# MAYFAIR GOLD REPORTS FINAL POSITIVE RESULTS AND ANALYSIS FROM GRADE CONTROL DRILLING PROGRAM Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mayfair-gold-reports-final-positive-results-and-analysis-from-grade-control-dril--025ed6cd-2b05-451a-8d60-2567e0a60649 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/MFG/news/7151301262567716/mayfair-gold-reports-final-positive-results-and-analysis-from-grade-control-dril Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2026-06-18T10:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Mayfair Gold Corp. - Ticker: MFG - Exchange: TSX - Region: Ontario - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Resource update, Drill results - Extracted: 2026-09-14 10:39:03 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Mayfair Gold has completed a grade control drilling program at the Fenn-Gib Project, validating approximately 1.0 million tonnes of probable reserves. The results showed that for material above 3.0 g/t Au, the grade control model identified 28% more tonnes at a 7% higher grade than the previous reserve model, suggesting potential for accelerated high-grade production. Reasoning: The grade control program validated ~1.0Mt of probable reserves, showing higher-than-expected grade and tonnage for high-grade material \(>3.0 g/t Au\), significantly de-risking early mine production. - Positive factor: Validation of probable reserves - Positive factor: Higher grade material identified for early production - Positive factor: De-risking of early cash flow profile - Positive factor: QA/QC protocols disclosed - Negative factor: Results specific to the tested area only Facts used in scoring: 2 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: Release details specific QA/QC protocols including CRM, blanks, duplicates, and third-party check assays. Evidence · text > As part of Mayfair Gold's QA/QC protocol, one certified reference material \(CRM\), one coarse blank, and one coarse duplicate sample were inserted into the sequence of every 25 samples. **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The technical report and PFS are explicitly stated to be NI 43-101 compliant. Evidence · text > Fenn-Gib Gold Project NI 43-101 Technical Report ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (2) ### probable [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mayfair-gold-reports-final-positive-results-and-analysis-from-grade-control-dril--025ed6cd-2b05-451a-8d60-2567e0a60649#fact-resource-facts-0) Fenn-Gib Project · gold #### Identity - Project: Fenn-Gib Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: Ontario - Ticker: MFG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: reserve - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Drew Anwyll - Resource group id: resource:d4e0a7ab6ccbe9969df2 - Deposit or zone: test area 1 - Mining method: open\_pit - Resource basis: gross #### Resource Data - Category: probable - Tonnes: 1000000 #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-12-19 #### Lab - Laboratory: Swastika Laboratories Ltd. #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Validation of a significant portion of the Phase 1 reserve model. - Positive factor: Confirms reserve model Evidence · text > approximately 1 million tonnes of ore-grade material that was categorized as probable reserves #### Tags used in scoring **Probable Reserve** Polarity: positive Definition: Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors. Why it applies: category is "probable" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ### probable [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mayfair-gold-reports-final-positive-results-and-analysis-from-grade-control-dril--025ed6cd-2b05-451a-8d60-2567e0a60649#fact-resource-facts-1) Fenn-Gib Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Fenn-Gib Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: Ontario - Ticker: MFG #### Resource scope - Estimate type: reserve - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Drew Anwyll - Resource group id: resource:ce3db2074b5ba84b2ecc - Deposit or zone: Fenn-Gib Project - Resource basis: gross #### Resource Data - Category: probable - Tonnes: 25100000 - Grade: 1.29 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1000000 - Contained Unit: oz #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2025-12-19 #### Lab - Laboratory: Swastika Laboratories Ltd. #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-12-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Baseline probable reserve figure mentioned for context. Evidence · text > 25.1Mt at an average grade of 1.29g/t #### Tags used in scoring **Probable Reserve** Polarity: positive Definition: Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors. Why it applies: category is "probable" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **PFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports **DFS-Supporting** Polarity: neutral Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence. Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.