# Untitled mining news story Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2 Original source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1713748/000110465921129014/tm2124138d1_ex99-56.htm Publisher: research Original announcement: Unknown date Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-11-08T19:48:47.611Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-11-08T19:48:47.611Z - Company: Unavailable - Ticker: SKE - Exchange: TSX - Region: British Columbia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver - Document categories: Other, Resource update, Drill results - Extracted: 2026-11-08 19:48:47 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.10 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary This is a Skeena Resources investor presentation covering the Eskay Creek and Snip projects in British Columbia’s Golden Triangle. It includes historical resource and PEA information, project timeline items, and some highlighted drill intercepts, but it is not a standalone new results announcement. The document also states that the technical information was approved by the Qualified Person, Paul Geddes. Reasoning: Corporate investor presentation for a mining issuer, with background resources, project timeline and historical drill highlights rather than one dominant new technical event. - Positive factor: The presentation states a 90,000 m drill program was underway at Eskay Creek with infill and exploration drilling. - Positive factor: It includes disclosed mineral resource estimates and PEA metrics for Eskay Creek and Snip. - Positive factor: Qualified Person approval is explicitly stated for the technical information. - Negative factor: This is a presentation/portfolio briefing rather than a single new results release. - Negative factor: Several drill figures are historical highlights or prior results, not fresh assays in this document. - Negative factor: No new assay tables or completed current drill results are provided in the main body. Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source. Facts used in scoring: 24 ## Classification and evidence **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: The presentation states that Paul Geddes, P. Geo., approved the technical information. Evidence · text > The Qualified Person responsible for the technical information in this presentation is Paul Geddes P. Geo. **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: The disclaimer states that mineral resource estimates are prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. Evidence · text > all mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates referred to herein or publicly available on SEDAR have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: The presentation discloses the 0.7 g/t AuEq and 2.5 g/t Au cut-offs for the resource tables. Evidence · text > Pit constrained resources are quoted at a 0.7 g/t AuEQ cut-off. **Apparent Width Only** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness. Why it applies: Several drill highlights are stated as intercept lengths without true width or drill orientation. Evidence · text > 25.03 g/t AuEq over 35.42 m **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: The document repackages historical resource tables and historical drill highlights in a corporate presentation rather than reporting new assays. Evidence · text > Any reference to historical estimates and mineral resources should not be relied upon. **Infill Drilling** Polarity: neutral Story-specific tag Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery. Why it applies: The Eskay Creek slide explicitly says a 90,000 m drill program was underway with infill and exploration drilling. Evidence · text > 90,000 m drill program underway \(infill & exploration\) ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (10) ### SK-19-063 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-14) Eskay Creek Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-19-063 - Project: Eskay Creek - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Intercept: 2.21 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 314.07 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t Au-Eq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical highlighted drill intercept from Eskay Creek. - Positive factor: Very high gold-equivalent grade is explicitly highlighted. - Positive factor: The intercept is short but exceptionally rich. - Negative factor: No from-to depths are stated in the text snippet. - Negative factor: It is a highlighted historical drill result in a presentation, not a new assay release. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Metal Equivalent Opaque** Polarity: negative Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent. Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-20-290 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-15) Eskay Creek Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-20-290 - Project: Eskay Creek - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Intercept: 35.42 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 25.03 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t Au-Eq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Eskay Creek drill highlight with strong grade and width. - Positive factor: Large width and strong gold-equivalent grade are disclosed. - Positive factor: The interval is substantial enough to matter materially. - Negative factor: Downhole width only; true width is not stated. - Negative factor: Historical highlight within a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Metal Equivalent Opaque** Polarity: negative Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent. Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-20-290 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-16) Eskay Creek Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-20-290 - Project: Eskay Creek - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Intercept: 4.2 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 6.26 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t Au-Eq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Secondary historical intercept from hole SK-20-290. - Positive factor: Moderate-to-strong gold-equivalent grade is disclosed. - Negative factor: Downhole width only; no true width is stated. - Negative factor: Historical highlight in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Metal Equivalent Opaque** Polarity: negative Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent. Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-20-274 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-17) Eskay Creek Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-20-274 - Project: Eskay Creek - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Intercept: 5.99 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 12.27 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t Au-Eq #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Eskay Creek drill highlight from hole SK-20-274. - Positive factor: Strong gold-equivalent grade over a meaningful width is disclosed. - Negative factor: No true width stated. - Negative factor: Historical highlight in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Metal Equivalent Opaque** Polarity: negative Definition: Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent. Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-19-044 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-18) Snip · gold Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-19-044 - Project: Snip - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Grade: 1131 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Compositing - Cutoff Grade: 45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Snip 200 Footwall drill intercept. - Positive factor: Extremely high gold grade is stated. - Positive factor: The interval is short but very rich. - Negative factor: No true width stated. - Negative factor: Historical drill highlight in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-19-044 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-19) Snip · gold Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-19-044 - Project: Snip - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Grade: 3390 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Compositing - Cutoff Grade: 45 - Cutoff Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval from the Snip 200 Footwall highlight. - Positive factor: Bonanza-grade gold is explicitly reported. - Negative factor: Very narrow interval. - Negative factor: Historical drill highlight in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-19-043 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-20) Snip · gold Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-19-043 - Project: Snip - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Grade: 12 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Snip 200 Footwall drill intercept. - Positive factor: Strong gold grade is reported over a short interval. - Negative factor: No true width stated. - Negative factor: Historical highlight in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-19-044 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-21) Snip · gold Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-19-044 - Project: Snip - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Grade: 7.41 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.6 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Additional Snip 200 Footwall drill intercept. - Positive factor: High gold grade is stated. - Negative factor: Very narrow interval. - Negative factor: Historical highlight in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### SK-19-044 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-22) Snip · gold Historical result Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: SK-19-044 - Project: Snip - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc #### Geometry - Grade: 12.6 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Additional narrow intercept from the Snip 200 Footwall highlights. - Positive factor: Strong gold grade is disclosed. - Negative factor: Very narrow interval. - Negative factor: Historical drill highlight. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### UG-2610 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-drill-facts-23) Snip · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: UG-2610 - Project: Snip - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: canada\_bc - Ticker: SKREF #### Geometry - Grade: 26.83 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 3.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-11-10T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Snip underground drill intercept. - Positive factor: Strong gold grade over a moderate width is reported. - Negative factor: Historical drill result reproduced in the presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## Resource Estimates (14) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-0) Eskay Creek Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:3e3c1412b1d78ffc568c - Deposit or zone: Pit Constrained #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 12650000 - Grade: 5.8 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 2340 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 0.7 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 5.8 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical indicated resource row from the 2019 Eskay Creek estimate. - Positive factor: Large indicated resource is disclosed for the Eskay Creek pit-constrained scenario. - Positive factor: Cut-off grade and AuEq formula are stated. - Positive factor: NI 43-101 framing and QP approval are disclosed. - Negative factor: This is a historical resource table reproduced in a presentation. - Negative factor: The document says historical estimates should not be relied upon as current mineral resources. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-1) Eskay Creek Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:3e3c1412b1d78ffc568c - Deposit or zone: Pit Constrained #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 12650000 - Grade: 4.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1740 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 0.7 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 5.8 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Gold grade component of the historical pit-constrained indicated resource. - Positive factor: Gold grade is explicitly disclosed for the pit-constrained indicated resource. - Positive factor: Cut-off grade and NI 43-101 context are stated. - Negative factor: Historical table reproduced in presentation. - Negative factor: Not a current estimate announcement. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-2) Eskay Creek Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:3e3c1412b1d78ffc568c - Deposit or zone: Pit Constrained #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 12650000 - Grade: 110 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 44660 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 0.7 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 5.8 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver component of the historical pit-constrained indicated resource. - Positive factor: Silver grade and contained ounces are disclosed for the pit-constrained indicated resource. - Positive factor: The table provides full contained metal disclosure. - Negative factor: Historical estimate within a presentation. - Negative factor: No new technical work is tied to this row in the document. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-3) Eskay Creek Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:18d3d56e08d41c341c4d - Deposit or zone: Pit Constrained #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 14420000 - Grade: 2.9 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1340 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 0.7 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 3 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical inferred pit-constrained gold resource. - Positive factor: Inferred resource tonnage and grade are disclosed. - Positive factor: Cut-off grade is stated for comparability. - Negative factor: Historical resource table in a presentation. - Negative factor: Inferred category carries lower confidence. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-4) Eskay Creek Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:18d3d56e08d41c341c4d - Deposit or zone: Pit Constrained #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 14420000 - Grade: 2.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 1050 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 0.7 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 3 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver component of the historical pit-constrained inferred resource. - Positive factor: Silver grade is disclosed for the inferred pit-constrained resource. - Negative factor: Historical table reproduced in presentation. - Negative factor: Inferred category only. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-5) Eskay Creek Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:18d3d56e08d41c341c4d - Deposit or zone: Pit Constrained #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 14420000 - Grade: 47 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 21720 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 0.7 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 3 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver component of the historical pit-constrained inferred resource. - Positive factor: Contained silver ounces are stated for the inferred pit-constrained resource. - Negative factor: Historical resource row in a presentation. - Negative factor: No current resource update is being announced here. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-6) Eskay Creek Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:4edaa20af7cc6cb0474b - Deposit or zone: Underground #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 819000 - Grade: 8.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 218 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 8.2 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical underground indicated gold resource row. - Positive factor: Underground indicated resource is disclosed at a high gold grade. - Positive factor: Cut-off grade is stated. - Negative factor: Historical resource estimate reproduced in the presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-7) Eskay Creek Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:4edaa20af7cc6cb0474b - Deposit or zone: Underground #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 819000 - Grade: 139 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 3657 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 8.2 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver component of the historical underground indicated resource. - Positive factor: Silver grade and contained ounces are disclosed for the underground indicated resource. - Negative factor: Historical estimate in a presentation. - Negative factor: No current update attached to this row. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-8) Eskay Creek Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:928fb8da70397415fc38 - Deposit or zone: Underground #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 295000 - Grade: 8.2 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 78 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 8.2 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical underground inferred gold resource row. - Positive factor: High gold grade is disclosed in the underground inferred resource. - Negative factor: Historical resource table reproduced here. - Negative factor: Inferred category only. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-9) Eskay Creek Project · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Eskay Creek Project - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:928fb8da70397415fc38 - Deposit or zone: Underground #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 295000 - Grade: 82 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 778 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t AuEq #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-11-07 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 8.2 - Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq - Assumptions Disclosed: Yes #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2019-11-07T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver component of the historical underground inferred resource. - Positive factor: Contained silver ounces are disclosed for the underground inferred resource. - Negative factor: Historical estimate in a presentation. - Negative factor: No new resource work is reported. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.0 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-10) Snip Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Snip Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:5d3bae17cf5a3e355d3d - Deposit or zone: Main #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 502000 - Grade: 14.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 231 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2020-07-20 #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-07-20T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Snip Main zone indicated resource. - Positive factor: Indicated resource grade is disclosed for the Main zone. - Positive factor: Cut-off grade is stated. - Negative factor: This is a historical estimate reproduced in the presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.3 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-11) Snip Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Snip Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:8446b585368a87ccaa3e - Deposit or zone: Twin West #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 37000 - Grade: 10.4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 12 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2020-07-20 #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-07-20T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Snip Twin West indicated resource. - Positive factor: Indicated resource is disclosed for Twin West. - Negative factor: Historical estimate in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.3 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-12) Snip Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Snip Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:6703fb76486638fed671 - Deposit or zone: Main #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 886000 - Grade: 13.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 379 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2020-07-20 #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-07-20T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Snip Main zone inferred resource. - Positive factor: Inferred resource for Main zone is disclosed with high grade. - Negative factor: Historical estimate reproduced in the presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.3 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/mining-news--35e0f93b-565c-4996-b279-f2f1a702a6c2#fact-resource-facts-13) Snip Project · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Snip Project - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: SKE #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - QP Signed: Yes - Qualified person names: Paul Geddes - Resource group id: resource:dd7d385ac06adbd645a9 - Deposit or zone: Twin West #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 56000 - Grade: 12.4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 23 - Contained Unit: koz - Cutoff Grade: 2.5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2020-07-20 #### Lab - Laboratory: Unknown #### Location - Loc. Confidence: inferred #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2020-07-20T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical Snip Twin West inferred resource. - Positive factor: Twin West inferred resource is disclosed. - Negative factor: Historical estimate in a presentation. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **QP/CP Signed** Polarity: positive Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience. Why it applies: qp\_signed is true **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 6.3 years before this release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.