METALLA REPORTS FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2026 AND PROVIDES ASSET UPDATES

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.
Ticker
MTA
Exchange
TSX
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Zinc, Lead
Document categories
Production, Resource update, Drill results, Metallurgy, Economic study, Permitting, Agreement transaction
Extracted
2026-09-18 10:51:05 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. announced strong financial results for the first quarter of 2026, reporting a 115% increase in Adjusted EBITDA to $1.9 million and a return to net income. The company received or accrued payments on 660 attributable Gold Equivalent Ounces (GEOs) at an average realized price of $4,871 per GEO. Metalla also provided extensive asset updates, highlighting significant resource estimates for projects like Taca Taca and Joaquin, high-grade drill results from La Parrilla and Mirado Mine, and progress on economic studies and permitting for several development-stage assets.

Reasoning: Metalla reported strong financial results for Q1 2026, including a 115% increase in Adjusted EBITDA and a return to net income, driven by its royalty and streaming portfolio. The company also provided numerous positive asset updates, including significant resource estimates, high-grade drill results, and progress on economic studies and permitting for key development projects.

Positive factors

  • Significant increase in Adjusted EBITDA and return to net income
  • Strong operating cash margin per attributable GEO
  • Advancement of key development assets towards production and milestones
  • Multiple updated resource estimates showing significant contained metal
  • High-grade drill intercepts reported from several projects

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 71

Classification and evidence

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The source explicitly discloses a revised resource estimate

Evidence · text

“updated Mineral Resource Estimate”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 36. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (18)

IDP-SN-26-001La ParrillaIntercept: 3.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IDP-SN-26-001
Project
La Parrilla
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Intercept
3.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IDP-SN-26-001:null-null

Location

Location
San Nicolas zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
473
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole IDP-SN-26-001 returned a high-grade silver equivalent intercept over a significant width, confirming the presence of high-grade mineralization in the San Nicolas zone.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Confirms presence of high-grade mineralization

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 473 g/t AgEq over 3.60 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for silver.

Evidence · text

“473 g/t AgEq over 3.60 m”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Evidence · text

“473 g/t AgEq over 3.60 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IDP-SN-26-001La ParrillaIntercept: 1.65 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IDP-SN-26-001
Project
La Parrilla
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Intercept
1.65 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IDP-SN-26-001:null-null

Location

Location
San Nicolas zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
740
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole IDP-SN-26-001 included an exceptionally high-grade silver equivalent intercept, further highlighting the strong mineralization in the San Nicolas zone.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Confirms presence of high-grade mineralization

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 740 g/t AgEq over 1.65 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for silver.

Evidence · text

“740 g/t AgEq over 1.65 m”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Evidence · text

“740 g/t AgEq over 1.65 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IDP-SN-26-001La ParrillaIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
IDP-SN-26-001
Project
La Parrilla
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Intercept
0.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
IDP-SN-26-001:null-null

Location

Location
San Nicolas zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
527
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole IDP-SN-26-001 also included another high-grade silver equivalent intercept, reinforcing the strong mineralization in the San Nicolas zone.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Confirms presence of high-grade mineralization

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 527 g/t AgEq over 0.90 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for silver.

Evidence · text

“527 g/t AgEq over 0.90 m”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Evidence · text

“527 g/t AgEq over 0.90 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 4Garrison · goldGrade: 6.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.25 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garrison
Commodity
gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
6.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.25 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Jonpol deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A drill intercept at Garrison's Jonpol deposit returned high-grade gold over a significant width, supporting the potential for strike extension of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept over significant width
  • Supports strike extension of mineralization

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 6.03 g/t Au over 22.25 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“6.03 g/t Au over 22.25 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 5Garrison · goldGrade: 12.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.25 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garrison
Commodity
gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
12.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.25 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Jonpol deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An included interval within the Garrison drill result showed exceptionally high-grade gold, further confirming strong mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold intercept
  • Confirms strong mineralization within the broader intercept

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 12.67 g/t Au over 9.25 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“12.67 g/t Au over 9.25 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 6Garrison · goldGrade: 2.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.86 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garrison
Commodity
gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
2.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.86 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Jonpol deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Another drill intercept at Garrison's Jonpol deposit returned strong gold grades over a significant width, further supporting the potential for strike extension.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold intercept over significant width
  • Supports strike extension of mineralization

