NEVADA KING INTERCEPTS 4.68 G/T AU OVER 7.3M AND 1.00 G/T AU OVER 26.8M NEAR SURFACE AND BOTTOMING IN MINERALIZATION AT EAST RIDGE TARGET

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Nevada King Gold Corp.
Ticker
NKG
Exchange
TSX
Region
eastern Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-14 14:40:44 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Nevada King Gold Corp. announced high-grade, near-surface gold intercepts from its reconnaissance Rotary Air Blast (RAB) drilling program at the East Ridge Target, immediately east of the Atlanta pit in eastern Nevada. Key results include 4.68 g/t Au over 7.3m and 1.00 g/t Au over 26.8m, with several holes bottoming in mineralization. These results validate a new structural model and indicate potential for expanding the existing resource, with follow-up Reverse Circulation (RC) drilling planned.

Reasoning: Nevada King's RAB drilling at the East Ridge Target has yielded high-grade, near-surface gold intercepts, expanding the known mineralization footprint outside the current resource and validating a new structural model. The results, particularly those bottoming in mineralization, indicate strong potential for resource expansion, although the early-stage nature of RAB drilling and lack of true width information warrant moderate confidence.

Positive factors

  • High-grade gold intercepts near surface, including 4.68 g/t Au over 7.3m and 1.00 g/t Au over 26.8m, are significant for an open-pit target.
  • Mineralization bottoming in several holes indicates potential for further depth extension.
  • New mineralization discovered outside the current resource area, validating a revised structural model and expanding the known footprint.
  • The reconnaissance RAB drilling successfully identified new high-priority targets for follow-up RC drilling.

Negative factors

  • RAB drilling is an early-stage reconnaissance method, and results need to be confirmed by deeper RC drilling.
  • No true width is stated for the intercepts, which are reported as downhole lengths.
  • Metal equivalent assumptions are disclosed but not fully transparent regarding recovery averages from Phase II metallurgical work.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 109

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Hole AT26ERB-16 intersected 4.68 g/t Au over 7.3m, which is an exceptional gold grade for an open-pit target.

Evidence · text

“4.68 g/t Au over 7.3m”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling encountered new gold mineralization immediately east of the Atlanta pit and outside the current resource area, extending the known mineralized footprint.

Evidence · text

“new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located immediately east of the Atlanta pit at its 100% owned, 130km 2 Atlanta Gold Mine Project (" Atlanta ") in eastern Nevada. ... outside the current resource area”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC protocols including the splitting of samples, insertion of standards, blanks, and duplicates, and the laboratory used.

Evidence · text

“All RC and RAB samples from the Atlanta Project are split at the drill site and placed in cloth and plastic bags utilizing a nominal 2kg sample weight. CRF standards, blanks, and duplicates are inserted into the sample stream on-site on a one-in-twenty sample basis, meaning all three inserts are included in each 20-sample group.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The reported intervals are given as downhole lengths (e.g., '7.3m') with no mention of true width or drill orientation relative to mineralization.

Evidence · text

“4.68 G/T AU OVER 7.3M”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent (AuEq) is reported, and assumptions (Au/Ag prices, recovery averages from Phase II metallurgical work) are mentioned, but the specific recovery averages are not detailed.

Evidence · text

“AuEq based on US$2,200/oz Au, US$25/oz Ag, and Au/Ag recovery averages from Phase II metallurgical work, as applied to the mineral resource estimate.”

Exploration Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The program is described as a 'reconnaissance exploration program' using a 'RAB drill' to 'rapidly test early-stage targets'.

Evidence · text

“ongoing Rotary Air Blast (" RAB ") reconnaissance exploration program. ... rapidly test early-stage targets”

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The East Ridge Target is explicitly positioned 'immediately east of the Atlanta pit' and the results are discussed in the context of 'enhancing the potential for converting waste rock into mineable mineralization within a future pit shell'.

Evidence · text

“East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located immediately east of the Atlanta pit at its 100% owned, 130km 2 Atlanta Gold Mine Project”

Bottoming in Mineralizationpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Several holes, including the high-grade AT26ERB-16 and AT26ERB-42, are explicitly stated to have 'bottomed in mineralization', indicating potential for further depth extension.

