Masivo Successfully Drills Hole Number 5 at Promising Skarn Deposit
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Masivo Silver Corp.
- Ticker
- MASS
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Nevada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-14 11:15:29 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Masivo Silver Corp. has completed drilling Hole No. 5 at its Boston Mine project in Nevada. While no new assay results were provided, the company highlighted significant historical intercepts from Hole No. 1 and is preparing to begin Hole No. 6.
Reasoning: The release announces the completion of a drill hole (Hole 5) but contains no new assay results; it only restates historical high-grade intercepts from Hole 1.
Positive factors
- completion of Hole No. 5
- historical high-grade intercepts from Hole No. 1
Negative factors
- no new assay results reported in this release
- assays for holes 2, 3, and 4 are still pending
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The primary news is the completion of a hole, but the only assay data provided is historical from Hole No. 1.
Evidence · text
“Hole No.1 had significant drill intercepts including 55 feet (drilled width) of 0.99% Cu, 1.52 g/t Au and 30.35 g/t Ag starting at 65 feet down hole.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions the core will be delivered to a certified lab and names a Qualified Person.
Evidence · text
“The drill core will be delivered to the certified lab for analysis this week”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
Hole No.1Boston Mine · copperGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.764 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole No.1
- Project
- Boston Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- MASS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.99
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.764 m
- From
- 65 m
- To
- 81.764 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Hole No.1:65-81.764
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Restated historical intercept from Hole No. 1.
Positive factors
- significant drill intercept
Evidence · text
“Hole No.1 had significant drill intercepts including 55 feet (drilled width) of 0.99% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Hole No.1Boston Mine · goldGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.764 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole No.1
- Project
- Boston Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- MASS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.764 m
- From
- 65 m
- To
- 81.764 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Hole No.1:65-81.764
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Restated historical intercept from Hole No. 1.
Positive factors
- significant drill intercept
Evidence · text
“1.52 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Hole No.1Boston Mine · silverGrade: 30.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.764 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- Hole No.1
- Project
- Boston Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- MASS
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.764 m
- From
- 65 m
- To
- 81.764 m
- Intercept Depth
- 65 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Hole No.1:65-81.764
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Restated historical intercept from Hole No. 1.
Positive factors
- significant drill intercept
Evidence · text
“30.35 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.