NEVADA KING EXTENDS MINERALIZATION 150M ALONG STRIKE AT SILVER PARK EAST

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Nevada King Gold Corp.
Ticker
NKG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-14 15:19:43 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Nevada King Gold Corp. announced drill results from its Silver Park East target, extending gold and silver mineralization 150m along strike and identifying potential for a new satellite oxide zone. The company also re-stated its NI 43-101 compliant resource estimate for the Atlanta Gold Mine Project, which remains unchanged from its September 2024 effective date. The drill program is part of a larger regional exploration effort to identify additional oxide gold zones.

Reasoning: The drill results are positive, extending mineralization and identifying potential for a new oxide zone, which adds moderate novelty and materiality. However, the resource update is a re-release of stale data, which dampens overall novelty.

Positive factors

  • Mineralization extended 150m along strike at Silver Park East, indicating potential for a new satellite oxide gold and silver zone.
  • Drill results confirm gold and silver mineralization over a significant footprint (450m by 300m).
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed, including standards, blanks, duplicates, and a certified lab.
  • The resource estimate is NI 43-101 compliant and signed off by a Qualified Person.

Negative factors

  • Many drill intercepts show relatively low gold grades, with some AuEq values below 0.5 g/t.
  • No true width is stated for the drill intercepts, which are reported as downhole lengths.
  • The resource update is a re-release of previously announced figures (effective date September 6, 2024), offering no new information.
  • Metal equivalent assumptions for the drill results do not explicitly state recovery rates, only metal prices.

Facts used in scoring: 46

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill results confirm gold and silver mineralization over a 450m by 300m footprint, with a strike extension of 150m, indicating an extension beyond the previously known limit.

Evidence · text

“Drill results released today confirm gold and silver mineralization over a 450m by 300m footprint, with a strike extension of 150m”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC protocols including CRF standards, blanks, duplicates, and analysis by American Assay Lab.

Evidence · text

“QA/QC Protocols All Reverse Circulation (RC) samples from the Atlanta Project are split at the drill site and placed in cloth and plastic bags utilizing a nominal 2kg sample weight. CRF standards, blanks, and duplicates are inserted into the sample stream on-site on a one-in-twenty sample basis, meaning all three inserts are included in each 20-sample group. Samples are shipped by a local contractor in large sample shipping crates directly to American Assay Lab in Reno, Nevada , with full custody being maintained at all times.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The scientific and technical information has been reviewed and approved by Nevada King VP Exploration, Justin Daley, P.Geo., a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“The scientific and technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Nevada King VP Exploration, Justin Daley , P.Geo., a non-independent Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 (" NI 43-101 ").”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Intervals are given as downhole widths (e.g., '70.1m') with no true width or drill orientation information provided.

Evidence · text

“0.25 g/t AuEq over 70.1m in AT25SP-41”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: AuEq is based on metal prices but does not disclose recovery assumptions, which are crucial for a complete understanding of the equivalent grade.

Evidence · text

“AuEq based on US$2,200/oz Au and US$25/oz Ag, as applied to mineral resource estimate.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The NI 43-101 resource estimate presented has an effective date of September 6, 2024, and a report date of July 18, 2025, indicating it is a re-release of prior data without new information.

Evidence · text

“The project hosts an NI 43-101 compliant pit-constrained oxide resource of 1,020koz Au in the measured and indicated category ( 27.7M tonnes at 1.14 g/t) plus an inferred resource of 99koz Au ( 3.6M tonnes at 0.84 g/t). See the NI 43-101 Technical Report titled "Technical Report and Estimate of Gold and Silver Mineral Resources for the Atlanta Project, Lincoln County, Nevada , USA" with an effective date of September 6, 2024 , and a report date of July 18, 2025 , as prepared by RESPEC (formerly Mine Development Associates) and filed under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ www.sedarplus.ca .”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is explicitly stated as NI 43-101 compliant.

Evidence · text

“The project hosts an NI 43-101 compliant pit-constrained oxide resource”

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component. No prior estimate exists, so every change band is not applicable.

Why it applies: The drill results indicate potential for a 'new satellite oxide gold and silver zone' at Silver Park East, suggesting this area could lead to a maiden resource for this specific zone.