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 7Garrison · goldGrade: 14.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.33 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garrison
Commodity
gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
14.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.33 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Jonpol deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An included interval within the Garrison drill result showed exceptionally high-grade gold, further confirming strong mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold intercept
  • Confirms strong mineralization within the broader intercept

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 14.89 g/t Au over 2.33 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“14.89 g/t Au over 2.33 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 8Garrison · goldGrade: 9.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.85 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garrison
Commodity
gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
9.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.85 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Jonpol deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An initial assay from Garrison's Jonpol deposit returned high-grade gold, supporting the western strike extension of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept
  • Supports western strike extension

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 9.22 g/t Au over 5.85 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“9.22 g/t Au over 5.85 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 9Garrison · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.65 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garrison
Commodity
gold
Region
canada
Reported Region
canada
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Location
Jonpol deposit
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Another initial assay from Garrison's Jonpol deposit returned strong gold grades over a significant width, supporting the western strike extension of the mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold intercept over significant width
  • Supports western strike extension

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-001Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 5.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-001
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
5.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-001:null-null

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole KLM26-001 at Mirado Mine returned a high-grade gold intercept over a significant width, contributing to the ongoing resource update program.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept over significant width
  • Part of a program designed for resource update

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 5.66 g/t Au over 18.2 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“5.66 g/t Au over 18.2 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-001Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 23.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-001
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
23.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-001:null-null

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An included interval within Hole KLM26-001 showed exceptionally high-grade gold, further confirming strong mineralization at Mirado Mine.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold intercept
  • Confirms strong mineralization within the broader intercept

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 23.03 g/t Au over 4.3 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“23.03 g/t Au over 4.3 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-002Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 121 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-002
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
121 m
From
11 m
To
132 m
Intercept Depth
11 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-002:11-132

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole KLM26-002, a step-out hole, confirmed continuous mineralization over a very significant width in the South Zone at Mirado Mine, indicating good continuity.

Positive factors

  • Confirms continuous mineralization over a very significant width
  • Step-out drilling extends known mineralization

Tags used in scoring

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The second drill hole, targeting the South Zone at Mirado, stepped out 75 m southeast of KLM26-001 and confirmed continuous mineralization

Evidence · text

“stepped out 75 m southeast of KLM26-001 and confirmed continuous mineralization”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-002Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 7.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-002
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
7.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.8 m
From
74.2 m
To
79 m
Intercept Depth
74.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-002:74.2-79

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An included high-grade interval within Hole KLM26-002 further confirmed strong mineralization in the South Zone at Mirado Mine.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept within a broader zone
  • Confirms strong mineralization

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 7.41 g/t over 4.8 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“7.41 g/t over 4.8 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-004Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 39.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-004
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
39.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.4 m
From
53.6 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
53.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-004:53.6-70

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Hole KLM26-004 at Mirado Mine returned an exceptionally high-grade gold intercept over a significant width, confirming lateral continuity of the South Zone mineralized system.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional high-grade gold intercept over significant width
  • Confirms lateral continuity of mineralization

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 39.35 g/t Au over 16.4m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“39.35 g/t Au over 16.4m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-004Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 106.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-004
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
106.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-004:53.6-70

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An included interval within Hole KLM26-004 showed an extremely high-grade gold intercept, demonstrating the presence of bonanza-grade shoots within the South Zone.

Positive factors

  • Extremely high-grade gold intercept
  • Confirms presence of high-grade shoots

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 106.9 g/t Au over 6.0 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“106.9 g/t Au over 6.0 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-004Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 1670Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.38 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-004
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
1670
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.38 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-004:53.6-70

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An included interval within Hole KLM26-004 showed an ultra-high-grade gold intercept, providing strong evidence of bonanza-grade shoots within the South Zone.

