 million commitment from Eric Sprott to fund a Pre-Feasibility Study for the Battery Hill Manganese Project, in which Electric Royalties holds a 2% gross metal royalty. The document also references a 2022 PEA for the project which projected significant annual revenues and a short payback period.

Reasoning: The announcement highlights a significant funding commitment from a major mining investor \(Eric Sprott\) to advance a key project \(Battery Hill\) where the company holds a royalty, de-risking the upcoming PFS.

- Positive factor: Strategic investment from Eric Sprott to fund upcoming PFS

- Positive factor: Existing royalty interest in a high-purity manganese project

- Positive factor: Historical PEA shows strong revenue and short payback

- Negative factor: Electric Royalties only holds a 2% gross metal royalty, limiting direct upside

Facts used in scoring: 4

## Classification and evidence

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The company's value is derived from its royalty interest in the Battery Hill Manganese Project.

Evidence · text

> Electric Royalties Ltd. ... is pleased to provide an update on the Battery Hill Manganese Project \("Battery Hill" or "the Project"\) in New Brunswick, Canada, on which it owns a 2% Gross Metal Royalty.

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: David Gaunt, P.Geo., a qualified person, has reviewed and approved the technical information.

Evidence · text

> David Gaunt, P.Geo., a qualified person who is not independent of Electric Royalties, has reviewed and approved the technical information in this release.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (3)

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/manganese-x-energy-announces-eric-sprott-s-commitment-to-fund-pre-feasibility-st--c9225670-c0b5-4197-839e-852c95eaf2b5#fact-resource-facts-1)

Battery Hill Manganese Project · manganese

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Battery Hill Manganese Project
- Commodity: manganese
- Region: canada\_nb
- Reported Region: New Brunswick
- Ticker: ELEC

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2022-05-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id: resource:969754780dc83adff65d

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 5900000
- Grade: 7.65
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 3.3
- Cutoff Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2022-05-12

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-01-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The resource figures are part of the historical PEA technical report.

- Positive factor: High grade manganese reported

- Negative factor: Historical data from 2022 PEA

Evidence · text

> Measured MR of 5.90 Mt grading 7.65% Mn

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/manganese-x-energy-announces-eric-sprott-s-commitment-to-fund-pre-feasibility-st--c9225670-c0b5-4197-839e-852c95eaf2b5#fact-resource-facts-2)

Battery Hill Manganese Project · manganese

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Battery Hill Manganese Project
- Commodity: manganese
- Region: canada\_nb
- Reported Region: New Brunswick
- Ticker: ELEC

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2022-05-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id: resource:924463b98e00709daf2d

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 6370000
- Grade: 7.26
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 3.3
- Cutoff Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2022-05-12

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-01-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The resource figures are part of the historical PEA technical report.

- Positive factor: High grade manganese reported

- Negative factor: Historical data from 2022 PEA

Evidence · text

> Indicated MR of 6.37 Mt grading 7.26% Mn

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/manganese-x-energy-announces-eric-sprott-s-commitment-to-fund-pre-feasibility-st--c9225670-c0b5-4197-839e-852c95eaf2b5#fact-resource-facts-3)

Battery Hill Manganese Project · manganese

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Battery Hill Manganese Project
- Commodity: manganese
- Region: canada\_nb
- Reported Region: New Brunswick
- Ticker: ELEC

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2022-05-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Resource group id: resource:cb55b75deffbcc0990e8

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 4730000
- Grade: 8.26
- Grade Unit: %
- Cutoff Grade: 3.3
- Cutoff Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2022-05-12

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2022-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-01-03T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The resource figures are part of the historical PEA technical report.

- Positive factor: High grade manganese reported

- Negative factor: Historical data from 2022 PEA

Evidence · text

> Inferred MR of 4.73 Mt grading 8.26% Mn

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**Stale Estimate**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Effective date is &gt;2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