Evidence · text

“Hole AT26ERB-16 intersected 4.68 g/t Au over 7.3m starting at 21.9m depth and bottomed in mineralization”

New Structural Model Validatedpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The high-grade intercepts 'reveal the presence of "blind" mineralized faults that validate this revised structural model', suggesting new understanding of the deposit.

Evidence · text

“The high-grade intercepts reported today reveal the presence of "blind" mineralized faults that validate this revised structural model”

Near Surface Mineralizationpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The headline and multiple intercepts emphasize 'near surface' mineralization, which is favorable for open-pit mining scenarios.

Evidence · text

“NEVADA KING INTERCEPTS 4.68 G/T AU OVER 7.3M AND 1.00 G/T AU OVER 26.8M NEAR SURFACE”

Oxide Goldpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The release explicitly refers to 'Highlight Near-Surface Oxide Gold Results' and 'high-grade oxide gold already defined within the Atlanta pit', indicating favorable metallurgy.

Evidence · text

“Highlight Near-Surface Oxide Gold Results from RAB Drilling at the East Ridge Target”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 109. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (109)

AT26ERB-1Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-1
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
2.4 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-1:2.4-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.03 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-1Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-1
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
2.4 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-1:2.4-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-2Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-2
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
2.4 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-2:2.4-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.03
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.03 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-2Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-2
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
2.4 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-2:2.4-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-3Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-3
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.1 m
From
0 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-3:0-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.05 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 17.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-3Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-3
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.1 m
From
0 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-3:0-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 17.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-4Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-4
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
From
0 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-4:0-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.06 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-4Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-4
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
From
0 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-4:0-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (1.61 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“1.61”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.3 m
From
0 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5:0-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.11 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 29.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 5.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
5.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.3 m
From
0 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5:0-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (5.14 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“5.14”

Context: 29.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.18 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
7.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (7.5 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“7.5”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
26.8 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5:26.8-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.15 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
26.8 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5:26.8-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (2.4 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-8Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-8
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
2.4 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-8:2.4-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.18
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.18 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-8Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-8
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
2.4 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-8:2.4-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-9Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-9
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
0 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-9:0-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.15
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.14 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-9Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 10.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-9
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
10.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
0 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-9:0-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (10.2 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“10.2”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-11Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-11
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
4.9 m
To
19.5 m
Intercept Depth
4.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-11:4.9-19.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.5
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width near surface, contributing positively to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (0.5 g/t Au) over a reasonable width (14.6m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.50”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-11Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-11
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
4.9 m
To
19.5 m
Intercept Depth
4.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-11:4.9-19.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.63 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-15Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-15
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-15:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.28
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width near surface, contributing to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.28 g/t Au) over a moderate width (7.3m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.28”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-15Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-15
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-15:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (1.43 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“1.43”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-16Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-16
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
4.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
21.9 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
21.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-16:21.9-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.68
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is an exceptional high-grade gold intercept near surface, bottoming in mineralization, and located outside the current resource, making it highly material and novel for the project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (4.68 g/t Au) over a good width (7.3m) near surface.
  • Intercept bottomed in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension at depth.
  • This high-grade intercept is outside the current resource area, suggesting significant expansion potential.

Evidence · table

“4.68”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-16Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-16
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
3.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
21.9 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
21.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-16:21.9-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: While the silver grade is low, its presence alongside high-grade gold contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (3.3 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“3.3”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-17Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-17
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-17:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.12 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-17Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-17
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-17:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-17Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-17
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
0 m
To
2.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-17:0-2.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.26
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width near surface, contributing to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.26 g/t Au) over a narrow width (2.4m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-17Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-17
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
0 m
To
2.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-17:0-2.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 2.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-18Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-18
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.8 m
From
0 m
To
26.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-18:0-26.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.75
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width starting at surface and outside the current resource, making it highly material and novel for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (0.75 g/t Au) over a significant width (26.8m) starting at surface.
  • This intercept is outside the current resource area, suggesting significant expansion potential.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 26.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-18Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-18
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.8 m
From
0 m
To
26.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-18:0-26.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: While the silver grade is very low, its presence alongside strong gold contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 26.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-18Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-18
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
0 m
To
4.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-18:0-4.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.14
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.14 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-18Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-18
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
0 m
To
4.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-18:0-4.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-18Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-18
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
19.5 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-18:19.5-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.11 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-18Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-18
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
19.5 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-18:19.5-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.6 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-20Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-20
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
19.5 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
19.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-20:19.5-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.61
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, contributing positively to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (0.61 g/t Au) over a narrow width (4.9m).