Positive factors

  • Ultra-high-grade gold intercept
  • Confirms presence of bonanza-grade shoots

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 1,670 g/t over 0.38 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“1,670 g/t over 0.38 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-004Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 2.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-004
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
2.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.1 m
From
78.7 m
To
104.8 m
Intercept Depth
78.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-004:78.7-104.8

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Another strong gold intercept over a significant width in Hole KLM26-004 further confirms the lateral continuity of the South Zone mineralized system at Mirado Mine.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold intercept over significant width
  • Confirms lateral continuity of mineralization

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

KLM26-004Mirado Mine · goldGrade: 3.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
KLM26-004
Project
Mirado Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
canada_on
Ticker
MTA

Geometry

Grade
3.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
KLM26-004:78.7-104.8

Location

Location
South Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An included high-grade interval within Hole KLM26-004 further confirmed strong mineralization in the South Zone at Mirado Mine.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercept within a broader zone
  • Confirms strong mineralization

Tags used in scoring

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 3.75 g/t Au over 13.5 m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept for gold.

Evidence · text

“3.75 g/t Au over 13.5 m”

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (17)

probableTaca Taca · copperTonnes: 1990000000Grade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8429Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Taca Taca
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2025-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:5f7b6b80c855dc501607

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
1990000000
Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8429
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Taca Taca reported substantial Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves for copper, indicating a robust and high-confidence resource base for future development.

Positive factors

  • Large Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves for copper
  • High confidence in the reserve estimate (NI 43-101 compliant)

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves total 1,990 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves total 1,990 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101

Evidence · text

“updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

probableTaca Taca · goldTonnes: 1990000000Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5532Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Taca Taca
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Effective date
2025-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:5f7b6b80c855dc501607

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
1990000000
Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5532
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Taca Taca reported significant Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves for gold, adding to the project's overall value and confidence.

Positive factors

  • Significant Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves for gold
  • High confidence in the reserve estimate (NI 43-101 compliant)

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves total 1,990 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves total 1,990 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101

Evidence · text

“updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTaca Taca · copperTonnes: 2078000000Grade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 8716Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Taca Taca
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:2f68a9ad041e65926d4d

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2078000000
Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
8716
Contained Unit
kt

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Taca Taca reported substantial Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources for copper, providing a strong foundation for economic studies and development.

Positive factors

  • Large Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources for copper
  • High confidence in the resource estimate (NI 43-101 compliant)

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources total 2,078 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold

Evidence · text

“Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources total 2,078 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101

Evidence · text

“updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTaca Taca · goldTonnes: 2078000000Grade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5715Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Taca Taca
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2025-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:2f68a9ad041e65926d4d

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2078000000
Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5715
Contained Unit
koz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-31

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Taca Taca reported significant Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources for gold, further enhancing the project's overall value.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources for gold
  • High confidence in the resource estimate (NI 43-101 compliant)

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources total 2,078 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold

Evidence · text

“Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources total 2,078 Mt grading 0.42% copper and 0.09 g/t gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101

Evidence · text

“updated technical report for the Taca Taca project prepared in accordance with NI 43-101”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

probableTocantinzinho · goldTonnes: 49784000Grade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.87Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tocantinzinho
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Resource group id
resource:694a0d64fffe03f0bfd7

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
49784000
Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.87
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Tocantinzinho reported substantial Proven and Probable Reserves for gold, indicating a strong and reliable resource base.

Positive factors

  • Significant Proven and Probable Reserves for gold

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Reserves of 1.87 Moz of gold at a grade of 1.17 g/t contained in 49,784 kt

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Reserves of 1.87 Moz of gold at a grade of 1.17 g/t contained in 49,784 kt”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTocantinzinho · goldTonnes: 47665000Grade: 1.25Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.92Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tocantinzinho
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:cffc56a71aa602d7ac76

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
47665000
Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.92
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Tocantinzinho reported significant Measured and Indicated Resources for gold, providing a strong base for future mine planning.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated Resources for gold

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Measured and Indicated Resources of 1.92 Moz gold at a grade of 1.25 g/t within 47,665 kt

Evidence · text

“Measured and Indicated Resources of 1.92 Moz gold at a grade of 1.25 g/t within 47,665 kt”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

probableWharf · goldTonnes: 55100000Grade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.25Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Wharf
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:342b44e18c250c77e978

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
55100000
Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.25
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wharf reported a substantial 65% increase in Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves, nearly doubling the mine life and indicating significant project de-risking.

