Midland, in Partnership with Rio Tinto Exploration Canada, Intersects New Lithium and Cesium Bearing Pegmatites During the 2025 Drilling Program on the Galinée Project

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Midland Exploration Inc.
Ticker
MD
Exchange
TSX
Region
Quebec
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
Cesium, Gold
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-14 11:03:13 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Midland Exploration, in partnership with Rio Tinto Exploration Canada, announced significant drill results from its 2025 program on the Galinée project. The program intersected new lithium and cesium bearing pegmatites, with highlights including 1.77% Li2O over 18.4 metres and 9.15% Cs2O over 6.4 metres. Additionally, new gold mineralization was identified, returning up to 8.8 g/t Au over 1.03 metres, expanding the project's prospectivity.

Reasoning: The drilling program on the Galinée project delivered strong lithium and exceptional cesium and gold intercepts, extending known mineralization and discovering new zones. The results are highly novel, indicating significant potential, despite the lack of true width information and some RC drilling.

Positive factors

  • High-grade lithium intercepts, including 1.77% Li2O over 18.4m, indicating strong mineralization
  • Discovery of new high-grade cesium mineralization, with up to 9.15% Cs2O over 6.4m, adding potential value
  • Identification of new gold mineralization, including 8.8 g/t Au over 1.03m, diversifying prospectivity
  • Drill program successfully extended known mineralization and tested new targets, demonstrating exploration success
  • Comprehensive QA/QC protocols disclosed, including blanks, duplicates, standards, and certified lab analysis
  • Qualified Person sign-off provides credibility to the reported results

Negative factors

  • True thickness of mineralized intervals is not determined, potentially overstating apparent widths
  • RC drilling may statistically return higher grades, introducing potential bias for some holes
  • Gold intercepts lack specific from/to depths, limiting precise location information

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 13

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details internal blanks, field duplicates, CRM standards (OREAS 750, 751, 753, 999, 520, 524), and analysis by ALS Laboratories, with specific analytical packages mentioned.

Evidence · text

“RTEC sampling protocols include the insertion of blanks, duplicates, and standards as such: Internal blanks were inserted at the beginning of every drill hole, or sample batch, and were inserted every 30 samples throughout. Field duplicates of ¼ cut drill cores were also inserted every 30 samples (with the parent sample immediately preceding). At least 1 CRM standard was inserted within every intersected pegmatite interval. CRM materials used included OREAS 750, OREAS 751, OREAS 753 and OREAS 999 for mineralized samples; OREAS 520 and OREAS 524 for unmineralized materials. All samples were prepared by ALS Laboratories in Thunder Bay using a preparation package whereby the entire sample is crushed to 70% less than 2-millimetre mesh size using a Boyd crusher and splitter combination. A one-kilogram split of crushed material is pulverized to better than 85% passing 75 microns mesh size. ALS internally sends all pulps to ALS Geochemistry in Vancouver for analysis. Pegmatite materials were analyzed by a multi-method analytical package: (1) ME-MS61L four acid digest and ICP-MS multicollector multi-element analysis, (2) ME-ICP06 lithium borate fusion whole rock analysis, and (3) ME-MS81 lithium borate fusion trace element analysis. All samples reporting >4500 ppm Li are reported by both a dilution method from the four-acid digest ME-MS61L and reanalyzed by Li-ICP82b sodium peroxide fusion and ICP-AES determination.”

QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Jean-François Larivière, P. Geo, Ph. D, is named as Midland’s qualified person (QP) within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 and approved the press release.

Evidence · text

“Jean-François Larivière, P. Geo, Ph. D, prepared, reviewed and approved this press release and verified the Galinée project data as Midland’s qualified person (QP) within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that the true thickness of mineralized intervals cannot be determined with the information currently available.

Evidence · text

“The true thickness of mineralized intervals cannot be determined with the information currently available.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: While cut-off grades for lithium and cesium composites are mentioned, the cut-off grade for the gold intercepts is not disclosed.

Evidence · text

“returned 8.8 g/t Au over 1.03 metres and 3.3 g/t Au over 0.68 metres.”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The project's location is highlighted by its proximity to the Adina lithium deposit held by Winsome Resources, suggesting value based on nearby discoveries.

Evidence · text

“The Galinée project is located approximately 5 kilometres east of the Adina lithium deposit held by Winsome Resources”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The 2025 drilling campaign included step-outs throughout the property to test structural targets and follow up on 2024 intersections outside the core area.

Evidence · text

“The objectives of the 2025 drilling campaign were to follow up on 2024 intersections that were mainly outside the core of the main Iceberg area and which remained open and required further testing, and also conduct step-outs throughout the property to test structural targets.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 13. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (13)

TLIB0030Galinée · lithiumGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0030
Project
Galinée
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.3 m
From
27.6 m
To
43.9 m
Hole Depth
201 m
Intercept Depth
27.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0030:27.6-43.9

Location

Easting
677032
Northing
5909178
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A weak to moderate lithium intercept, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit, but not a standout result on its own.