Evidence · table

“0.61”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-20Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-20
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
19.5 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
19.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-20:19.5-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-21Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-21
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
2.4 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-21:2.4-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.12 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-21Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-21
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
2.4 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-21:2.4-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-22Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-22
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-22:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.12 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-22Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-22
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-22:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-23Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-23
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
9.8 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
9.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-23:9.8-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.13 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-23Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-23
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
9.8 m
To
17.1 m
Intercept Depth
9.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-23:9.8-17.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-24Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-24
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.3 m
From
0 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-24:0-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.11 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 29.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-24Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-24
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.3 m
From
0 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-24:0-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 29.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-24Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-24
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
0 m
To
4.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-24:0-4.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.23
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width near surface, contributing to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.23 g/t Au) over a narrow width (4.9m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-24Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-24
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
0 m
To
4.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-24:0-4.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-24Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-24
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
12.2 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-24:12.2-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.14
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.14 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-24Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-24
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
12.2 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-24:12.2-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-30Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-30
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
From
2.4 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-30:2.4-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.11
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.11 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-30Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-30
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
From
2.4 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-30:2.4-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 21.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-34Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-34
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-34:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.13 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-34Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-34
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-34:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-35Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-35
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
16.5 m
To
26.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-35:16.5-26.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.23
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width, contributing to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.23 g/t Au) over a good width (10.4m).

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: 10.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-35Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-35
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
16.5 m
To
26.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-35:16.5-26.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 10.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-36Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
0 m
To
19.5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-36:0-19.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.31
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a strong width near surface, contributing positively to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.31 g/t Au) over a strong width (19.5m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 19.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-36Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-36
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
0 m
To
19.5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-36:0-19.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.67 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 19.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-39Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-39
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-39:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width near surface, contributing positively to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (0.46 g/t Au) over a good width (9.8m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-39Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-39
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-39:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.5 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.5”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-40Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-40
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
9.8 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
9.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-40:9.8-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.16
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.16 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-40Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-40
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
9.8 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
9.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-40:9.8-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-42Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-42
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-42:2.4-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong high-grade gold intercept near surface, bottoming in mineralization, and located outside the current resource, making it highly material and novel for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (1.00 g/t Au) over a significant width (26.8m) near surface.
  • Intercept bottomed in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension at depth.
  • This high-grade intercept is outside the current resource area, suggesting significant expansion potential.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 26.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-42Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-42
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-42:2.4-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: While the silver grade is low, its presence alongside strong gold contributes to the overall polymetallic nature of the mineralization.

Negative factors

  • Low silver grade (1.0 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 26.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-47Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-47
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
12.2 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-47:2.4-12.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.1 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-47Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-47
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
12.2 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-47:2.4-12.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-51Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-51
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-51:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.13 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-51Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-51
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-51:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-53Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-53
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
2.4 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-53:2.4-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.05
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.05 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 19.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-53Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-53
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
2.4 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-53:2.4-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 19.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-54Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-54
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
9.8 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
9.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-54:9.8-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.04
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.04 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-54Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-54
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
9.8 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
9.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-54:9.8-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.25 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-55Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-55
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
0 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-55:0-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a strong width near surface, contributing to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.24 g/t Au) over a strong width (24.4m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 24.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-55Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-55
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
0 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-55:0-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (1.0 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: 24.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-56Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-56
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.06
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-56:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.06 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.06”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-56Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-56
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
0 m
To
7.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-56:0-7.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.87 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: 7.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-57Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-57
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
12.2 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-57:2.4-12.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a good width near surface, contributing to the exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.24 g/t Au) over a good width (9.8m) near surface.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-57Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-57
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
12.2 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-57:2.4-12.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (1.75 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 9.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-58Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-58
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
0 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-58:0-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.12
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows low gold grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Low gold grade (0.12 g/t Au) is below typical economic thresholds for gold deposits.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-58Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-58
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
0 m
To
14.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-58:0-14.6
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows very low silver grades, which is not material, but contributes to the overall understanding of the target area's geology.

Negative factors

  • Very low silver grade (0.93 g/t Ag) is not economically significant.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 14.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT24ET-11Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT24ET-11
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
0 m
To
22.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT24ET-11:0-22.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a strong historical gold intercept near surface, providing context for the current exploration program, but with low novelty as it was previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade (1.32 g/t Au) over a significant width (22.9m) starting at surface.