Positive factors

  • Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves increased significantly
  • Mine life nearly doubled
  • High confidence in the reserve estimate (NI 43-101 compliant)

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves at Wharf increased by 65% to 1.25 Moz of gold at a grade of 0.71 g/t, contained within 55.1 Mt

Evidence · text

“Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves at Wharf increased by 65% to 1.25 Moz of gold at a grade of 0.71 g/t, contained within 55.1 Mt”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: updated NI 43-101 compliant technical report for Wharf

Evidence · text

“updated NI 43-101 compliant technical report for Wharf”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedWharf · goldTonnes: 61800000Grade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.19Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Wharf
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:08c0e398b9be33d53b24

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
61800000
Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.19
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wharf reported significant Measured and Indicated Resources for gold, providing a strong base for future mine planning and potential extensions.

Positive factors

  • Significant Measured and Indicated Resources for gold
  • High confidence in the resource estimate (NI 43-101 compliant)

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Measured and Indicated Resources of 1.19 Moz gold at a grade of 0.6 g/t, contained within 61.8 Mt

Evidence · text

“Measured and Indicated Resources of 1.19 Moz gold at a grade of 0.6 g/t, contained within 61.8 Mt”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: updated NI 43-101 compliant technical report for Wharf

Evidence · text

“updated NI 43-101 compliant technical report for Wharf”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredWharf · goldTonnes: 72900000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.49Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Wharf
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:0ef9ac7663e1877e2282

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
72900000
Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.49
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Wharf reported a substantial Inferred Resource, indicating significant potential for future mine life extensions and exploration upside.

Positive factors

  • Significant Inferred Resource provides potential for future mine life extensions
  • High confidence in the resource estimate (NI 43-101 compliant)

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: total Inferred resource estimate of 72.9 Mt at 0.63 g/t for 1.49 Moz gold

Evidence · text

“total Inferred resource estimate of 72.9 Mt at 0.63 g/t for 1.49 Moz gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: updated NI 43-101 compliant technical report for Wharf

Evidence · text

“updated NI 43-101 compliant technical report for Wharf”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedCôté-Gosselin · goldContained Metal: 18.2Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté-Gosselin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:75e13754d1f473390f75

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Contained Metal
18.2
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Côté-Gosselin reported very large Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources for gold, indicating a significant and high-confidence resource base.

Positive factors

  • Very large Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources for gold

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: 18.2 million ounces Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

Evidence · text

“18.2 million ounces Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredCôté-Gosselin · goldContained Metal: 2.2Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Côté-Gosselin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:b6f9cf7ad97790f13992

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Contained Metal
2.2
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Côté-Gosselin reported significant Inferred Mineral Resources for gold, indicating further exploration potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant Inferred Mineral Resources for gold

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: 2.2 million ounces Inferred Mineral Resources

Evidence · text

“2.2 million ounces Inferred Mineral Resources”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredJoaquin · silverTonnes: 45300000Grade: 85Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 123Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:946107953f6710222b06

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
45300000
Grade
85
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
123
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Joaquin reported substantial Indicated and Inferred Resources for silver, establishing a significant resource base under JORC(2012) standards.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated and Inferred Resources for silver
  • JORC(2012) compliant estimate

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: Indicated and Inferred Resources of 45.3 Mt grading 85 g/t silver and 0.36% gold for 123 Moz of silver

Evidence · text

“Indicated and Inferred Resources of 45.3 Mt grading 85 g/t silver and 0.36% gold for 123 Moz of silver”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: JORC(2012) Mineral Resource Estimate for Joaquin

Evidence · text

“JORC(2012) Mineral Resource Estimate for Joaquin”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredJoaquin · goldTonnes: 45300000Grade: 0.36Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 522Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Joaquin
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
Resource group id
resource:946107953f6710222b06

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
45300000
Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
522
Contained Unit
koz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Joaquin reported significant Indicated and Inferred Resources for gold, adding to the project's overall value under JORC(2012) standards.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated and Inferred Resources for gold
  • JORC(2012) compliant estimate