Evidence · text

“Continuity and scale of mineralization suggest SPE may represent a new satellite oxide gold and silver zone”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 46. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (44)

AT25SP-33Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-33
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
100.6 m
To
102.1 m
Intercept Depth
100.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-33:100.6-102.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms gold mineralization in a new target area but is of low grade and narrow width, limiting its individual materiality.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low grade and narrow intercept length.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-33Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 4.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-33
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
4.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
100.6 m
To
102.1 m
Intercept Depth
100.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-33:100.6-102.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.51
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept confirms silver mineralization in a new target area but is of low grade and narrow width, limiting its individual materiality.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low grade and narrow intercept length.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“4.6”

Context: 1.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-34Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-34
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
103.6 m
To
109.7 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-34:103.6-109.7
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, indicating limited individual materiality despite confirming mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-34Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-34
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
6.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
103.6 m
To
109.7 m
Intercept Depth
103.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-34:103.6-109.7
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low silver grades, indicating limited individual materiality despite confirming mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“6.7”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-35Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-35
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-35:44.2-51.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate AuEq grade over a reasonable width, confirming mineralization in a new target area.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • AuEq grade is moderate for an open-pit oxide target.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-35Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 60.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-35
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
60.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
44.2 m
To
51.8 m
Intercept Depth
44.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-35:44.2-51.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.84
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a reasonable width, confirming mineralization in a new target area.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • Silver grade is moderate.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“60.16”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-36Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
35 m
To
39.6 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-36:35-39.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong AuEq grade, primarily driven by silver, over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the new target.

Positive factors

  • High AuEq grade for an open-pit oxide target.
  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade, high AuEq driven by silver.
  • Narrow intercept length.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-36Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 125Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
125
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
35 m
To
39.6 m
Intercept Depth
35 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-36:35-39.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade over a narrow width, indicating a high-grade zone within the new target.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade for an open-pit oxide target.
  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Narrow intercept length.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“125”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-36Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-36:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate AuEq grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • Moderate AuEq grade for an open-pit oxide target.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-36Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
22.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-36:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • Moderate silver grade.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“22.8”

Context: 6.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-36Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
109.7 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
109.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-36:109.7-121.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades over a moderate width, indicating limited individual materiality.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-36Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
109.7 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
109.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-36:109.7-121.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades over a moderate width, indicating limited individual materiality.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: 12.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-37Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-37
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41.1 m
From
147.9 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
147.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-37:147.9-189
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a significant width of mineralization, contributing to the overall footprint, despite low gold grades.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length (41.1m).
  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 41.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-37Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 16.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 41.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-37
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
16.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
41.1 m
From
147.9 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
147.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-37:147.9-189
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a significant width of mineralization, contributing to the overall footprint, despite moderate silver grades.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length (41.1m).
  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Moderate silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“16.12”

Context: 41.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-37Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-37
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
147.8 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-37:147.8-163.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate AuEq grade over a good width, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Moderate AuEq grade over a good width.
  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 15.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-37Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-37
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
147.8 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-37:147.8-163.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a moderate silver grade over a good width, indicating a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade over a good width.
  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“39.0”

Context: 15.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-38Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-38
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.8 m
From
140.2 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-38:140.2-189
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a significant width of mineralization, contributing to the overall footprint, despite low gold grades.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length (48.8m).
  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 48.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-38Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 8.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 48.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-38
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
8.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
48.8 m
From
140.2 m
To
189 m
Intercept Depth
140.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-38:140.2-189
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.2
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a significant width of mineralization, contributing to the overall footprint, despite low silver grades.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length (48.8m).
  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“8.5”

Context: 48.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-39Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.091Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-39
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.091
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.6 m
From
233.2 m
To
272.8 m
Intercept Depth
233.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-39:233.2-272.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a significant width of mineralization, contributing to the overall footprint, despite very low gold grades.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length (39.6m).
  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Very low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.091”

Context: 39.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-39Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-39
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.6 m
From
233.2 m
To
272.8 m
Intercept Depth
233.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-39:233.2-272.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a significant width of mineralization, contributing to the overall footprint, despite low silver grades.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length (39.6m).
  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“11.3”

Context: 39.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-40Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-40
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
176.8 m
To
184.4 m
Intercept Depth
176.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-40:176.8-184.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate AuEq grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Moderate AuEq grade for an open-pit oxide target.
  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-40Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 43.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-40
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
43.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
176.8 m
To
184.4 m
Intercept Depth
176.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-40:176.8-184.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.6
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a reasonable width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade over a reasonable width.
  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“43.3”

Context: 7.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
70.1 m
From
80.8 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
80.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:80.8-150.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very significant width of mineralization, indicating broad mineralization in the new target area despite low gold grades.