Evidence · text

“22.9m grading 1.32 g/t Au starting at surface in hole AT24ET-11”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT24ET-13Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT24ET-13
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
12.2 m
To
33.5 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT24ET-13:12.2-33.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a moderate historical gold intercept over a significant width, providing context for the current exploration program, but with low novelty as it was previously reported.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade (0.53 g/t Au) over a significant width (21.3m).

Evidence · text

“21.3m grading 0.53 g/t Au starting at 12.2m in hole AT24ET-13”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT24ET-15Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT24ET-15
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.6 m
From
42.7 m
To
79.3 m
Hole Depth
79.3 m
Intercept Depth
42.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT24ET-15:42.7-79.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-07-16T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept, while low grade, is significant for its width and confirmation of geological continuity at depth, providing important context for the current exploration program.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade (0.16 g/t Au) over a continuous and strong width (36.6m).
  • Intercept bottomed in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension at depth.
  • Confirmed a direct geological link between surface mineralization and mineralized intrusive material at depth.

Evidence · text

“hole AT24ET-15 intersected 36.6m of continuous 0.16 g/t Au within a strongly altered tuff dike intrusion and bottomed in mineralization at a depth of 79.3m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.3 m
From
0 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5*:0-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: AT26ERB-5*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-5*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 5.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-5*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
5.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.3 m
From
0 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-5*:0-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.14 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 150.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.14 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.14”

Context: AT26ERB-5*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.18 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
7.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.5 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 73.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 7.5 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.5”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
26.8 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:26.8-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.15 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.15 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
2.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
26.8 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
26.8 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:26.8-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.4 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 2.4 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.4”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-16*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 4.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-16*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
4.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
21.9 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
21.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-16*:21.9-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.68 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 34.2 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.68 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.68”

Context: AT26ERB-16*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-16*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-16*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
3.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
21.9 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
21.9 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-16*:21.9-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.3 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.3 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.3”

Context: AT26ERB-16*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
0 m
To
2.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:0-2.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.26 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.26 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m
From
0 m
To
2.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:0-2.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 0.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
0 m
To
4.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:0-4.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
0 m
To
4.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:0-4.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 1.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
19.5 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
19.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:19.5-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
19.5 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
19.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:19.5-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.6 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
12.2 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:12.2-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.14 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.14 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

IncludesAtlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Includes
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
12.2 m
To
21.9 m
Intercept Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Includes:12.2-21.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: Includes

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-30*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-30*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
From
2.4 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-30*:2.4-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.11 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.11 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: AT26ERB-30*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-30*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-30*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.9 m
From
2.4 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-30*:2.4-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: AT26ERB-30*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-34*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-34*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-34*:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.13 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: AT26ERB-34*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-34*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-34*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.8 m
From
0 m
To
9.8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-34*:0-9.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: AT26ERB-34*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-35*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-35*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.23
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
16.5 m
To
26.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-35*:16.5-26.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.23 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.23”

Context: AT26ERB-35*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-35*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-35*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
16.5 m
To
26.8 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-35*:16.5-26.8
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.25 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 2.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.25 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: AT26ERB-35*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-36*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-36*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
0 m
To
19.5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-36*:0-19.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: AT26ERB-36*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-36*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-36*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.5 m
From
0 m
To
19.5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-36*:0-19.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.67 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 13.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.67 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: AT26ERB-36*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-42*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-42*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-42*:2.4-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 26.8 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: AT26ERB-42*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-42*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-42*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
26.8 m
From
2.4 m
To
29.3 m
Intercept Depth
2.4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-42*:2.4-29.3
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 26.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: AT26ERB-42*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-55*Atlanta Gold Mine · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-55*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
0 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-55*:0-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is below against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.9 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.24 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the open_pit mining band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: AT26ERB-55*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

AT26ERB-55*Atlanta Gold Mine · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
AT26ERB-55*
Project
Atlanta Gold Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
NKG

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
24.4 m
From
0 m
To
24.4 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
AT26ERB-55*:0-24.4
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Assay Lab
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 24.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 1 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.0”

Context: AT26ERB-55*

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Drilling has encountered new, high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization at its East Ridge Target (" ERT "), located i"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.