Positive factors

  • Moderate lithium grade for the deposit type
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 16.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0034Galinée · lithiumGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0034
Project
Galinée
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17.1 m
From
47.6 m
To
64.7 m
Hole Depth
177 m
Intercept Depth
47.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0034:47.6-64.7

Location

Easting
677360
Northing
5909168
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
21 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A solid moderate-grade lithium intercept that contributes positively to the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate lithium grade for the deposit type
  • Good intercept length

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: 17.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0044Galinée · lithiumGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0044
Project
Galinée
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
22.9 m
From
25.9 m
To
48.8 m
Hole Depth
83.82 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0044:25.9-48.8

Location

Easting
674698
Northing
5909075
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
6 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A long intercept with a lower average grade, but containing higher-grade sections, indicating variable mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length
  • Contains higher-grade sub-intervals

Negative factors

  • Grade is below weak threshold for lithium
  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“0.53”

Context: 22.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0044Galinée · lithiumGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0044
Project
Galinée
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.1 m
From
25.9 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
83.82 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0044:25.9-29

Location

Easting
674698
Northing
5909075
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
6 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade over a narrow interval, indicating a higher-grade zone within a broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Moderate to strong lithium grade for the deposit type

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 3.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0044Galinée · lithiumGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0044
Project
Galinée
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.1 m
From
32 m
To
38.1 m
Hole Depth
83.82 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0044:32-38.1

Location

Easting
674698
Northing
5909075
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
6 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good grade over a moderate interval, indicating a higher-grade zone within a broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Moderate lithium grade for the deposit type
  • Reasonable intercept length

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0051Galinée · lithiumGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0051
Project
Galinée
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
30.6 m
From
46.91 m
To
77.5 m
Hole Depth
264 m
Intercept Depth
46.91 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0051:46.91-77.5

Location

Easting
674399
Northing
5909071
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
8 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very strong intercept with good grade and significant width, indicating substantial lithium mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate lithium grade over a significant intercept length
  • Contains a high-grade sub-interval

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 30.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0051Galinée · lithiumGrade: 1.77Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0051
Project
Galinée
Commodity
lithium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
1.77
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.4 m
From
46.91 m
To
65.3 m
Hole Depth
264 m
Intercept Depth
46.91 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0051:46.91-65.3

Location

Easting
674399
Northing
5909071
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
8 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
% Li2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional lithium intercept with high grade over a substantial width, indicating a very promising zone of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong lithium grade, approaching exceptional threshold
  • Significant intercept length

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“1.77”

Context: 18.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0006Galinée · cesiumGrade: 9.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0006
Project
Galinée
Commodity
cesium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
9.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.4 m
From
188.6 m
To
195 m
Intercept Depth
188.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0006:188.6-195

Location

CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Loc. Confidence
low

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
% Cs2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An outstanding and highly novel cesium intercept with bonanza-grade mineralization, representing a significant new discovery for the project.

Positive factors

  • Extremely high cesium grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization
  • Good intercept length for such high grade
  • New discovery of cesium mineralization

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined
  • Collar data not available in the provided table for this hole

Evidence · table

“9.15”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0015Galinée · cesiumGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0015
Project
Galinée
Commodity
cesium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.9 m
From
46.8 m
To
50.7 m
Intercept Depth
46.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0015:46.8-50.7

Location

CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Loc. Confidence
low

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
% Cs2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong cesium intercept over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization in this new discovery.

Positive factors

  • High cesium grade
  • New discovery of cesium mineralization

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True thickness not determined
  • Collar data not available in the provided table for this hole

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 3.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0030Galinée · cesiumGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0030
Project
Galinée
Commodity
cesium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
0.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.1 m
From
34.8 m
To
43.9 m
Hole Depth
201 m
Intercept Depth
27.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0030:34.8-43.9

Location

Easting
677032
Northing
5909178
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
% Cs2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A good cesium intercept, adding to the newly identified cesium mineralization on the project.

Positive factors

  • Good cesium grade over a reasonable intercept length
  • New discovery of cesium mineralization

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“0.52”

Context: 9.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0044Galinée · cesiumGrade: 1.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0044
Project
Galinée
Commodity
cesium
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
1.89
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.2 m
From
38.1 m
To
50.3 m
Hole Depth
83.82 m
Intercept Depth
25.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLIB0044:38.1-50.3

Location

Easting
674698
Northing
5909075
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
6 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.3
Cutoff Unit
% Cs2O

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very strong cesium intercept with high grade and good width, indicating significant mineralization in this new discovery.

Positive factors

  • Very high cesium grade over a significant intercept length
  • New discovery of cesium mineralization

Negative factors

  • True thickness not determined

Evidence · table

“1.89”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

TLIB0049Galinée · goldGrade: 8.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.03 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0049
Project
Galinée
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
8.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.03 m
Hole Depth
210.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Easting
680349
Northing
5908372
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
228 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An exceptional gold intercept, representing a significant new discovery, though the narrow width and lack of precise depth information limit its immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade, indicating high-grade mineralization
  • New discovery of gold mineralization

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length
  • True thickness not determined
  • From/to depths not specified in the document

Evidence · text

“8.8 g/t Au over 1.03 metres”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

TLIB0049Galinée · goldGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.68 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLIB0049
Project
Galinée
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
MD

Geometry

Grade
3.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.68 m
Hole Depth
210.65 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill

Location

Easting
680349
Northing
5908372
CRS
UTM zone 18, NAD83
Azimuth
228 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong gold intercept, further confirming the new gold mineralization, but over a very narrow width.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade
  • New discovery of gold mineralization

Negative factors

  • Very narrow intercept length
  • True thickness not determined
  • From/to depths not specified in the document

Evidence · text

“3.3 g/t Au over 0.68 metres”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.