Positive factors

  • Very significant intercept length (70.1m).
  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.2”

Context: 70.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
70.1 m
From
80.8 m
To
150.9 m
Intercept Depth
80.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:80.8-150.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.25
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very significant width of mineralization, indicating broad mineralization in the new target area despite very low silver grades.

Positive factors

  • Very significant intercept length (70.1m).
  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“4.0”

Context: 70.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
80.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
80.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:80.8-85.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade and narrow width.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
80.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
80.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:80.8-85.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low silver grades over a narrow width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade and narrow width.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“11.0”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
92.9 m
To
103.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:92.9-103.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
92.9 m
To
103.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:92.9-103.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“13.0”

Context: 10.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
115.8 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:115.8-129.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-41Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-41
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
115.8 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-41:115.8-129.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.42
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“1.74”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-42Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-42
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
120.4 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-42:120.4-134.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms gold mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AT25SP-42Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 11.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT25SP-42
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
11.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
120.4 m
To
134.1 m
Intercept Depth
120.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT25SP-42:120.4-134.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low silver grades over a moderate width, contributing to the overall mineralization footprint.

Positive factors

  • Confirms silver mineralization in a new target area.
  • QA/QC protocols are disclosed and QP signed.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade.
  • No true width stated.

Evidence · table

“11.3”

Context: 13.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 22.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
22.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
88.4 m
To
94.5 m
Intercept Depth
88.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:88.4-94.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 139.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 22.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.8”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
109.7 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
109.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:109.7-121.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.1 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.1 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.1”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

AndAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.2 m
From
109.7 m
To
121.9 m
Intercept Depth
109.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:109.7-121.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 51.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 4.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.2”

Context: And

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
147.8 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:147.8-163.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.22 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.22 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
147.8 m
To
163.1 m
Intercept Depth
147.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:147.8-163.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 39 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 596.7 g/t·m is weak.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“39.0”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
80.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
80.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:80.8-85.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
80.8 m
To
85.3 m
Intercept Depth
80.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:80.8-85.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 49.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 11 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.0”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
92.9 m
To
103.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:92.9-103.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.27 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.27 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
92.9 m
To
103.6 m
Intercept Depth
92.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:92.9-103.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 139.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.0”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
115.8 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:115.8-129.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
115.8 m
To
129.5 m
Intercept Depth
115.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
other
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:115.8-129.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.74 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 23.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1.74 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.74”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (2)

inferredAtlanta Gold Mine Project · goldTonnes: 3638400Grade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 98500Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Atlanta Gold Mine Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
NKG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Justin Daley
Resource group id
resource:fb7d58c983653292067a
Deposit or zone
Atlanta Mine
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3638400
Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
98500
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-release of a previously announced Inferred resource, so it has moderate confidence but no novelty.

Positive factors

  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
  • Pit-constrained oxide resource.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • This is a re-release of stale data, offering no new information.

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 3,638,400

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

inferredAtlanta Gold Mine Project · silverTonnes: 3638400Grade: 2.56Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 299500Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Atlanta Gold Mine Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
Nevada
Ticker
NKG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Justin Daley
Resource group id
resource:fb7d58c983653292067a
Deposit or zone
Atlanta Mine
Material type
oxide
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
3638400
Grade
2.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
299500
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-06

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.85
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-09-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a re-release of a previously announced Inferred resource, so it has moderate confidence but no novelty.

Positive factors

  • NI 43-101 compliant and QP signed.
  • Pit-constrained oxide resource.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category has lower geological confidence.
  • This is a re-release of stale data, offering no new information.

Evidence · table

“2.56”

Context: 3,638,400

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.