McEwen Files NI 43-101 Technical Reports: Grey Fox Prefeasibility Study in Ontario and Lookout Mountain and Windfall Mineral Resource Estimate in Nevada

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
McEwen Inc.
Ticker
MUX
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper
Document categories
Resource update, Other
Extracted
2026-09-12 14:35:27 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

McEwen Inc. has filed NI 43-101 technical reports for the Grey Fox Project in Ontario and the Lookout Mountain and Windfall deposits in Nevada. The filings support previously announced results, including Probable Reserves at Grey Fox and significant gold mineral resources in Nevada.

Reasoning: The filing of NI 43-101 technical reports formalizes previously announced PFS and MRE results for multiple key projects.

Positive factors

  • Probable Reserves at Grey Fox
  • Significant gold resources in Nevada
  • Oxide mineralization amenable to heap leach

Negative factors

  • Low novelty as reports support previously announced results

Facts used in scoring: 7

Classification and evidence

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document reports on technical reports supporting previously announced mineral resource estimates.

Evidence · text

“The report supports the Mineral Resource estimates previously announced”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Multiple Qualified Persons are named for both the Grey Fox and Lookout Mountain/Windfall reports.

Evidence · text

“The Grey Fox Report was prepared by the following Qualified Persons”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 7. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (7)

probableGrey Fox · goldTonnes: 9410000Grade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 980300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Grey Fox
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
MUX

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Resource group id
resource:b6a3c19c311172b20340

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
9410000
Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
980300
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable reserves at Grey Fox with 3.24 g/t Au.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade and tonnage for reserves

Negative factors

  • Supports previously announced results

Evidence · text

“Probable Mineral Reserves of 9.41 million tonnes grading 3.24 g/t Au and containing 980,300 gold ounces”

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedGrey Fox · goldTonnes: 9680000Grade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 701000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Grey Fox
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
MUX

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:bc35bbeeea58b56394e4

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9680000
Grade
2.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
701000
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource at Grey Fox.

Positive factors

  • Significant indicated resource

Negative factors

  • Supports previously announced results

Evidence · text

“9.68 million tonnes at 2.25 g/t Au for 701,000 gold ounces Indicated”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredGrey Fox · goldTonnes: 4700000Grade: 2.57Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 388000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Grey Fox
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
MUX

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:bb4d88529f0f25248059

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4700000
Grade
2.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
388000
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource at Grey Fox.

Positive factors

  • Good grade for inferred resource

Negative factors

  • Supports previously announced results

Evidence · text

“4.70 million tonnes at 2.57 g/t Au for 388,000 gold ounces Inferred”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedLookout Mountain · goldTonnes: 19570000Grade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 402300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lookout Mountain
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
MUX

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:1648a9cef5e7b8141a9e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
19570000
Grade
0.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
402300
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource at Lookout Mountain.

Positive factors

  • Large indicated resource

Negative factors

  • Supports previously announced results

Evidence · text

“Indicated Mineral Resources of 19.57 million tonnes at 0.64 g/t Au, containing 402,300 gold ounces”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredLookout Mountain · goldTonnes: 7290000Grade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 134200Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lookout Mountain
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
MUX

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:5748d7b55f7a8b619bd5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
7290000
Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
134200
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource at Lookout Mountain.

Negative factors

  • Supports previously announced results

Evidence · text

“Inferred Mineral Resources of 7.29 million tonnes at 0.57 g/t Au, containing 134,200 gold ounces”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedWindfall · goldTonnes: 9400000Grade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 227500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Windfall
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
MUX

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:33834289346db367ecb3

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9400000
Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
227500
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource at Windfall.

Positive factors

  • Solid indicated resource

Negative factors

  • Supports previously announced results

Evidence · text

“Indicated Mineral Resources of 9.40 million tonnes at 0.75 g/t Au, containing 227,500 gold ounces”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredWindfall · goldTonnes: 2600000Grade: 1.53Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 127800Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Windfall
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
MUX

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:0ba53c482199ccab58f9

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2600000
Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
127800
Contained Unit
oz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource at Windfall.

Positive factors

  • High grade for inferred resource

Negative factors

  • Supports previously announced results

Evidence · text

“Inferred Mineral Resources of 2.60 million tonnes at 1.53 g/t Au, containing 127,800 gold ounces”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.