Tags used in scoring

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: JORC(2012) Mineral Resource Estimate for Joaquin

Evidence · text

“JORC(2012) Mineral Resource Estimate for Joaquin”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Inferred ResourceRejected · negative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Reason: Indicated and Inferred Resources of 45.3 Mt grading 85 g/t silver and 0.36% gold for 522 koz of gold

Evidence · text

“Indicated and Inferred Resources of 45.3 Mt grading 85 g/t silver and 0.36% gold for 522 koz of gold”
indicatedGurupi · goldTonnes: 43512000Grade: 1.31Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.83Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gurupi
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:48ae60ed3b63eebbccae

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
43512000
Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.83
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gurupi reported significant Indicated Resources for gold, providing a strong base for ongoing technical studies.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated Resources for gold

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Indicated Resources of 1.83 Moz gold at a grade of 1.31 g/t within 43,512 kt

Evidence · text

“Indicated Resources of 1.83 Moz gold at a grade of 1.31 g/t within 43,512 kt”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredGurupi · goldTonnes: 18518000Grade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.77Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Gurupi
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:01b140afdc6f79f0c140

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
18518000
Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.77
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gurupi reported significant Inferred Resources for gold, indicating further exploration potential.

Positive factors

  • Significant Inferred Resources for gold

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: Inferred Resources of 0.77 Moz gold at a grade of 1.29 g/t within 18,518 kt

Evidence · text

“Inferred Resources of 0.77 Moz gold at a grade of 1.29 g/t within 18,518 kt”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

indicatedTower Mountain · goldTonnes: 34500000Grade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 514Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tower Mountain
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:914d10d9ccd5a2ef8037

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
34500000
Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
514
Contained Unit
koz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Tower Mountain reported a significant Indicated Mineral Resource for gold, establishing a solid base for future economic assessment under NI 43-101.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated Mineral Resource for gold
  • NI 43-101 compliant estimate

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Indicated Mineral Resource of 34.5 Mt averaging 0.46 g/t gold for a total of 514 koz gold

Evidence · text

“Indicated Mineral Resource of 34.5 Mt averaging 0.46 g/t gold for a total of 514 koz gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report supporting the Mineral Resource estimate at the Tower Mountain project

Evidence · text

“filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report supporting the Mineral Resource estimate at the Tower Mountain project”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

inferredTower Mountain · goldTonnes: 211100000Grade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3.05Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tower Mountain
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MTA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:d412a6bde853207b6ca6

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
211100000
Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3.05
Contained Unit
moz

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Tower Mountain reported a very large Inferred Mineral Resource for gold, indicating significant exploration upside and potential for future resource conversion under NI 43-101.

Positive factors

  • Very large Inferred Mineral Resource for gold
  • NI 43-101 compliant estimate

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: Inferred Mineral Resource of 211.1 Mt averaging 0.45 g/t gold for a total of 3.05 Moz gold

Evidence · text

“Inferred Mineral Resource of 211.1 Mt averaging 0.45 g/t gold for a total of 3.05 Moz gold”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report supporting the Mineral Resource estimate at the Tower Mountain project

Evidence · text

“filed a NI 43-101 Technical Report supporting the Mineral Resource estimate at the Tower Mountain project”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Metallurgical Results (1)

metallurgical test work studiesPlomosasView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Plomosas
Ticker
MTA

Test Work

Test Type
metallurgical test work studies
Sample
Sampled and composite feed grades in zones targeted for the BSTM in the historical Plomosas Mine

Recovery

Recovery Basis
actual_test

Reagents

Reagent Notes
concentrates that were within acceptable commercial specifications with no concerns over potential penalties or deleterious elements.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Metallurgical test work at Plomosas yielded positive results, with concentrates meeting commercial specifications and no penalty elements, supporting de-risking and pilot plant design.

Positive factors

  • Concentrates met commercial specifications
  • No concerns over penalties or deleterious elements
  • Supports basic engineering and pilot plant design

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Clean OreRejected · positive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: concentrates that were within acceptable commercial specifications with no concerns over potential penalties or deleterious elements.

Evidence · text

“concentrates that were within acceptable commercial specifications with no concerns over potential penalties or deleterious elements.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.